From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:49 PM
Subject: Stephen Gianelli
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, "harriet.ryan" <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Hello FBI,
Blogonaut said...
Linda said...
Blogonaut said...
Blogonaut said...
Blogonaut said...
Date: Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:49 PM
Subject: Stephen Gianelli
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, "harriet.ryan" <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Hello FBI,
How are you? I have absolutely abandoned the appeal. I have had it with these lying thugs in Los Angeles. Linda wants to know about probation. My friends are sitting here wondering why LA Superior Court hasn't figured out what is going on here and are mentioning Cohen's three different versions of the Phil Spector highly embellished gun story. They find it pathetic that the DA's investigator was hanging around in the courtroom and lunching with Cohen.
As the FBI knows, I sent the Valentine to the FBI and what did we end up with according to one of my lawyers? The prosecutor's attempt to criminally obstruct justice. That has now been well documented.
Paulette is hardly a spam victim and we speak regularly. Paulette spoke for herself when she wrote me the long email noting that Clarkson told Phillip what she could do to his "cock" prior to shooting herself. The City Attorney didn't mind wasting money on a lying prosecutor who concealed exculpatory evidence, lied about the IRS, elicited perjured and false testimony. Well, in any event, we now have their response brief and it is pathetic, filled with lies, and proves this is an IRS case.
Gianelli's obsession with me continues. I've asked Franciscso, and others, to hold onto his emails as evidence of his conduct and, from my perspective, motive.
All the best,
Kelley
A lot of water over the dam here since the last comment. Lynch never filed a motion to strike the brief. No, after publishing that she filed a substitution of attorneys form firing her attorney and representing herself, did she do that either.
Instead, Lynch has instructed her laywer (the same lawyer) to abandon her pending appeal.
Since the record on appeal has been filed already the Court may or may nt dismiss the appeal.
Instead, Lynch has instructed her laywer (the same lawyer) to abandon her pending appeal.
Since the record on appeal has been filed already the Court may or may nt dismiss the appeal.
March 8, 2013 at 2:40 PM
I'm still holding out for revocation of probation. Any news on that yet?
March 11, 2013 at 10:58 AM
Amazingly - because KL has done everyyhing in her power to insult and even threaten the prosecutor (she sent her a Vallentine) - no.
March 11, 2013 at 12:16 PM
KL has a new spam victim, a former Spector Asst. Who was naïve enought to send KL a one line response to an email. KL is now fowarding same to the usual suspects, posting her contact info, and posting chatty emails addressed to her on her blog that imply this poor soul agrees with Lynch's persecution and conspiracy theories re Cohen and others.
March 11, 2013 at 12:22 PM
We have read Kelley Lynch's use of the "assume I'm bluffing" catch phrase about a dozen times in the context of a myriad of threated action, from sueing this blog for libel, to initiating a tax court action, to moving to set aside the Cohen default, to suing the LAPD - and on and on and on.
NOT ONCE has she ever followed through.
Not only did Lynch fail to do any of the things referenced in her December 29 post, on March 7 she filed an "abandonment" of her appeal - after forcing the tax payers to fund a transcript on appeal and an opposition brief.
Assume you are bluffing? Doe the sun set in the West?
NOT ONCE has she ever followed through.
Not only did Lynch fail to do any of the things referenced in her December 29 post, on March 7 she filed an "abandonment" of her appeal - after forcing the tax payers to fund a transcript on appeal and an opposition brief.
Assume you are bluffing? Doe the sun set in the West?
March 11, 2013 at 2:39 PM