Friday, April 8, 2016

Kelley Lynch Advises Her Stalker to Cease & Desist, Stop Harassing Her Over Phil Spector, Bruce Cutler, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM
Subject: Fwd:
To: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, bruce <bruce@brucecutler.com>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>


Stephen Gianelli,

Cease and desist.  You have harassed and stalked me over Bruce Cutler since 2009.  At no time did I "suggest" that Bruce Cutler was representing me with respect to you re. "libel."  That is how you attempted to infiltrate his office and elicit information about Phil Spector - whether Mr. Cutler left the trial or not.  I know precisely how you operate so save your lies for someone - like Pat Dixon or Alan Jackson - who might find them of interest.

You do not represent Bruce Cutler.  Mr. Cutler knows how to contact me directly. 

What interests you about "Pat Dixon?"  The fact that you personally advised me that he was behind the Boulder PD incident at Deneuve Construction?   Do Jackson and Dixon still "fear for their lives" over Eminem's lyrics?  They must have been terrified - just like Streeter was re. my email to FBI and DOJ.  Unfortunately, she doesn't work for FBI and DOJ.  She did however lie throughout my trial and the record is evidence of that fact.

I don't want to speak to you about Bruce Cutler.  Are we clear? - because I've made that clear to him.


Kelley Lynch


Alan Jackson


Pat Dixon




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 9:52 AM
Subject: RE:

To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Cc: blind <distribution@gmail.com>


Bruce Cutler left the defense case during the beginning of the first trial, early in the trial, in August of 2007.


REDACTED

Kelley Lynch's Email to Her Ambulance Chasing Stalker

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:44 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, bruce <bruce@brucecutler.com>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>


Stephen Gianelli,

What part of cease and desist confuses your ambulance chasing, psychotic brain?  You most certainly do not represent Bruce Cutler or Dennis Riordan.  The mere notion is farcical.  Both of these individuals are adult men who have my contact information (both email and phone) as well as Paulette Brandt's.  Therefore, if we (not YOU) have something to discuss that will be done so privately.  

I personally believe you used me to phone Bruce Cutler in an attempt to infiltrate Phil Spector's case - whether or not Mr. Cutler advised you that he left the case or not.  I believe you represent the legal interests of Leonard Cohen and are moonlighting for the Spector prosecutors.  That's probably why Investigator William Frayeh (who you constantly cc. although he was an investigator on the Spector case) concluded that you found a "sympathetic ear" with Alan Jackson about me.  That may be why you have made insane comments, on behalf of Dixon and Jackson, that they "fear for their lives" over Emimen's lyrics (Love the Way You Lie and Puke - with Eminem's references to "dry humping").  And, it might explain why Gary and Louis Spector consulted with you re. their father's "estate."  It would explain why Blaine and Sprocket were posting on your blog (and I have my comments so don't bother lying that it was hundreds or thousands; I also have your original emails about that insanity).  You worked with Blaine to target my Free Phil Spector blog and email accounts.  She publicly congratulated you.  You have sent me at least one deranged cc. on your email to Ed Lozzi, Clarkson's publicist.  You work in tandem with these individuals, including Lozzi, online and set up reasonable doubt theories that can be attacked and refuted.  Feel free to communicate directly with Lozzi but leave me out of your insanity re. Clarkson.  The woman shot herself; was probably a prostitute who played with guns; grew up on an LSD commune; and was served her childhood pony, which she ate, by commune members.  That is hardly a stable environment and in fact shocks people.  You argue Spector prosecution theories online. You've publicly lied that Clarkson's DNA wasn't on the ammunition and lied that the gun was Phillip's.  Bruce Cutler and Phil Spector have confirmed that it was not.  Your pal, Bill Pavelic, has provided me with considerable information and that would include re. who could help prove that the gun was not Spector's.  You helped defraud Paulette Brandt of $6,700 and routinely lie and slander her.  You encouraged Karina Von Watteville to sue PB, me, and Linda Carol who you terrorized over her declaration which is absolutely privileged and that is witness tampering.

You have terrorized my sons for seven straight years.  You are an absolute psychopath and pathological liar.  You have engaged in egregious witness tampering with many people including all witnesses who provided declarations to numerous courts on my behalf.  You routinely lie about me and all matters related to Leonard Cohen.  You have lied that I attempted to turn Phillip against Cohen.  That is laughable and insane.  You have lied that you know someone who communicates with Phillip and read your insane article - a defense of Cohen slandering me - to him.

It's none of your business what Bruce Cutler or Dennis Riordan think about me.  That's their business and they know very well how to communicate with me.  They also happen to be two of the greatest attorneys in this country and most certainly don't need an ambulance chasing agent provocateur/infiltrator attempting to elicit information about Phil Spector while representing the interests of Cohen - who lies about Phillip and has three versions of his gun story before LA Superior Court.  Cohen is a thief who has stolen from me, Machat & Machat, Phil Spector, and others.

My sentencing judge can read my RICO suits.  He can also ponder where his jurisdiction arose from including with respect to the fraud DMV order and DMV related orders.  I am well aware of the fact that LA Superior Court could care less about jurisdiction, actual facts, evidence, the truth, or anything else.  

Dennis Riordan has never made a public statement, liar, so you're on one of your fishing expeditions. Why don't you do the world a favor and climb back under the sleazy rock you crawled out of.  Cease and desist, criminal.

Kelley Lynch


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 3:45 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>

REDACTED RANT

To the 9th Circuit,

Re: 
Case Name:
Kelley Lynch v. CIR
Case Number:  

Thank you for your opinion.  I wholeheartedly disagree.  This is egregious fraud upon the court, theft, self-dealing, embezzling and so forth but I appreciate your insights.  I didn’t file the appeal document so it would be impossible to discern if it was “frivolous” or not. 

My opinion, on the other hand, is that our court system condones fraud, perjury, and criminal conduct. 

I won’t be appealing this matter.  There’s no point in addressing individuals who refuse to hold others accountable for their actions.

I do want to thank you for posting my fee waiver application online and exposing me to the ongoing criminal harassment by Bay Area lawyer, Stephen Gianelli.  Very generous of the 9th Circuit.

Kelley Lynch

P.S.  Please see the Sharmapa’s welcoming suggestion to individuals who view his own works as inaccurate or “evilly written.” 


“If it is deemed by scholars to either be inaccurate or it is considered to be evilly written, then you are most welcome to treat my book in either of the previous ways mentioned. That is to say, you may ban the publication completely or parade it on the neck of a dog throughout the city.”

Wednesday, April 6, 2016

Kelley Lynch's Electronically Transmitted Letter to the 9th Circuit Court Re. Their "Opinion" That Fraud Upon the Court Is Frivolous: SOBEIT

To the 9th Circuit,

Re: 
Case Name:
Kelley Lynch v. CIR
Case Number:  

Thank you for your opinion.  I wholeheartedly disagree.  This is egregious fraud upon the court, theft, self-dealing, embezzling and so forth but I appreciate your insights.  I didn’t file the appeal document so it would be impossible to discern if it was “frivolous” or not. 

My opinion, on the other hand, is that our court system condones fraud, perjury, and criminal conduct. 

I won’t be appealing this matter.  There’s no point in addressing individuals who refuse to hold others accountable for their actions.

I do want to thank you for posting my fee waiver application online and exposing me to the ongoing criminal harassment by Bay Area lawyer, Stephen Gianelli.  Very generous of the 9th Circuit.

Kelley Lynch

P.S.  Please see the Sharmapa’s welcoming suggestion to individuals who view his own works as inaccurate or “evilly written.” 

If it is deemed by scholars to either be inaccurate or it is considered to be evilly written, then you are most welcome to treat my book in either of the previous ways mentioned. That is to say, you may ban the publication completely or parade it on the neck of a dog throughout the city.”

Docket Text:

Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY and EDWARD LEAVY) Appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied because we find that the appeal is frivolous. If appellant wishes to pursue this appeal despite the court’s finding that it is frivolous then, within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay $505.00 to the tax court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and file proof of payment with this court. Otherwise, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute, regardless of further filings. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of the denial of appellant’s in forma pauperis status shall be entertained. Because the court has found that this appeal is frivolous, the tax court order may be summarily affirmed even if appellant pays the fees. If appellant pays the fees and files proof of such payment in this court, appellant therefore shall simultaneously show cause why the order challenged in this appeal should not be summarily affirmed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of appellant’s filing. If appellant pays the fees but fails to file a response to this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with this order, the court will not entertain any motion to reinstate the appeal that is not accompanied by proof of payment of the docketing and filing fees and a response to the order to show cause. Appellant’s motions for an extension of time to file the opening brief are denied as unnecessary. See 9th Cir. Rule 27-11(a). Briefing is suspended pending further order of this court. [9930099] (WL)

Notice will be electronically mailed to:

Miss Kelley Ann Lynch
Mr. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Mr. William J. Wilkins, Chief Counsel
Sherra Wong


Case participants listed below will not receive this electronic notice:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
1111 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20224 
Robert R. Di Trolio
Clerk, U.S. Tax Court
400 Second Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20217 

The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document Description: Main Document
Original Filename: 16-70335.pdf
Electronic Document Stamp:
[STAMP acecfStamp_ID=1106763461 [Date=04/06/2016] [FileNumber=9930099-0] [a0d83d12b81e071a514cbe9a6e60af6172cca859d8e248e091b976bb8a85a9a255e9721d0d37769810e57bbd574edc37b9231f17726828ed1f8a7e381cf64ae7]]


This is a description of why it is appropriate for Buddhist teachers to write books and involve in any social work which is deemed good for society.

From the Time of Buddha until now, the curriculum of Buddhist study has been language (including all known spoken languages such as Sanskrit etc.), art (including painting, carving sculptures etc.), logic, natural sciences, social and political ethics, medicine, mathematics, world history, philosophy, mind science and meditation.

When one completes these subjects they were expected to write a book on any one of these topics. Then, other scholars would examine and critique the views espoused in their master thesis. Once one had passed the critique of other scholars, they would get the degree of a Mahapundit.

Accordingly, depending on how many subjects one had mastered, they would then receive particular umbrellas respectively. When one received an umbrella of peacock feathers, it indicated that they were a qualified pundit. When one received a gold painted umbrella, this meant they were considered a Mahapundit (a great Buddhist scholar).

All of these subjects were studied in order to write books or teach to the public for the good of the people. If a book was deemed a particularly evil book, then the government would put that book on the neck of a dog and the book would have been paraded throughout the city. If a book was considered to be not so accurate, they would just ban the publication.

The parading of the book on the neck of a dog has not been used for quite some time. However, the tradition of receiving criticism from other scholars has still been practiced up to the present day. 

According to the Buddhist view, writing a book is for the benefit of others. Therefore, they say your book must be logically accurate. If it is just your own thinking, and it is uncertain that it is beneficial for others, they say it is good to write in your own notebook but not fit for publishing, as it may mislead others. Otherwise, one can publish with the intent to have it scrutinized and validated by others for its accuracy.

Buddhist teachers can write books on politics, ethics etc., if it is deemed good for society. Buddhist teachers are not merely Tantric gurus who hold ritualistic bells in their hands and stand next to statues. 

Therefore, I wrote the book "Creating A Transparent Democracy: A New Model" for the good of society and only after I was certain myself that it was logically flawless and was needed for the world today did I decide to publish it.

If it is deemed by scholars to either be inaccurate or it is considered to be evilly written, then you are most welcome to treat my book in either of the previous ways mentioned. That is to say, you may ban the publication completely or parade it on the neck of a dog throughout the city.


Best wishes,
Shamar Rinpoche

Monday, April 4, 2016

Leonard Cohen & Steven Clark Lindsey: Perjuring Misogynists

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:20 PM
Subject: The Perjuring Misogynists
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, bruce <bruce@brucecutler.com>


IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

I am reviewing the declarations of Lindsey and Kory submitted to LA Superior Court, following SWAT/Killer King, and used to remove legal custody of Ray from me.  I intend to submit Robert Kory's full declaration but will provide the court with a redacted copy of Lindsey's.  The reason for that is due to the fact that Ray was a minor and his fathers lies and perjured statements are utterly and thoroughly humiliating and disgraceful - towards his son.

In any event, it is quite clear that Cohen and Lindsey have developed their views on statutory required "dating" and "engagement" in similar manners.  They are both aggressive misogynists.  They use children as weapons to target mothers.  The comments about who I will "sleep" with in this town relate to Kory & Rice's repeated communications to Lindsey that I had sex with Oliver Stone and others.  I most certainly did not but Cohen/Kory were determined to stir up a custody matter.  At no time did I advise anyone that I was going to jail.  Why?  Because Cohen is the individual who stole from me and the corporations.  He obviously views this conduct as acceptable because he has a team of lawyers willing to defraud and slander me.  The news media has been too happy to assist with this conduct.  And then there are Cohen's co-conspirators.

Lindsey confirmed that he phoned LAPD.  My neighbors and I did not.  I never told LAPD that I had a gun to my head.  I have asked IRS, FBI, and DOJ to investigate this situation which continues to be used against me - including in the latest "article" Gianelli posted online and has sent to third parties slandering me.

Cohen's co-conspirator continues to harass and target my sons, sister, and Paulette Brandt.  The situation remains unconscionable.

My review of the evidence - for my RICO suit - continues.

Kelley

P.S.  Please study this video carefully.  It reminds me of Cohen and Kory and their views on women.  That might shock the uninformed but this is an accurate depiction of their misogynistic habits.


Hitler finds out that Eva Braun is a slut






Steven Lindsey Declaration dated May 26, 2005

5.         Approximately five or six years ago [1997], Respondent and I ceased living together.  We established a custodial schedule without the necessity of court intervention, by which we had abided until Respondent lost her job in October 2004.  I would visit with Ray every day after school for a few hours and on Saturdays, and he would sleep at my residence on Wednesday and Sunday nights.

6.         Until approximately October 2004, Respondent worked as a manager for singer/songwriter/poet Leonard Cohen.  However, she was terminated due to suspicion that she stole over $8 million from Mr. Cohen.  It is my understanding that over approximately the past seven months, Mr. Cohen and his attorney, Robert Kory, have been attempting to negotiate with Respond to avoid filing a lawsuit against her.

7.         Mr. Kory’s attempts at negotiation have been without success, and he is on the verge of filing a complaint against Respondent.  A criminal action may also be brought against Respondent, and she has told me sever times that she may face time in jail.  I have noted, and as further discussed below, Respondent seems desperate.

8.         The more Respondent has dealt with the potential lawsuit and the consequences of her illegal actions, as well as the reality that she owes I believe over REDACTED HEARSAY on three of her credit cards, the more mentally unstable Respondent has become.  Her thoughts and behaviors have now reached a point where I believe our son is in danger while in our care, partially because of the following incident that took place on May 25, 2005:  FRAUDULENT SWAT INCIDENT NARRATIVE.

“I then called the police, and the policeman with whom I spoke informed me that they had already received many telephone calls regarding Respondent’s behavior (presumably from her neighbors) and that the police were already on their way.  The policeman also informed me that Respondent had now locked herself inside her residence and that she told the police she had a gun to her head and was going to kill herself.  He asked me to come to the house to describe the layout to the police officers there.”

“I went to the house and described the layout.  To the best of my recollection, there were approximately 20 police officers surrounding the house.  One policeman asked me whether there were any guns in the house, and Rutger responded that he owned a shotgun, which he kep in the guesthouse.” 

“After my conversation with the police, I picked up Ray from the bottom of Respondent’s street, and he went home with Dinah.  He was very shook up.”  [Ray was at the bottom of the hill with Cloris Leachman]

9.         … I am also very concerned that she is going to run away to Tibet with Ray as soon as she is released from the psychiatric hospital without telling anybody they are leaving.  I have a bad feeling that, because things are quickly closing in with Mr. Cohen, Respondent is about to run from the law.”

“b.  Approximately three weeks ago, when I approached Respondent and told her to contact Mr. Cohen to negotiate a deal, she responded that maybe she should just go and live in Tibet.”

“d.  On or about May 23, 2005, I received an email from Respondent stating, ‘If you ever attack me the way you did the other day, I will call the police and have you arrested.  I am going to explain this to Ray today.  Beyond that, if I go to Tibet – he is coming with me …” 

“10.  On or about May 3, 2005, I received an email from Respondent stating that she will ‘sleep with everyone in the DA’s office, every judge in town, every fucking lousy lawyer and somehow after I’ve cast this spell, I will manage to tell my story … I’m also going to be having sex with probation officers, wardens, Criminal Investigators at the DA’s office, inmates, and anyone I can think of … Love, Mata Hari (tell Kory my real name also).’”

“iv.  On or about May 3, 2005, I received another email from Respondent stating, ‘Also tell Kory I plan to sleep with his father and ex-wife.  If they’re not careful, I’ll have sex with Leonard & Adam.  Before you know it – all of LA will be under my spell.  I’m going to sleep with movie producers, agents, and hair dressers.  Authors.  I’ll be busy – you might have to pick Ray up at school more often.” 

“v.  On or about May 3, 2005, Respondent sent me another email, stating ‘Tell Kory this:  I’m going to call the Child Protection agency myself.  Very soon now.  They are threatening Ray’s mother with jail and this information was also told to Ray’s grandparents.  I really don’t like this story.  I will take Ray right into that agency and have him tell this story.  It’s downright abusive – of Robert Kory and Leonard Cohen.  Read these words:  they are deadly serious.  No one – including you – will put my children in any type of problematic situation.  Child Protection Agency to me is a much better place than John Grenner or a therapist.  Why – look at the name of the Agency:  Child Protection … Do you see where we are going?  Get a lawyer and get out of my story.  Kelley Protection Agency.”

“h.  Respondent told me during our telephone conversation on or about May 19, 2005 that she was so desperate for a job that she was thinking about becoming a hooker.”   OUTRAGEOUS LIE.

“16.     I am concerned about giving Respondent notice of my ex parte request … Moreover, I am unable to give Respondent notice because she was arrested on May 25, 2005 and placed in a psychiatric hospital for 72 hours.  I therefore request that this order by issued without notice.”

Dated May 26, 2005

Robert Kory Declaration dated May 26, 2005

3.  Mr. Cohen and I have evidence demonstrating that Ms. Lynch stole over $8 million from Mr. Cohen over a period of approximately six to seven years.  Because of same, Mr. Cohen terminated Ms. Lynch’s employment in or about late October, 2004.  Since that time, we have attempted to negotiate with Ms. Lynch to resolve the matter without the necessity of court intervention. 

4.         Approximately three weeks ago, Ms. Lynch appeared at my office with her son, Ray, without an appointment and demanded to see me.  When I walked into the lobby, she demanded that I listen to what she had to say.  Then she began interrogating Ray, asking him leading questions and waiting for what appeared to be his rehearsed answers, such as:

Ms. Lynch’s question:  Who is the victim in this case?
Ray’s response:  You are, mom.
Ms. Lynch’s question:  Who is the evil person in this case?
Ray’s response:  Leonard Cohen.
Ms. Lynch’s question:  Are you afraid that your mother is going to go to jail?
Ray’s response:  Yes.

6.         When she finished questioning Ray, she turned to me and stated, “Ray is going to be my witness when you try to destroy me” and then she left.