Gianelli, Blogonaut Law Blog, Moderates His Posts - He Likes To Lie Without Any Ramifications - I Continue To Maintain That The IRS & FBI Should Charge & Prosecute Him; He - No Doubt - Views That As A Game

Gianelli,

For the record, and I will publish this on my Blog, I have spoken to the Appellate Division.  A Motion to Strike this Opening Brief is being filed - as is a Motion to replace the attorney whose efforts I appreciate.  I think if someone is representing me, the Brief should be coherent and the lawyer should understand the difference between the City Attorney and District Attorney who are clearly in cohoots here.  Furthermore, my Writ of Habeas Corpus will ask that the City Attorney's office be removed and replaced with a Special Prosecutor due to the situation with respect to Phil Spector and her obvious alignment with the DA's office.  The three Leonard Cohen versions of the Phil Spector gun story will be addressed.  The Grand Jury Legal Adviser (who does not know how Cohen's statements were presented to the Grand Jury, without a witness testifying) advised me to contact Phil Spector's attorney about the situation.  I did.  His name is Dennis Riordan.  Judge Fidler's clerk, Wendy, advised me to write the DA and copy in Judge Fidler.

Leonard Cohen has stolen millions from me and the IRS has been provided with an abundance of evidence.  Cohen's fraudulent refund from the IRS in no way closed the case re. the allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud.  I met with Agent Sopko, and her partner, over a year after he received that refund and after that reported Cohen's tax fraud to Agent Luis Tejeda who will be properly addressed on appeal.  Cohen perjured himself.  He obtains judgments, orders, and verdicts via fraud, perjury, lies, and concealment.  These appear to be his religious beliefs.

I have reconfirmed, for the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury, that I continue to maintain that you should be prosecuted for criminal harassment, stalking, witness intimidation, witness tampering, etc.

I have advised the court and Viramontes/LAPD that you attempted to entrap me into violating the restraining order - with the prosecutor Streeter and Cohen's lying lawyer, Rice, copied in and that will be addressed in my Writ.

I am filing a Motion to Vacate Cohen's fraudulent and retaliatory lawsuit and have a criminal attorney ready to review it.  Assume I'm bluffing.

Kelley Lynch

Gianelli, Aligned With Cohen & Possibly Prosecutor Alan Jackson, Pathetically Weighs In On The Appeal

"SandraJo.Streeter" <SandraJo.Streeter@lacity.org>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, info <info@kibi-edu.org>, "YesheRimpoche@aol.com" <bhakhatulku@yahoo.com>

ajackson <ajackson@da.lacounty.gov>, "Truc.Do" <Truc.Do@mto.com>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>, jthompson <jthompson@da.lacounty.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "harriet.ryan" <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, The Scientist <thescientist@dubmusic.com>

To the IRS and FBI,

Gianelli has, predictably, weighed in.  Are you certain he's not on someone's payroll?  His obsession with me, willingness to lie, 

target my family and friends, attempt to entrap me into violating a restraining order, lie to the IRS and FBI about me, are truly astounding.

As I have repeatedly said, this man needs to be prosecuted for his actions which I feel include criminal harassment, stalking, witness

tampering, witness intimidation, etc.

I am working on the replacement brief and that will be submitted with my Motion early next week.  I will privately send you a draft over the weekend.  At that time, it will also be sent to my roommate's criminal attorney brother who will assist me with my Motion to Vacate re. Cohen's fraudulent and retaliatory lawsuit.  At the same time, a Writ will be filed addressing all perjury, fraud, lies, concealment, etc.

All the best,

Kelley

EMBEZZLING FORMER LEONARD COHEN MANAGER FILES APPEAL FROM HARASSMENT CONVICTION

THE MAN ALIGNED WITH COHEN - WHO MAY HAVE FOUND A SYMPATHETIC EAR WITH SPECTOR PROSECUTOR ALAN JACKSON - WEIGHS IN, PREDICTABLY, ON THE APPEAL BRIEF THAT I AM ABOUT TO FILE A MOTION TO STRIKE AND REFILE (AS i'VE DISCUSSED WITH THE APPELLATE DIVISION).

We promised to post former Leonard Cohen manager Kelley Lynch’s appeal from her conviction and jail sentence following Lynch’s violations of a court issued protective order and obscene and threatening phone messages left on the entertainer’s home phone.

I HAVE REVIEWED THE TRANSCRIPTS AND THERE IS NOTHING OBSCENE OR THREATENING.  JUST LEONARD COHEN'S VERBAL MUSINGS.  THE MAN HAS A 50-YEAR HISTORY (ACCORDING TO THE GUARDIAN) OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE, PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS, LYING, STEALING, EMBELLISHING STORIES, ETC.  

THE CIVIL HARASSMENT ORDER WAS FRAUDULENTLY FILED AS A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ORDER IN CALIFORNIA.  LA SUPERIOR COURT HAS NOW ADVISED ME, ON AT LEAST THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS, THAT YOU CANNOT FILE A CIVIL HARASSMENT ORDER AS A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ORDER.  COHEN AND I WERE NEVER IN A DATING RELATIONSHIP AND THE NOTION IS LAUGHABLE.  I ALSO WAS NOT SERVED THE REGISTERED CALIFORNIA ORDER AND LA SUPERIOR COURT HAS ADVISED ME, ON AT LEAST THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS, THAT I HAD TO BE SERVED.

It is utterly and completely deficient as an appellate brief, meaning that the issues it tries to raise are instead forfeited though failure to comply with the applicable rules on appeal.

SOUNDS LIKE SOMEONE HAS READ HOW THE AG OR CA SHOULD RESPOND TO A BRIEF - ARGUE FORFEITURE.  A REPLACEMENT BRIEF IS BEING PREPARED AND WILL BE FILED.  

For instance, Lynch argues that the trial evidence is insufficient to support her conviction, but does not even try to fully and fairly set forth an exposition of all of the trial evidence against her as the law requires to even deem the question properly raised, let alone win it.  

ACTUALLY, I FOUND THE BRIEF INCOHERENT WHICH IS WHY I HAVE DISCUSSED, WITH THE APPELLATE DIVISION, THE NEED TO HAVE THIS ATTORNEY REPLACED - ALTHOUGH I APPRECIATE HIS EFFORTS ON MY BEHALF.  

As stated by the California Court of Appeal in Schmidlin v. City of Palo Alto (2007)

157 Cal.App.4th 728, 737:

“Defendants assert that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's finding of excessive force. At least we so construe their brief, which alludes in passing to the insufficiency of the evidence, but which is actually devoted almost entirely to rearguing the facts. This approach disregards the fundamental principles governing appellate review of factual findings, and the “daunting burden” those principles impose upon an appellant who challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support a judgment. ( Citation omitted. ) “ ‘The rule is well established that a reviewing court must presume that the record contains evidence to support every finding of fact, and an appellant who contends that some particular finding is not supported is required to set forth in his brief a summary of the material evidence upon that issue. Unless this is done, the error assigned is deemed to be waived. [Citation.] It is incumbent upon appellants to state fully, with transcript references, the evidence which is claimed to be insufficient to support the findings.’ [Citations.]” ( Citation omitted, italics added.)

IS SOMEONE PAYING JIHAD GIANELLI TO DO HIS LEGAL RESEARCH OR IS HIS OBSESSION WITH ME MERELY A HOBBY?  AFTER ALL, THIS MAN DID FEEL FREE TO WRITE PROSECUTOR STREETER (COPYING IN COHEN'S LAWYER, MICHELLE RICE) IN AN ATTEMPT TO ENTRAP ME INTO VIOLATING THE RESTRAINNG ORDER, CAUSING ME TO CONTACT JUDGE ROBERT VANDERET, DETECTIVE VIRAMONTES/LAPD, THE STATE BAR, AND OTHERS.

If anyone cares to read the brief we have posted it HERE. But the notion that six binders of at times obscene emails transmitted to Leonard Cohen or the multiple vile and drunken voice messages that Cohen was forced to endure – after Lynch embezzled $5M of his hard earned cash – are all fully and fairly summarized in this 17 page brief is absurd.

NO ONE HAS EVER PROVEN THAT ANY DRUNKEN MESSAGES WERE LEFT.  A LIAR AND THIEF WITH MOTIVE (LEONARD COHEN) IS IN NO POSITION TO PROVE ANYTHING.  SINCE HE ESSENTIALLY CONFESSED TO COMMITTING PERJURY (AND HAS COUNTLESS INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS) HIS TESTIMONY SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISREGARDED ENTIRELY, PER THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS.  COHEN AND HIS SOUND ENGINEER TAMPERED WITH THE VOICE MAIL MESSAGES THAT ARE NOT DATE OR TIME STAMPED.  THIS WILL BE FULLY ADDRESSED IN THE REPLACEMENT APPEAL BRIEF AS WILL THE SHABBY AND INCOHERENT TRANSCRIPTS THAT STREETER PRESENTED TO THE JURORS.

COHEN HAS STOLEN MILLIONS FROM ME AND THE EVIDENCE PROVES THAT.  IT HAS ALSO BEEN PROVIDED TO THE IRS AND THE REFUND IN NO WAY CLOSED THE CASE ON THE ALLEGATIONS THAT COHEN COMMITTED CRIMINAL TAX FRAUD - NOR DID IT AFFIRM THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT SINCE IT PRE-DATED IT.

Other arguments, like Lynch’s contention that the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office had a conflict of interest arising out of the Phil Spector murder prosecution – when that agency was not even involved in the Spector matter – make no sense, setting aside that there is no indication in the brief that Lynch even preserved that issue for appeal by filing a disqualification motion in the court below.

THAT WASN'T MY CONTENTION BUT THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS THIS:  STREETER IS ALIGNED WITH THE DA'S OFFICE, REPEATEDLY RAISED PHIL SPECTOR, DENNIS RIORDAN, STEVE COOLEY, AND ALAN JACKSON, AND HAD A DA INVESTIGATOR SITTING IN THE COURTROOM DURING THE ENTIRE TRIAL.  CAPTAIN JACK HORVATH/DA'S OFFICE THEN LIED TO THE COURT WHEN HE SAID I CONTACTED THE DA'S OFFICE IN 2007 WHEN, IN FACT, THEY CAME TO MY HOUSE IN 2005 ABOUT PHIL SPECTOR AND I FILED A COMPLAINT WITH THEIR MAJOR FRAUD UNIT RE. COHEN IN 2006.  THEY DECIDED NOT TO PROSECUTE HIM AND I WANT DETAILS REGARDING THAT DECISION AND WANT TO KNOW IF THERE WAS A QUID PRO QUO THAT PROTECTS COHEN.  THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE CERTAINLY APPEARS TO BE INOLVED IN THE PHIL SPECTOR MATTER NOW AND LEGAL CONSPIRACY CERTAINLY SEEMS TO RING A BELL.

The argument that no one physically handed her the protective order she was convicted of violating when she admittedly received a copy via email, and then promptly replied that the protective order was a “fraud” is equally silly.

I WAS NOT SERVED THE CALIFORNIA REGISTERED ORDER.  NOT NOTIFIED.  I NEVER ADMITTED RECEIVING A COPY VIA EMAIL. THAT'S A BALD FACED LIE.  RICE WROTE AND LIED TO ME ON FEBRUARY 14, 2011 WHEN SHE SAID THE ORDER WAS REGISTERED IN CALIFORNIA.  THAT LIE IS REPEATED IN THE LAPD REPORT AS VIRAMONTES/LAPD AND I HAVE DISCUSSED.  THE ORDER IS FRAUD BUT THAT'S NOT AN ISSUE ON APPEAL AT THIS MOMENT IN TIME.  COHEN'S FRAUD, PERJURY, CONCEALMENT, AND LIES WERE ADDRESSED IN MY MOTION TO QUASH (WITH EVIDENCE ATTACHED) AND STREETER CONCEALED THAT FROM MY JURORS WITH A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE.

That is all the comment that this sordid tale deserves in this, the seventh year of this sad saga.

THE SORDID TALE HERE IS THAT LEONARD COHEN NOW HAS THREE VERSIONS OF HIS PHIL SPECTOR GUN STORY BEFORE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT.  

If our readers have anything at all to add they may do so in the comments.

 

--Blogonaut   

POSTED BY BLOGONAUT AT 12/28/2012 04:27:00 PM