Wednesday, August 19, 2015

The Criminal Stalker's Harassment Over Kelley Lynch's Appeals, Leonard Cohen, Her Sons, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:25 PM
Subject: Fwd: Your blog posted email dated Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:03 PM
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com


Hi IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

The Criminal's on a roll.  One could always pray that Somali pirates nab this criminal.  There's probably more chance of that than finding justice in LA Confidential.

Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:23 PM
Subject: Your blog posted email dated Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:03 PM
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com


Ms. Lynch,

You really are clueless.

“Swampland sales pitch”? Ha!

As you will soon learn, there really is something called a “case information statement” that you should have filed in the court of appeal for both pending appeals by 8/11 but did not. You now have just a few days to file them, after identifying the precise legal basis for appelability as to each order appealed from.

Per my prior email, yes, there really is something called a “standard of review” and all of the cases cited in that email, and in other prior emails, are binding and applicable.

Good luck with your hearings on 9/1, 9/3 and 8/6 and with Shepparding your first appeal to the CA/2 through the procedural maze provided by the California Rules of Court and the local rules – with both eyes closed no less.

Sorry to miss out on all the fun in real time, but I leave for the Almafi Coast on Thursday. We will see what is left of your various law and motion claims/appeals upon my September return.

You never disappoint.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece

Kelley Lynch Asks Mayor Garcetti & LA City Attorney Mike Feuer If LAPD'S TMU Experts View The Criminal Harassment, Stalking, Etc. Of Her Sons As Acceptable

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: Re you blog posted and emailed claim I have harassed Rutger "for six years"
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>


Mayor Garcetti,

Have the stalking experts at LAPD's TMU reviewed these declarations?  Do they think the targeting of my son is acceptable?  How about when Ray was a minor?  Do they know that this criminal is not a sexual predator?  The matter involves a celebrity so LAPD's TMU could take a look.  They're experts, right?  Perhaps it would be acceptable if it were their children?  It's hard to know.



Kelley

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Mike Feuer and Mayor Garcetti,

I think LA residents Rutger and Ray (who was a minor) have been quite clear about the harassment they've experienced for over six years now.  Rutger explained his email in the declaration.  He wanted to know what information the criminal stalker had re. the City Attorney's plans to arrest me.  Interesting that Gianelli had that information in June 2013.  Why was the City Attorney giving a criminal information about me?  

Kelley Lynch

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Do read Rutger and Ray's declarations.  They also note that Rice was copied in and they were harassed by Cohen's fan, Walsh, as well.  Gianelli's harassing over the domestic violence matter, appeals, etc.  I'll provide evidence to the various courts now.  This man belongs in prison.  Rice has provided with no information proving he is Cohen's attorney of counsel.

Kelley

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Gianelli,

Cease and desist.  You have criminally harassed both of my sons for years now.  They've addressed in their declarations filed with various courts.



You have authenticated this email and Rutger explained his alarm over your emails providing secret information you obtained from the City Attorney about me in or around June 2013.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:30 PM
Subject: Re you blog posted and emailed claim I have harassed Rutger "for six years"
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: BlindDistribution@gmail.com


--------------------forwarded email-----------------------
from:
 Rutger Penick <mr.synt4xerror@gmail.com>
to:
 STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
date:
 Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:50 AM
subject:
 Re: 

REDACTED



Kelley Lynch Suggests That The Criminal Stalker Who Continues To Harass Her Review Her Sons' Declarations


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:18 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re you blog posted and emailed claim I have harassed Rutger "for six years"
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>


Gianelli,

Cease and desist.  You have criminally harassed both of my sons for years now.  They've addressed in their declarations filed with various courts.



You have authenticated this email and Rutger explained his alarm over your emails providing secret information you obtained from the City Attorney about me in or around June 2013.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:30 PM
Subject: Re you blog posted and emailed claim I have harassed Rutger "for six years"
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com
Cc: BlindDistribution@gmail.com

--------------------forwarded email-----------------------
from:
 Rutger Penick <mr.synt4xerror@gmail.com>
to:
 STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
date:
 Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:50 AM
subject:
 Re: 

REDACTED.


Is IRS, FBI, & DOJ Interested In The Criminal Stalker's Swamp Land In Florida Sales Pitch?

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:03 PM
Subject: Fwd: Your blog-posted email dated Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com


Hi IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Are you interested in swamp land in Florida also?  In any event, the criminal harassment over my appeals, the fraudulent domestic violence order, etc. continues.  This is a proxy criminal who continues to argue Leonard Cohen legal issues.  He has since hearing from "Michelle Rice" in May 2009.  He also relentlessly harassed both of my sons for over six straight years.  Please review Rutger and Ray's declarations.  I want you to keep in mind how frequently I brought this to the attention of the City and District Attorneys of Los Angeles - including when Ray was a minor.  Also LAPD.



Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:41 PM
Subject: Your blog-posted email dated Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com


Ms. Lynch,

As I am sure you know, I do not represent and will never represent Leonard Cohen.

One clear indication of this, aside from the facts that you have been expressly so advised ad nauseam and that the Cohen’s counsel on the referenced appeal is Michelle Rice (and not the undersigned), is that I am bothering to point out your failings to you at all.

If I represented Leonard Cohen’s interests I would not have written to advise you of the Department 7 judge’s qualifications and published “pet peeves” nor would I have advised you that you were in default regarding Appeal -  Case Number B265753. Nor would I have bothered to give you any of the other chapter-and-verse primers on the law revealing your various pending legal claims to nonsense.

I would be giving you no “heads up” or assistance at all.

I certainly would not have mentioned certain propensities on your part that annoy the judge you will be appearing in front of on September 1.

As for the appeal, I would have let you simply receive the default notice in Monday’s mail and then let you scramble around trying to figure out what “statement” was being referenced and I certainly would not have pointed out to you a pitfall in filling out the case information statement that could potentially lead to a dismissal of the pending appeals.

You really are quite clueless when it comes to helpful tips. If you were not so obsessed with trying to instantly scream “harassment” every time someone sneezes in your earshot, you might learn something that might make the difference between a hearing on the merits and none at all.

Nothing will win the day for you, however. Your issues are so meritless that even token opposition would defeat them – let alone the polished and spot opposition that you were served with on August 17. But at least you might make it to oral argument in B265753 without the case being dismissed on procedural grounds. If you had the capacity to listen and learn. Which you obviously don’t.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece   


Kelley Lynch's Email To DOJ's Office On Violence Against Women & Leonard Cohen's Fraudulent Domestic Violence Order

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:48 PM
Subject: 
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, oped@csps.com, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com


Hello Office on Violence Against Women,

I am dealing with a situation in Los Angeles and would like to file a formal complaint with your office and request an investigation into VAWA funds.  

I am in an ongoing dispute with singer-songwriter Leonard Cohen.  This has been ongoing for approximately 10 years.  Cohen failed to serve me the summons and complaint in his lawsuit (Case No. BC338322 LA Superior Court) that was essentially his defense to my reporting allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud to IRS and other tax authorities.  You can read further details about this ongoing situation in this article:


Leonard Cohen has used fraudulent restraining orders to discredit me, prevent me from serving as a credible witness, and to silence me.  He has also used them to prevent me from requesting (and his providing me with) IRS required tax and corporate information.  To make a long story short, Leonard Cohen - in the midst of a European tour - flew into Boulder, Colorado (where I was staying at the time) and obtained a restraining order when his Los Angeles Superior Court order was expiring.  I have no details about the LA Superior Court order.  The Colorado order was issued without any findings whatsoever.  I simply advised the Court that I thought the proceedings were insane and asked her to enter the order.  I later discovered that Cohen filed an entirely perjured and fraudulent declaration and most certainly did not agree to any order based on fraud or perjury.  I filed a Motion to Quash.  Leonard Cohen then took that order, which I believe was used to set me up, and registered it in California using domestic violence form DV-600.  This wrongfully converted the Boulder order into a domestic violence order in California.  I have spoken with the Judicial Council and they disagree with Cohen's legal theory that the use of domestic violence form DV-600 is mandatory when filing an out-of-state non-domestic violence order.  There were no findings of domestic violence anywhere.  There were no findings.

The City Attorney, who lied about many federal tax issues and me personally, then decided that I was in a "dating relationship" with Leonard Cohen.  I was arrested for violating the domestic violence order.  The jurors wanted to hear from the IRS because the City Attorney argued that my requests for tax information were a "ruse."  They were not. A tremendous amount of evidence was concealed and the same email was basically printed out over and over.  The IRS was meeting about their potential testimony but the judge refused to permit the IRS agent to take the stand.  In any event, I am filing a federal RICO suit and this entire matter is retaliation over the fact that I reported Cohen's criminal tax fraud allegations to IRS.

My question for you is this:  how do I file a formal complaint with your office requesting an investigation into VAWA funding fraud and LA Superior Court's attempt to extort domestic violence fines/fees from me and require me to attend domestic violence classes?  This is all based on the fraudulent domestic violence form registration.  There are more details that I don't have time to get into right now.  And, I can assure you that I am not the only person in LA who has been assigned a "dating relationship."  Something is wrong.

I also believe there should be an investigation into the placement of this non-domestic violence order - fraudulent or otherwise - into a domestic violence database in California.  There are already serious problems with fraud and restraining orders.  That's a known fact.  However, what is going on here is out of control.

I look forward to hearing from you and enclosed the Boulder Combined Court's email confirming that the order is not domestic violence.  Gabrielle Selden, Judicial Council, advised me that Cohen was not permitted to use form DV-600 to register the Colorado order and there is no mandatory form re. the non-domestic violence civil harassment orders.  Cohen and his lawyers are now embellishing their insane story.  The involvement of half the local government in LA here makes this particularly disturbing.

Leonard Cohen and I were never in a dating relationship.  He did sexually harass me and expose himself to me.  The City Attorney thinks that annoyed him.  I am also attaching a declaration from someone who did date Leonard Cohen and seems to see right through him.  She also knows that when confronted with his lies - he will never back down.  His response to my Motion to Vacate the fraud domestic violence order in California is evidence of that.  He also has a history of fabricating and embellishing stories.  And, based on his fantasies about me, I do believe his long publicly documented history of psychiatric problems, drug and alcohol abuse should be taken into consideration.  I've also enclosed my son's declaration.  Both of my sons have been criminally harassed over this situation for over six straight years now.

I would like to send you a package and want to know if you have a formal complaint process re. VAWA fraud.  

All the best,
Kelley Lynch


From: Selden, Gabrielle <Gabrielle.Selden@jud.ca.gov>
Date: Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: Information and resources for your family law case
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Hello,

I see that you have also been researching.

First, I want to answer your question about CLETS-001. This form is not relevant to your issue. It is required to be filed by a party seeking a temporary domestic violence restraining order in family court.

I have confirmed with my colleagues who specialize in civil court matters and forms that the Judicial Council has not adopted a mandatory form equivalent to DV-600 for the registration of an out-of-state civil harassment order. This does not mean that the out-of-state order cannot be entered into the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS). It just means that the method of achieving entry of the order into CLETS is a matter of judicial discretion.

I regret that I am not able to refer you to the correct form, but I hope this information will be helpful to you in deciding your course of action.

Respectfully,

Gabrielle D. Selden, Attorney                                                                                                                                      
Center for Families, Children & the Courts
 |  Operations and Programs Division
Judicial Council of California
455 Golden Gate Avenue,  San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
415-865-8085 | Gabrielle.Selden@jud.ca.gov | www.courts.ca.gov
 From: "xiefeng" <feng.xie@judicial.state.co.us>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:32:19 -0600
Subject: RE: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Thank you,

You may refer to the attachment (ICON) and Motion for Civil Protection Order I have sent you to verify my answers. I will not charge you for this document.

1. The Order regarding the motion to dismiss PPO was denied on 1/12/09.

2. The temporary restraining order expired on that date (2/15/09) and the PPO was granted on 9/2/08.

3. This case is not a domestic violence case which can be verified on the top right of the first page of the ICON;  noted as "Type:
Protection Order". On the motion for civil protection order, the Petitioner only checked off Stalking and Physical Assault, Threat, or Other Situation but not Domestic Abuse.

4. I cannot verify when the PPO was received from any other agencies besides the Court. Again the court granted the PPO on 9/2/08.

5. The PPO hearing was held on 9/2/08 and will cost $35 for an audio recording. If you require a written transcript you will need to go through Tami with CTS West and her contact number is 720-922-3581.

6. If the PPO has restricted you from filing your taxes then you would need to motion the court to request specifically what you need or require to complete your taxes. The motion will then be determined by the Judge to either grant or dismiss the motion.

I will waive the request fee as this was completed in November of 2013. If you require anymore documents from this case I will need to charge you  a $5 research fee and $.25 per copy.

Thank you,

Feng Xie
Judicial Assistant - Research
20th Judicial District
303-441-3729


-----Original Message-----
From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 12:20 PM
To: xiefeng; irs.commissioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; Kelly.Sopko; Doug.Davis; Dennis; wfrayeh; stan.garnett; MollyHale; nsapao; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; moseszzz; a; wennermedia; Hoffman, Rand; Mick Brown; woodwardb; glenn.greenwald; lrohter; harriet.ryan; hailey.branson
Cc: Paulette Brandt
Subject: Re: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request

Hello Feng,

There are several pieces of information I need.  My friend, Paulette Brandt, and I have been told (on approximately six occasions) that Leonard Cohen's restraining order expired on February 15, 2009.  We were also advised that a Motion to Dismiss was entered on January 12, 2009.  I was not a resident of Boulder, Colorado when this restraining order was granted and left shortly after the hearing.  I may not have received certain documents.  I am requesting the following:

1.  Information regarding the Motion to Dismiss that was entered (and appears in the computer database) on January 12, 2009.

2.  Information regarding the expired restraining order (and appears in the computer database) on February 15, 2009.

3.  Any and all information that would establish that this order (originally granted based on a business relationship) was modified and re-issued as a domestic violence order.

4.  The date this order was entered into any federal, state, or local database.

5.  The amount it would cost to acquire a copy of the "secret" hearing Leonard Cohen attended that led to the judge issuing a temporary restraining order.

6.  Any information that would support Leonard Cohen's legal position and testimony that Judge Enichen had jurisdiction to prevent me from requesting information needed to file my federal and state tax returns.  That is how this order has been used and there is testimony to support this.  I am unclear how a local order can override IRS rules and requirements.

What I would like to know is how much it will cost to obtain this information and hearing CD.

Thank you,

Kelley Lynch

Is The Proxy Criminal Stalker Now Handling Leonard Cohen's Appellate Work?

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM
Subject: Fwd: Appeal - Case Number B265753 (It's not so easy to navage the court of appeal as a pro se)
To: Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com


Michelle Rice,

Will Gianelli be handling the appeals?  Please advise.  

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:31 AM
Subject: Appeal - Case Number B265753 (It's not so easy to navage the court of appeal as a pro se)
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com

You failed to file case information statements as required by 8/11/2015 – for BOTH appeals.

To do so you will need to attach a copy of EACH (respective) order you are trying to appeal from AND will be required to identify the STATUTE that provides that each (respective) order you are trying to appeal is an APPELABLE ORDER. (Not all orders are appealable.)

If you fail to do this in the time specified in the written notice, each affected appeal will be DISMISSED.

If you fail to identify a proper basis for appealability in your case information statement, your (affected) appeal will be dismissed as from a “non-appealable order”. (As an aside, this happened to me once – even though I was correct that the order WAS appealable. I had to file a timely petition for rehearing to get the appeal reinstated. That alone was 40 hours of work. See here: In re Marriage of Dupre (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1517 “Stephen R. Gianelli, San Francisco, CA, for Appellant … [Appellant] filed a notice of appeal on May 20, 2004. On June 10, 2004, we dismissed the appeal as from a nonappealable order. On June 14, 2004, [Appellant]  filed a petition for rehearing. We granted her petition and reinstated the appeal on June 17, 2004.”)

This is one of the many potential procedural obstacles from the filing of the notice of appeal through decision and if you mess it up a DISPOSITIVE one.

Docket (Register of Actions)
Cohen v. Lynch
Division p
Case Number B265753


Date
Description
Notes
08/19/2015
Default letter sentno case information statement filed.
    both appeals

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

The Criminal Harassment Over Leonard Cohen's Fraudulent Domestic Violence Order Continues

From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:53 AM
Subject: Your latest hyperbolic blog post
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com


Ms. Lynch,

The first thing a competent lawyer does is research the biography, quirks  and preferences of the judge he or she is going to be in front of. (You can bet that your opponent already has.) Sending you a concise summary re same published by the Los Angeles County Bar Assn. is not “harassment”.

You will note from his bio that Judge Silverman worked for a California Supreme justice (Ray Sullivan) for30-years as a staff research attorney. (Staff research attorney is a full time, paid legal position. They work matters up for conference and draft bench memoranda for their justice that analyses the issues raised, sets forth a recommended disposition [e.g., “affirm” or “reverse”] and that  often form the basis for the ultimate majority or concurring opinion resulting from the matter.) This indicates two things.

1.     He is among the brightest and the best to qualify for and hold that position for 30-years. Indeed, Judge Silverman is probably going to wind up as a justice on the court of appeal.

2.     His take on the 2011 California Registration of the 2008 Colorado civil harassment order is likely to be exactly the take that court of appeal staff will have should you elect to appeal the (anticipated) denial of your pending motion.

Finally, since “personal attack” of the opposing party as well as of opposing counsel are you stock-in-trade, and 90% of every declaration you have ever filed has consisted of “argument” as distinguished from admissible facts, you would do well to heed Judge Silverman’s “pet peeves”.

Good luck on at the hearing.

Very truly yours,


Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece

The Ongoing Criminal Harassment Over Leonard Cohen's Fraudulent Domestic Violence Order

From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:02 AM
Subject: Department 7 judge - note
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com


JUDICIAL PROFILE
JUDGE B. SCOTT SILVERMAN  

Name:  B. Scott Silverman
Position: Judge District: Central Department: 7

Judicial Biography
 Hastings College of Law, J.D.
  Stanford University, B.A.  1975-1977
Law Clerk to Associate Justice Raymond Sullivan,    California Supreme Court  1977-2007
Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco & Los Angeles,   Associate & Partner  11/07–11/08
Commissioner, Los Angeles Superior Court 
 Appointed Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court  11/08

àPet Peeves Regarding Litigation Conduct 
 - Lawyers and parties interrupting me or each other during hearings.
  - Irrelevant personal attacks on counsel or party
 -Argumentative declarationsuse Points & Authorities for argument and Declarations for facts.

Monday, August 17, 2015

The Ongoing Criminal Harassment Over Leonard Cohen's Lawyer, Michelle Rice

From: Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>
Date: Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:25 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>, Linda Carol <linda.carol@gmx.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, "tips@radaronline.com" <tips@radaronline.com>


FYI


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
To: Linda Carol <linda.carol@gmx.com>; *IRS.Commisioner <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>; Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>; "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>; Doug.Davis <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>; Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>; MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>; nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>; fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>; rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>; khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>; blourd <blourd@caa.com>; Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>; a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>; wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>; Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>; glenn.greenwald <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>; Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>; hailey.branson <hailey.branson@latimes.com>; Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>; Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>; mayor.garcetti <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>; Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>; Kelly.Sopko <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>; Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>; Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>; tips@radaronline.com; Michelle Rice <mrice@koryrice.com>
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 11:19 AM
Subject: Re:

Linda Carol,

After your last meltdown with LAPD, I would appreciate it if you didn't contact me.  LAPD clearly seemed to understand that you are out of your mind with your rants about your boyfriend being a hitman for the Mafia; Paulette and I being involved in the "murder" at Phil Spector's house; etc.  In fact, I have a card from LAPD with instructions about obtaining a restraining order against you.

I'm not certain why LAPD didn't find it illegal for you to present a forged "rent receipt" from Paulette but I found that highly outrageous.  


You either need serious psychiatric care or should cut the bimbo act and behave like an adult.  Lying in bed, not cleaning your room or washing your clothes for a year or more, throwing trash out the window, lying that you're being poisoned by the City, etc. is absurd.  

Is there a reason you are writing me about Michelle Rice?  I have no interest in Michelle Rice.  If you do, please contact her directly.  Perhaps you'll find a new friendship.

Kelley Lynch

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Linda Carol <linda.carol@gmx.com> wrote: