Stephen Gianelli - Aligned With Leonard Cohen - Is Demanding Answers From Me About My Alleged Prosecutor, A Woman Who Has No Problems Lying To Judges, Jurors, Eliciting Perjured Testimony, Concealing Evidence Etc

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:57 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

To the FBI,

The criminal harassment, on the part of a man who views himself as a talking dog, continues.  My attorney is clear about the extent of the prosecutorial misconduct, concealed evidence, retaliation (that he views as criminal obstruction of justice), the fact that Cohen owes me millions, and the legal issue having to do with a City of Los Angeles Deputy CA arguing federal tax matters and lying to my jurors about me, the IRS, and IRS required tax forms. 

Gianelli is completely out of control.  Who is this man to demand answers from me?  I don't know him.  He is aligned with Leonard Cohen.  And, according to Investigator Frayeh/DA's office, a shady character who may have found a sympathetic ear with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson.  That sounds about right. 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>

Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:38 PM
Subject: Re:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>


I ask again: What acts of "retaliation" do you claim by the City of LA?

Someone PHONED you once to ask about your bizarre and inappropriate contacts with a prosecutor?

 

NO ONE phoned me about inappropriate contacts with my lunatic prosecutor (who should seek help for her habit of lying and her issues with aggression, baby talking judges ..).  I phoned Detective Viramontes/LAPD on another matter and ultimately asked him if he thinks this woman has psychiatric problems.  My lawyer has been clear - her conduct was tantamount to criminal obstruction of justice.  

Heavens to Betsy! Oh the humanity!

On Wednesday, April 10, 2013, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Mr. Rohter,
>
> The criminal harassment over Leonard Cohen and the City Attorney is astounding.  A talking dog is stalking me and has engaged in cxriminal witness tampering, criminal witness intimifdaton - AND the City Attorney permitted this lunatic to copy her in on MANY MANY emails.  These people are the scum of the earth.
>
> All the best,
> Kelley
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:03 PM, The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You cannot articulate answers, because no one tool ANY action to "retaliate" against you.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> To the FBI,
>>>
>>> My leader, the 14th Sheep Dog is COMMANDING me.  The Roswell escape was horrifying.
>>>
>>> Kelley
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:17 PM, The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Retaliated HOW EXACTLY and for WHAT?
>>>
>>>
>>> --

Kelley's Emal To Larry Rohter/NY Times Re. The Ongoing Criminal Harassment Involving Leonard Cohen & The City Attorney O(f Los Angeles, Phil Spector, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:19 PM
Subject: Re:
To: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

Hello Mr. Rohter,

The criminal harassment over Leonard Cohen and the City Attorney is astounding.  A talking dog is stalking me and has engaged in cxriminal witness tampering, criminal witness intimifdaton - AND the City Attorney permitted this lunatic to copy her in on MANY MANY emails.  These people are the scum of the earth.

All the best,
Kelley

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:03 PM, The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com> wrote:

You cannot articulate answers, because no one tool ANY action to "retaliate" against you.

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

To the FBI,

My leader, the 14th Sheep Dog is COMMANDING me.  The Roswell escape was horrifying.

Kelley

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:17 PM, The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com> wrote:

Retaliated HOW EXACTLY and for WHAT?

Ghetto Gospel - Kelley Lynch & Tupac Shakur Were Both Targeted By Prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter cc: Aftermath Records

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do5MMmEygsY

And, DDA Pat Dixon fears for his life over Eminem's live version of Puke and dry humping.  I can't help it if Eminem's song PUKE reminds me of DDA Pat Dixon who makes me sick.

Eminem's lyric:

[Sounds of someone puking]

There I go--thinking of you again

You don't know how sick you make me
You make me f-in' sick to my stomach
Every time I think of you, I puke
You must just not know--whoa-whoa-whoa-whoa
You may not think you do, but you do

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j--Xl8DklgY

Phil Spector Is Innocent - Of Course He Would Be Covered In Blood, Tissue, GSR & His Fingerprints Would Be On The Gun - How Absurd. Positively LA Confidential. And, Leonard Cohen Just Suddenly Took The Stand In My Intent To Annoy Him Over His Criminal Tax Fraud And Lied Through His Teeth About Phil Spector While The City Attorney Continues To Conceal Exculpatory Evidence Proving He Perjured Himself Over Phil Spector - No Wonder They Retaliated

www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=5108692429992499483#editor

How Do You Know When The LA City Attorney Is Lying?

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:46 PM
Subject: The City'Attorney's Views On Leonard Cohen's Constitutional Rrights
To: ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

To the DOJ,

Where in the Constitution does it state that Leonard Cohen has a right to live in anger?  Is that my issue - this man's revenge fantasies and psychotic personality?  Leonard Cohen's lies on the stand - or his anger - are not constitutionally protected.  My speech is.  This is a pure freedom of speech issue.  Furthermore, I was not served or notified of the Califrnia resgistered order.  It's fascinating that  tte City Attorney would liie and say I don't have to be served or notified.  Do you know what I love?  That the California Supreme Court found the intent to annoy statute unconstuitutionally vague and then struck if from the record. 

The City Attorney is arguing over federal tax matters while concealing Agent Tejeda/IRS.  Of course I was deprived of a defense.  Its incredible to me that the City Attorney would squander taxpayer dollars over Leonard Co9hen's seriously egregious tax fraud and for a man who cannot live in Canada.  I am mailing the IRS Commissioner's Staff Schmitter''s declaration.  She's lying about their budget woes, obviously  Someone should audit them. 

There is no prosecution case.  Fortunately, even teenagers get this.  Talk abut arrogant idiots. 

The City Attorney is just lying through their teeth in the Respondent's Brief.  It's incredible.  The City Attorney doesn't think there was prosecutorial misconduct.  Back to this joke - how do you know when a lawyer's lying?

All the best,

Kelley

Who Does City Attorney Carmen Trutanich Think He Is? I Have Every Right To Speak To Bob Dylan & Paul Shaffer

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:13 PM
Subject: Bob Dylan
To: ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

Hi DOJ,

What is this line of questioning about?  My call to Bob Dylan annoyed Leonard Cohen and this lunatic City Attorney who attempted to sabotage the IRS and taxpayers.  Shocking.  I know Paul Shaffer through Phil, Spector.  Paul knows this.  What's the issue?

All the best,
Kelley

BOB DYLAN AND PAUL SHAFFER

Streeter:  Do you know a person by the name of Paul Shaffer?

Cohen:  Yes, I know him.

Streeter:  Who is that?

Cohen:  Paul Shaffer is David Letterman’s band leader.

Streeter:  Do you know a person by the name of Dylan?

Cohen:  Yes, I do.

Streeter:  Who is that?  RT 256

Cohen:  That’s Bob Dylan.

Streeter:  Were you ever with Mr. Dylan when Ms. Lynch was in your employ?

Cohen:  I met with Bob Dylan several times.  We have a cordial acquaintanceship.

Streeter:  How about Mr. Shaffer?  Was he ever around when Ms. Lynch was in your employ?

Cohen:  I -- I believe -- I wouldn’t say she was around, but I did bump into him a couple of times under professional circumstances.

Streeter:  And Ms. Lynch was present?

Cohen:  No.  RT 257

City Attorney Carmen Trutanich Thinks He Can Prevent Me From Speaking With Bob Dylan? WOW.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:07 PM
Subject: Fwd: Contacting Dylan
To: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

Hi Mick,

So why was Bob Dylan an issue at my trial.  Apparently, according to the lunatics in LA, I cannot even speak to Bob Dylan.  It annoys Leonard Cohen and my alleged lunatic prosecutor.  I think Dylan himself should weigh in. Evidently Bob Dylan and I cannot have a conversation if Carmen Trutanich thinks it annoys Leonard Cohen.  And then there is Phillip and my friend, Paul Shaffer.  My God - Trutanich think I can't call Paul. 

The criminal harassment continues.

All the best,
Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:49 PM
Subject: Contacting Dylan
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>


No, poor unfortunate one, contacting Bob Dylan is not a crime unless you cc someone you have been ordered to have no contact with.

It is not complicated.

Letter From A Dear Friend Who Sees Right Through Leonard Cohen, The DA, City Attorney And Other Psychopaths

Kelley- your words could not ring more true. This insanity with my criminal roommate has reached a breaking point. I have never in my life felt so indignant than when I have had my integrity questioned, my reputation maligned and my sanity attacked by baseless, insane rhetoric. And this is on the smallest scale involving $700. It's a miracle you've been able to deal with the utter bullshit (for lack of a better term) on such a grand scale. 

 I honestly cannot imagine how you have kept your sanity over the last decade in the face of the most depraved behavior imaginable. I would lose it. Standing your ground in the face of the most egregious injustices is one of the noblest things one can do. You are a remarkable person and let us pray that some day these assholes will receive their comeuppance. It is only a matter of time. Have faith that some day all will be right- unfortunately  for now we must adapt to the whims  of psychopaths. And it is unfathomably insane. No matter what, you are always welcome to stay at my new place on Berkeley if you need to. 

Hope to see you soon, love you much,

Leonard Cohen's Operative Continues To Criminally Harass Me And Is Now Defending Spector Prosecutor Alan Jackson & Lunatic Deputy City Attorney Sandra Jo Streeter

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:06 PM
Subject: Fwd: "Permitted" has nothing to do with it
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

To the IRS and FBI,

When the City Attorney of Los Angeles, during my appeal, permits a man criminally harassing me to repeatedly copy them in (and Cohen's lawyer who doesn't want to be contacted evidently) that raises huge legal issues.  Interesting that this lunatic would raise Alan Jackson as an issue.  What's the problem - the DA's office dragged me into Phil Spector's murder trial when THEY rolled by my house unannounced.  They began threatening me after I filed a complaint with their Major Fraud Unit about Cohen's tax fraud, theft from me in the millions, etc.  They elected NOT to prosecute him and then targeted me with him and the City Attorney.

All the best,
Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:50 PM
Subject: "Permitted" has nothing to do with it
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

You either deflect the point or are too obtuse to get it - set Dennis Riordan aside for the moment (although NO ONE has given you "permission" to cc him, and no amount of cc's by you to Riordan would so indicate, no matter what Phil Spector has the "ability" to ascertain).

You cc a multitude of persons, prosecutors, officials, governors, agents, lawyers, and reporters - routinely.

When you cc Anderson Cooper (for example), does mean that he is "permitting" you to do so? I am being rhetorical. Of course it doesn’t.

That is because anyone can cc anyone else to any email they want - permission has nothing to do with it.

You have been ccing Alan Jackson for years. Does that mean he "permitted" you to do so? No. In fact, he even requested that you stop doing so, but you persisted.

NOTE:  Jackson evidently thinks that only he determines what unfolds in reality - and the taxpayers should demand to know why he or Major Fraud elected NOT to prosecute Leonard Cohen, the criminal negligence that led to my son's horrific accident at Whole Foods, etc.  WHO do these people work for?  They are NOT a private law firm and neither are the lunatics at the unconscionable Los Angeles City Attorney's Office who haven't met a lying celebrity they won't cover for - on the taxpayers dime.  Unconscionable governmental conduct.  

What point am I making? (Try to follow me here. I know it’s hard, but try.)

If someone, anyone, cc's a member of the City Attorney's Office that does NOT mean that they are "permitting" or in any way encouraging the email or endorsing the content of the email in any way - no more than all (or any) of the people or organizations you cc are "permitting" or encouraging you to do so or are endorsing the content of your emails.

Adding someone to the cc field of an email is a unilateral act by the sender without any significance beyond that.

Why Does The Los Angeles City Attorney Think I Cannot Communicate With Bob Dylan - His Lyric Is Now Evidently Criminal To Carmen Trutanich

Yes, I wish that for just one time, you could stand inside my shoes You'd know what a drag it is to see you

Read more: BOB DYLAN - POSITIVELY 4TH STREET LYRICS

NOTE:  Speaking to Bob Dylan is now a crime in Los Angeles if it annoys Leonard Cohen; Trutanich has to sabotage me and the IRS; and Phil Spector was set up.  Let's see if Dylan agrees.   

Sure - Phil Spector Is Unable To Determine What His Lawyers Receive - The Criminal Harassment On The Part Of Cohen's Operative Continues

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:45 PM
Subject: Re:
To: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>

To the FBI,

The criminal harassment on the part of this dangerously unstable lunatic continues.  This is what I have been exposed to due to Cohen's criminal tax fraud and Phil Spector's matter.  I think Phil Spector can decide if I can write his attorney.  And,Doug Davis gave me his email and we've spoken.  He knows how to talk to me and we've spoken - about Cohen's tax fraud and other very serious issues that would include the 1099 for the year 2004 that my prosecutor LIED to the jurors about.  I think my attorney is correct - the City Attorney arguing federal tax matters is misconduct.  No one cares.  The judge concealed Agent Tejeda.  These people are insane and thank goodness I don't like in LA Confidential.  These are sick people.

All the best,
Kelley

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:29 PM, The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com> wrote:

Permission has nothing to do with it. When I cc a person I do not need "permission" to do so nor is that indicative that permission was given - any more than you cc's to Dennis Riordan or Doug Davis indicate their "permission" for you to do so.

Your attempts to impute the sender's email to all recepients is stupid.

NO - Prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter Does Not Have A Legal Right To Permit A Man To Criminally Harass Me And My Family While Copying Her In - During My Appeal - As People Are Noting - The City Attorney Has Liability Over This Issue - That's Probably Why They Continue To Lie About Federal Tax Matters

To the FBI,

I have relentlessly advised Gianelli to cease and desist.  This man has no right to write me.  He has no right to copy my alleged prosecutor during my appeal.  she let it go on for months.  These people are shocking.  Intent to annoy?  Gianelli does not speak for the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, Phil Spector or his attorneys.  Of course various parties gave me permission - that includes the IRS and Agent Sopko   Does the FBI understand how sick these people are?  That includes Gianelli, the DA of Los Angeles (right out of the Sopranos re. the Denver FBI), the City Attorney Vanderet, etc?  They attempted to sabotage the IRS over the Phil Spector matter.  The great news - teenagers get this. 

My criminal stalker is OUT OF CONTROL

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:35 AM
Subject:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Ms. Lynch:

You are the criminal defendant here who was convicted of criminal harassment.

Leonard Cohen's conduct annoyed himself.  That does NOT give the City Attorney a license to LIE, sabotage me and the IRS, conceal evidence, elicit perjured testimony, and engage in activity that is complicit with an individual criminally harassing me who views himself as a dog.
 

Other persons are free to “copy in” anyone they wish in their email correspondence. Nor does doing so reflect the “permission” of the email recipient. Your hundreds of emails to all manner of persons who never gave you “permission” to do so proves that.

No Wonder The Whores Aren't In Prison - They Have Now Immunized Perjury & Fraud

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:15 AM
Subject: Fwd: Regarding your threat to sue lawyers in connection with your criminal prosecution
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>

To the FBI,
;
I do not like being exposed to dangerously unstable stark raving lunatics with motive over Cohen's tax fraud and Phil Specor's matter.  Anyway, these lunatics are clear - perjury is immune from consequences.  That's obvious.  Cohen confessed to perjury, lied through his teeth, and this is definitely LA Confidential.  Many people should be arrested here.  They're arrogance and thuggery shocks the conscience.  These lunatics are clearly used to getting their way and bull dozing through reality.  That's why LA is corrupt.  Gianeli belongs in prison.  The man's obsession with me is psychotic and to think that the prosecutor permitted this man to criminally harass me while copying her in is DERANGED.  I'm glad I am in the Bay Area because people know I am dealing with LUNATICS with motive. 

All the best,
Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:05 AM
Subject: Regarding your threat to sue lawyers in connection with your criminal prosecution
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

All but two states recognize absolute immunity for lawyers involved in litigation with "very little variation" from state to state. The Restatement formulation, adopted in nearly every state (including California), describes the litigation privilege as follows:

“An attorney at law is absolutely privileged to publish defamatory matter concerning another in communications preliminary to a proposed judicial proceeding, or in the institution of, or during the course and as a part of, a judicial proceeding in which he participates as counsel, if it has some relation to the proceeding.”

The privilege applies regardless of malice, bad faith, or any nefarious motives on the part of the lawyer so long as the conduct complained of has some relation to the litigation.  Every state in the nation also recognizes that the question of whether absolute privilege applies in a given case is necessarily one of law for the trial court to determine. Requiring a judicial determination of absolute immunity allows courts to dismiss cases against attorneys at the earliest possible stage in the litigation.  

While the absolute immunity from civil liability originated to protect attorneys from lawsuits for defamation, recent cases logically extend immunity to other claims as well. The spectrum of legal theories to which the privilege has been applied includes negligence, breach of confidentiality,  abuse of process, intentional infliction of  emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy, civil conspiracy, interference with contractual or advantageous business relations and fraud.

Additionally, the Restatement summarizes the scope of the litigation privilege as "all proceedings before an officer or other tribunal exercising a judicial function.

As a consequence, any suit along the lines you threaten would be subject to immediate dismissal and no one fears it.

That's obvious.  See out of control LA Confidential.  

LA Confidential Met A Celebrity And Cohen's Operative Continues To Criminally Harass Me

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:10 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>

To the FBI,

I am legally represented and this man is criminally insane.  He belongs in prison and this is clearly a game for him - lying to the IRS and FBI, transmitting fraud to the IRS, and do keep in mind that he is obviously Leonard Cohen's operative.  This is how Cohen functions behind the scenes.  I know.  I worked with him for 20 years and the man is positively evil.  Who would steal from someone force them into homeless, target their children and parents, take the stand and lie about Phil Spector, perjure themselves in every court they roll into?  Leonard Cohen - Canada's National Treasure who cannot live in Canada due to tax and residence issues.  In any event, Trutanich and Cooley need their fraud celebrity even if I'm sitting here with the evidence and have provided that to the IRS.  Trutanich does not care about the taxpayers.  He'll waste LA County monies and federal taxpayer monies.  It's disgusting - so is their thuggery.  The great news - teenagers get this.  Not former FBI agent George Mueller.  Teenagers.  I think that sums things up.  There's also an intelligence issue here - as in arrogant idiots.  These people make the music industry look like rocket science.  Literally. And, then there's the Denver FBI's buddy, Marko.  He's right out of the Sopranos. 

All the best,
Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:43 AM
Subject:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Oral arguments in appellate proceedings are not court reported or electronically recorded by the Court and no transcript of an oral argument is available. The only way to hear an oral argument is to attend the hearing. (Mr. Suarez is a "litigator" is he not?)

Perfect.  Then I won't have to hear the appellate division and City Attorney lying.  I'll view this as a blessing.  Who would want to hear these insane people?  The appellate division should resign.  They haven't heard of due process?  They don't understand prosecutorial misconduct is rampant?  I want this appeal abandoned and intend to sue LA County over this.  They can't force me to deal with their ongoing lies and psychotic insanity.  They should learn to control their own minds.  Nowhere in reality is this type of criminal conduct acceptable.  LA County has its own breed of criminal insanity - see the DA, City Attorney, and LA Superior Court.  They just don't like it.  They want to engage in this conduct but they don't want people to acknowledge it.  What a bunch of gangsters.  Helping Leonard Cohen steal from me; sabataging the IRS, concealing evidence re. Phil Spector ... these people are a John Grisham Novel.

The habeas petition you say you intend to file pro se should have been filed at the time you filed your direct appeal and is no longer timely.

Actually an attorney is filing it on my behalf.   

An Investigation Into Leonard Coihen's Insane Lawyer Operative Is Warranted

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:17 AM
Subject: Fwd: Your admission to tape recording your attorney-client communications at the courthouse
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>

To the FBI,

The criminal harassment continues.  I did not record any proceedings.  I am entitled to record a meeting with my lawyer.  In any event, Gianelli is out of control, dangerously unstable, and obsessed. This is the lunatic who - after hearing from Cohen's lawyers - relentlessly targeted my children and elderly parents, attempted to blackmail my sister, phoned people and lied to them about me, and has most definitely engaged in criminal witness tampering, witness intimidation, stalking, harassment, etc.  Leonard Cohen's role in this activity demands an investigation.  Slandering me is not a defense to criminal tax fraud and neither is his theft from me in the millions.  My appellate attorney is now very familiar with the evidence and understands this - I had to be served or notified of the Califiornia order.  That will be addressed in oral arguments and the writ of habeas corpus wil addressl the concealed evidence, including the IRS binder.  The IRS binder opens a can of worms since Cohen's lies, fraud, perjury, and concealment are excessive. 

All the best,

Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:10 AM
Subject: Your admission to tape recording your attorney-client communications at the courthouse
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

California Penal Code Section 632, subdivision (a):

Every person who, intentionally and without the consent of

all parties to a confidential communication, by means of any

electronic amplifying or recording device, eavesdrops upon or records

the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried

on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a

telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be

punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars

($2,500), or imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year,

or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

A conversation between an attorney and a client is a confidential communication. (See Evidence Code section 952.)

Leonard Cohen's operative has a tremendous amount of time for his obsession with me.  A conversation with a public defender - in front of three witnesses - is NOT confidential, particularly when the man is lying and his supervisor confirmed that.  In any event, the tape has been sent to the IRS.  

Congratulations, you just posted an admission that you committed a felony offense on the Internet. However, that was not the point of my earlier email regarding the Los Angeles County Superior Court Local Rules prohibiting the recording of court proceedings. I was addressing your stated intention to have the April 18, 2013 oral argument in your criminal appeal electronically recorded on your behalf - which would be a violation of local rule.

No court proceedings were taped but this man is dangerously unstable and insane.  I think I can get the transcript and wouldn't go near LA Superior Court without a litigator if my life depended on it.  They lie, cheat, set up innocent people, and it is nasty.  LA Confidential is vile and vulgar up close and personal.  But, they met a celebrity who could help them with Phil Spector - Leonard Cohen.  

You essentially gratuitously admitted to a felony offense by way of a rebuttal to a point the Dogster never made.

Writing to the IRS and FBI about the ongoing criminal harassment - involving Leonard Cohen's operative - is not a rebuttal and I admitted to no such thing because that's a bald faced lie by the bald faced liar with motive - Stephen Gianelli.  

--

Kelley Lynch Appeal & Writ Of Habeas Corpus Re. Leonard Cohen's Perjury, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Fraud, Concealment, Theft, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:09 AM
Subject: Withdrawal of Counsel & My File
To: Joel Lofton <loftonjl@yahoo.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

Joel,

I left you a message.  My appellate attorney is assisting me with both the appeal and a writ of habeas corpus.  This is very difficult since we do not have my entire file - including the 17 CDs re. evidence that are listed on the inventory form you sent me.  Clearly, the motion in limine is important and it's outrageous that you are withholding this, and other information, from me.

I would like Mike Kelly and Nikhil Ramnaney to formally withdraw as counsel.  Stephen Gianelli has publicly noted that one of them contacted him to discuss my witnesses and what they could or could not corroborate.  That is an extremely egregious violation of attorney client privilege,  particularly given the fact that he has engaged in criminal witness tampering, witness intimidation, harassment, etc. since hearing from Cohen's lawyer in 2009.  The man is insane.  I have left you my address and would appreciate receiving a copy of the formal withdrawal that Kelly/Ramnaney file with the court. 

If you would let me know about the motion in limine that would be great.  The City Attorney continues to lie about me, and other matters, in their Respondent's Brief and I think with powerful foes such as the City Attorney and District Attorney I should be fully prepared to address those lies, perjury, etc.  It's very interesting what LA Superior Court will tolerate in terms of fraud perjury concealment, etc.  I cannot imagine why my PDs did not file a motion regarding the prosecutorial misconduct we discussed throughout the trial. 

Kelley Lynch

The Inconceivable Insanity With Leonard Cohen's Tax Fraud Matter, The Los Angeles City Attorney, Los Angeles District Attorney, Phil Spector's Trials, And The Ongoing Criminal Harassment

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:26 AM
Subject: Fwd: Possession of recording devices OR making a recording in a Los Angeles courtroom prohibited
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>

To the IRS and FBI,

Gianelli continues to criminally harass me.  I am permitted to record a conversation with my lawyer - in the presence of others - in a courthouse.  I taped no proceeding.  This man is insane and this situation remains out of control.  What Leonard Cohen's tax fraud and Phil Spector's matters have exposed me to is outrageous and that includes the conduct on the part of the DA's office and the insanity with the City Attorney's office.  And, I might add that when a public defender is lying to me, I have a right to protect myself.

All the best,
Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:09 PM
Subject: Possession of recording devices OR making a recording in a Los Angeles courtroom prohibited
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT LOCAL RULES

2.17 PHOTOGRAPHING, RECORDING AND BROADCASTING IN COURT

[. . . ]

(b) Court Order Required. While in court, no one may engage in photographing, recording,

or broadcasting, or activate any camera, microphone, recorder or broadcasting device, except:

1) in a courtroom where the judge has issued an order allowing media coverage under

California Rules of Court, rule 1.150 and Local Rule 2.17(d), or expressly granted permission, under California Rules of Court, rule 1.150(d) or otherwise, to photograph, record, and/or broadcast; or

2) outside the courtroom, if it is: i) in a designated media area, or ii) with prior

written permission from the Presiding Judge, supervising judge, or site judge. No one may carry any camera, microphone, or recording equipment, or activate the image or sound capturing feature of any computer, mobile telephone, watch or other similar equipment in a courtroom without express written permission from the appropriate judicial officer.

--

Question: How can you tell the difference between an attorney lying dead in the road and a coyote lying dead in the road? 
Answer: With the coyote, you usually see skid marks.

--

Question: How can you tell the difference between an attorney lying dead in the road and a coyote lying dead in the road? 
Answer: With the coyote, you usually see skid marks.

LA Confidential Now Has A Talking Dog Targeting Me - How Perfect.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:37 AM
Subject: Re:
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>

To the FBI,

Did I forget Killer King, the entirely fraudulent file, or is the talking dog who Streeter permitted to copy in on many emails insane?  Wow.  It's worse than I thought.  I guess the City Attorney has to cover for the SWAT incident.  I know - women in bikinis are a real threat to LAPD when they have a lying father, Leonard Cohen, MOTIVE, and Phil Spector.  And now they have a talking dog criminally harassing me.  How interesting?  A talking dog is criminally harassing me.  I see.

All the best,
Kelley

You also appear to have forgotten who is subject to multiple protective orders, who is considered a threat to multiple persons, and who has been subjected to involuntary transport to several mental hospitals. (Again, only you.)

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

To the News Media,

Trutanich has no budget woe.  He's covering for a lying fraud and I have the evidence.  Lying in court doesn't change reality.  This man is unconscionable and he thinks threatening me is appropriate conduct on our dime.  That's clear.  So, LA has exposure and they are THUGS.  That's obvious.  The LA Times and Dark Shadows cover for these lunatics.  It shocks the conscience but not in LA Confidential.  They have a great celebrity scam and I see right through them. If you are a fraud wealthy powerful celebrity, Trutanich will cover for you on the taxpayer dime.  It doesnt mattert if he defrauded the IRS and taxpayers - Trutanich loves celebrities.  That might include a dog who is criminally harassing me.

Kelley

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi IRS and FBI,

I forgot.  A talking dog is targeting me and I have problems.  Well, that puts Roswell in perspective but doesn'[t address JUDGE Robert Vanderet's conduct that demands an investigation.  Wow - I've convicted of annoying Leonard Cohen over his criminal tax fraud, Phil Spector, my son's fingers, my son's custody matter, and his theft.  That says more about Vanderet than it will ever say about me.  The man is deranged or corrupt.  Anyway, a talking DOG is criminally harassing me.  That talking dog was PERMITTED to copy lying prosecutor Streeter in many many emails targeting me and my sister. 

How could I forget the lengths Cohen, LA Superior Court, the DA of LA, and the City Attorney, have gone to target me? No one in reality falls for this insanity.  Trutanich  should personally be investigated.  Why would his office threaten me after LA Superior Court told me to contact his office to file complaints against lunatic prosecutor Streeter?  Well, obviously they don't have budget woes.  They are LIARS. 

All the best,

Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:14 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Kelley,

You seem to forget who the probationer is. (That would be you.)

You also seem to forget who the one with the criminal record is, including the one who has engaged in (and been convicted of) criminal harassment. (You.)

You also appear to have forgotten who is subject to multiple protective orders, who is considered a threat to multiple persons, and who has been subjected to involuntary transport to several mental hospitals. (Again, only you.)

Do you see any kind of pattern here at all?

 

I Do Indeed See A Pattern Here And It Involves Carmen Trutanich, Steve Cooley, LA Superior Court, And A Talking Dog

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:24 AM
Subject: Re:
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>

To the News Media,

Trutanich has no budget woe.  He's covering for a lying fraud and I have the evidence.  Lying in court doesn't change reality.  This man is unconscionable and he thinks threatening me is appropriate conduct on our dime.  That's clear.  So, LA has exposure and they are THUGS.  That's obvious.  The LA Times and Dark Shadows cover for these lunatics.  It shocks the conscience but not in LA Confidential.  They have a great celebrity scam and I see right through them. If you are a fraud wealthy powerful celebrity, Trutanich will cover for you on the taxpayer dime.  It doesnt mattert if he defrauded the IRS and taxpayers - Trutanich loves celebrities.  That might include a dog who is criminally harassing me.

Kelley

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi IRS and FBI,

I forgot.  A talking dog is targeting me and I have problems.  Well, that puts Roswell in perspective but doesn'[t address JUDGE Robert Vanderet's conduct that demands an investigation.  Wow - I've convicted of annoying Leonard Cohen over his criminal tax fraud, Phil Spector, my son's fingers, my son's custody matter, and his theft.  That says more about Vanderet than it will ever say about me.  The man is deranged or corrupt.  Anyway, a talking DOG is criminally harassing me.  That talking dog was PERMITTED to copy lying prosecutor Streeter in many many emails targeting me and my sister. 

How could I forget the lengths Cohen, LA Superior Court, the DA of LA, and the City Attorney, have gone to target me? No one in reality falls for this insanity.  Trutanich  should personally be investigated.  Why would his office threaten me after LA Superior Court told me to contact his office to file complaints against lunatic prosecutor Streeter?  Well, obviously they don't have budget woes.  They are LIARS. 

All the best,

Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:14 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Kelley,

You seem to forget who the probationer is. (That would be you.)

You also seem to forget who the one with the criminal record is, including the one who has engaged in (and been convicted of) criminal harassment. (You.)

You also appear to have forgotten who is subject to multiple protective orders, who is considered a threat to multiple persons, and who has been subjected to involuntary transport to several mental hospitals. (Again, only you.)

Do you see any kind of pattern here at all?

 

A Dangerously Unstable Man - Who Views Himself As A Dog - Was Permitted To Copy Prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter In On Many Emails Criminally Harassing Me Over Leonard Cohen's Tax Fraud & Phil Spector

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:33 AM
Subject: Fwd: The Whore Liars OF Ft. Liquordale ... Drugs, etc.
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

To the IRS Commissioner's Staff,

Ask yourself this question - would you want this lunatic (who sees himself as a talking dog) targeting your children and elderly parents?  This man is amused here.  He's engaged in criminal conduct that involves criminal witness tampering, criminal witness intimidation, criminal harassment, etc.  The prosecutor lets him copy her in (for quite a long time) while he targets me and my sister.  And, this situation is totally out of control.  Either there's been an escape from Roswell or it's time to investigate what cxriminal asylums in this country are missing patients. 

I didn't realize I was writing the IRS about a talking dog but keep in mind - this man has targeted me since hearing from Cohen's representatives in 2009, may be aligned be aligned with Alan Jackson, and is clearly playing games with the IRS.  That would include transmitting fraudulent information about me as a form of retaliation based on his self-inflicted revenge fantasies.  I would like the IRS to find out what's going on with the LA City Attorney and federal tax matters that I was targeted over and why it took them until March 13th to advise Gianelli to remove Streeter from his emails criminally harassing me.  These are incredibly sick people who continue to lie in the Respondent's Brief and are obsessed with federal tax matters and Phil Spector.  I suppose they threw my son's fingers into the mix just to show how vile, vulgar, and cruel they are. 

All the best,
Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: The Whore Liars OF Ft. Liquordale ... Drugs, etc.
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

"Insane"?

At least we have not written the IRS scores of letters complaining about a talking dog.

Ha!

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

To the IRS Commissioner's Staff,

Leonard Cohen's criminal tax fraud is NOT my manufactured drama regardless of what my criminal stalker - who belongs in prison - has to say.  I suppose he's emboldened because he's headed to Europe.  Great.  The U.S. is rid of yet another thug lawyer who sounds like he crawled out of a crypt.  Well, he enjoys lying to the IRS and FBI.  He's having a blast in his latest incarnation - gangster dog defending the indefensible - Leonard Cohen's theft and criminal tax fraud.  Perhaps Cohen's Buddhist deity is Gianelli's dog who shits/pisses pujas on carpets.  Threat manufacturing unit Jihad Gianelli.
The escapee from LA Confidential criminal insane asylum.

All the best,

Kelley

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

P.S.  Must be thinking of the Manufacturing Unit.

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

To the FBI,

My criminal stalker continues to criminally harass me.  He is obsessed with Leonard Cohen's criminal tax fraud matter.  Of course, this is the stark raving lunatic who accused me of drinking when I was using a Spanish keyboard and then decided I should buy a new keyboard.  This man is dangerously unstable and his obsession with my children is truly perverse.  Now think about this - the City Attorney permitted this stark raving lunatic to copy one of his prosecutors in on many emails to me.  Just answer this question - is this man who relentlessly targeted my children a drug addict or criminally insane?  What we know for certain is this - he has targeted me since hearing from Cohen's representatives in 2009 and is aligned with Leonard Cohen.  I think that sums things up perfectly.  And then there's Alan Jackson. 

All the best,
Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: The Whore Liars OF Ft. Liquordale ... Drugs, etc.
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Mommy Dearest,

As touching as your intoxicated and profane correspondence to your child is not, neither is the IRS the SLIGHEST bit interested in your manufactured drama.

"Taunting" the IRS? 

Ha! In reality you are not.

--The Dogster

Mango Whores & LA Confidential's Manufacturing Unit

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: The Whore Liars OF Ft. Liquordale ... Drugs, etc.
To: STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>

P.S.  Must be thinking of the Manufacturing Unit.

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

To the FBI,

My criminal stalker continues to criminally harass me.  He is obsessed with Leonard Cohen's criminal tax fraud matter.  Of course, this is the stark raving lunatic who accused me of drinking when I was using a Spanish keyboard and then decided I should buy a new keyboard.  This man is dangerously unstable and his obsession with my children is truly perverse.  Now think about this - the City Attorney permitted this stark raving lunatic to copy one of his prosecutors in on many emails to me.  Just answer this question - is this man who relentlessly targeted my children a drug addict or criminally insane?  What we know for certain is this - he has targeted me since hearing from Cohen's representatives in 2009 and is aligned with Leonard Cohen.  I think that sums things up perfectly.  And then there's Alan Jackson. 

All the best,
Kelley

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: The Whore Liars OF Ft. Liquordale ... Drugs, etc.
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Mommy Dearest,

As touching as your intoxicated and profane correspondence to your child is not, neither is the IRS the SLIGHEST bit interested in your manufactured drama.

"Taunting" the IRS? 

Ha! In reality you are not.

--The Dogster

 

 

I See The Los Angeles City Attorney Could Care Less About The Taxpayer - The LA Times Dark Shadows Reporter Will Cover Oral Arguments In My Appeal. How Special!

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: 2003 tax return
To: The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com>, STEPHEN GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>

To the IRS and FBI,

My stalker - who seemed extremely comfortable copying in prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter while criminally harassing me - continues on with his madness.  The IRS and federal tax matters are all over this deranged misdeameanor set up.  I see people remain obsessed with the LA Times.  I don't live in LA Confidential and remain uninterested in garbage journalism.

Gianelli has been relentkessly advised to cease and desist  He's amused and taunting the IRS.  A truly sick man who belongs in prison.  The prosecutor should be investigated for her role in permitting him to target me while copying her in.  I think there's a problem when the City Attorney waits until March 13th to advise this lunatic to remove Streeter from his emails.  In fact,  think it's entirely transparent and I am not alone.  People are now discussing the fact that LA really doesn't want the Phil Spector verdict overturned even if that means sabotaging the IRS and taxpayers. 

All the best,
Kelley

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:51 PM, The-14th Sheepdog <thexivthsheepdog@gmail.com> wrote:

Speaking of Hades dropping below zero degrees, that is when your pending motions - to argue issues not briefed in your brief and for extra time to talk about the IRS - will be granted: NEVER.

This is not a "default" but instead the operation of well established rule of procedure that do no exist to give you a soap box in front of the LAT.

Nice try though.

--The Dogster