From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: Kelley Lynch Fax to Susan Schmitter/City Attorney's Office
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "SandraJo.Streeter" <SandraJo.Streeter@lacity.org>, ajackson <ajackson@da.lacounty.gov>, "Truc.Do" <Truc.Do@mto.com>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>, jthompson <jthompson@da.lacounty.gov>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>
Cc: rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, "harriet.ryan" <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
To the FBI,
No wonder Streeter's engaged in prosecutorial vindictiveness.
All the best,
Kelley
To punish a person because he has done what the law plainly allows him to do is a due process violation "of the most basic sort." Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U. S. 357, 434 U. S. 363. In a series of cases beginning with North Carolina v. Pearce and culminating in Bordenkircher v. Hayes, the Court has recognized this basic -- and itself uncontroversial -- principle. For while an individual certainly may be penalized for violating the law, he just as certainly may not be punished for exercising a protected statutory or constitutional right. [Footnote 4]
Date: Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: Kelley Lynch Fax to Susan Schmitter/City Attorney's Office
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "SandraJo.Streeter" <SandraJo.Streeter@lacity.org>, ajackson <ajackson@da.lacounty.gov>, "Truc.Do" <Truc.Do@mto.com>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>, jthompson <jthompson@da.lacounty.gov>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>
Cc: rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, "harriet.ryan" <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
To the FBI,
No wonder Streeter's engaged in prosecutorial vindictiveness.
All the best,
Kelley
To punish a person because he has done what the law plainly allows him to do is a due process violation "of the most basic sort." Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U. S. 357, 434 U. S. 363. In a series of cases beginning with North Carolina v. Pearce and culminating in Bordenkircher v. Hayes, the Court has recognized this basic -- and itself uncontroversial -- principle. For while an individual certainly may be penalized for violating the law, he just as certainly may not be punished for exercising a protected statutory or constitutional right. [Footnote 4]
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Mr. Riordan,
I raised the exculpatory evidence re. Phil Spector in my fax to Susan Schmitter.
Love,
Kelley
--
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
February 14, 2013
5 pages
Susan Schmitter
City Attorney's Office
FAMILY VIOLENCE UNIT
Fax No. 213.847.8544
Kelley Lynch
Case No. 2CA04539
Ms. Schmitter,
Enclosed please find the fully executed Substitution of Attorney form that has been mailed to the Appellate Division and you.
I would like to be served your reply:
Kelley Lynch
REDACTED
I would like the appropriate time needed to respond. I am also filing a Writ of Habeas Corpusto address prosecutorial misconduct. I do not have the IRS required 1099 for the year 2004 from Leonard Cohen; I am not a partner on LC Investments (see IRS binder - Cohen's declaration that is otherwise perjured), and the K-1s are illegal; the refund from the IRS in 2005 did not address the default judgment (procured via fraud, perjury, willful disregard for corporate records, etc.) - See IRS binder. Agent Sopko and I met in 2007, over a year after the IRS confirmed the refund. The IRS has now advised me to file Form 3949a re. the fraud.
I was not in a dating relationship with Cohen. He testified to this fact at the 3/23/12 hearing and confirmed that I never stole from him. The Boulder order is a civil harassment order unlawfully filed in California as a domestic violence order. I was not served the new California order and serious due process issues have arisen.
I would like to know why the DA decided not to prosecute Cohen re. my complaint to Major Fraud. He has stolen millions from me.
The exculpatory evidence concealed during trial will be addressed on appeal and in my writ: including the fact that Cohen emailed Streeter that Phil Spector held a gun to his NECK; he testified that the gun was held to his HEAD: the prosecutors in the Spector trial have used a version that involves a semi-automatic to the CHEST.
Kelley Lynch
Enclosed: Substitution of Attorney form signed by Francisco Suarez and Kelley Lynch. Mailed to the Appellate Division (with a cover letter addressing certain extremely disturbing issues with the City Attorney, etc.) and Susan Schmitter.
"You are a cheat!" shouted the attorney to his opponent."And you're a liar!" bellowed the opposition.Banging his gavel loudly, the judge interjected, "Now that both attorneys have been identified for the record, let's get on with the case."
