Saturday, March 23, 2013

WOW



From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: Wow. Some Ex Groupie Has Me On Her Radar. I Must Thank Threat Management.
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Cc: Francis Shivers <shivers@gmail.com>, alisa spitzberg <alisaspitzberg@gmail.com>, Paul Burger <paul@sohoartists.co.uk>, Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>, mlbornma <mlbornma@lasd.org>, The Scientist <thescientist@dubmusic.com>, David Moorhead <moorheadlaw@qwestoffice.net>, dboies <dboies@bsfllp.com>, Steven Machat <smachat@gmail.com>


Hello Francisco,

Gianelli is now publicly lying about you, David Moorhead, Steven Machat, and Agent Tejeda/IRS.  The information about my trial lawyer is invaluable.  Illegal?  I think so.  Let's talk Monday.  Not all that into LA Confidential right now.  

All the best,
Kelley

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey David,

How's life in Boulder? Still dealing with LA Confidential and satellite clowns.  My God - you cannot believe my prosecutor.  It was shocking.  She's a total sycophant.  The lies are inconceivable.  It's PURE LA Confidential Meets The Insane Clown Posse.

All the best,
Kelley


Blogonaut said...
Why would one of your FORMER public defenders call me, one might ask (and he or she phoned me, not the reverse)?

I see someone’s drinking now.  

Because, Ms. Lynch, the day you were released from jail in September of 2012 and while I was in Europe, you lit up my Blackberry with emails, many CCing me with your attorney-client communications with your public defenders. (There were six such initial emails sent that day.)

Wow. What a lunatic.  My lawyers can’t breach attorney client privilege.  Period.  What a lunatic.  Cease and desist clearly does  NOT resonate.  

I emailed you back – cc to your defenders – suggesting that it was not in your interest to do this, that you were waiving the attorney-client privilege. Your defenders specifically cautioned you to NOT continue to waive the attorney client privilege in this manner.

It’s not in my interest?  What does that mean?  Is that a threat.  I didn’t waive attorney client privilege and speaking publicly about issues I want to speak about does not give any trial lawyer of mine the right to violate a/c privilege.  Cautioned?  Wow.  

Against your attorney’s advice, you persisted in this behavior, however, and continued to copy me with your email communications with your defenders, at one point sending me 70 emails in a 24 hour period, the last six with the reference line “cease and desist faggot”.

This man, who is obsessed with Bruce Cutler and thinks Pat Dixon fears for his life over Eminem and his dry humping lyric. is worried about my cease and desist demand.  What’s the issue?  I don’t speak like your ordinary lunatic lying faggot rotten lawyer?  REDACTED.  Who could stand this rotten logic?


March 23, 2013 at 5:06 AM Blogonaut said...
On a typical day, Kelley Lynch is on Blogonaut all day long. Here is our visitors log for MARCH 22, 2013.

Really?  All day long? How fascinating?  Does my stalker have evidence of this?

March 23, 2013 at 8:24 AM Blogonaut said...
KL:

"The fact that my trial lawyer breached a/c privilege and spoke to a man aligned with Cohen is shocking."

No, moron, what is suprising is that you would even think to foward to me email strings between you and your attorneys - thereby discposing a significant part of the communications, which is the California Evidence Code test for a waiver the the attorney-client privlege, let alone persist in that activity for MONTHS in the face of warnings from me AND your lawyers that you were doing just that.

Over to Francisco Suarez.

Suprising under these circumstances that one of them would call me it is not.

You really are stupid sometimes.
March 23, 2013 at 11:39 AM Blogonaut said...
NEWSFLASH: Francisco doesn't give a damn about your sordid little saga either; there ain't no money it it Kelley. He and your public defenders had to put up with you, respectively, during your appeal and trial - but you discharged Francisco and abandoned your appeal and your trial is over.

My God.  This lunatic is now lying about Francisco Suarez.  Amazing.  Francisco represents me right now and we’re attempting to abandon this appeal due to prosecutorial misconduct, retaliation, etc.  I talk to Francisco privately. I think I know what’s on his mind.  

Of course you are STILL emailing your court appointed lawyer in your trespassing case in Boulder - and that case ended in 2007.

David Moorhead was NOT court appointed.  I hired him.  There was NO trespassing case.  This man cannot stop lying.  

I told your FORMER public defender about that and we both had a good laugh.

Really?  How amusing.  

Every lawyer who is REQUIRED to put up with you humors you - because that is what people do with the mentally ill. The rest ignore or block your emails.

I see.  

They ALL roll their eyes when they hear your name.

Really?  Amazing.  

Oh, and you BELIEVED Marchat's unspecified "conflict" excuse? Then you are dumber than I thought.

No.  I don’t believe that for a moment but remain delusional psychopathic manic who people viewas sick and vile.


March 23, 2013 at 1:31 PM


On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Alisa,

Meet the Scientist.

Kelley


On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Scientist,

What a bunch of maniacs.  No one said LA Confidential had brains.  Now, Coyote Shivers' ex-wives are onto me. How perfectly THIRD GRADE.  

Love,
Kelley


On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Coyote,

Meet The Scientist.  He's been targeted by gold digging whores with motive.  One tried to KILL herself at his house.  He's standing up for Phil Spector.  I think the LGBT community has  been deceived by your lunatic ex-wife.  Congratulations - you''ve seen LA Confidential up close and personal.  Thank you for becoming a Phil Spector advocate.  One by one we have to stand up for him.  

Kelley




On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Glenn,

I think the LGBT community has been taken for a ride by Perette.  

Kelley


On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
P.S.  Coyote didn't tell me anything.  I reviewed Buell's website.  She's a groupie and aligned with his lunatic ex-wife.  My gay friends are googling this NCIS star who used the gay community.  The great news - they don't buy this D-level broad's BULLSHIT.  LAPD freaked my mother out over this situation.  She doesn't glorify lunatic punk wanna be rockers or Cohen.  She is too intelligent and asked me - what's Viramonte's mother like.  WHY does he want to know about me.  TELL the man to pick up the phone and call me and back away from my family, LUNATIC.  LA Confidential but my mother understands Phll Spector is innocent.  SHE knows him and sees right through lying lunatics with motive and other insane psychiatric ailments.  That includes Vanderet.  Her father was a magistrate and she thinks this man should rot in hell.  And he should.  


On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Alisa,

Fill me in tomorrow. Not interested in LA Confidential today.  I'm clear about Vanderet.  Lt. Wolak/LASD told me he has never seen anything like my case in 26 years in law enforcement.  Coyote Shivers' ex-wives now know about me.  This is a very sick situation with fraud celebrities.  WHAT is going on with LAPD here? I have been clear with you and Coyote - TMU was entirely professional with me.  Nevertheless.  This situation is OUT OF CONTROL.  Really.  Misery.  And, I contacted LAPD repeatedly because Gianelli ruthlessly targeted my children.  My lawyer asked  me during trial  - WHAT did they do?

Take it easy.  We have house guests.  A sweet 5-year old who hasn't heard that I'm a crack smoking alcoholic whore yet.  My gay friends want to buy me a toy drone now.  They are all over this, girlfriend.  So is my hair dresser.  I sent him the Valentine's Day card as well.

Love,
Kelley

alisa spitzberg
4:32 PM (0 minutes ago)
 
to me
 
Hello Kelley,
Have some interesting news about Vanderet. Nothing earth shaking just interesting. He's completely in the pockets of the city attorney. How i found out is kind of odd. I'll have to tell you the details tommorow. Need to go out again and then sleep.
As for Coyote Shivers I wish he didn't tell you that. Needlessly upsetting. How the hell does bebe buell know about you? This doesn't make sense absent e-mail hacking or coyote telling her and that .... hmmmm. The awful mysteries deepen.
The TMU causes such misery and then waits for fancy jobs to materialize. Blood boilingly disgusting.
talk tommorow



--

Posted by at

Coyote Shivers Must Be Great In Bed


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: The Revenge Of The Lying Groupies
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Cc: Francis Shivers <shivers@gmail.com>, alisa spitzberg <alisaspitzberg@gmail.com>, Paul Burger <paul@sohoartists.co.uk>, Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>


To the News Media,

My God.  Coyote must be great in bed.

All the best,
Kelley


On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Alisa,

I must thank Threat Management Unit.  I'm now exposed to Bebe Buell and other psychotic ex-groupies. My God.  Coyote and his darling wife, May, have my sympathies.  This is so LA Confidential it's not funny.  Leonard Cohen can commit tax fraud, steal from me, destroy my life, but Buell will congratulate him because of her ex-husband.  Maybe TMU will come to my rescue and realize I am now the target of cyber-terrorists.  Somehow I doubt that.  I am not a celebrity, not an ex-groupie, and no whore from LA's defense bar is representing me. Coyote must be great in bed, no? 

Love,
Kelley

SATURDAY, MARCH 23, 2013

Bebe Buell Is Pathetic - Some Ex-Groupie Is Aware Of Me Because Of Coyote Shivers. WOW.


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:05 PM
Subject: Wow. Some Ex Groupie Has Me On Her Radar. I Must Thank Threat Management.
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Cc: Francis Shivers <shivers@gmail.com>, alisa spitzberg <alisaspitzberg@gmail.com>, Paul Burger <paul@sohoartists.co.uk>, Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>


Hello News Media,

Posted by at

Bebe Buell Is Pathetic - Some Ex-Groupie Is Aware Of Me Because Of Coyote Shivers. WOW.


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:05 PM
Subject: Wow. Some Ex Groupie Has Me On Her Radar. I Must Thank Threat Management.
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Cc: Francis Shivers <shivers@gmail.com>, alisa spitzberg <alisaspitzberg@gmail.com>, Paul Burger <paul@sohoartists.co.uk>, Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>


Hello News Media,

Posted by at

I Must Remember To Send LAPD's Threat Management Unit A Thank You Note



From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:52 PM
Subject: Fwd: Never Mind
To: Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>


Hi FBI,

I must send Threat Management Unit a thank you note.  I'm now being targeted by Coyote's ex-wives.  Wow.  

All the best,
Kelley


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:51 PM
Subject: Never Mind
To: Francis Shivers <shivers@gmail.com>


Hey Coyote,

Never mind.  I see Perette's on here.  Well, you know how these groupies who are obsessed with their ex-husbands can be.  How nasty - your ex-wives might be interested in me now.  How creepy.  I feel like I'm in a porn movie and your ex-wives are the stars.  I must call Detective Viramontes/Threat Management Unit to thank him.  It's lovely be targeted.  Maybe TMU will rush right over and investigate.   Hard to say.  Perhaps they don't know anyone that screwed these women yet.  

Kelley

#NCIS IT'S ON NOW East Coast! Even our crew guys said bring tissues!

Posted by at

Why Would Bebe Buell, Coyote Shiver's Ex, Have An Interest In Me? I Must Give This Some Thought



From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: Quick question
To: Francis Shivers <shivers@gmail.com>


Coyote,

I have a question for you.  Why do you think your ex-wife (wasn't she involved with Steve Tyler previously) would have an interest in me?  I think I've heard, through the industry, that she's a groupie.  In fact, I'm trying to think of who the person is that I know who screwed her.  Anyway, let me know if you have any thoughts on why your ex-wife might be interested me.  Maybe she had sex witih Cohen?  Do you think tha't's possible?  I'd appreciate any insights you have. 

Kelley 


Posted by at

Stephen Gianelli On Harriet Ryans/LA Times, Alan Jackson, And Phil Spector cc: David Boies



From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:50 AM
Subject: Gianelli
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Cc: dboies <dboies@bsfllp.com>


Mr. Riordan,

I've updated my Blog addressing the latest round of insanity re. Gianelli's outrageous ad hominem attack on me, lies about Agent Tejeda/IRS and the subpoena he was issued, lies about witnesses the trial lawyers spoke to (including Steven Machat), the outrageous breach of attorney/client privilege on the part of one of my trial lawyers, and other insanity.  I never said Gianelli was in a coordinated effort with Harriet Ryan/LA Times and prosecutor Alan Jackson that is adverse to Phil Spector but it's a theory worth giving serious consideration to.  I addressed the fact that Gianelli - who raises reasonable doubt theories on the internet about Phil Spector (that can then be refuted and attacked by cyber-terrorists) was right on time with his post on Harriet Ryan's shameless LA Times article about the David Mamet/HBO Phil Spector biopic.  My trial lawyers thought Phil Spector was irrelevant to the Leonard Cohen intent to annoy Stalinesque Show Trial?  Where's the motion to suppress or exclude testimony or evidence with respect to Phil Spector.  Why was Leonard Cohen testifying about Phil Spector and one of his highly embellished gun stories about Phil Spector?  Oh right - the DA's investigator was hanging out in the courtroom and lunching with Cohen.  I have no idea why Gianelli is lying about Steven Machat who can absolutely corroborate the fact that Cohen steals from his personal managers and lawyers, withholds commissions, uses corporations to evade paying taxes, the fact that I was Cohen's personal manager, etc

Steven knows he spoke to my public defender and offered to testify for me but had a conflict.  I just spoke to him about it and what prosecutor Streeter thinks is irrelevant - including the theft of Machat & Machat's share of Stranger Music, Inc. and Cohen's concealment from me of their ownership interest.  I found the evidence after Cohen and I parted ways.  I sent that evidence to Boies Schiller and Steven Machat.  My PD told me Norman Posel/formerly of Boies Schiller gave him the name of someone to contact at Boies Schiller during my trial.  I wonder what happened?  They understood this and advised me of this - Leonard Cohen and Robert Kory are attempting to engage you in criminal conduct; go wired to your meetings with them.

All the best,
Kelley    

From my comment to the LAT review of the Spector HBO movie [StephenG2010 at 6:19 AM March 22, 2013] – which criticized the reporter you don’t like (Harriet Ryan) and stated that Phil Spector did NOT receive a fair trial – you infer that I am involved in a “coordinated effort” with Harriet Ryan and prosecutor Alan Jackson that is adverse to Phil Spector?


Posted by at

Kelley's Email To Steven Machat - About Gianelli's Lies Re. My Witnesses ... Steven Machat, For Instance



From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:29 AM
Subject:
To: Steven Machat <smachat@gmail.com>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>


Steven,

This man, Stephen Gianelli, has relentlessly targeted me, my family, and others since hearing from Cohen's lawyers in 2009.  He and Michelle Blaine (a woman who was found guilty of stealing approximately $900,000 from Phil Spector) conspired to target my email accounts and blogs - addressing the factual situation with Leonard Cohen.  I have posted a public quote of his below.  He is engaged in an outrageous ad hominem attack on my character.  Why do you think he and my trial lawyer (who outrageous spoke to this man about my witnesses and what they could or could not corroborate) would lie about the fact that you were willing to fly across the country, on your own dime, and take the stand for me but then had a conflict in your schedule?  Leonard Cohen has stolen your and your father's share of intellectual property so that establishes a pattern on Cohen's part.  Cohen also withheld commissions due Machat & Machat and he has done the same to me.  In any event, you could corroborate quite a lot of things.  

For instance, you could have addressed Michelle Rice's fraudulent letter to me advising me that Cohen registered his fraudulent domestic violence order (that was originally a civil harassment order I requested and it can only be modified by the Boulder court) in California on or before February 14, 2011.  Attached to my response to Rice (which you were copied in on) was a transcript of our conversation (that you reviewed) which the prosecutor concealed.  I reviewed the PD notes in the file with you not that long ago - it states that you advised them that Cohen uses corporations to evade paying taxes.  That's correct and that's why he's in the situation he is with respect to his tax fraud.  You discussed other matters with my PD as well.  

You and I also discussed the fact that Streeter raised, on the record, a letter sent to Carter/Irving Trust that helps prove Cohen defrauded you and your father of your 15% share of intellectual property that was assigned to Stranger Music, Inc.  I think it's extremely relevant and legitimate to address the fact that Cohen concealed this fact from me (and possibly others) when he sold Stranger Music's stock to Sony/ATV.  Why did the prosecutor want to attack that, Steven?  Any thoughts?  The prosecutor views anything factual as irrelevant.  She met a celebrity, appeared intent on sabotaging me and the IRS, and she introduced Phil Spector into my intent to annoy the fraud thief known as Leonard Cohen.  She doesn't like that definition of Cohen.  But, Steven, we know this is simply truthful.  

The fact that my trial lawyer breached a/c privilege and spoke to a man aligned with Cohen is shocking.  It shocked the public defender's office.  But Gianelli - a lawyer with motive here - thinks conduct that may be illegal or criminal is perfectly acceptable.  In fact, he's trying to argue that Jane Doe is not the actual name of the individual who did not live with me and wasn't served Cohen's complaint.  I don't care what the woman's name was, Steven.  She didn't live with me and I wasn't served Cohen's complaint, the proof of service is fraudulent (I had no female co-habitant), and I wasn't served or notified of the default judgment.  Te default is void but evidence of theft and wrongfully altered my tax returns as you and I discussed.  I agree - its a very serious legal issue.  

All the best,
Kelley

3. That the PD's office called all of the potential witnesses you provided them with, and that your lawyers were unable to corroborate ANY of your claims. That is why no defense witnesses were called to the stand (except you).


Posted by at

I've Asked My Appellate Attorney To Review Gianelli's Comments Re. My Public Defender And The Lies About Agent Tejeda/IRS, Witnesses, Etc.



From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: Gianelli Is Lying About Agent Tejeda/IRS
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>


Francisco,

Would you please review Gianelli's public comments - below - re. his discussion with one of my trial lawyers.  Gianelli is lying about Agent Tejeda/IRS - who did receive a subpoena (I am in possession of that) - and what my witnesses could or could not corroborate.  Steven Machat (who Cohen has also defrauded of his and his father's 15% share of intellectual property) wanted to fly in for my trial.  He then had a conflict.  WHERE is the motion to stay or request for continuance.  Steven had a conflict in his schedule.  If the trial lawyers felt the Phil Spector testimony was irrelevant (and I thought it was psychotic) why didn't they file a motion to suppress?  Are the trial lawyers trying to blame me for their ineffective assistance of counsel?  Nikhil Ramnaney told me that the City Attorney was attempting to sabotage the IRS; the DA didn't want the Phil Spector verdict overturned; and the trial lawyers raised the issue of the Cohen/Kory conspiracy.  In any event, it is shocking that one of my trial lawyers spoke to Gianelli but Gianelli's quite blatant about this fact.  It shocked Joel Lofton at the Public Defenders office.

All the best,
Kelley


On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
To the IRS Commissioner's Staff and DOJ,

Stephen Gianelli is obsessed with me.  I am simply capturing his slanderous attacks on me and commenting on them.  This man is now lying that Agent Tejeda/IRS didn't receive a subpoena.  I am in possession of a copy of that subpoena, my attorney notes have the DOJ's phone number listed, and Agent Tejeda was contacted immediately after prosecutor Streeter handed the IRS binder over to my lawyers, although the attorney notes state that she was in possession of that since meeting with Kory two weeks earlier and just handed it over on April 9th in the middle of the trial which is outrageous conduct.  The judge wouldn't permit us to wait two hours to hear from Agent Tejeda/IRS before sending the case to trial.  It's on the record and I personally addressed that on the record as well.  Why didn't the trial lawyer file a continuance or motion to stay the proceedings?  As lawyers have asked - what was Judge Robert Vanderet's hurry?  Gianelli is lying about witnesses who could corroborate what I had to say - that would include Steven Machat who weighed in on Michelle Rice's frraudulent letter to me of February 14, 2011.  The transcript of our conversation was concealed.  In any event, what would cause Gianelli and a trial lawyer of mine to lie about Agent Tejeda and the IRS?  It seems quite unwise.  

All the best,
Kelley


6. The IRS agent you wanted to call to the stand was never personally served with a subpoena and was not even contacted until the middle of the trial. Nor did he ever agree to appear at your trial. Obviously, the IRS avoided your trial like the plague.


Whether or not Jane Doe had two black eyes is irrelevant.  The fact that I wasn’t served and the proof of service is fraudulent is the legal issue.  I had no female co-occupant and was not served Leonard Cohen’s Complaint in his wholly retaliatory and fraudulent lawsuit.  I was not served or notified of the default judgment that was entered in May 2006 when I was homeless.  Therefore, the judgment (complete with fraudulent expense ledger which is positively outrageous and in no way resembles an accounting - that lists assets, liabilities, equity, corporate ownership interests - and meaningless numbers with no backup documentation together with suspect non-audited statements provided by Cohen’s investor who has now been sued by the SEC and defrauded many people of their retirement accounts) is VOID.  LA Superior Court has a serious problem with their fraudulent proof of service scam and that also extends to Cohen’s so-called domestic violence order (when we were not in a dating or intimate relationship) that I was not served or notified of.  Apparently, LA Superior Court has a pattern of this type of scandalous activity.

Blogonaut said...
Oh, and Kelley, when a legal document refers to "Jane Doe", it does not mean that her name is literally Jane or Ms. doe.

And when a proof of service describes "black eyes" the process server did not mean to say the female handed the papers had "one or more" shiners.

Good Lord, how obtuse.
March 22, 2013 at 9:11 PM Blogonaut said...
March 22, 2013 at 9:11 PM Blogonaut said...
As anyone who has watched Law and Order or CSI knows, "Jane Doe" refers to a female whose identity is unknown.

March 23, 2013 at 3:23 AM

Obsessed stalker and a man engaged in an ongoing ad hominem attack on my character continues to think he is actually writing to me.  I  have been clear and I have studied this matter:  Stephen Gianelli (aligned with a woman who stole $900,000 from Phil Spector - together they conspired to target my emails and blogs in an attempt to silence me) sets up reasonable doubt theories about Phil Spector.  The cyber-terrorists, in a highly coordinated fashion, then descend and rip apart the theories by further slandering and trashing Phil Spector.  It’s the tactic de jour with respect to high profile legal cases.  Anyone who understands social media and bullying should be able to see right through these tactics.  

Blogonaut said...
Kelley Lynch,

From my comment to the LAT review of the Spector HBO movie [StephenG2010 at 6:19 AM March 22, 2013] – which criticized the reporter you don’t like (Harriet Ryan) and stated that Phil Spector did NOT receive a fair trial – you infer that I am involved in a “coordinated effort” with Harriet Ryan and prosecutor Alan Jackson that is adverse to Phil Spector?

You are one sick lady.

Gianelli, a man who has relentlessly targeted me and my family, friends, and others, is a dangerously unstable man.  I have been clear with the IRS and FBI - this man needs to be investigated for criminal witness tampering, criminal witness intimidation, stalking, harassment, etc.  The USPS Inspector in the Bay Area advised me that they opened a criminal investigation into certain U.S. mail activity with respect to Gianelli and his targeting of me via an individual in Ft. Lauderdale.  Leonard Cohen also has a serious USPS Inspector matter.  He illegally attempted to change my mailing address on my personal/management company mail.  I filed a complaint with the USPS at the time and that is further evidence of criminal conduct.  

From Kelley Lynch’s blog last night:

FRIDAY, MARCH 22, 2013
The Usual Suspects On Phil Spector - The LA Times, Harriet Ryan, Sprocket, Stephen Gianelli ... It's A Coordinated Effort And Has Been Throughout The Trials ... It's Unfortunate Ron Burkle Wasn't Able To Buy The LA Times - Perhaps Some Of The Corruption In Los Angeles Would Be More Transparent

POINTING PEOPLE TO SPROCKET'S BLOG. SPROCKET IS NOW EVIDENTLY A FRIEND OF LA SUPERIOR COURT'S DARK SHADOWS SOAP OPERA SYSTEM

lynda360 at 3:12 PM March 22, 2013
For those without a specific agenda and for those with an genuine interest in knowing more about the trial, including documents involved, etc., I strongly recommend checking out Trials & Tribulations, a great blog but entertaining as well as informative.
Here's the link to the Spector case:
And 'Sprocket' didn't just cover this case, she's covered and continues to cover other cases from a personal but factual approach.

IS THIS MY STALKER, STEPHEN GIANELLI, SETTING UP REASONABLE DOUBT THEORIES ABOUT PHIL SPECTOR THAT CAN THEN BE ATTACKED AND REFUTED? I'DBET THE FARM THAT IT IS AND I SEE RIGHT THROUGH STEPHEN GIANELLI WHO WAS MOST DEFINITELY CONSPIRING WITH MICHELLE BLAINE ABOUT ME AND TARGETING MY BLOGS AND EMAIL ACCOUNTS. THAT'S WHEN I REALIZED - PERHAPS ALAN JACKSON IS SOMEHOW CONNECTED TO STEPHEN GIANELLI ...

StephenG2010 at 6:19 AM March 22, 2013
Harriet,
By questioning the accuracy of the verdicts in the Jackson and Blake trials, you do more undermine confidence in the jury system than a hollywood movie ever could.
Some of us believe that Phillip Spector - guilty or innocent - did not receive a fair trial. No trial movie can be 100% accurate in detail (trials are essentially tedious affairs and there were no cameras in Spector's mansion), but at their best they caputure the essence.
I'll reserve judgment until I have seen the film.

March 23, 2013 at 3:35 AM Blogonaut said...

REDACTED.  Addressed.  Doron Weinberg might want to rethink his position on Stephen Gianelli.  Other people have come to the conclusion that Gianelli is a psychopath and sick and vile man.  Perhaps Doron Weinberg should ponder this question:  Why did Investigator Frayeh/DA’s office advise Kelley Lynch that he felt Gianelli was a shady character who may have found a sympathetic ear with Spector prosecutor Alan Jackson about Kelley Lynch?  Doron Weinberg might also want to contemplate this - why did Michelle Blaine (who stole $900,000 from Phil Spector) conspire with Stephen Gianelli/Blogonaut to target Kelley Lynch’s email accounts and blogs that defended Phil Spector and truthfully addressed the facts about Leonard Cohen.  Perhaps Doron Weinberg understands the three versions of Leonard Cohen’s gun stories re. Phil Spector before LA Superior Court - well, the prosecutor in my insane intent to annoy trial does continue to conceal one that I have in my possession.  I would assume Doron Weinberg can read the Grand Jury transcripts that Mick Brown/UK Telegraph reviewed and can read the statements of Cohen’s that Phillip’s prosecutors used against Phil Spector - also in motions available online (LA Superior Court).  If Doron Weinberg can read them, he will see that Phil Spector’s prosecutors used a version of the Cohen highly embellished Phil Spector gun stories where a semi-automatic gun is pointed at the chest and yet in my trial Cohen testified that an automatic was pointed at his head.  

Beyond that - WOW!  Doron Weinberg wrote Stephen Gianelli.  I wrote Phil Spector about Stephen Gianelli.  I can assure you Phil Spector sees right through a man who conspired with Michelle Blaine to target my email accounts and blogs - including kelleylynchandphilspector.blogspot.,com.  

In fact, Phil Spector’s trial lawyer Doran Weinberg – who shares office space with Dennis Riordan in San Francisco, wrote me at the conclusion of the retrial to thank me for the counter-balancing coverage of the retrial on Blogonaut.
March 23, 2013 at 3:56 AM

Blogonaut said...
Oh, and Ms. Lynch, one of your FORMER public defenders told me the following:

The fact that Gianelli/Blogonaut talked to one of my trial lawyers is outrageous and shocked the public defender’s office.  I would assume this is highly illegal but Gianelli/Blogonaut is bragging about it.  

1. That you were in complete denial about your mental health issues and the legal issues in your harassment trial, which were limited to was there a restraining order and did you violate it (his or her words not mine).

The public defender is a bald-faced liar and he might want to speak to my appellate attorney about his work which is shabby, misstates facts and evidence, etc.  In have no mental health problems but I think the trial lawyer that spoke to Gianelli has some legal problems.  

2. You refused to waive time for trial, yet wanted to litigate issues in your trial going back years.

I see the fact that the PD did not tell me about the plea deal is a motivating factor.  I never said I wanted to litigate issues going back years.  The trial judge permitted the admittance of this deranged evidence.  Where’s the motion to exclude the irrelevant and wholly immaterial evidence?  I did refuse to waive time for the trial.  That’s my legal right.  I still was not informed of a plea deal and this sentence doesn’t explain the ineffective assistance of counsel issues.  My trial lawyer was unable to figure out what LA Superior Court advised me - that a civil harassment order I requested in Colorado cannot be registered as a domestic violence order in California?  Where’s the collateral attack on the California order that I wasn’t served or notified of?

3. That the PD's office called all of the potential witnesses you provided them with, and that your lawyers were unable to corroborate ANY of your claims. That is why no defense witnesses were called to the stand (except you).

I see the PD thinks he can lie about Steven Machat who wanted to fly across the country, at his own expense, to testify on my behalf but had a conflict in his schedule.  Why didn’t the trial lawyer ask for a continuance or stay or proceedings over this - or, at the very least, ask for a declaration from Machat?  Why didn’t they contact Doug Davis/FTB for a declaration?  Agent Kelly Sopko?  Why didn’t they follow up with the individual at Boies Schiller - they were given a name of someone to speak with at BS who understood this - Leonard Cohen and Robert Kory were asking Kelley Lynch to engage in criminal conduct.  Why didn’t they contact Greenberg’s lawyer who wrote me (and I forwarded this to the IRS and FBI, etc .) that they have evidence of witness tampering with respect to Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, and others.  And it goes on and on.  Rutger wanted to take the stand.  The judge refused to permit it although it wasn’t over SWAT.  It was to impeach Cohen re. his deranged testimony about Rutger’s Whole Foods matter which horrifies decent people.  The judge refused to wait two hours for us to hear from Agent Tejeda/IRS before sending the case to the jurors.  As lawyers are now asking me (including Steven Machat) - what was his hurry?  Plenty of people corroborate what I have to say and I just spoke to my former lawyer (Dianne DiMascio) about what Kory testified to with respect to her and her husband.  

4. Your lawyers recognized that your conspiracy theories were utter nonsense but elected to manage you by "indulging" you in conversation on these issues, that is "humoring" you and not disagreeing with your wacky views.

I didn’t  have any conspiracy theories.  See attorney notes in my file.  They obtained the Neal Greenberg legal documents and raised the conspiracy with respect to Cohen and Kory.  The lawyers never met with me to discuss this case.  The bailiff repeatedly pointed this out to me.  Perhaps that’s why at least one of them is lying now.  

5. Your defense team never believed that any statements Leonard Cohen made about Phil Spector in the past or that the Phil Spector case was in any way relevant to your prosecution for harassing Cohen.

I can’t understand the English language here but it’s bizarre that my trial lawyers wouldn’t have addressed - in a motion - the fact that Streeter concealed an email sent to them (which they showed me) with respect to Cohen’s gun story about Phil Spector.  It impeaches his testimony.  Well, if my lawyers didn’t believe this - where’s the motion to suppress or exclude this testimony?  Streeter entered this evidence into the record.  Cohen testified about it.  I couldn’t even imagine why this was permitted.  My trial lawyer told me - the DA does not want the Phil Spector verdict overturned and the City Attorney is attempting to sabotage the IRS and you.  Therefore, Gianelli must have spoken to Mike Kelly.  

6. The IRS agent you wanted to call to the stand was never personally served with a subpoena and was not even contacted until the middle of the trial. Nor did he ever agree to appear at your trial. Obviously, the IRS avoided your trial like the plague.

Agent Tejeda/IRS was indeed served the subpoena.  He and one of my trial lawyers spoke.  Agent Tejeda was served the subpoena IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING the prosecutor’s handing over the IRS binder to my lawyers.  I Ithink Agent Tejeda/IRS will be aware that this is a bald-faced lie by a man who transmits fraud to the IRS about me.  The IRS didn’t avoid my trial and, in fact, Agent Tejeda advised my lawyer to call him back if he could be of further assistance in a future proceeding.  The judge refused to wait two hours for Agent Tejeda to speak to IRS lawyers about what he was permitted to testify to - see the trial record.  

March 23, 2013 at 4:25 AM Blogonaut said...
Why would one of your FORMER public defenders call me, one might ask (and he or she phoned me, not the reverse)?
Because, Ms. Lynch, the day you were released from jail in September of 2012 and while I was in Europe, you lit up my Blackberry with emails, many CCing me with your attorney-client communications with your public defenders. (There were six such initial emails sent that day.)

What rotten logic and the fact that I have spoken publicly about certain matters does not entitle a trial lawyer of mine to violate attorney/client privilege.  The mere notion is outrageous.  In any event, this conduct SHOCKED the public defenders office.  

I emailed you back – cc to your defenders – suggesting that it was not in your interest to do this, that you were waiving the attorney-client privilege. Your defenders specifically cautioned you to NOT continue to waive the attorney client privilege in this manner.

My trial lawyer wrote and asked me to advise him if anyone asked to be removed from my emails.  Neither Doug Davis/FTB or Captain Bornman/LASD made that request.  I wrote Gianelli, relentlessly, advising him to cease and desist.  What’s his explanation for targeting my appellate attorney who is privately discussing Gianelli and his conduct with me and has not communicated with this stark raving lunatic?  REDACTED THE BALANCE OF THIS PSYCHOTIC RANT.  How do you know a lawyer’s lying?  Their lips or fingers are moving.  See Stephen Gianelli.  

March 23, 2013 at 5:06 AM Blogonaut said...

REDACTED.  I am capturing the articles and posts on Gianelli’s blogs.  They are evidence from my perpsective and I have been addressing my views on them with the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and Phil Spector’s appellate attorney, Dennis Riordan.


Posted by at
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)