Having now reviewed the thousands of words Kelley Lynch has written on her blog about her 2012 criminal harassment trial it is now apparent to me why Kelley Lynch wants to abandon her appeal:
Somehow I doubt that.
An appeal will result in an objective, up or down decision by a three judge panel on the merits of her legal claims and defenses, and (frankly) she knows the decision will not be in her favor.
I see no merit in prosecutorial misconduct, exculpatory evidence, perjury, etc. It is entirely possible that the Appellate Division's definition of MERIT differs from that of the Lord Buddha's but that's their rotten karma. I could care less about their decision. This is like a running lawyer joke now.
Instead, she prefers to litigate her preposterous assertions – such as her claim that variations in Leonard Cohen’s Phil Spector “gun stories” undermine her conviction – on her blog and (ridiculously) in her incessant daily emails to the IRS and Washington Bureau of the FBI for years to come.
I've just emailed the Daily Beast evidence of Cohen's various gun stories before LA Superior Court. I don't know if they undermine my conviction but LA Confidential might want to give it some thought. Gianelli is focused on the IRS and Washington Bureau of the FBI? Well, I've been clear - this man should be arrested for criminal witness tampering, criminal witness intimidation, stalking, harassment, etc. Are my emails actually incessant or merely documenting the destruction of my life since reporting Leonard Cohen's criminal tax fraud to the IRS on April 15, 2005, after which is retaliated? How does he reconcile his offer of 50% community property? Maybe the dog ate his tax payment.
But her bid for an 11th hour dismissal of HER OWN criminal appeal has been DENIED and there will be an up or down vote on the merits of her preposterous claims and defenses.
Who cares. A bunch of ordinary people weighing in on prosecutorial misconduct? The mere notion is absurd. These people do NOTHING about this conduct and that's why prosecutorial misconduct is rampant and out of control This is a federal IRS tax matter. The City Attorney attempted to sabotage the IRS. If this court doesn't understand that you need to be served or notified, they need to resign. The taxpayers don't have the money for this type of insanity.
The reality of why Kelley Lynch was prosecuted and why she was convicted have NOTHING to do with “gun stories” or Phil Spector’s murder trial and everything to do with violating a Protective Order issued at a 2009 hearing she attended, after being warned on the record at that proceeding that if she violated that order she could be sentenced to 18-months in jail. She did and she was. End of story.
Sure. The DA simply had his investigator in the courtroom hanging out with and lunching with Cohen while he testified about Phil Spector for no reason, right? Warned by a fraudulent letter from Cohen's lying lawyer fraudulently advising me in February 2011 that the order was registered in California when it wasn't? Only LA Confidential could believe they have jurisdiction over me without a proof of service, notice,etc. That's their scam. Not mine.
“Who cares if I read in the news media about a lawsuit and Edelman's quote?”
The point is this: Most innocent people, even if they were not properly served with a $7.9M embezzlement suit, would rush to court to learn the details of the resulting default judgment and would then ask the court to set the default aside.
I'm not most innocent people and that's not an argument. Actually, the court can eat the default judgment for all I care. I have HAD IT with LA Confidential.
Edelman was quoted an a NYT article published in 2007; Lynch was contacted for comment about the default judgment and quoted in the same article as stating that she was “waiting to hear from Bruce Cutler” before you responded to the judgment, so clearly she knew about the suit and the default judgment NO LATER than 2007. Yet to this day she has not filed a motion to set the default judgment aside based on the claim that the “proof of service was forged” and that she was never served.
Edelman wasn't quoted about Bruce Cutler. Here's an argument - WHO would hire Gianelli? Well, lawyers are calling him an idiot - vicious but an idiot.
At the same time she has literally devoted hundreds of hours and tens of thousands of words in emails to the IRS and in blog posts since 2008 denouncing the $7.9M judgment as a “fraud”, far less than the time it would have taken Lynch to have filed a simple motion to set aside the judgment for lack of service. IF that claim was true.
I suppose it's my obligation to prove an IRS tax fraud matter. Last I heard, I was the IRS Commissioner,no?
Given all the lies Lynch has told over the last three years as well as the irrefutable evidence of her theft from Leonard Cohen attached to the Prins Declaration, as well as Lynch’s failure for the last six years to move the set the default judgment aside, we’ll go with the veracity of the process server.
There's no irrefutable evidence. There's one version of events and concealed corporate documents, etc. The Alter Ego/Ego Maniac is really out on a limb here but he's worried about his reputation and not reality. There was no female co-occupant with two black eyes so the process server's a liar.
An appeal will result in an objective, up or down decision by a three judge panel on the merits of her legal claims and defenses, and (frankly) she knows the decision will not be in her favor.
Instead, she prefers to litigate her preposterous assertions – such as her claim that variations in Leonard Cohen’s Phil Spector “gun stories” undermine her conviction – on her blog and (ridiculously) in her incessant daily emails to the IRS and Washington Bureau of the FBI for years to come.
But her bid for an 11th hour dismissal of HER OWN criminal appeal has been DENIED and there will be an up or down vote on the merits of her preposterous claims and defenses.
The reality of why Kelley Lynch was prosecuted and why she was convicted have NOTHING to do with “gun stories” or Phil Spector’s murder trial and everything to do with violating a Protective Order issued at a 2009 hearing she attended, after being warned on the record at that proceeding that if she violated that order she could be sentenced to 18-months in jail. She did and she was. End of story.
“Who cares if I read in the news media about a lawsuit and Edelman's quote?”
The point is this: Most innocent people, even if they were not properly served with a $7.9M embezzlement suit, would rush to court to learn the details of the resulting default judgment and would then ask the court to set the default aside.
Edelman was quoted an a NYT article published in 2007; Lynch was contacted for comment about the default judgment and quoted in the same article as stating that she was “waiting to hear from Bruce Cutler” before you responded to the judgment, so clearly she knew about the suit and the default judgment NO LATER than 2007.
Yet to this day she has not filed a motion to set the default judgment aside based on the claim that the “proof of service was forged” and that she was never served.
At the same time she has literally devoted hundreds of hours and tens of thousands of words in emails to the IRS and in blog posts since 2008 denouncing the $7.9M judgment as a “fraud”, far less than the time it would have taken Lynch to have filed a simple motion to set aside the judgment for lack of service. IF that claim was true.
Given all the lies Lynch has told over the last three years as well as the irrefutable evidence of her theft from Leonard Cohen attached to the Prins Declaration, as well as Lynch’s failure for the last six years to move the set the default judgment aside, we’ll go with the veracity of the process server.