From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:27 PM
Subject: Gianelli Moves Onto The Proof Of Service Re. Cohen's Complaint I Wasn't Served
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>
Hello,
Gianelli must have a lot of time on his hands to spend on his obsession - me. For the record, I didn't live with anyone called Jane Doe. I had no female co-occupant, ever. Jane Do or Jihad Jane. It doesn't matter what name you want to make up - I had NO FEMALE CO-OCCUPANT. The proof of service is perjured. I've reviewed it with attorneys and a bounty hunter also weighed in and noted that an actual name was needed.
Blogonaut said...
Blogonaut said...
Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:27 PM
Subject: Gianelli Moves Onto The Proof Of Service Re. Cohen's Complaint I Wasn't Served
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>
Hello,
Gianelli must have a lot of time on his hands to spend on his obsession - me. For the record, I didn't live with anyone called Jane Doe. I had no female co-occupant, ever. Jane Do or Jihad Jane. It doesn't matter what name you want to make up - I had NO FEMALE CO-OCCUPANT. The proof of service is perjured. I've reviewed it with attorneys and a bounty hunter also weighed in and noted that an actual name was needed.
I don't care if she had one or two black eyes. I didn't have a female co-occcupant. I wasn't served the complaint. I wasn't served or notified of the default judgment in May 2006. The judgment is VOID.
All the best,
Kelley
Blogonaut said...
Oh, and Kelley, when a legal document refers to "Jane Doe", it does not mean that her name is literally Jane or Ms. doe.
And when a proof of service describes "black eyes" the process server did not mean to say the female handed the papers had "one or more" shiners.
Good Lord, how obtuse.
And when a proof of service describes "black eyes" the process server did not mean to say the female handed the papers had "one or more" shiners.
Good Lord, how obtuse.
March 22, 2013 at 9:11 PM
Blogonaut said...
March 22, 2013 at 9:11 PM
