My meetings with Kory - including with Ray present - were well documented for Boies Schiller at the time. Kory is a liar with motive. These people don’t care if they lie to the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, Phil Spector’s attorneys, on the witness stand, to the news media … I have never seen such liars in my entire life.
CONSPIRACY
Michelle Rice Direct:
Public Defender: But isn’t it also true that in that allegation of that lawsuit was that Ms. Lynch, Mr. Cohen and Mr. Kory were also engaged in civil extortion and fraud against the plaintiff in that case, Mr. Greenberg.
Rice: That is what they can state in the complaint. But, as you know, you can make any kind of allegations in a complaint. RT 358
Public Defender: And they named Ms. Lynch as one of the conspirators in that civil conspiracy; is that also correct?
Rice: I don’t believe Ms. Lynch was named as a coconspirator. RT 358
Robert Kory Cross:
Public Defender: Isn’t it true that at some point in 2004 or 2005 you approached my client, Ms. Lynch, and you asked her to participate in a conspiracy to extort money from Mr. Cohen’s former financial adviser, Mr. Greenberg?
Kory: Absolutely not.
PD: So, Ms. Lynch never refused to engage in any plan to extort money from Mr. Greenberg for millions of dollars with you, that never happened?
Streeter: Objection; assumes facts not in evidence.
Court: Sustained. RT 400
PD: Even though you just said that there was no plan to extort money from Mr. Greenberg, there was a lawsuit against you in the State of Colorado, and you were named as defendant, where you were accused of engaging in civil conspiracy, extortion, outrageous conduct and defamation against Mr. Greenberg; isn’t that true?
Kory: That lawsuit was dismissed as an illegal lawsuit before it even got started against me. RT 403
PD: You were actually dismissed in that lawsuit because the Colorado court ordered that it didn’t have any personal jurisdiction over you pursuant to rule 12(b)12 of the Federal Laws of Civil Procedure? RT 406 Let me rephrase, Mr. Kory, there was no order of dismissal based on the actual merits of the Colorado lawsuit against you, was there?
Kory: … To the extent that claims against Mr. Cohen as a conspirator were dismissed, claims against me were dismissed. Because you cannot have a conspiracy alone. You have to have two people in a conspiracy.
PD: … But that order that I showed you, Mr. Kory, dismissed you from the lawsuit not based on any merits of the case but because the court ruled it didn’t have any personal jurisdiction over you; is that right? RT 407
Kelley Lynch Cross:
Streeter: Now, your position is, if the people understand you correctly, that the meeting that Mr. Kory had with you was because Mr. Cohen was doing something illegal, right?
Lynch. No … No, that is not why we met. Is that what you’re asking? RT 490
Streeter; BYes.
Lynch: That is not why I felt we were meeting … we were trying to work out some of the problems between me and Mr. Cohen when I was no longer represented.
Streeter: But during the course of that meeting, if the people understand you correctly, Mr. Kory intimated to you that there was a lot of illegality going on with the tax information that had been filed on Mr. Cohen’s behalf, correct?
Lynch: We didn’t talk about the tax information that was filed. What Mr. Kory told me is that there was tax fraud on all entities. Specifically, Blue Mist Touring, LC Investments, and Traditional Holdings. That Leonard Cohen’s advisors created this, that I had a cause of action against every one of his advisors, and in particular they felt that Neal Greenberg and Richard Westin were to blame and had defrauded Leonard Cohen.
Streeter: And there was no mention that you had defrauded him, right?
Lynch: No, there was mention that I was used as a pawn. RT 491
Defense Closing:
[Robert Kory] On the stand his demeanor was condescending, argumentative. We asked him questions about a lawsuit in which he was named a defendant for civil extortion, conspiracy, outrageous conduct and defamation. But he didn’t even want to admit that he had been sued over what my client said happened by a third party. … And when I was asking him questions, what was his demeanor? Even simple questions. I want you to think about it. RT 588
Leonard Cohen owes TH millions of dollars. He has to repay those loans plus 6% interest. I have no idea what bank account Streeter is referring to. If he deposited his loans and interest into this account, there would be millions. A juror relied on Streeter’s fraudulent and false accusations. Cohen himself testified that he bought homes for his girlfriend and son with these assets. The woman doesn’t know what the words assets means? Then why is she representing the people? Who wants to pay for incompetence or perhaps she is merely lying. Leonard Cohen concealed all corporate books, records, stock certificates, notarized documents, memoranda, my indemnity agreement, etc. from LA Superior Court. I have given that evidence to the IRS and others. He has taken the position that he is the alter-ego who has engaged in self-dealing. TH and BMT were not held in trust for Cohen and no trust exists. Cohen simply lied.
TRADITIONAL HOLDINGS ASSETS - COHEN/ALTER EGO - SELF DEALING
Kelley Lynch Cross:
Streeter: At the point that you quit Mr. Cohen’s employ, there was only a hundred thousand dollars left in that account?
Lynch: I don’’t know about that. There were loans from Mr. Cohen that were not repaid. So there would need to be an accounting to determine what was left.
Streeter: There wasn’t millions in there?
Lynch: There were assets, okay?
Streeter: In the bank account?
Lynch: There were assets … that was one asset, the bank account, $150,000. There were other assets.
Streeter: But that bank account had only $150,000?
Lynch: Right, and there were other assets. RT 494 There were millions in other assets.
Streeter: And you had access to that bank account?
Lynch: No, I did not have access. Neal Greenberg was his financial adviser. I had no access. RT 495
Kelley Lynch Redirect:
Public Defender: And asked you questions about money that was not in his account.
Lynch: I don’t believe there wasn’t any money in his account. I don’t know what that means. RT 526
DEFENSE CLOSING:
Ms. Lynch has been requesting documents related to accusations made against her for over six years. Her wages have been garnished by the state tax authorities and she’s desperate to get these critical documents to clear her name and to move on with her life. She’s not represented by any attorneys in her civil matters. She represents herself. She’s trying to clear her name. RT 597 Nobody comes up and shows you a letter or a document or a receipt showing we turned these documents over to her … Nobody said that. Why not? Because it didn’t happen … They never gave her what she asked for. And they kept stone walling her and stone walling her. RT 597
The prosecution failed to impeach her on anything she said. They brought not one witness, not one document, nothing to impeach her story. Why not? Because it’s true. RT 598 I don’t believe Ms. Lynch -- or the evidence shows that Ms. Lynch intended to annoy or harass anybody. RT 598
