Public Interest, Public Figures, First Amendment, and some celebrity gossip - because, why not?
Monday, March 18, 2013
Stephen Gianelli Is Out Of His Mind - The Proof Of Service Re. Leonard Cohen's Retaliatory Lawsuit Is PERJURED - I Had No Female Co-Habitant With Two Black Eyes
KELLEY LYNCH TODAY: “I was not served the complaint in Leonard Cohen’s retaliatory lawsuit. The proof of service is perjured. I had no female co-occupant named Jane Doe. I was not served or notified of the default judgment.
I was homeless in Santa Monica and Cohen was well aware of this.”
Actually, Ms. Lynch, Cohen’s civil suit was served on August 25, 2005, see here:
Stephen Gianelli, who has relentlessly targeted me and lied about me to the IRS, FBI, and others, is now attempting to obfuscate issues. I didn't say I wasn't served Cohen's WHEN I was homeless. I said the proof of service is perjured. I had no female co-occupant. No Jane Doe lived with me - with or without two black eyes. I was NOT served the default judgment in 2006 when I was homeless in Santa Monica. I was NOT notified of the default and the news media published many articles and accounts noting that the default had been entered in March 2006 which turned out to be false. Gianelli continues to argue on behalf of Leonard Cohen. This is how Leonard Cohen operates - hiding behind people who are targeting me. And yet, the man is concerned about his reputation? How about his conduct? Lying about me, targeting my children and elderly parents, stealing from me and Steven and Marty Machat, selling Phil Spector's masters (per Steven Machat) to Sony, perjuring himself in court and confessing to it - then glorifying the judge who permitted him to get away with outrageous conduct. And that's before anyone addresses the prosecutor's misconduct which now involves an attempt to retaliate against me over my appeal. Maybe Carmen Trutanich should investigate her rather than wasting more taxpayer dollars while I attempt to abandon this God forsaken insanity. Perhaps he doesn't like it that my lawyer and I advised the appellate division that his office threatened me for contacting Streeter's supervisor to complain about her conduct. What did LA Superior Court just tell me to do? Contact the City Attorney's office to file a complaint about Streeter's conduct. It's like dealing with the criminally insane. Literally.
In contrast, the LA Superior Court docket entries for the action to evict you from your foreclosed home – that precipitated you becoming homeless – 6 Angles LLC vs. Kelley Lynch, establishes that the complaint in unlawful detainer was not even FILED until October 27, 2005, and that a Writ of Possession was not issued to the Sherriff to evict you until November 22, 2005.
I cannot imagine who would hire Stephen Gianelli to represent them. The proof of service re. Cohen's complaint is PERJURED.
Second, if you truly were not served with the suit, it would have been an easy matter to apply to the court for an order setting the default aside. But you have not done that, EVEN AFTER ALL THESE YEARS. Most people with a bogus $7.9M embezzlement judgment against them and who were never served would do that as soon as possible.
Gianelli publicly threatened me when I made it clear in 2010 that I intended to file a Motion to Vacate. He started contacting law enforcement with respect to unverified warrants, many of which did NOT relate to me. Unfortunately, the City Attorney lied about these at my arraignment hearing. The judgment is fraudulent, evidence of theft and concealment, and based on fraud, perjury, concealment, and lies. Leonard Cohen is aware of the corporate books, records, stock certificates, non-revocable assignments re. my ownership interest in all his intellectual property, etc. He simply decided to declare that he is the sole beneficial owner of two corporate entities, concealed my ownership interest, and lied to LA Superior Court that these were held in trust for him. Where is the trust document? LA Superior Court is uninterested in evidence. Lies, perjury, fraud, and concealment are absolutely accepted as a substitute form of evidence. Hearsay has now replaced corporate books and records.
Third, as soon as you were served with Cohen’s lawsuit, you started calling the attorney for Cohen listed on the Complaint leaving intoxicated and abusive voice messages on his office phone. You would not have even known Scot Edelman’s name (let alone his phone number) had you not read it off the Complaint.
Edelman refused to speak to me although he did call me, just before my outrageous arrest, to advise me that he no longer represents Cohen. He also told me, previously, that what happened to me is unfortunate and was not personal. It was personal to my children and elderly parents. I advised Edelman that I wasn't served the complaint. Who cares if I read in the news media about a lawsuit and Edelman's quote? That doesn't replace due process, regardless of what LA Superior Court thinks. I wasn't able to read the documents untli Gianelli posted them online in April 20, 2010. I spoke to Judge Freeman's court reporter at the time, advised her I planned to file a Motion to Vacate, and she told me there was a second lawsuit that I have no details about but which may relate to an illegal seizure of partnership documents, etc. Leonard Cohen couldn't be bothered to arrange to pick up the boxes of documents I stored for him as a courtesy for years. He simply lied to LA Superior Court. The man is pathetic but now worries about his reputation. He shouldn't perjure himself and lie through his teeth if he's that concerned.
Nice try, no cigar.
What a lunatic.
cc: IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and Dennis Riordan
Actually, Ms. Lynch, Cohen’s civil suit was served on August 25, 2005, see here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29620753/Cohen-vs-Kelley-Lynch-Proof-of-Service-Complaint
In contrast, the LA Superior Court docket entries for the action to evict you from your foreclosed home – that precipitated you becoming homeless – 6 Angles LLC vs. Kelley Lynch, establishes that the complaint in unlawful detainer was not even FILED until October 27, 2005, and that a Writ of Possession was not issued to the Sherriff to evict you until November 22, 2005.
See here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/111580644/6-Angles-Llc-vs-Kelley-Lynch-Court-Docket-for-Eviction-Action-Los-Angeles-Superior-Court-No-05x00965
Second, if you truly were not served with the suit, it would have been an easy matter to apply to the court for an order setting the default aside. But you have not done that, EVEN AFTER ALL THESE YEARS. Most people with a bogus $7.9M embezzlement judgment against them and who were never served would do that as soon as possible.
Third, as soon as you were served with Cohen’s lawsuit, you started calling the attorney for Cohen listed on the Complaint leaving intoxicated and abusive voice messages on his office phone. You would not have even known Scot Edelman’s name (let alone his phone number) had you not read it off the Complaint.
Nice try, no cigar.