Kelley Lynch vs. LA Confidential And Their Celebrity Love Affair With Leonard Cohen

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:25 AM
Subject:
To: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>

Francisco,

Here are Gianelli's comments.  This man, who is dangerously unstable from my perspective, actually writes 

online as if he is communicating with me.  The man has terrorized my family, targeted me since 2009, and is 

calling me "Kell."  This is a very sick individual.  I can assure you that this court is not protecting me.  I want 

to appeal this to the California Supreme Court if necessary.  This prosecutor lied through her teeth, elicited

perjured and false testimony, appeared to be in a legal conspiracy with the Los Angeles District Attorney 

about Phil Spector, concealed evidence, attempted to sabotage the IRS and my future litigation matters, and

the judge permitted Cohen to confess to his perjury and did absolutely nothing.  He sustained an objection 

about this man raising his hand, taking an oath, and lying on the stand.  And that's not the only lie - Streeter

is in possession of an email from Cohen that proves his testimony about Phil Spector was contradicted by 

what he wrote the prosecutor just days beforehand.   Please think through the Writ you mentioned.  No, I'm 

not afraid I'll lose.  I just cannot deal with these lies and these liars any longer.  You and my sister's attorney 

agree - Gianelli is an idiot but he is vicious and may have found a sympathetic ear with Spector prosecutor 

Alan Jackson.  He is definitely aligned with Cohen and seems to be covering for Streeter.  The man is a lunatic.  

His M.O.  He attempts to infiltrate and sabotage matters.  I have seen it time and time again.  He's aligned with 

a woman who stole nearly $1 million from Phil Spector.  They targeted my blogs and email accounts together.  

She publicly thanked him.   I have nothing to lose here.  This is an insane misdemeanor matter that people 

view as an outrageous waste of taxpayer dollars.  Leonard Cohen has defrauded the U.S. and state governments 

of millions of dollars.  I have provided the IRS with an abundance of evidence.  This trial was about the IRS and 

Cohen and involves Phil Spector's insanity.  The DA's investigator just happened to be hanging out with Cohen 

and lunching with him, right Francisco?  That's called a legal conspiracy.  I suppose Streeter didn't like the notion 

that she engaged in criminal obstruction of justice.  I continue to feel as though I am dealing with the criminally 

insane.  

I am working on listing all the prosecutorial misconduct, lies, concealment, and the perjured testimony she elicited.  The appellate division can have this lunatic.  They all deserve each other.  It's like watching porn.

All the best,

Kelley

Blogonaut said...

Lynch speaks: “The Appellate Court's Decision [to deny her request to dismiss her appeal] Will Be Appealed”.

Just a few problems with that plan, Kell . . .

First, there is no appeal from the decision of the Superior Court Appellate Department decision in a limited jurisdiction (misdemeanor) case unless the Appellate Department “certifies” the case for appeal to the California Court of Appeal.

Essentially, you need the Appellate Department’s permission to appeal further.

Second, this decision only denies your request to DISMISS the appeal, which will now be heard on the merits of the issues raised in your Opening Brief. Therefore, you are not being prejudiced in any way. In fact, your pleading implied that you are being coerced into dismissing the appeal, so the Court is PROTECTING you from prejudice! You cannot fault them for that!

Third, California Rules of Court, rule 8.55 (b) (3) provides that “If the record has been filed in the appellate division, the appellate division MAY dismiss the appeal . . ."

Here, not only has the record on appeal been filed (at taxpayer expense), but the Appellant’s Opening Brief and the prosecution’s opposition brief (an 80 hour job) have also been filed at taxpayer expense! Therefore, the Appellate Department is well within its discretion to REFUSE to dismiss this appeal, ESPECIALLY where Kelley Lynch is claiming that she is requesting the dismissal because of prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter’s (unspecified) “retaliation during the appeal”. In other words, the Court of Appeal would not disturb this discretionary ruling on a procedural matter.

Fourth, this is NOT AN APPEALABLE ORDER! To overturn it you would need to file an extraordinary writ with the Court of Appeal and demonstrate irreparable injury. But all they are doing is allowing your appeal to be heard as you originally requested, so where is the injury, Kelley?

And why, Kelley, are you so afraid that the Appellate Department will address your claims on appeal?

Could it be that you know that you are going to LOSE?

March 14, 2013 at 9:39 AM