Wednesday, April 17, 2013

A Liar With Motive Is Criminally Harassing Me While Impersonating A Dog - His Interest In My Appeal, Writ, Oral Arguments, Etc. Shocks The Conscience - Naturally He's Aligned With Leonard Cohen & Felt Comfortable Criminally Harassing Me With Prosecutor Streeter Copied In

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:38 PM
Subject: Fwd: Criminal harassment is the behavior YOU did time for
To: Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, rbyucaipa <>, Robert MacMillan <>, moseszzz <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, "Hoffman, Rand" <>, Mick Brown <>, woodwardb <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>

To the FBI,

My God, this man is INSANE.  Francisco Suarez and I have discussed what he intends to do and it it not limited to editing my Writ.  However, this man knows I am represented and he continues to criminally harass me while impersonating a dog.  Leonard Cohen did NOT terminate me.  He heard I was reporting his tax fraud to the IRS and I refused to meet with him and his tax lawyer, hand over the corporate books and records, and assist them in unraveling their handiwork.  Cohen should have problems explaining his offer of 50% community property but I'm sure he's carefully crafting some lie or another to cover that situation that Dale Burgess advised me to let the IRS and Treasury know he would testify about.  Leonard Cohen sexually harassed me.  Someone asked me if he exposed his penis to me while he would soak in a bubble bath and have me read legal and business documents to him.  The answer is yes.  In any event, my lawyer has advised me to forward Gianelli's criminally harassing emails to the FBI so please see below.  This man is dangerously unstable and clearly OUT OF HIS MIND. 
I have not posted my draft Writ on my Blog so this lunatic is lying about a stream of conscious narrative.  Francisco Suarez simply wants to know the facts and all details which requires explaining it and we did that in the form of draft sections so we could discuss things like - prosecutorial misconduct, concealment of exculpatory and IMPEACHMENT evidence, perjury, etc. 
This lunatic appears to be criminally harassing me over the appeal, writ, oral arguments and seems to be arguing the City Attorney or Leonard Cohen's case.  How fascinating, no?  The City Attorney could  care less if she lied through her teeth, elicited perjured testimony, concealed information, or the fact thatr I was NOT SERVED the Califoirnia order.  I had to be served or notified.  It's right there on the three page document entered into evidence that's missing the proof of service.  In any event, I'[ve addressed all of this ad nauseum and have no intention of addressing it with a deranged human being who is impersonating a dog that is demeaning my teacher the 14th Sharmapa which his revolting.  Of course, the City Attorney went right at Sharmapa also.  I suppose his conclusions that I am the victim of corrupt politicians and law enforcement really disturbs these out of control maniacs. 
I served time in jail because I was railroaded.  Period.  My lawyer is very clear about that - as are many others - and that's why he is convinced that my trial is nothing other than an IRS case that demands an investigation and involves outrageous testimony about Phil Spector.  The great news - Mick Brown has ethics and knows why I was under the impression that Cohen's testimonial statements were presented to Phil Spector's Grand Jury.  Just search LA Superior Court's website under High Profile cases.  Go to Phil Spector.  Open the motion in limine dated February 17, 2005 - and voila - there's Leonard Cohen's brandishing incident that he personally proved was NOT the version he testified to or emailed Streeter about.  These people are sick and have exposed me to the criminal writing me as a DOGSTER.  That's my personal opinon.  Someone should ask Trutanich personally why his prosecutor permitted Gianelli to copy her in on so many emails criminally harassing me.  His answer will probably be revolting. 

All the best,

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <>
Date: Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:38 PM
Subject: Criminal harassment is the behavior YOU did time for
To: Kelley Lynch <>


First, you are not ebtitled to court appointed counsel to draft your habeus petition - which is why you are filing it pro se. Mr. Suarez's offer to "proof read" it for you does not change your pro se status in that contemplated proceding.

As for sending you the link + excerpts to/from a leading appellate defender's office habeas manuel, this is NOT "criminal harassment", particularly where you have posted your every communication with your appointed counsel on your blog along with your extremely inaccurate views of the kinds of issues that may be addressed in your circumstances via habeas petition, your stated intention to draft it yourself in stream of consciousness narrative form - as illistrated by the draft petition excerpts you have emailed to a host of third parties and the blog posted.

Rather, criminal harassment is what you did six months in jail for in 2012.

And, no, alleged sexual harassment occuring at an unspecified time prior to your firing seven years ago does not give you license to send your victims thousands of obscene, profane, and threatening and accusatory emails or to leave obscene and threatening voice messages in violation of a Colorado Court Order that you were well aware was permanent in duration.

As for your dismissing the habeas manuel as "harassment" or "insane", you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. (The horse in this anology, MsM lynch would be you.)

--The Dogster