Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Leonard Cohen's Operative Doesn't Have Sources; He Has "Associates-in-Fact" & An Obsessive Interest In Interfering With Phil Spector's Legal Matters While Eliciting Information by Lying

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:53 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: alan hootnick <>, Stephen Gianelli <>

Alan Hootnick,

I am putting together all of Gianelli's harassing emails from the past month or so.  Many of them will be submitted with a new document I am filing with Tax Court explaining that I personally believe Gianelli altered/tampered with my Tax Petition evidence blog.  The Petition was online at Scribd and Gianelli is obsessed with my blogs, Scribd documents, etc.  In fact, he writes and tells me what to post on Scribd.  He posts all documents related to Cohen and Spector.

I continue to believe Gianelli is lying about having a contact with Phil Spector.  As this criminal is NOT a journalist and says he's a retired lawyer who doesn't REPRESENT anyone (although he does defend Leonard Cohen's legal interests), the word "source" is absolutely misleading.  He has no "sources."  This man attempts to infiltrate matters, elicit information, interfere with matters, and infests them with extraneous and slanderous information about me, Paulette Brandt, etc.  He also targets my sons, witnesses, etc.  

I have previously filed a declaration with Tax Court about this ongoing harassment.  I want you to be aware that Gianelli harasses me, copies you in, and is now forwarding me emails you have privately sent him.  I can assure you that Phil Spector doesn't "appreciate" this criminal who has worked with Michelle Blaine and is most definitely "Kelly Green," Mongochili, 14th Sheepdog, 17th Shitzu, etc.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <>
Date: Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:32 PM
Subject: Re:
To: Kelley Lynch <>

Ms. Lynch,

That email relied on the same second had hearsay sources from 2014 that you did.

I now have first hand reports from a person of substance (not some grafter out for what she can get like you) who (unlike you) actually talks to Spector every day.

The 2014 article said he was awaiting the surgery to remove the polyps.

And Alan Hootnick agrees that my source is bonifide and is glad that someone has finally told Spector that you (and others) are not his friends and are merely trying to use his name for their own benefit.

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

Alan Hootnick,

In case you fall for Gianelli's latest insanity, here's his November email confirming that Phil Spector cannot speak.  Gianelli's starting to sound like the Vietnamese Sand Dunes who constantly shifts its arguments.  Or, Cohen's bullshit about Spector and a gun; my not stealing form him v. misappropriation; my being in a purely business relationship with him v. the "domestic violence" fraud order; etc.  It's hard to keep up with these criminals.

For the record, I'm not writing you every 10 minutes.  The criminal known as Gianelli is.  I have advised this criminal relentlessly to cease and desist.

Kelley Lynch

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Stephen Gianelli <> wrote:
Ms. Lynch,

All I need to know about Phil Spector is that he is quite ill, that he can no longer speak and is unresponsive and, in the meantime, his motion to the 9th Circuit filed August 27 for a certificate of appealability (without which the appeal cannot proceed further) is still pending. That is all ANYONE knows or can know about the 9th Circuit proceedings as of today, even Dennis Riordan.

All I know about Mrs. Spector is that she will have nothing to do with you.

As for your unwanted contacts with Dennis Riordan, you told me the same thing in 2009 when I advised you your contacts with Bruce Cutler were unwanted, remember?

Most people who had written a lawyer they have never met, spoken to, or retained thousands of times without a single reply would get a clue that the contacts were unwelcome.

Not you. 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:
IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

This criminal, who need look no further than his mirror for an actual moron, has once again been advised to cease and desist.  
The criminal's obsession with Dennis Riordan's fees is positively pathological.  


On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:
Stephen Gianelli,

I've advised you to cease and desist.  You do not know Phil Spector, Dennis Riordan, or me.  You're an out-of-control stark raving lunatic with motive.  You have targeted my sons, and others, for years now.  You are attempting to elicit information about Phil Spector, his attorneys, and the 9th Circuit Court.  I see right through your lame tactics.  You would never make it as an intelligence agent or analyst.  I am not the moron but do take a look in the mirror.

If you want information about Phil Spector, write Phil Spector.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <>
Date: Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: Your public blog post dated November 2
To: Kelley Lynch <>

Ms. Lynch,

1. Dennis Riordan is not reading your emails.

2. I do not want "details" about any of the subjects you mention, and if I did YOU would be the last person on Earth who could supply those details.

3. Everything knowable about Phil Spector's pending 9th Circuit appeal is available on-line (including the briefs). The answer to "what is the court going to do" not even the court knows at this point, and Dennis Riordan will know when we all know, because no one outside the court is allowed to know a ruling until it is public knowledge. That is how it works.

4. Knowing Riordan's approximate hourly rate as well as the obvious fact that you cannot afford even one hour of his time is hardly an "obsession" with his hourly rate.


On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

Hi Mr. Riordan,

The Criminal Stalker is on a fishing expedition.  This criminal is a complete stranger who has relentlessly targeted my sons.  His lies about that fact won't change reality.  He's not too obsessed, is he?   The Criminal Liar doesn't know me.  He wants details about you, Phillip, Rachelle, and the 9th Circuit appeal.  The Criminal Stalker can write Phil Spector.  I know I've certainly addressed Gianelli with Phillip.  

The Criminal Stalker Ambulance Chaser, known as Stephen Gianelli, has been advised to cease and desist.  He seems consistently obsessed with your legal fees.  Did you actually waive to the Criminal once?  


On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

Stephen Gianelli,

Cease and desist.  You don't know me, Phil Spector, Rachelle Spector, or Dennis Riordan.  Evidently, Mr. Riordan waived to you once.  You have no idea who represents me, who I talk to, or how I contact Rachelle.  You're on a fishing expedition, LIAR.

Cease and desist, Criminal.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <>
Date: Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:53 PM
Subject: Your public blog post dated November 2

Dennis Riordan is being paid to appeal the order issued by the Central District of California denying Phil Spector’s habeas petition to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. He has not been retained to track which Spector fan websites like or don’t like Mrs. Spector (or for that matter Mr. Spector).

If you want to tattle on an unofficial fan website, you will need to email Mrs. Spector directly. Oh, wait. You don’t have her contact information. I guess she will never hear what you have to say. Your emails to Riordan are never read nor are they forwarded to anyone.

You are not a client. Riordan is not a general contact for Mr. or Mrs. Spector. And Spector is not paying Riordan $800 an hour to read and process your emails. The necessary legal costs associated with his own matter have been expensive enough.

The fact that you would even try to impose yourself on a busy appeals lawyer’s time or try to take time away from his client matters shows how self-centered you really are.

Why do you think you don’t have Rachelle Spector’s contact information? She has avoided you like the plague. Get a clue.

Sunday, December 13, 2015

Phil Spector Did Not Just "Speak" to Leonard Cohen's Operative's Friend; Nor Does Phil Spector Appreciate Stephen Gianelli Who Is Writing Himself & Forwarding His Self-Written Emails As Evidence

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 1:38 PM
Subject: Fwd: FW:
To: alan hootnick <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, ": Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>,, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,

Alan Hootnick,

I suppose Stephen Gianelli was unaware that Phil Spector lost his ability to speak when he wrote repeatedly, attempting to elicit information about Mr. Spector, that he has a friend who spoke to him the other day.  Phil Spector never told anyone that he appreciates Stephen Gianelli.  Gianelli worked with Michelle Blaine in targeting my email accounts and blogs.  Did Gianelli and Blaine have a "disdain" for my online posts?  Why?  Blaine's blog was one of the most vile and vulgar blogs I've ever seen - dedicated to slandering Phillip after she stole from him.  She is the female Leonard Cohen although Cohen's a real pro.  Gianelli wrote Lozzi, copying me in.  I don't know either of these dangerous clowns.  Gianelli is definitely Kelly Green, Mongochili, 14th Sheepdog, 17th Sheepdog.  He is representing Leonard Cohen's legal interests and desperately attempting to infiltrate matters related to IRS and Phil Spector.  He is now blatantly insulting FBI which is precisely what Cooley's investigator did. 

Who does Gianelli believe would fall for his moronic attempts to advise me that Phil Spector appreciates him?  Does Phil Spector appreciate Cohen's unofficial lawyer, Gianelli, targeting me, Paulette, my sons, elderly parents, etc.  Does Phil Spector appreciate Leonard Cohen's three versions of his bullshit gun story about Phil Spector before LA Superior Court?  Does Phil Spector appreciate the City Attorney eliciting perjured testimony about my email to Dennis Riordan that Cohen testified he was copied on?  He wasn't.  The City Attorney, working with the DA who prosecuted Spector, elicited perjured testimony from Cohen and attempted to sabotage IRS.  

Phil Spector does not appreciate these criminals.  I can assure you of that.  


Legendary music producer Phil Spector has lost the ability to SPEAK as he wastes away in jail, the Mirror can exclusively reveal.
Spector - who produced some of the 20th century’s greatest pop music including the Beatles seminal album Let It Be – lost the use of his voice NINE months ago and is in a “very dangerous” situation in prison.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <>
Date: Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 2:38 AM
Subject: FW:

FYI – from the person you claim does not exist!

Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2015 10:04 AM
To: Stephen R. Gianelli
Subject: Re:

I forgot to say thank you [REDACTED]
Phillip is extremely impressed by you!



That is my [REDACTED] I'm [REDACTED full-time.


On Dec 11, 2015, at 10:32 PM, Stephen R. Gianelli <> wrote:
I just checked the PACER website (real time docketing information about all past and pending federal court maters in all civil and criminal courts and courts of appeal).

As of today, December 12, 2015, there has been no action by the 9th Circuit  on Phil Spector’s request for a certificate of appelability.

The last thing filed in the appeal was on August 12, 2015, when Phil Spector’s attorneys filed the attached petition – which contains a good summary of the case for the 9th Circuit.