Thursday, October 25, 2018

Kelley Lynch Letter to Judge Dennis Perluss, Presiding Judge, Court of Appeal - Re: Leonard Cohen's Fraud Default Judgment Renewal & Fraud California DV Order

Kelley Lynch
1754 N. Van Ness Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90028
October 25, 2018


Judge Dennis A Perluss, Presiding Judge
Second Appellate District
Division Seven
300 South Spring Street
2nd Floor
Los Angeles, California  90013

Re:  Leonard Norman Cohen vs. Kelley Lynch
       Court of Appeal Case No. B267794
       L.C. vs. K.L.
       Court of Appeal Case No. B267409

Dear Judge Perluss:

I am writing in response to Wendy Lascher’s letters to this Court dated October 10, 2018 with respect to the above referenced cases.

Wendy Lascher does not represent my interests and I did not authorize her to request a continuance of oral arguments due to the retaliatory proceedings before Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 6CJ03685, related to deceased “protected” party, Leonard Cohen, and/or the co-conspirators, Robert Kory and Michelle Rice that involves a very serious federal tax controversy, obstruction of justice with respect to federal tax matters and compliance with federal tax laws, and the use of the fraudulent California and Colorado restraining orders to tamper with the administration of those laws. 

As set forth in the Natural Wealth suit, filed with the U.S. District Court in Colorado on July 1, 2005, Leonard Cohen and Robert Kory planned to use restraining orders to “crush” and “discredit” me as a “witness.”  This does not seem to be a valid basis for the issuance of restraining orders.  This allegation was raised six months prior to Cohen obtaining his first civil harassment order against me.  That order was not a domestic violence order and therefore one must conclude that the nature of Cohen and my relationship, which was purely business as set forth in the motion filed with the Boulder Combined Court, changed at some time during the period of 2005 through May 25, 2011 when the fraudulent California domestic violence order was issued to Cohen without minimal due process, service, notice, and/or a meaningful opportunity to be heard.  I would like to point out that I did not see Leonard Cohen again, apart from legal proceedings before LA Superior Court, since November 2004.  Leonard Cohen and I were not in a “dating” relationship.  Sexual harassment and sexual assault are not “dating” and California’s laws, as well as federal VAWA, have a statutory relationship requirement.  My lawyers discussed the sexual harassment and so forth with Robert Kory as early as January 2005.  At that time, in front of my lawyers and accountant, Robert Kory offered me “50% community property.”  I have steadfastly refused to enter into any type of settlement agreement with Leonard Cohen due to his conduct and the conduct of his representatives.  I find the issuance of the fraudulent California domestic violence order, and particularly in light of the public’s interest in sexual harassment, gravely offensive.  I also take offense at the government, without any jurisdiction whatsoever, assigning me a “dating” or any other type of “relationship” with anyone.

145. When these tactics to draw Lynch into his extortion scheme proved futile, Cohen
and Kory – according to Lynch – turned to far more aggressive means to obtain her cooperation.
Indeed, as heard by other witnesses, Cohen and Kory vowed to "crush her," and planned to use
restraining orders and other means to prevent her from serving as a credible witness regarding
both Cohen's affairs and in regard to the scheme into which they had tried without success to
draw her.  Natural Wealth Real Estate, Inc., et al. vs. Leonard Cohen, et al, U.S. District Court, District of Colorado, Civil Action No. 05-CV-01233-LTB-MJW.

Wendy Lascher’s letters to this Court stated as follows:  “I have just learned that a hearing is also pending November 2 in criminal proceedings arising from appellant’s violation of the restraining order protecting my client, Mr. Robert Kory, and trial counsel, Ms. Rice.”  Robert Kory and Michelle Rice are not parties, protected or otherwise, to the Colorado and/or California restraining orders at issue in these appeals and elsewhere.  Leonard Cohen was and remains the sole “protected” party.  These orders have also been used by the deceased “protected” party, his representatives, respondents, and numerous government actors to criminalize compliance with federal tax laws and pure speech related to federal tax matters, civil litigation, corporate record inspection demands, demands for federal tax and corporate forms, and so forth.  This is not an appropriate use of restraining orders from any point of view. 

As this Court requested that either appellant or respondent submit a copy of the Complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC338322, which led to the fraudulent default judgment (and which has been used to defraud the US Government, numerous states, corporations that the Court absolutely did not obtain jurisdiction over, and me), I would like to ask the Court to review the declaration I submitted to IRS in March 2015.  That declaration was submitted with evidence attached thereto, in both a redacted and non-redacted form, in related Court of Appeal Case No. B265753.  The same fraud upon the court addressed in that case is now being used to respond to this appeal.

The fraud upon this court, LA Superior Court, and at least two federal courts is unconscionable.  I am now seeking representation to attack the fraud upon the federal courts.  The Los Angeles Superior Court system does not appear to have a proper remedy for “fraud upon the court.”The default judgment has been transmitted, together with countless fraudulent legal pleadings, to the Internal Revenue Service and used to obtain fraudulent tax refunds, amend Leonard Cohen’s personal tax returns, and as a defense to wholly legitimate allegations related to tax fraud that I have been advised is both civil and criminal in nature.

I would like to mention that no evidence has been submitted to this Court that the fraudulent default judgment, fraudulent renewal of the default judgment, and/or either fraudulent restraining order were assigned to the Cohen Family Trust created solely for the purpose of avoiding probate.  None of the corporations at issue were assigned to this trust.  A formal estate has not been opened.  Plaintiff LC Investments, LLC, was suspended as of the date this appeal was filed.  It owned no assets whatsoever.  Robert Kory does not have standing with respect to these appeals.

I look forward to attending oral arguments and, should any opposing counsel, attempt to deceive this Court, I will include them in the fraud upon the court motion I intend to file with the Court of Appeals.

                                                                        Very truly yours,


                                                                        Kelley Ann Lynch

P.S.  As the fraudulent restraining orders continue to prohibit me from communicating with Kory & Rice, I have only served a copy upon Wendy Lascher.

cc:  IRS, FBI, DOJ, Senate Judiciary Finance Committee, and Wendy Lascher, Esquire