Thursday, March 16, 2017

Kelley Lynch's Email to LAPD Re. Fabricated Electronic Communication & Other Computer Crimes

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:33 PM
Subject: Electronic File - Fabricated February 27, 2017 Email to Robert Kory
To:, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>, "Kelly. Sopko" <>, Dennis <>, bruce <>, 


The Court provided me with a copy of the fabricated email to Robert Kory.  That was not my email address, etc.  The Court noticed that my name was spelled with three llls.  I have found the actual email post it was lifted from almost word for word.  I posted this online on February 26, 2017.  It was sent to the IRS Commissioner.  Robert Kory was not copied and the email was not sent to him by me as the Court understood.  This is not the first time I have dealt with fabricated evidence, altered electronic communications, and so forth.  In fact, it is an ongoing problem as are certain individuals who feel comfortable illegally accessing my blogs, having blogs/email accounts fraudulently shut down, removing documents from my Scribd account, creating accounts in my name, destroying evidence on blogs submitted as evidence to Tax Court, and so forth.  All of this has been documented for IRS, FBI, and DOJ and those examples are only a handful of what I have been dealing with for years now.  An individual has also used fake email account monikers to target me and others.  That now extends to the account: who clearly is attempting to elicit information.  

As nearly everyone in my family is involved in computer engineering, IT, etc., I would like to have a copy of the electronic communication itself examined.    The Court provided me with a paper copy that is cut off at the top due to the copying technique.  Would it be possible for you to forward me the original electronic communication?  As my communication to the IRS Commissioner was altered and fabricated, I would also like to send a copy of the electronic file to IRS, FBI, DOJ, and Treasury.  

Thank you.

Kelley Lynch


From: Kelley Lynch 
Date: Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 5:37 PM
Subject: The City Attorney & Robert Kory's Declaration
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,, alan hootnick <>, bruce <>


I've sent you Kory's declaration.  You've been copied on my emails to my prosecutor regarding the federal tax issues, etc. raised in that.  I've advised the prosecutor that federal matters, tax forms, etc. are issues that should be argued in federal court.  The City Attorney is not going to tell me that they are in a position to alter federal tax rules and regulations, reporting and filing requirements, or advise me what is or is not legitimate with respect to those matters.

The Boulder court has jurisdiction over nothing and no one.  Kory & Rice did not, until the issuance of the recent fraudulent domestic violence related orders, have any order.  They are not part of the Colorado order.  

May I have your opinion on what IRS thinks the City Attorney is doing particularly in light of the fact that they've lied profusely about federal tax matters, etc.  I've advised this prosecutor that I have nothing further to say to him on this issue.  He should feel free to call the IRS and try to convince IRS of his positions. If he wants to write me about a hearing or discovery, that's fine.  As for the rest, he should study federal preemption and leave me out of his insanity.  

I will have my private responses to Robert Kory's declaration in the very near future.  That will be presented to IRS privately.  This trial is an attempt elicit information about IRS, federal tax matters, etc.  That information can be elicited before the U.S. District Court.  I have nothing to say about my private discussions with IRS.  That includes to the Deputy City Attorney who, together with his colleague, has lied through four hearings to date.  That's not a very good record even if LA Superior Court approves of that misconduct.


Tuesday, March 14, 2017

Why Is All Misconduct - Including Perjury & An Entirely Fraudulent Trial Record - Acceptable with LA Superior Court?

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:01 AM
Subject: Fraudulent Trial Record
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, Division, Criminal" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,, alan hootnick <>, bruce <>


Let's look at this latest harassing email from sandra123.  This is an attempt to elicit information and infiltrate my defense.  Since at least one juror relied on Streeter's false statements about corporate assets (which she argued were Cohen's personal property and failed to address his $7 million or more "loans" from the corporation), I think it's relevant and material particularly as the Court instructed them not to rely on attorney statements.  One juror felt sorry for Cohen over Streeter's statements that he only had $150,000 left.  Has there been an investigation?  It's been brought to the attention of LA Superior Court and last I heard juror misconduct is unacceptable.  Why did the jurors want to hear from IRS?  My public defender can confirm these issues for the appropriate court.  

There are far more serious issues with the fraud trial record as well.  This criminal believes egregious due process violations are acceptable.  The City Attorney wants to rely on a fraudulent/perjured trial record?  That should be interesting once their witnesses take the stand and lie further.  The "co-conspirators" actually.  


From: Sandra <>
Date: Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:32 AM

A prosecutor's questions are not evidence, and are oly properly considered by a jury to give meaning to the witnesses' asnwers.  Counsel's statements during a trial are not evidence.

More importantly, your 2012 jurors were so instructed by the judge - as are jurors in every criminal trial in California.

Therefore, your claim that Sandra Jo Streeter somehow tainted your trial record with "fradulent" questions is nonsense. Just another BS excuse for a guilty defendant losing.