Tuesday, March 14, 2017

Why Is All Misconduct - Including Perjury & An Entirely Fraudulent Trial Record - Acceptable with LA Superior Court?

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:01 AM
Subject: Fraudulent Trial Record
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, bruce <bruce@brucecutler.com>


Let's look at this latest harassing email from sandra123.  This is an attempt to elicit information and infiltrate my defense.  Since at least one juror relied on Streeter's false statements about corporate assets (which she argued were Cohen's personal property and failed to address his $7 million or more "loans" from the corporation), I think it's relevant and material particularly as the Court instructed them not to rely on attorney statements.  One juror felt sorry for Cohen over Streeter's statements that he only had $150,000 left.  Has there been an investigation?  It's been brought to the attention of LA Superior Court and last I heard juror misconduct is unacceptable.  Why did the jurors want to hear from IRS?  My public defender can confirm these issues for the appropriate court.  

There are far more serious issues with the fraud trial record as well.  This criminal believes egregious due process violations are acceptable.  The City Attorney wants to rely on a fraudulent/perjured trial record?  That should be interesting once their witnesses take the stand and lie further.  The "co-conspirators" actually.  


From: Sandra <sandra123@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:32 AM
To: kelley.lynch.2016@gmail.com

A prosecutor's questions are not evidence, and are oly properly considered by a jury to give meaning to the witnesses' asnwers.  Counsel's statements during a trial are not evidence.

More importantly, your 2012 jurors were so instructed by the judge - as are jurors in every criminal trial in California.

Therefore, your claim that Sandra Jo Streeter somehow tainted your trial record with "fradulent" questions is nonsense. Just another BS excuse for a guilty defendant losing.