Wednesday, August 3, 2016

Kelley Lynch's Email to IRS Re. Leonard Cohen's Ongoing Obstruction of Justice Over Federal Tax Matters

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:01 AM
Subject: Fwd: Blog post dated 7/31
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,, alan hootnick <>, bruce <>
Cc: rkory <>, Michelle Rice <>, WCL CL <>


The harassment over Leonard Cohen, federal tax matters, and so forth continues.  The Central California did not say that all legal theories were legally and factually frivolous.  The federal tax matters have not been litigated but Gianelli explains what he meant by lying further.

I haven't embezzled anything.  That honor goes to Leonard Cohen.  The judgment is not legally binding with respect to federal tax matters.  I did have an ownership interest in these entities and Leonard Cohen and his representatives included on federal tax returns, provided me with K-1s, and Cohen himself entered into many agreements that are no longer convenient for him.  I am filing a complaint in equity re. the fraud default judgment and we shall see what happens.  I am also filing a complaint in equity re. the fraud DMV order.  If the results are adverse, those matters will be appealed.  Were the entities formed to benefit Leonard Cohen?  That's fascinating.

Gianelli is advancing Rice's position that my requests for IRS required tax information are belated.  The longer this goes on, the more confident Leonard Cohen is that he doesn't have to provide me with IRS required tax and corporate information?  

This is a pretext to harass Leonard Cohen?  I intend to discuss that at length with the IRS.  Am I playing a dangerous game because fraud TROs are being used to obstruct justice?  I will also discuss that threat with IRS.  I didn't see an injunction included with the fraud judgment.  A state court judgment has not effect on federal tax matters.  Not when it's based on fraud, perjury, and concealment of evidence.  That includes with respect to the tax returns, etc. transmitted to IRS well in advance of the fraud judgment.

Gianelli is an operative of Cohen's.  I see he's attempting to elicit information re. the actual accountant I am using, lawyers that may be involved here, and my meeting with IRS.  I'm not meeting with an IRS legal aid office.

Will my appeals be dismissed?  Well, they will be appealed further.  It's that simple.

I'm working on my declaration for Judge Babcock re. the U.S. District Court in Colorado matter and the fraud upon that court.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:48 AM
Subject: Blog post dated 7/31
To: blind <>


Sunday, July 31, 2016

Kelley Lynch's Email to IRS, FBI, & DOJ Re. Leonard Cohen's Ongoing Obstruction of Justice, Gianelli's Interference With Federal Tax Matters & Further Attempts to Infiltrate Matters

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:21 PM
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

I want to review Leonard Cohen's co-conspirator's emails interfering with a federal tax controversy with you.

Why is this criminal advising an accountant he does not know that this has all been litigated.  The federal tax matters have not been litigated.  And that includes with respect to Leonard Cohen's willful and knowing refusal to provide this information to me.  The RICO suit was not served on Cohen and his lawyers.  I disagree with the Court.  Fraud upon the court is not litigation protected and there is a fraud exception to Rooker Feldman.  The 9th Circuit is clear about that fact.  In any event, I intend to write Judge Babcock, and will serve opposing counsel, advising him that I do not believe for one moment that submitting fraud and perjured documents to him is litigation protected.  I will prepare that letter this week.

The Tax Court Petition has nothing whatsoever to do with my requests for IRS required tax and corporate information or Leonard Cohen's obstruction of justice with respect to this situation.  My statements are on the record and that includes with respect to what I witnessed on the part of Cohen and his representatives and the lies transmitted to IRS Chief Trial Counsel's Office.  There is nothing frivolous about fraud upon the court.  What is patently frivolous is the court system condoning fraud upon the court, fraud, perjury, submission of altered and/or fabricated evidence, the willful failure to serve a party a lawsuit, and so forth.  There was no reason for me to appeal the Tax Court matter and the 9th Circuit should hang their decision on the neck of a dog and parade it around San Francisco.

The June 23, 2015 hearing related to fraud upon the court.  Judge Hess did not make any determinations re. IRS and federal tax matters.  In fact, at one point - re. the Tax Court matter and my declaration to IRS - he said he didn't have jurisdiction. 

Michelle Rice's Scribd account is filled with fraudulent legal pleadings.  She views that as some form of victory. I suppose the lies work with LA Superior Court and the Appellate Division.  I find that beyond outrageous.  

The Court in the fraud DMV matter said nothing whatsoever about federal tax and IRS matters.  The U.S. Constitution and Supremacy Clause are at issue with respect to the use of this fraud DMV Order.  I am waiting for Cali DOJ to explain how they intend to address the fraud DMV in the CLETS/DMV database.

Leonard Cohen failed to serve me and has submitted fraudulent evidence to LA Superior Court arguing that I am the Jane Doe that was served.  It has become absurd.  

The Appellate Court has concluded that due process is irrelevant in the State of California vis a vis fraud orders and service.  That speaks volumes about that Court.  The City Attorney, and their witnesses, lied relentlessly to jurors about federal tax and other matters.

Leonard Cohen's fraudulent judgment is evidence of theft, fraud, extortion, embezzlement, money laundering, alter ego, the illegal transfer of assets belonging to suspended corporations, tax fraud, etc

The Killer King incident, in the minds of the criminals, appears to relate to federal tax and accounting matters.  I don't see how it relates to Cohen's willful and knowing refusal to provide me with IRS required tax or corporate information.  The Killer King incident, and file that does not belong to me, demands an investigation.  

Nothing has been litigated before federal court that involves me.  

Gianelli speaks for third parties he doesn't know but harasses in an attempt to elicit information, harass and abuse them, and badger people.  Gianelli represents Cohen's legal interests and is, as usual, out of control and engaged in criminal conduct.  And, Cohen's co-conspirator is threatening me over IRS required tax and corporate information.  I will bring these harassing, threatening emails to my meeting with IRS.  I am also submitting them with my declaration to FTB's Fraud Unit.  


Date: Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 4:25 PM