From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: Right On Cue - Kelly Green Is Back On Gianelli/Blogonaut's Law Group Trashing Me
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, "harriet.ryan" <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Cc: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>
Hello Francisco,
-- Date: Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: Right On Cue - Kelly Green Is Back On Gianelli/Blogonaut's Law Group Trashing Me
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, "harriet.ryan" <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>
Cc: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>
Hello Francisco,
The document is coming along and will definitely be finished this afternoon. I had to deal with Gianelli's ongoing attack on me yesterday and was shocked to learn that he has now fraudulently advised the IRS that I have not paid my taxes. The man is dangerously obsessed with me and Kelly Green always reminds me of prosecutor Alan Jackson. My document contains the testimony on the record and commentary for you so that you are clear about the ongoing prosecutorial misconduct, concealed evidence, perjured testimony, etc. I've made some of my notes available on my Blog. After all, this is a high profile matter and I believe I amnow in LA Confidential.
Thank you for everything. Gianelli, of course, will trash you. That's his M.O. He attempts to infiltrate and sabotage matters. I have studied him. Another thing he does - he sets up reasonable doubt theories about Phil Spector, etc., that can then be refuted. He was all over the internet about Phil Spector and has relentlessly targeted me since aligning himself with Leonard Cohen in 2009. He does not understand the meaning of cease and desist. My sister's attorney advised him to cease and desist. He refuses. I have no idea who this lunatic is but I know this - he and others attempted to lure my son (then a minor) into privately communicating with them. I repeatedly brought this to the attention of LAPD. Somehow, Threat Management - a celebrity unit in LA - showed up to meet with Leonard Cohen. The situation is pathetic.
I never said Cohen testified, wrote the prosecutor, etc. about a version of the gun story that involves his SHOULDER. The prosecutors in Phil Spector's matter used a version of the gun story that involves his chest and a semi-automatic weapon. Cohen was clear - the weapon was an automatic and confirmed twice - on the stand - that the gun was held to his head. He emailed the prosecutor, during the trial or shortly before, that Phil Spector held the gun to his neck. Kelly Green has now weighed in. Kelly Green is the thug. The situation is totally transparent.
Did I copy the prosecutor in my emails? What's the issue? I'm not permitted to contact the government when I am representing myself? The government thinks it has a right to lie about me and conceal evidence, retaliate against me after I filed an appeal? The government is out of control. Streeter doesn't like the truth. As my trial lawyer and I discussed - she lied constantly throughout the trial. One trial lawyer told me judges don't realize that she lies so excessively. That's fascinating. The baby talking must conceal that. It's nasty. It was almost like watching porn.
I have no idea if the DA"s investigator was a cop. I know this - Captain Jack Horvath/DA"s investigator LIED to the court in his letter re. sentencing. These people are right out of some hell realm.
I'll send you the document later. Do address the fact that Streeter continues to conceal the email Cohen sent her re. Phil Spector. Also, the fact that I do not have the IRS required 1099 form. And, the fact that I wasn't served and Vanderet cannot have jurisdiction over me. He can read the U.S. Constitution and speak to chidlren about the legal issues for all I care. The man did not want Agent Tejeda/IRS on the stand. Is he incompetent? Corrupt? I have no idea and could care less. I want this appeal abandoned. LA Confidential is not going to expose me to ongoing prosecutorial misconduct, retaliation, lies, and these stark raving lunatics - like Gianelli. They appear to have escaped from an asylum for the criminally insane.
All the best,
Kelley
SUNDAY, MARCH 17, 2013
Kelley's Notes For Her Appellate Attorney Re. Prosecutorial Misconduct, Concealed Evidence, Perjured Testimony, Phil Spector, Etc.
Streeter Opening:
Leonard Cohen has breached many agreements with me - oral, written, implied, explicit, you name it. I own 15% of all his intellectual property. The non-revocable assignments date back to 1967. They were assigned to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. Leonard Cohen advised LA Superior Court that this entity was held in trust for him. That is a bald-faced lie and absurd. I also own 99.5% of Traditional Holdings, LLC which is basically worth the value of the private annuity - $4.7 million. I do not want a penny of that but want to address - ultimately - the fact that I legally own this. Why? Because Leonard Cohen needed assistance with his tax and estate planning, used me horrendously, and then decided to defraud me. He has also withheld commissions, worth millions, from me which were addressed at my trial. This man is a thief. He is a fraud. He has done this to his prior manager/attorney. He lies about Phil Spector. And he lied extensively throughout this trial - including with respect to the IRS and his fraudulent refund. This man, who has an outrageous sense of entitlement, feels absolutely comfortable lying and perjuring himself in every court he rolls into. That’s why he gave Judge Robert Vanderet a glowing review - he understood that the man wouldn’t even hold him accountable for confessing, on the stand, to perjuring himself. What more could another Hollywood fraud want?
I suppose I do talk about tax fraud a lot. I have, after all, been documenting - in emails - the destruction of my life (and everything I’ve gone through since reporting Cohen’s criminal tax fraud to the IRS) for the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, Phil Spector’s attorneys, and the news media. This is clearly what concerned Leonard Cohen. Streeter raised the fact that I was posting online. She evidently thinks she has the right to silence me. This woman was gushing in her cell phone about celebrity Leonard Cohen and his calm demeanor; skipping out of the court room to advise Cohen that the LA Times would take one still photograph; lying through her teeth; breaking items - like the podium; and generally conducting herself as the moronic lunatic that she is. She is hugely overweight and rolled into court - first day of trial - wrapped in a skin tight spandex outfit that highlighed her rolls of fat. I have never seen a more unprofessional individual in my life but, then again, I haven’t spent that much time with LA Confidential up close and personal. They make the individuals who work in the entertainment industry look like saints and brain surgeons. Leonard Cohen is required, by the IRS, to provide me with Form 1099 for the year 2004. He has steadfastly refused to do so and testified that he knows what a 1099 is. His lawyer, Rice, lied when she testified that she is not permitted to provide me with tax documents. She obviously feels entitled to email me and lie to me and, I might add, the IRS, FBI, Treasury, Dennis Riordan, Ron Burkle and others - including, I believe, Alan Jackson. The only ruse here is the trial which is a Stalinesque Show Trial and a circus brought to you, using taxpayer dollars, by Leonard Cohen, the City Attorney, and the District Attorney. Leonard Cohen does not want to provide me with a 1099 because he has lied about my receiving overpayments with respect to my personal management commissions. The illegal K-1s his 100% owned entity transmitted to the State of Kentucky and IRS completely undermine the fraudulent expense ledger. The K-1s, from LC Investments, LLC, for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005 state that I received $0 income from this entity and yet income is alleged on the fraudulent expense ledger which in no way resembles an accounting and does not take into consideration corporate ownership interests, assets, liabilities, or equity. Leonard Cohen’s loans and personal transaction fees (totalling nearly $3 million) are not addressed and yet he testified that he used corporate assets to purchase things such as homes for his girlfriend and son. In any event, Detective Viramontes/LAPD has been clear with me - the IRS must obtain the 1099 I need from Leonard Cohen. At that point, we will see what he considers income. One thing he doesn’t consider income - the income he received from the sale of certain assets to Sony Music in 2001. His disdain for ordinary income taxes is unparalleled. Sandra Jo Streeter repeatedly lied to the jurors when she stated that I have the tax documents I require. That would include a proper accounting, taking into consideration the corporate ownership interests, assets, liabilities, and equity. Streeter concealed the fact that Leonard Cohen (as the sole owner of LC Investments, LLC) has provided me with illegal K-1s for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005 and refuses to rescind them. Robert Kory testified that I asked that they withdraw these K-1s. Leonard Cohen’s declaration (part of the IRS binder in Streeter’s possession) clearly notes - he is the 100% owner of this entity. Streeter concealed this evidence of criminal conduct on Cohen’s part from the jurors. Streeter lies when she says that Cohen doesn’t have the information I required. Of course he does. All employers are required, by the IRS, to provide a 1099 or similar tax document to their employees and there are penalties for failing to do so. The ruse here - the entire trial. Leonard Cohen testified that he knows what a K-1 and 1099 are. Streeter simply lies and this is a classic example of how she does that. My trial lawyer advised me that judges don’t know she lies. I suppose that’s because she baby talks to them. It’s nauseating and obscene.
In some of these emails there are mention by Ms. Lynch of failed business agreements and failure by Mr. Cohen to live up to his agreement of what she believed their business relationship was. And indeed one of the things, the evidence will show, that she talks a lot about is tax fraud and the need to have the tax return … Indeed the most important thing that she mentions every so often the tax statement is merely a ruse. RT 42
The evidence you will see from December 18 … emails by Ms. Lynch to Mr. Cohen, exactly one of all those emails that Ms. Lynch specifically asked for her K-1 form it is. RT 42
I have not asked for a W-2 and could care less what Cohen knows. As an employer, who has many professionals working for him, he is required to understand IRS reporting and filing requirements. He has a clue about these forms but testified that he couldn’t teach it. The man is pathetic. Leonard Cohen has this information. He simply does not want to hand it over. It creates further complications for him with respect to his tax fraud.
Let’s talk about Ms. Lynch’s need for the tax form or tax return -- The evidence will show that Ms. Lynch -- Mr. Cohen has no clue as to what a W-2 form is, a 1099 is, a K-1 form. The evidence will show that Ms. Lynch is the one that had all of that information, knew all that information. Mr. Cohen did not have it, does not have it and does not understand what it means. Okay. RT 43
Leonard Cohen and I never had a brief intimate relationship or dating relationship. Please address the perjury in the motion/writ. This man lies as easily as he breaths.
Leonard Cohen Direct
Streeter: And did you ever have an intimate relationship with her?
Cohen: Yes I had a brief intimate relationship with her. RT 49/50
Leonard Cohen has breached many agreements with me - oral, written, implied, explicit, you name it. I own 15% of all his intellectual property. The non-revocable assignments date back to 1967. They were assigned to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. Leonard Cohen advised LA Superior Court that this entity was held in trust for him. That is a bald-faced lie and absurd. I also own 99.5% of Traditional Holdings, LLC which is basically worth the value of the private annuity - $4.7 million. I do not want a penny of that but want to address - ultimately - the fact that I legally own this. Why? Because Leonard Cohen needed assistance with his tax and estate planning, used me horrendously, and then decided to defraud me. He has also withheld commissions, worth millions, from me which were addressed at my trial. This man is a thief. He is a fraud. He has done this to his prior manager/attorney. He lies about Phil Spector. And he lied extensively throughout this trial - including with respect to the IRS and his fraudulent refund. This man, who has an outrageous sense of entitlement, feels absolutely comfortable lying and perjuring himself in every court he rolls into. That’s why he gave Judge Robert Vanderet a glowing review - he understood that the man wouldn’t even hold him accountable for confessing, on the stand, to perjuring himself. What more could another Hollywood fraud want?
I suppose I do talk about tax fraud a lot. I have, after all, been documenting - in emails - the destruction of my life (and everything I’ve gone through since reporting Cohen’s criminal tax fraud to the IRS) for the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, Phil Spector’s attorneys, and the news media. This is clearly what concerned Leonard Cohen. Streeter raised the fact that I was posting online. She evidently thinks she has the right to silence me. This woman was gushing in her cell phone about celebrity Leonard Cohen and his calm demeanor; skipping out of the court room to advise Cohen that the LA Times would take one still photograph; lying through her teeth; breaking items - like the podium; and generally conducting herself as the moronic lunatic that she is. She is hugely overweight and rolled into court - first day of trial - wrapped in a skin tight spandex outfit that highlighed her rolls of fat. I have never seen a more unprofessional individual in my life but, then again, I haven’t spent that much time with LA Confidential up close and personal. They make the individuals who work in the entertainment industry look like saints and brain surgeons. Leonard Cohen is required, by the IRS, to provide me with Form 1099 for the year 2004. He has steadfastly refused to do so and testified that he knows what a 1099 is. His lawyer, Rice, lied when she testified that she is not permitted to provide me with tax documents. She obviously feels entitled to email me and lie to me and, I might add, the IRS, FBI, Treasury, Dennis Riordan, Ron Burkle and others - including, I believe, Alan Jackson. The only ruse here is the trial which is a Stalinesque Show Trial and a circus brought to you, using taxpayer dollars, by Leonard Cohen, the City Attorney, and the District Attorney. Leonard Cohen does not want to provide me with a 1099 because he has lied about my receiving overpayments with respect to my personal management commissions. The illegal K-1s his 100% owned entity transmitted to the State of Kentucky and IRS completely undermine the fraudulent expense ledger. The K-1s, from LC Investments, LLC, for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005 state that I received $0 income from this entity and yet income is alleged on the fraudulent expense ledger which in no way resembles an accounting and does not take into consideration corporate ownership interests, assets, liabilities, or equity. Leonard Cohen’s loans and personal transaction fees (totalling nearly $3 million) are not addressed and yet he testified that he used corporate assets to purchase things such as homes for his girlfriend and son. In any event, Detective Viramontes/LAPD has been clear with me - the IRS must obtain the 1099 I need from Leonard Cohen. At that point, we will see what he considers income. One thing he doesn’t consider income - the income he received from the sale of certain assets to Sony Music in 2001. His disdain for ordinary income taxes is unparalleled. Sandra Jo Streeter repeatedly lied to the jurors when she stated that I have the tax documents I require. That would include a proper accounting, taking into consideration the corporate ownership interests, assets, liabilities, and equity. Streeter concealed the fact that Leonard Cohen (as the sole owner of LC Investments, LLC) has provided me with illegal K-1s for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005 and refuses to rescind them. Robert Kory testified that I asked that they withdraw these K-1s. Leonard Cohen’s declaration (part of the IRS binder in Streeter’s possession) clearly notes - he is the 100% owner of this entity. Streeter concealed this evidence of criminal conduct on Cohen’s part from the jurors. Streeter lies when she says that Cohen doesn’t have the information I required. Of course he does. All employers are required, by the IRS, to provide a 1099 or similar tax document to their employees and there are penalties for failing to do so. The ruse here - the entire trial. Leonard Cohen testified that he knows what a K-1 and 1099 are. Streeter simply lies and this is a classic example of how she does that. My trial lawyer advised me that judges don’t know she lies. I suppose that’s because she baby talks to them. It’s nauseating and obscene.
In some of these emails there are mention by Ms. Lynch of failed business agreements and failure by Mr. Cohen to live up to his agreement of what she believed their business relationship was. And indeed one of the things, the evidence will show, that she talks a lot about is tax fraud and the need to have the tax return … Indeed the most important thing that she mentions every so often the tax statement is merely a ruse. RT 42
The evidence you will see from December 18 … emails by Ms. Lynch to Mr. Cohen, exactly one of all those emails that Ms. Lynch specifically asked for her K-1 form it is. RT 42
I have not asked for a W-2 and could care less what Cohen knows. As an employer, who has many professionals working for him, he is required to understand IRS reporting and filing requirements. He has a clue about these forms but testified that he couldn’t teach it. The man is pathetic. Leonard Cohen has this information. He simply does not want to hand it over. It creates further complications for him with respect to his tax fraud.
Let’s talk about Ms. Lynch’s need for the tax form or tax return -- The evidence will show that Ms. Lynch -- Mr. Cohen has no clue as to what a W-2 form is, a 1099 is, a K-1 form. The evidence will show that Ms. Lynch is the one that had all of that information, knew all that information. Mr. Cohen did not have it, does not have it and does not understand what it means. Okay. RT 43
Leonard Cohen and I never had a brief intimate relationship or dating relationship. Please address the perjury in the motion/writ. This man lies as easily as he breaths.
Leonard Cohen Direct
Streeter: And did you ever have an intimate relationship with her?
Cohen: Yes I had a brief intimate relationship with her. RT 49/50
Question: How can you tell the difference between an attorney lying dead in the road and a coyote lying dead in the road?
Answer: With the coyote, you usually see skid marks.
Answer: With the coyote, you usually see skid marks.
