Saturday, November 1, 2014

Susanne Walsh, Leonard Cohen's Fan, Did NOT Inadvertently Copy Kelley Lynch's Sons, Sister, & City Attorney On Her Latest Round Of Harassing Emails

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:11 AM
Subject: Fwd: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request
To: "irs.commissioner" <>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, "Hoffman, Rand" <>, Mick Brown <>, woodwardb <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, police <>
Cc: Jeffrey Korn <>, sedelman <>, JFeuer <>, "kevin.prins" <>

Hello IRS, FBI, DOJ, and FTB,

My sons, sister, friends, etc. have now been criminally harassed by these people since May 2009 when Gianelli allegedly heard from Michelle Rice.  I have asked Jeffrey Korn if he could assist in bringing this criminal conduct to an end.  

Walsh just replied to Rutger.  Please note that the "City Attorney," who lied about many IRS matters, is copied in on their emails.  I think Rutger nailed this situation.  Please do refer back to Cohen's email noting that he saw Rutger copied in.  

Susanne Walsh is a liar.  I have all of their emails.  This criminal harassment now revolves around the Motions i intend to file.  Please see Steve Miller's lawsuit.  Swanigan has allegedly retaliated against others.  According to Steve Miller, some City Attorneys are "angry."  Sounds like LA Confidential.  

All the best,

This case should be fascinating.  Are the taxpayers footing the bill?

“It falls on the weird side of things,” said Los Angeles-based attorney Fred Woocher, who isn’t involved in either case but has sued the city on numerous occasions. Woocher said he didn’t see a direct legal conflict but questioned why Swanigan was assigned to this harassment case.
“Her personal interest could be adverse to the client that she is now representing,” Woocher said.

All the best,

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: susanne walsh <>
Date: Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 7:57 AM
Subject: Re: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request

To: Rutger Penick
Cc: "STEPHEN R. GIANELLI" <>,, Karen Lynch, "Vivienne A. Swanigan" <>

I am sorry Rutger Penick, I did not mean to copy you in on my mail to Kelley Lynch. I have not contacted your mother for a very long time, but still she keeps mentioning my name, with accusations of different crimes and guesswork of what I "maybe involved in" with Mr. Cohen, Mr. Gianelli and others, in order to "target and harass" her, on her very public blog and in e-mails to several different authorities (IRS, FBI, DOJ, different judges, attorneys, medias etc.). I have asked her to remove my name from her from all these publications, she refuses.
However, I am sorry to bother you with this, it will not happen again.
Susanne Walsh
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request

Wow, you guys are ridiculous. What did you do last night? Thinking of things to write? Bravo fruitcakes. Suzanne and Gianelli are meant for each other, thunder buddies?


Rutger Penick
IT Support Specialist

On Nov 1, 2014, at 4:56 AM, susanne walsh <> wrote:
Mr. Gianelli.
I was very tempted to write exactly this to Ms. Lynch, but not in the mood to once again, be accused of "criminal harassment", but Ms. Lynch, as long as you, on a regular basis mention my my name in your public blog, I will continue to monitor it, as I am confident everybody else you slander and accuse of a variety of crimes, will.
Furthermore, instead of screaming "criminal harassment" to and about Mr. Gianelli, you ought to thank him for all the free and valuable legal advise he is giving to you. It seems like no practicing attorney wish to have anything to do with you and your many "cases and suits",.
Susanne Walsh

Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 12:42 PM
Subject: FW: Re: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request

Ms. Lynch,

If you habitually author emails expressly accusing named persons of criminal conduct (e.g., employees of the Los Angeles City Attorney’s office, Susanne Walsh, the undersigned, a public relations firm that has done work for Leonard Cohen) and then post them on your Google indexed blog,  it is neither surprising nor sinister when the persons you are slandering on the World Wide Web show an interest in your blog.

Indeed, if it weren’t for the people you are slandering reading your blog, you would have virtually no blog visitors at all.

So please, don’t pretend that you are not getting exactly the attention you wanted or that visits to your blog by persons expressly mentioned therein evinces anything illegal or improper.  

Your assumption that the IRS is interested in your blog readership is another issue altogether. Suffice it to say that that it is emblematic of your mental illness and evidence that you are not taking your medication – as is your email reference that is (typical for you) wholly unrelated to the subject matter of  your email (below).

Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece

-----------------------Forwarded email-------------------------
From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request
To: ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "irs.commissioner" <>, Washington Field <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, "Hoffman, Rand" <>, Mick Brown <>, woodwardb <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, police <>

The criminal stalker has been on my blog quite a lot today.  So has Cohen fan, Susanne Walsh.  What is Gianelli at?  It seems as though he is focused on the IRS and federal tax matters.  In any event, you might want to review these posts and emails.  I'm sure the next round of lies will be fascinating.  And, there are the liars at the City Attorney's office.  Their lies and responses to my federal lawsuit should prove fascinating.  

All the best,