Monday, October 27, 2014

Kelley Lynch Email To DOJ About Leonard Cohen & Federal Criminal Activity

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:45 PM
Subject: Re:
To: ASKDOJ <>, "stan.garnett" <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, MollyHale <>,,, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, rbyucaipa <>, Robert MacMillan <>, moseszzz <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Jeffrey Korn <>, sedelman <>, JFeuer <>,, Sherab Posel <>


This is Cohen's personal investigator's bio.  According to his biography, he works with LAPD's TMU.  That unit works with SMART who took me to Killer King.  LAPD's TMU works for the DA and City Attorney.  There are lawsuits in Colorado (related to Greenberg), Los Angeles (related to me), something in the California District Court related to Cohen and Greenberg, Westin settled with Cohen in California.  Westin lives in Kentucky.  There is fraud with the restraining orders - including the use of them to prohibit me from requesting or receiving IRS required forms and information.  Those requirements also relate to corporations.  Furthermore, the order was modified, subjected me to California's domestic violence statutes, and was granted without proof of a statutory required "dating relationship."  The case was immediately given, by the LA Superior Court's Family Division a BQ case number which means downtown Los Angeles Family Court domestic violence restraining order.  I've spoken to the Court about this.  I spoke to the Judicial Council and they advised me that DV-600 means a domestic violence form.  I've spoken to CLETs.  They cannot explain how a foreign non-domestic violence restraining order was transformed into a domestic violence order.  They have no explanation whatsoever.

Apart from the allegations of criminal tax fraud re. Leonard Cohen, there appear to be an outrageous number of federal crimes.  That would include the allegations raised in Neal Greenberg's lawsuit re. witness tampering, witness intimidation, bribery, extortion, etc.

I would like to point out that Leonard Cohen's PI was hanging out in the courtroom, had to be put out because he's an alleged "witness," and my lawyer saw Cohen, PI, and the District Attorney's investigator hanging out and having lunch.  Cooley, Jackson, and Trutanich are all over this matter.  And now so is Mike Feuer and his rotten domestic violence unit and workplace violence retaliation squad.  See Steve Miller, and others, for the pattern and practice.  

But what's going on?  Does anyone behave professionally?  Have you seen Korn respond?  Have you seen Gianelli continue to criminally harass me, my sons, sister, Paulette Brandt, and Clea Surkhang?  He's harassing us together, right?  Well, she lives in Colorado and I live in California.  That is now federal.  And, Michelle Rice communicated, according to Gianelli, with him in May 2009.  That's how long this criminal harassment has been going on.  

How can Judge Enichen's order apply when neither Cohen or I reside there and he had no minimal ties whatsoever?  Also, his testimony may prove perjury re. the Verified Motion because he said he obtained the order due to his concert which was scheduled for nearly a year later.  

I wonder why Judge Vanderet didn't want Agent Tejeda on the witness stand?  Well, DOJ should find out.  The entire 2012 trial was based on federal tax issues and IRS.  The CIty Attorney lied about IRS matters.

All the best,

Basil “Steve” Stephens 

Steve is CEO and Managing Partner for Close Range International, Inc. He has extensive investigative and executive protection experience. Steve has conducted hundreds of investigations with positive results. He has taken numerous DOJ and POST training classes in the police academy and has worked with and for the LAPD, FBI, Secret Service, Military Police and numerous security professionals.

Steve has worked and coordinated security for many high profile events and is a mainstay in Hollywood circles where his professionalism, knowledge and work ethic has never been challenged. Executive Protection is his expertise. 

Steve worked exclusively for the entertainer, Madonna, for over 10 years and captured her high profile stalker Robert Hoskins in 1995. Stephens’ testimony helped convict Hoskins of stalking and ensured his long prison sentence. Hoskins, as of 2014, remains in the California State Mental Health System as an extreme danger to the public. ( We only mention this case because of the worldwide media coverage-Close Range International normally will not disclose client’s identity)

Stephens has also provided personal security /executive protection for many other high profile celebrities and “Rock and Roll Royalty” in town and on the road.

Steve Stephens most recently was Security Director at Warner Bros Records in Burbank (2005-2009), providing armed security for executives and artists and conducting stalking investigations. Prior to that position he was Security Director at Maverick Records (1995-2004), Madonna’s label, where he conducted many investigations and managed numerous threats working closely with the LA County District Attorney’s “STAT” Team ( Stalking and Threat Assessment Team-founded by DDA Rhonda Saunders) and the LAPD’s Threat Management Unit. 

During the period he worked for the record company’s, he still managed Close Range International. He now devotes 100% of his time to Close Range International and serving your needs. 

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

Would you please take a look at the original order that Judge Enichen granted.  The Boulder Combined Court sent me an email confirming that the Boulder order is NOT a domestic violence order.  They pointed out that Cohen did not check "domestic abuse" on the original attached Verfied Motion.

First of all, I do not understand Judge Enichen's jurisdiction at all.  Cohen had no ties to Colorado.  He flew into Boulder, in the midst of a European tour, and attended a secret hearing.  A process server ran around Boulder telling people he had a check for my son's fingers so someone gave him that information which is outrageous.  He lied in the proof of service.  I attended the hearing.  The judge asked where Cohen was and his lawyer replied that he was not available.  She said fine and that was the end of it.  The judge did not even ask why.  Cohen, who is wealthy and bankrupted me, sent paid lawyer/witnesses, Kory and Rice, as well as a Colorado order.  Right there serious confrontation clause issues arise.  The judge maybe had the right to enter the temporary but not the permanent order.  Cohen resides in California and has no ties to the state.  I moved soon after the hearing to another State.  While I resided in Berkeley, California (and Cohen testified that he knew my whereabouts from descriptions in my emails and he hired a private investigator - who, I might note, works with LAPD's TMU and the District Attorney according to his biography).  At some point, Kory and Rice go into LAPD.  LAPD notes that I was notified on February 14, 2011 (by Rice) that the order was registered in California.  It was not.  They register the Order on May 25, 2011 when I am no longer a resident of Boulder, Colorado or Los Angeles, California.  

At this point, I cannot understand how either Court has jurisdiction particularly given the fact that this was modified when it was registered as domestic violence, subjected to domestic violence statutes, and a dating relationship was automatically assigned to me without any proof.  Then, Cohen testifies at the March 23, 2012 bail hearing that we were in a purely business relationship and I never stole from him - "just his peace of mind."  He obviously wasn't coached and I suppose it upset the prosecutor who works in "Domestic Violence" and who should be investigated.

The original order was modified and the Full Faith and Credit statute cannot apply.  It should not have been heard in Family Court which it was.  It was assigned Case No. BQ meaning downtown Los Angeles and family court domestic violence restraining order.  

This was not simply placed into the CLETS system.  It was registered as a domestic violence case by the family court.  Then, it was ultimately handled by the Domestic VIolence Unit.  I have Boulder Court's confirmation that it is not domestic violence.  

May have a DOJ opinion.  I particularly want this because Kory and Rice have taken the position that a Boulder Municipal County Court has the authority to subvert IRS reporting and other requirements.  Those would include requirements related to corporations.  And, Korn submitted documents to LA Superior Court arguing that the "domestic violence related" restraining orders (now expired for Kory and Rice) prevent from effecting service on the registered agent of a corporation who has transmitted K-1 partnership documents to IRS and State Kentucky for 2003, 2004, and 2005 indicating that I am a partner on that entity.  This is a Delaware Corporation and the issues are now federal matters.  

I am filing the Motion to Dismiss and asking the Court to disqualify Michelle Rice, the attorney of record.  She knew the original order was not domestic violence but worked with the domestic violence unit?  She testified.  She is now a paid witness/lawyer who has become a partner for her working targeting me for approximately 8 years.  She has communicated with Stephen Gianelli and that demands an investigation. She has also been copied in on emails sent by Cohen fan, Susanne Walsh, criminally harassing me.  

If LA Superior Court simply transforms foreign orders into domestic violence orders then the Court is committing fraud and there probably are federal DMV grants at issue here.  The statute requires a dating relationship so the order is not valid.  But that doesn't end it - Leonard Cohen, Michelle Rice, and Robert Kory worked with the domestic violence unit of the City Attorney's office to prosecute me.  Essentially, I was kidnapped in Berkeley.  Let me quote Berkeley PD (from numerous conversations):  This is a complete waste of taxpayer dollars;  what was Cohen's role, if any, in the Phil Spector matter; what has occurred with IRS and Treasury; and, please have the FBI call us about the arrest.  

All the best,

Domestic violence is a term used by members of the criminal justice system to describe and classify several types of conduct which society has made criminal through the enactment of laws. Domestic violence may be referred to as family violence, spousal abuse, relationship abuse, domestic battery, domestic assault, domestic abuse, intimate partner abuse, intimate partner violence, stalking, criminal threats, or harassment. The specific conduct which has been made criminal by California law includes, but is not limited to, causing or an attempt to cause an unwanted touching (battery), assaultrestraint, or fear based on the use of threatening words which the recipient claims were understood to be threatening which are made unlawful by Penal Code Section 422.
California law defines the specific relationships which qualify as being required in order for an incident to be characterized as domestic violence in Penal Code Section 273.5. The definition of qualifying relationships is very broad and includes spouse, former spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or the mother or father of a child.Penal Code Section 243(e)(1) provides that in addition to the relationships defined by Penal Code Section 273.5, a relationship qualifying for prosecution as a domestic battery includes person with whom the accused currently has, or previously had a dating or engagement relationship. In other words, if there is or was a dating relationship or more serious relationship, then a incident involving violence or the threat of violence, or fear may be characterized as domestic violence in California. The consequences of a criminal conviction for domestic battery (Penal Code Section 243(e)(1)) or domestic violence on a current or former spouse or cohabitant (Penal Code Section 273.5) provide for harsh punishment pursuant to Penal Code section 1203.097.