Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Kelley Lynch Email To DOJ Criminal Division Re. Robert Kory's Perjured Testimony - Federal Tax Matters

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: Required Tax Information
To: Jeffrey Korn <>, "irs.commissioner" <>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, woodwardb <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, sedelman <>, JFeuer <>, "kevin.prins" <>, police <>

Hello Criminal Division of DOJ,

Let's look at Kory's testimony.  First of all, I let Ken Cleveland go in September 2004 when I hired Dale Burgess.  Kory didn't meet with Cleveland about me.  NO ONE has the IRS required form 1099 for 2004.  That includes the IRS.  Cohen lied in the Complaint - I was entitled to a commission as a manager on gross income - that includes monies deposited to his personal account.  He testified that I assisted with the "Dear Heather" matter.  In any event, the K-1s from LCI prove the ledger is fraudulent.  They show $0 income.  The K-1s show income.  I didn't see an ad and I have emails to and from Kory proving this is perjured tesitmony.  He confirmed it on the stand - I asked them to rescind (that's what the IRS advised me to do) the LCI K-1s as I have no evidence that I am a partner.  And I advised them that the ledger is fraudulent.  This is not sophisticated.  Leonard Cohen didn't hire me because I was a moron.  I don't know if my intelligence is formidable and I don't know what that has to do with anything.  I didn't handle corporate, tax, accounting, financial or investment matters and I was very clear with Cohen, and others, about that.  In fact, I put it in writing.  I guess they thought I lost my emails.  Did IRS lose my emails?  I hope not.  The State of Kentucky would like them.  See Rob Watts/Fraud Unit.  I didn't contact Agent Sopko.  She contacted me.  I met with her and her partner and know what was discussed.  I have the fraud ledger now.  Make no mistake about that.  It is undermined by the K-1s and I have no idea why you would transmit evidence of fraud to the IRS.  EVIDENCE.

All the best,

PD:  And that default judgment was based upon a forensic accounting submitted to the Court; isn’t that correct?
Kory:  A forensic accounting submitted first to her first tax accountants and lawyers, then her next level of tax accountants and lawyers, and then to her and the Court, yes.  RT 419
Kory:  First – the first level of information – went to Ken Cleveland … RT 419

Kory:  In 2007, Ms. Lynch contacted in response to, I think, a general ad encouraging employees to turn in their employers if the employees know about their employer’s tax fraud.  Ms. Lynch contacted a woman named – an agent named Kelly Sopko.  Kelly Sopko referred the matter, all her allegations related to Mr. Cohen – RT 422

PD:  And in those emails, there’s multiple times Ms. Lynch requested forensic accounting; isn’t that correct?
Kory:  Most of the time I saw, when I read them, you have to read those emails carefully, I didn’t see a request for forensic accounting.  What I saw is a request that we change the forensic accounting.  That we withdraw a K-1.  These are fairly sophisticated concepts.  RT 425-426

Kory:  As I read them, as I read them, I was reading a formidable, intelligent person with sophisticated tax knowledge who had the forensic accounting and the K-1s and all the tax information in her possession, and she was requesting that we somehow modify what we had reported.  RT 426

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

Do you know what this doesn't say?  That the police can arrest me for requesting tax information.  Detective VIramontes was clear - Cohen wasn't comfortable with my requests for information.  I'm not comfortable being criminally harassed by some psychopath called "Stephen Gianell" who has relentlessly targeted me, my family, Paulette Brandt, and other, since 2009 when he heard from Cohen's lawyers.

I don't like to criminally harassed over federal tax matters.

All the best,

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

A fraudulent financial statement is NOT an IRS required form.  In fact, one would hope the IRS would discourage taxpayers from transmitting fraud to them and others.

Kelley Lynch

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

I basically have two sets of information for every issue.  If not more.  Let them lie.  


On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

I would like to point out that failure to provide me with IRS required form 1099 for the year 2004 and other information is a crime.  This Code does not exempt people who have obtained restraining orders, fraudulent or otherwise.  And, in this case they're fraudulent.  When did your client become of aware of what he evidently believes is fraud?  Sometime in November 2004?  Well, he should have repaid his loans and amended the corporate tax returns rather than taking the position that he is the alter ego, defrauding me, and defrauding the U.S. government further.  That's part of the reason I went to the IRS:  my lawyers advise me I had two choices when fraud was brought to my attention:  amend the returns or report it to IRS.  There were other reasons also.  Those include the tactics.  Your client told Detective Viramontes that he didn't feel comfortable with requests for tax information?

That doesn't explain the City Attorney's lies about federal tax matters.  The government doesn't know about IRS reporting requirements?  A government lawyer who thinks  an argument proving a "ruse" or "con" involves an employer not providing his employee with a tax document?  Then, according this Code, Streeter aided and abetted this matter.

As I said to Sergeant Fernandez:  is everyone in California aiding and abetting Cohen's criminal tax fraud?  That was a question.  Raoul Felder seemed to think the seizure was illegal.  I know he's a very intelligent attorney.  I also spoke to him about the DA, SWAT, not wanting to be dragged into Phil Spector's trial, etc.  

Kelley Lynch

26 U.S. Code § 7203 - Willful failure to file return, supply information, or pay tax

Current through Pub. L. 113-185. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
prev | next
Any person required under this title to pay any estimated tax or tax, or required by this title or by regulations made under authority thereof to make a return, keep any records, or supply any information, who willfully fails to pay such estimated tax or tax, make such return, keep such records, or supply such information, at the time or times required by law or regulations, shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $25,000 ($100,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both, together with the costs of prosecution. In the case of any person with respect to whom there is a failure to pay any estimated tax, this section shall not apply to such person with respect to such failure if there is no addition to tax under section 6654 or 6655 with respect to such failure. In the case of a willful violation of any provision of section 6050I, the first sentence of this section shall be applied by substituting “felony” for “misdemeanor” and “5 years” for “1 year”.