Thursday, November 20, 2014

Kelley Lynch Points Out To DOJ How Leonard Cohen Fabricates Statements & Elaborates On Statements She Never Made

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 1:03 PM
To:  DOJ, FBI, IRS cc:  Multiple Parties

Hello DOJ,

I am reviewing the transcript I am preparing for you.  For some reason, in the year 2004, LA Superior Court cannot provide a word document of a transcript.  I want you to have the basic transcript.  I also want you to look at how LA Superior Court does not require you to lay a foundation for testimony, permits a man who didn't know my email account (and hadn't seen me in 7 years and was in position to verify my email account), and lets someone engage in utter discursiveness.  This is one of my favorite examples.  Leonard Cohen testifies, poetically, that I alleged that he's the "author" of my "misfortunes."  I never said any such thing and I do not feel poetic about this unconscionable situation.  They are not required to enter evidence proving I said any of this.  The threat is my "tone of voice" which is absurd and this was repeatedly used against me.  Have you heard his "tone of voice?"  He sounds like Dame Edith Sitwell.  Then Streeter, an absolute liar, asks him to elaborate on what I meant by the "author" of my "misfortune" and he goes onto explain.  I never said this so it's fairly out there and really absurd.  However, I am clear the default, as he noted, is evidence of fraud.  He also testified that I said he should be "taken down and shot?"  So what?  There's no threat there.  This is why I sent you and FBI the drone card on Valentine's Day.  It was an example of what I thought someone in LA could be prosecuted over - someone else's artistic creation and expression related to serious political discussions about drones.  And that's precisely what happened.

I also believe it is important to keep in mind that the transcripts [undated voice mail messages] Streeter's secretaries typed as accurately as they could are completely incoherent, inaccurate, and do not reflect what was said - AT ALL.

As soon as I heard Vanderet permit Cohen to interpret my emails, I knew there was a serious problem with him and there was.  And, he even lied about me.  

I would like the DOJ to provide me with an opinion on this.  They conceal evidence, lie, and do anything they want to obtain a conviction.  The prosecutor herself lied about many federal tax matters.  They don't care.  I've watched them in action - they come up with further lies to support their prior lies.  

All the best,

Streeter:  What do you mean the phone calls were accusations?  Cohen:  Well – Well, she began to indicate that I was the author of her misfortunes and everything happening to her was my fault and she would, she would repay me with the same kind of kindness as I had shown her.  That was said in a menacing tone.  RT 53 [Absurd; furthermore it is a Tibetan Buddhist saying – I will repay your kindness.  The threat is alleged KL’s “tone” of voice.]  Streeter:  Okay when you say “author of her misfortune,” did she elaborate what her misfortune was?  Cohen:  Well, she … after the default judgment, she began to be very clear that I had finger counted (?) some kind of fraudulent action against her and I deserved to be taken down and shot.  RT 53  

Provided Drone Valentine Card For DOJ Review: