Sunday, May 5, 2013

Kelley Lynch vs. Los Angeles

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:07 AM
To: Washington Field <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, ASKDOJ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Dennis <>, rbyucaipa <>, Robert MacMillan <>, moseszzz <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, "Hoffman, Rand" <>, Mick Brown <>, woodwardb <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>

To the FBI,

The ongoing criminal harassment over my appeal, writ, Leonard Cohen, etc. continues.  I have received four emails already this morning.  This situation has exposed me to dangerously unstable stark raving lunatics with motive and that would include the City Attorney and District Attorney.  I have never seen such thugs in my life.

All the best,

From: The-14th Sheepdog <>
Date: Sun, May 5, 2013 at 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: No endorsed filed face page, no "filing"
To: Kelley Lynch <>

Lets be clear - you have been threatening to sue cohen for SEVEN YEARS, never have and never will.
This matter is between me and my attorney.  
No "writs", replies or lawsuits, it is always an empty threat.
The Writ was filed.  A reply brief was not filed because I attempted to abandon this appeal and the appellate division - unconscionably - refused to permit me to abandon it.  
You have cried wolf 15,000,000 times too often.
And you are pro se on your habeas remedies, or so you said.
Can't wait to read the tentative.
From: The-14th Sheepdog <>
Date: Sun, May 5, 2013 at 8:26 AM
To: Kelley Lynch <>

I know, the TRUTH is depressing for you compared with your rich fantasy world of writs, reversals and new lawsuits.
We will see what the tenative says on the 8th.
This matter will not end with the oral arguments or any decision on the part of the appellate division,  That will include litigating the fact that the appellate division is forcing me to appeal this matter - exposing me and members of my family to further criminal harassment..

(e) Tentative Rulings. Tentative rulings are issued in most cases, indicating the court's initial
proposed views or questions concerning a case. The court is not bound by a tentative ruling, whether
or not a party has submitted the case based on the stated tentative ruling. Tentative rulings will be
available: (1) on the afternoon before calendar (a) on the court’s website at, select Appellate Division, Tentative Rulings, or (b) by telephone; and (2)
will be posted outside the courtroom on the day of the hearing.
(f) Supplemental Briefing. Supplemental briefing will be

From: <>
Date: Sun, May 5, 2013 at 7:27 AM
Subject: No Declarations will be filed
To: Kelley Lynch <>

Your attorney of record filed a formal application to file a "late" reply brief and was granted permission to do so.

We're aware of what we have filed. 

Filing a reply brief was strictly a task for appellate counsel based on legal authorities - if any - rebutting the legal positions taken by the City Attorney in its Respondent's Brief and/or based on page and line citations TO THE RECORD showing where the People got the facts wrong.

The City Attorney has continued to lie - including about IRS matters - in their Respondent's Brief.  The abuse and waste of taxpayer dollars is shocking.

By getting permission to file a reply then failing to follow through Francisco dropped the ball. Period.

We made an informed decision not to file the reply brief.  No one dropped the ball.  We are dealing with excessive lies, fraud, perjury, concealment, theft, etc.  

Now that your attorney has AGAIN failed to file a reply, NO FURTHER BRIEFS ARE ALLOWED without the permission of the court.

My lawyer failed at nothing - including becoming a lying fraud with a license and motive.  We have addressed the abusive tactics used against me.  We have addressed the lies, fraud, perjury, concealment, prosecutorial misconduct, etc. 

The appellate department DOES NOT TAKE EVIDENCE except in support of procedural motions (I.e. Relief from default, motions to continue etc.).

Who knows what the appellate division does?  Evidence?  There is no evidence in my case and that's one problem with LA Superior Court.  It tolerates hearsay, lies, perjury, fraud, etc.  That would include Judge Ken Freeman who relied on Leonard Cohen's lies in a declaration - rather than reviewing corporate books and records, etc. that prove I own 15% of all of Cohen's intellectual property and am the beneficial owner of two corporate entities that the court helped Cohen steal from me - fraudulently altering my federal tax returns.  I am sitting here with an abundance of evidence but these courts have no interest in anything that resembles the truth, a fact, evidence, etc.  They tolerate prosecutorial misconduct and it is absolutely shameless and pathetic.  That's before we get into the Celebrity Justice System. 

Your attorney would not be permitted to file the declarations you announced on your blog last night you intended to ask him to file. Period.

I am filing declarations or writing a letter to these courts.  They are not going to deny what is going on here and I intend to litigate these matters.  

I am not surprised that a Reply was not filed and that your "writ" was never filed. It is par for the course. You have never done ANYTHING you said you were going to do - why start now?

My Writ was filed.  Leonard Cohen stole from me, bankrupted me, defrauded me, has tremendous wealth and power, connected lawyers - including former DA Ira Reiner -  and powerful allies including the District Attorney of Los Angeles and City Attorney of Los Angeles.  

BTW, there is no such thing as an "appeal" from a clerk's refusal to process a writ that is not in compliance with court rules. The remedy is to redo the "writ" (which, face it is never going anywhere anyway) to comply with the rules and to resubmit it.

Doe this lunatic have a life or is he paid to criminally harass me.  Its obsession is astounding.

Is it "harassment" for me to correct your PUBLIC pronouncements and emails about your pending appeal with truth? I think not.

Yes, I am being criminally harassed.  Writing honestly on a public blog; addressing my legal issues and the evidence; posting  my emails to the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, Dennis Riordan, and the news media; and detailing everything I am going through - for these parties and others ... does NOT entitled a dangerously unstable, stark raving lunatic to constantly bombard me with psychotic emails (including with prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter copied in since that really appeared to be an intent to annoy me and criminally harass me and she has already attempted to retaliate over my appeal, shamelessly lying to LAPD about an email example I sent the FBI - which they can prove), lying to me and about me, etc. is UNACCEPTABLE - legally and otherwise.

YOU decided to go public with every sordid little detail of your entire life - then to impose those "updates" on the rest of us in scores of weekly (sometimes daily) emails, not me. You made your bed now lay in it.

Leonard Cohen went public with this matter - after he was privately communicating with awe-inspired journalist, Brian Johnson MacLean's, when he realized his name would be dragged through the mud (extortion and conspiracy, etc.) by Neal Greenberg, etc., understood I went to the IRS, and retaliated against me for refusing to  make what I viewed as an illegal deal and testify that he was defrauded by his advisers.  I have evidence and witnesses re. his offer of 50% community property.  No one defrauded Leonard Cohen.  His greed caught up with him.  The man cannot live in Canada due to tax and residence issues.  Leonard Cohen made his bed and he must lay in it.  Having his operatives - including Gianelli and fan Susanne Walsh - target me is just par for the course with this vile, vicious, vengeful man.

I will be checking the tentative ruling on your direct appeal on the 8th. But it will say your positions and defenses are utterly without merit.

My positions and so-called defenses are the only merits.  If the trial court and appellate division do not understand this they should resign and stop abusing taxpayer dollars.

Good day.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

From: The-14th Sheepdog <>
Date: Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:52 AM
Subject: Re:
To: Kelley Lynch <>

Speaking truth and logic to you is like throwing holly wateR on a vampire. But its about time somebody did.