Friday, March 25, 2016

Kelley Lynch's Email to Karina Von Watteville Re. Harassment, Baseless Litigation, & Service

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:39 PM
Subject: Case No. BC614279
To: Karina Von Watteville <>
Cc: Paulette Brandt <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, ": Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,, alan hootnick <>

Karina Von Watteville,

Stephen Gianelli communicated with numerous parties the fact that you filed a lawsuit against me, Paulette Brandt, and Linda Carol on March 17, 2016.  He has stated in his harassing emails that the issues relate to documents filed in Paulette Brandt's Small Claims case, Linda Carol's declaration, and may involve an incident related to Robert Kory, Leonard Cohen's lawyer.

As opposed to serving us, you and Stephen Gianelli began sending harassing emails to me and Jules Zalon.  You were advised to cease and desist in all instances.

I have not been served your lawsuit.  I have informed you that I would like to be served as I will be attaching your Complaint to my federal RICO suit.  All communications with you were documented for IRS, FBI, DOJ, and others.  As you should recall, I initially sent you cease and desist emails due to the fact that you were slandering me to, among others, Linda Carol.  All documents filed in the Small Claims suit, as well as Linda Carol's declaration, are protected by the litigation privilege - regardless of the fact that your lawyer at the time, Stephen Gianelli, relentlessly harassed and threatened Linda Carol over her declaration.  

Please maintain copies of all communications between yourself, Robert Kory, and Stephen Gianelli as I intend to subpoena those communications (including emails and text messages) during discovery.

LA Superior Court provides a preview of half the first page of the Complaint online  Therefore, I noticed that you are using a P.O. Box.  The court rules require actual service.  I will be responding with an answer and would like a proper address.  As you should recall, I was present at the Small Claims hearings (and provided a declaration) where you informed the court that you were not served (by the court) due to the fact that the documents were sent to your P.O. Box (which you provided the court).  I would like to avoid this type of situation.  

Once again, I have not been served and no one has attempted to serve anything at my address.

Kelley Lynch

Case Number:  BC614279
Filing Date:  03/17/2016
Case Type:  Defamation (Slander/Libel) (General Jurisdiction)
Status:  Pending

Case Number:  BC614279
Filing Date:  03/17/2016
Case Type:  Defamation (Slander/Libel) (General Jurisdiction)
Status:  Pending

Future Hearings 


BRANDT PAULETTE - Defendant/Respondent
DOES 1 THROUGH 20 - Defendant/Respondent
LYNCH KELLY - Defendant/Respondent
MURPHY LINDA CAROL - Defendant/Respondent
VON WATTEVILLE KARINA FIMBEL - Plaintiff & Plaintiff In Pro Per

Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)
03/17/2016 Complaint

SECTION 1010-1020 
(b) If upon a party, service shall be made in the manner
specifically provided in particular cases, or, if no specific
provision is made, service may be made by leaving the notice or other
paper at the party's residence, between the hours of eight in the
morning and six in the evening, with some person of not less than 18
years of age. If at the time of attempted service between those hours
a person 18 years of age or older cannot be found at the party's
residence, the notice or papers may be served by mail. If the party's
residence is not known, then service may be made by delivering the
notice or papers to the clerk of the court, for that party.