Friday, March 25, 2016

Kelley Lynch Advises Her Stalker & His Client That It Might Be Time To Visit David Geffen

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:46 PM
Subject: Fwd: Kelley Lynch email dated Friday, March 25, 2016 11:36 PM
To: Stephen Gianelli <>, Karina Von Watteville <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, ": Division, Criminal" <>, MollyHale <>, fsb <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Dennis <>, alan hootnick <>

Stephen Gianelli and Karina Von Watteville,

I have received quite a number of harassing emails from you over this baseless, extortionate lawsuit and those harassing me and Jules Zalon, a man neither of you know.  For the record, I know neither of you although Gianelli has stalked and harassed me for years, terrorized my sons, targeted witnesses, continues to argue Cohen's legal issues, and appears to be affiliated with the Spector prosecution.

As I've said, serve the lawsuit.  I look forward to it and am about as concerned over this as I am about the baked potato I ate last week.  Karina Von Wattevile, a litigious individual, will not extort $1 dollar from me.  Karina Von Watteville just lost her attempt to obtain Sam Menning's house from his estate so I'm not clear why she is gloating.  I've also heard about numerous "slip and fall" accidents she has been in.

Why don't I visit David Geffen and ask him if he's interested in a movie about this situation.  I'll let him know that Cohen is threatening me with a fraud default judgment and fraudulent financial interest.  Call LAPD's TMU and see if they can help you.

Cease and desist.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:07 PM
Subject: RE: Kelley Lynch email dated Friday, March 25, 2016 11:36 PM
To: Kelley Lynch <>

Cc: Karina Von Watteville <>

What is your LEGAL AUTHORITY for the statement that a prayer for monetary relief contained in a civil complaint that is $1.00 or more constitutes the crime of extortion?

Where is the “threat” element for the crime of extortion set forth in Penal Code §§ 518-519?

For a person who not only lacks any legal training but has lost 10 out of the 10 legal motions/petition/proceedings she has been involved in (including the 2009 Colorado motion to vacate and the 2008 criminal tress pass trial) and has been 100% wrong about HER prediction of legal outcomes in her various matters to cite own “knowledge” as legal authority as your reply to my citation of the applicable criminal statute (which is written in plain English) and an on-point California Supreme Court case decided in 2006 is a bit ridiculous, don’t you think?

You cannot define extortion, you cannot explain why your opinion of what extortion is  contrary to the Penal Code definition relied on by California’s highest court, you just “know” that the California Supreme Court is wrong?

And this is the legal compass you are using to navigate the labyrinth of legal and appellate proceedings you are now in the middle of? Ha! No wonder you lose every time you walk into a courtroom!

Why don’t you visit the West Hollywood station to “report a crime” to wit: “extortion” consisting entirely of filing a civil complaint that asks for more than $1.00 in damages and see what you are told?  (When the sergeant on duty stops laughing long enough to speak.) Ha!