Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Kelley Lynch Email to DOJ & CIA Re. Fraud Transmitted by Stephen Gianelli on 03.22.2016 at 7.02 AM

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:29 AM
Subject: Kelley Lynch's Email to DOJ re. the Fraud Transmitted by Stephen Gianelli March 22, 2016 at 7.02 AM
To: ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>


Let's go through the fraud one more time.  First of all, please take a look at the Declaration of Linda Carol as updated on May 16, 2015.  DOJ should speak to LAPD's TMU.  Linda Carol confirmed information for them personally.  Gianelli and Von Watteville began harassing her.  I have her emails.  This was and remains criminal witness tampering.  The declaration falls within the litigation privilege.  It was dictated.  When someone dictates something that doesn't mean the person typing the notes is writing it.  I know this because I worked for men like Jules Zalon.  Gianelli did represent Von Watteville and at that time, with her copied in, he transmitted false statements to federal agencies.  I haven't seen her complaint but I have seen her writing style in the Small Claims court where all the details about her conduct, etc. have litigation privilege.  I've sent you the Sam Menning Trial Brief.  I think it is highly instructive.

I didn't communicate anything libelous.  This fraud continues to represent KVW's legal interests.  I don't care what his opinion is.  The man is a shameless, middle class, wine tasting, terrorist and criminal.  

You know I have a RICO suit.  I have said this repeatedly and forwarded various drafts to IRS, FBI, DOJ and others.  I have not divulged the content of my suit publicly.  Von Watteville did contact Kory, after receiving Paulette's rental demand letter, and he told her to sue me.  She then ended up represented by Gianelli.  Let me know if that is unclear.  The federal court will decide if there's a nexus - not Gianelli - who is attempting to dissuade me, mislead me legally, and crimnially harassing me.  

I don't believe a word out of this liar's mouth so I don't care what he says. I haven't made any false representations about anything he has said.   Did Kory and Rice ask to be omitted from all communications?  Why?  They think it's better for a proxy to assist with their filthy lawyering? 

So Gianelli received confirmation that DOJ received and opened the "email."  I'll let the federal court know that he transmitted fraudulent information, via email, and intends DOJ to rely on that information.

What was up with his "case reference" in his email copied to Alan Hootnick?  Does he want to talk about CIA?  It seems that way.  He has told me numerous times that Alan Hootnick is in CIA.  I have no idea.  Gianelli is convinced.  Did he hear that from someone at Bill's Bar in Hydra?  Maybe he heard it from Tara Cooper's mother (a tantric sex practicing agent).  Or perhaps Cohen, the alleged MK Ultra participant, confirmed this for Gianelli.  Or, it could be one of the retired CIA agents that are all over Boulder, Colorado.  I think Ronald Mitchell's wife is one of "them" or so he has alleged.  Hard to say right now and I don't want to speculate further.  As for the case he referenced:  He [Gianelli] has no idea how long my RICO complaint is or what evidence I will incorporate.  Incorporated evidence does not increase the length of the complaint.  It merely incorporates the evidence and supports the statements in the complaint or facts conveyed in the declarations.  I think it's best for the court to see actual facts supported by evidence.  

This criminal doesn't know when to quit.  That's my personal opinion.  


--Adam J. Ciralsky, Appellant, v. Central Intelligence Agency, et al., Appellees, 355 F.3d 661 (D.C. Cir. 2004)


From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:16 AM
Subject: FW: Read: Kelley Lynch email dated Tuesday, March 22, 2016 7:02 AM; STATEMENT OF NON-REPRESENTATION
To: kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com
From: ASKDOJ [mailto:ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 10:55 AM
To: Stephen R. Gianelli
Subject: Read: Kelley Lynch email dated Tuesday, March 22, 2016 7:02 AM; STATEMENT OF NON-REPRESENTATION
Importance: High
Your message


   Subject: RE: Kelley Lynch email dated Tuesday, March 22, 2016 7:02 AM; STATEMENT OF NON-REPRESENTATION
   Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 2:53:32 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

 was read on Tuesday, March 22, 2016 4:54:20 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:52 PM
Subject: RE: Kelley Lynch email dated Tuesday, March 22, 2016 7:02 AM; STATEMENT OF NON-REPRESENTATION
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, jzalon@zalonoffice.com, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.compaulettebrandt8@gmail.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>

Ms. Lynch,

1. I do not represent Ms. Von Watteville. I did not draft her defamation complaint.

2. I was informally assisting Ms. Von Watteville in defending Paulette Brandt’s time-barred small claims action for back-rent last summer ... REDACTED.

3. You mass communications and blog posts were libelous on their face. In some of your emails you admitted you did not know whether or not the accusations were true.

4. Under these circumstances, it was my opinion and remains my personal opinion that Ms. Von Watteville has a good and meritorious defamation suit against you.

5. You have no “RICO suit” pending against Leonard Cohen in federal court as of today (I checked through PACER). Ms. Von Watteville has no known affiliation with Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory or Michelle Rice although (according to you) Ms. Von Watteville once spoke to Robert Kory on the telephone prior to the hearing on Ms. Brandt’s small claims case against her. Under these circumstances, it is hard to conceive of a nexus of any kind between Ms. Von Wateville’s pending defamation action against you, Paulette Brandt, and others, and your threatened (since 2009 but never filed) “federal court RICO suit”.  Indeed, it takes a flight of fanciful speculation to reach that “conclusion” – which is utterly implausible on its face given the facts you have alleged.

6. As I have repeatedly advised you, I do not represent or speak for anyone in the world but myself. I am a retired lawyer living in a foreign jurisdiction. I do not represent, nor do I speak for or have authority to speak for Leonard Cohen, Robert Kory, Michelle Rice, Kory Rice LLP, or anyone else.

7. I am sending this email out as a “reply all” to correct the your false representations about my alleged affiliations.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece

Cc: Reply all (except for Robert Kory and Michelle Rice who have been omitted from all communications at their request)

From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 7:02 AM
To: Stephen Gianelli; Michelle Rice; Robert Kory; *irs. commissioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; : Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; Harriet Ryan; hailey.branson; Stan Garnett; Mike Feuer; mayor.garcetti; Opla-pd-los-occ; Kelly.Sopko; Whistleblower; Attacheottawa; tips@radaronline.com; alan hootnick
Subject: Re:

Senate Judiciary,

Yet another cease and desist letter.  This man continues to criminally harass and stalk Paulette Brandt as well.  I will send you the Von Watteville lawsuit once I am served.  I will also submit a writing sample to you so it can be determined if a lawyer wrote her legal pleading.  Her counter-claim in the Small Claims suit was clearly written by her personally.  She demanded $10,000 for her willful refusal to pay her rental arrears.  Robert Kory advised her to sue me?  Gianelli ended up representing her.  I can assure you that this lawsuit is retaliatory, baseless, strategic, etc.  It's also related to my RICO suit against Cohen.  Therefore, it will be attached as evidence to my RICO suit.