From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 2:50 PM
Date: Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 2:50 PM
Subject: The City Attorney Evidently Thinks My Emails To The IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, And Dennis Riordan Were Sent To Leonard Cohen, How Convenient
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>
CITY ATTORNEY’S LEONARD COHEN FANTASY CONTINUES
During relevant, charged, general time periods, appellant left about 30 voice mail messages at Cohen’s home and sent him about 1,500 emails -- spanning every month. Some of the voice mail messages were 10 minutes long. For the period from September 20, 2011 to the end of February 2012, appellant sent Cohen 1,055 emails. The content of the voice messages and emails were similar.
KELLEY’S BRIEF REPLY
The emails I saw are shabby, out of order, start in the middle, and emails to other parties were not sent to Cohen. They were part of a thread and those emails document everything I have gone through since reporting Cohen’s probable criminal tax fraud to the IRS in 2005. Therefore, the emails weren’t for Cohen. They were for me and the threads appear to have been counted separately. It’s just a malicious prosecution. I think the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and Dennis Riordan know what emails were sent to them because I addressed everyone directly. My wages were garnished in 2011. I don’t owe taxes because I have huge losses and the state guesstimated my 2004 returns based on income from 2003 which was substantial. I also have a huge personal theft report and LAPD was at the house for that issue which was witnessed by my son’s soccer coach and a Toronto police officer. Doug Davis/FTB agreed to remove the wage garnishment to give me the opportunity to submit my tax returns. We discussed the fact that I called City National Bank and he didn’t think they would still have the information. I advised him that I had contacted Cohen for the 1099 and we discussed the confusion created by the fraudulent expense ledger; the fact that the fraudulent default judgment - obtained via fraud, perjury, concealment, etc. - because that default wrongfully altered federal and state tax returns previously filed. I then phoned the IRS for a copy of my 2003 return. Mr. Davis felt I could try to guesstimate expenses, etc. by using my former tax return. At that time, the IRS advised me that they took would like my 2004 and 2005 returns. I do not owe the IRS money either. And yet, both Cohen and Kory testified - and made statements in the Victim Impact Statement - that the IRS and FTB are pursuing me. That is a bald-faced lie. They know where to meet me so this isn’t some high speed fantasy chase. The IRS is in possession of an abundance of evidence proving the allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud is true; corporate books and records; non-revocable assignments; my indemnity agreement re. TH; and many other documents. The State of Kentucky’s Fraud Unit advised me that they would like all the evidence I provided the IRS including all emails I gave the IRS access to and the authorization to use. In the footnotes, quotes are taken out of context, misstated, and a comment of His Holiness Kusum Lingpa’s is assigned to me. His Holiness, who knew Cohen, told me and others that he’s an asshole who is going to hell.
I think my lawyer’s take on this reply brief is correct - the City Attorney’s office continues to cover for Cohen; the IRS should investigate the entire situation; and Streeter engaged in criminal obstruction of justice when she lied to LAPD about me - in, what I believe, is retaliation over my appeal.
--
The
Judge admonished the witness, “Do you understand that you have sworn to
tell the truth?” “I do.” “Do you understand what will happen if you are
not truthful?” “Sure,” said the witness. “My side will win.”
--
The
Judge admonished the witness, “Do you understand that you have sworn to
tell the truth?” “I do.” “Do you understand what will happen if you are
not truthful?” “Sure,” said the witness. “My side will win.”
