From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: The Tragedies That Befell Me
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>
Hello,
Interesting legal practices. Almost finished with this. One last paragraph. It's about the K-1s, IRS, etc. I still cannot understand where these parties, including the court, have jurisdiction over IRS matters.
All the best,
Kelley
CITY ATTORNEY MOVES BACK ONTO THE ABUSIVE RESTRAINING ORDERS BUT HAS NOT ADDRESSED WHY A FRAUDULENT ORDER WAS REGISTERED IN CALIFORNIA - SINCE THE BOULDER ORDER I REQUESTED WAS A CIVIL HARASSMENT ORDER AND NOT THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ORDER REGISTERED IN CALIFORNIA.
In 2005, because of the increasing menace, volume and venom in the messages, Cohen obtained a restraining order against appellant. Appellant then moved to Colorado. In 2008, Cohen received a permanent restraining order against appellant in Colorado. On May 25, 2011, Cohen go another restraining order: the Colorado order “domesticated … applicable in California.” After the first order, the emails certainly did not stop or abate -- if anything they grew more threatening and violent. RT 70-71. The voice mail did not stop although appellant did not contact him when he was on the road about 2009 - 2010. She began contacting him again toward the end of 2010 and all through 2011 …
KELLEY’S RESPONSE
Cohen’s testimony about the emails. Not quotes from the alleged emails themselves. I see Leonard Cohen’s been hanging out with lawyers who talk about domesticating orders. Still doesn’t explain the fraudulently modified order registered in California on May 25, 2011, an order I was not notified about, served, or aware of. I think Berkeley PD was extremely clear about that fact. Not sure what point this lawyer is trying to make here. The voice mails are out of sequence and cannot be date or time stamped. Cohen could have sent them to his lawyers at any time to attempt to make it look like they were left on another date. I wonder how the voice mail that were allegedly left when Cohen was out of the country were handled, date wise, after he and his sound engineer worked with them, etc.
CITY ATTORNEY MOVES ONTO COHEN’S PAID LAWYER WITNESSES
Michelle Rice testified she listened to the voice mail messages Cohen would forward to her, then save them electronically onto her law firm’s server in a separate folder. Rice created a binder, which included a log, from information in Cohen’s emails regarding the messages and DVDs/Cds of the calls which occurred from February 2011 to February 2012. Rice either personally created or oversaw preparation of DVDs/Cds introduced in court of the voice mail messages. Rice then relistened to the messages to ensure all were included. DVDs/Cds in People 25 contain true and accurate copies of appellant’s voice mail messages to Cohen from February 2011-2012 and forwarded to Rice.
KELLEY’S RESPONSE
I don’t believe any of the above and this is not how you authenticate anything and the chain of evidence is shabby and surreal.
NOTE: I’m going to skip the next section about what Antoinette testified about. She knew nothing. Didn’t see a subpoena. Just knows Sandra gave her these things and her father works with Sandra but they didn’t discuss the case. That tells me all I need to know about Ms. Henry. My lawyers and I were sitting there noting that the City Attorney’s legal clerks were even trying to hel
Date: Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: The Tragedies That Befell Me
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>
Hello,
Interesting legal practices. Almost finished with this. One last paragraph. It's about the K-1s, IRS, etc. I still cannot understand where these parties, including the court, have jurisdiction over IRS matters.
All the best,
Kelley
CITY ATTORNEY MOVES BACK ONTO THE ABUSIVE RESTRAINING ORDERS BUT HAS NOT ADDRESSED WHY A FRAUDULENT ORDER WAS REGISTERED IN CALIFORNIA - SINCE THE BOULDER ORDER I REQUESTED WAS A CIVIL HARASSMENT ORDER AND NOT THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ORDER REGISTERED IN CALIFORNIA.
In 2005, because of the increasing menace, volume and venom in the messages, Cohen obtained a restraining order against appellant. Appellant then moved to Colorado. In 2008, Cohen received a permanent restraining order against appellant in Colorado. On May 25, 2011, Cohen go another restraining order: the Colorado order “domesticated … applicable in California.” After the first order, the emails certainly did not stop or abate -- if anything they grew more threatening and violent. RT 70-71. The voice mail did not stop although appellant did not contact him when he was on the road about 2009 - 2010. She began contacting him again toward the end of 2010 and all through 2011 …
KELLEY’S RESPONSE
Cohen’s testimony about the emails. Not quotes from the alleged emails themselves. I see Leonard Cohen’s been hanging out with lawyers who talk about domesticating orders. Still doesn’t explain the fraudulently modified order registered in California on May 25, 2011, an order I was not notified about, served, or aware of. I think Berkeley PD was extremely clear about that fact. Not sure what point this lawyer is trying to make here. The voice mails are out of sequence and cannot be date or time stamped. Cohen could have sent them to his lawyers at any time to attempt to make it look like they were left on another date. I wonder how the voice mail that were allegedly left when Cohen was out of the country were handled, date wise, after he and his sound engineer worked with them, etc.
CITY ATTORNEY MOVES ONTO COHEN’S PAID LAWYER WITNESSES
Michelle Rice testified she listened to the voice mail messages Cohen would forward to her, then save them electronically onto her law firm’s server in a separate folder. Rice created a binder, which included a log, from information in Cohen’s emails regarding the messages and DVDs/Cds of the calls which occurred from February 2011 to February 2012. Rice either personally created or oversaw preparation of DVDs/Cds introduced in court of the voice mail messages. Rice then relistened to the messages to ensure all were included. DVDs/Cds in People 25 contain true and accurate copies of appellant’s voice mail messages to Cohen from February 2011-2012 and forwarded to Rice.
KELLEY’S RESPONSE
I don’t believe any of the above and this is not how you authenticate anything and the chain of evidence is shabby and surreal.
NOTE: I’m going to skip the next section about what Antoinette testified about. She knew nothing. Didn’t see a subpoena. Just knows Sandra gave her these things and her father works with Sandra but they didn’t discuss the case. That tells me all I need to know about Ms. Henry. My lawyers and I were sitting there noting that the City Attorney’s legal clerks were even trying to hel
--
The
Judge admonished the witness, “Do you understand that you have sworn to
tell the truth?” “I do.” “Do you understand what will happen if you are
not truthful?” “Sure,” said the witness. “My side will win.”
