From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: The Tragedies That Befell Me
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>
Hi,
City Attorney's back on the IRS and FTB. They are quoting Cohen who just made that statement up. It's that simple. They misstate facts, distort evidence, elicit perjured testimony, conceal evidence, etc. It's very clear.
All the best,
Kelley
CITY ATTORNEY BACK ON THE IRS
Appellant’s subject line might say “Taxes” or “Kelley Lynch Tax Returns” but have no mention of this issue in the body of the email. As an example, appellant mentioned tax issues once in 1000 pages of emails appellant sent on January 21-22.
KELLEY LYNCH ON THE CITY ATTORNEY’S ONGOING MISSTATEMENT OF FACTS, LIES, DISTORTIONS, ETC.
On page 167 of the transcripts, Cohen makes this interpretation of the requests for tax information. I think the IRS Commissioner’s Staff should review these emails. The emails are apparently from January 21st. I supppose that’s 2011. The City Attorney is so interested in IRS tax matters and forms, etc. That should interest the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. Since Agent Sopko told me various individuals at the IRS Commissioner’s Staff are relating to various aspects of my emails to them, then they should have a handle on this m
Date: Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: The Tragedies That Befell Me
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>
Hi,
City Attorney's back on the IRS and FTB. They are quoting Cohen who just made that statement up. It's that simple. They misstate facts, distort evidence, elicit perjured testimony, conceal evidence, etc. It's very clear.
All the best,
Kelley
CITY ATTORNEY BACK ON THE IRS
Appellant’s subject line might say “Taxes” or “Kelley Lynch Tax Returns” but have no mention of this issue in the body of the email. As an example, appellant mentioned tax issues once in 1000 pages of emails appellant sent on January 21-22.
KELLEY LYNCH ON THE CITY ATTORNEY’S ONGOING MISSTATEMENT OF FACTS, LIES, DISTORTIONS, ETC.
On page 167 of the transcripts, Cohen makes this interpretation of the requests for tax information. I think the IRS Commissioner’s Staff should review these emails. The emails are apparently from January 21st. I supppose that’s 2011. The City Attorney is so interested in IRS tax matters and forms, etc. That should interest the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. Since Agent Sopko told me various individuals at the IRS Commissioner’s Staff are relating to various aspects of my emails to them, then they should have a handle on this m
--
The
Judge admonished the witness, “Do you understand that you have sworn to
tell the truth?” “I do.” “Do you understand what will happen if you are
not truthful?” “Sure,” said the witness. “My side will win.”
