From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: Section F - Appeal Brief - Agent Tejeda
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
Hi,
We've been through this ad nauseum. I had to be served/notified the California order. Rice lied in the February 14, 2011 email. Judge Enichen said she could not advise me if I could contact Cohen for tax information. She said she couldn't give me legal advice. Are they lying about Judge Enichen now? I prefer focusing on the attachment I sent to Rice. That's the transcript of Steven Machat and my conversation. He was curious when the IRS would charge Cohen. He knows he's a thief and a liar. It's time to quote Cohen's former lawyer who helped structure the charitable remainder trusts: the IRS Commissioner himself should come in - or will come in - after Cohen and his lawyers and accountants. Every time I think of that, I think that Westin, Kory, Rice, and others, should be arrested and prosecuted with Cohen. Rice lies on the stand, in her emails, etc. Do you think I care what Rice says. She's so insane, she thought I looked at her in court. We're coming up to Phil Spector. So, I'll have a cigarette first. I feel terribly sad about this. People have written that Paulette's email to me is horrifying and this is a tragedy. So, we're looking forward to the movie and Paulette and I will write him because we just feel so terrible. We know they've set him up and we worry he'll spend his life in prison. It's cruel. I've been talking to Paulette about what's going on in LA with these horrifying prosecutors and me. My lawyer yesterday was disgusted, sees right through these people, and had some very choice words about the prosecutors and my so-called judge. He thinks he's a rotten, bad judge, who helped target me. That's great. Many people feel this way. They think LA is corrupt and they are so right. They can now talk behind my back. Nobody even wants to talk about them. They shock the conscience.
All the best,
Kelley
Here, there was overwhelming evidence appellant know of the court order she permanently have no contact with Cohen. In addition to Michelle Rice testifying appellant was present at the hearing in which Judge Enichen ordered appellant not to contact Cohen , appellant acknowledged during testimony she was present in that court proceeding and had asked to make the restraining order permanent. RT 325, RT 473. Additionally, Rice attached a copy of that order to an email she sent appellant in February 2011, advising appellant to cease contacting Cohen. RT 330-331. Appellant clearly received this email, responding to it, claiming the order fraudulent. RT 333. That same order is the ONE registered in California. RT 328. Clearly, appellant know a court had ordered her not to contact Cohen under any circumstance; the fact she was unaware the order had been registered in California is irrelevant.
Date: Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: Section F - Appeal Brief - Agent Tejeda
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
Hi,
We've been through this ad nauseum. I had to be served/notified the California order. Rice lied in the February 14, 2011 email. Judge Enichen said she could not advise me if I could contact Cohen for tax information. She said she couldn't give me legal advice. Are they lying about Judge Enichen now? I prefer focusing on the attachment I sent to Rice. That's the transcript of Steven Machat and my conversation. He was curious when the IRS would charge Cohen. He knows he's a thief and a liar. It's time to quote Cohen's former lawyer who helped structure the charitable remainder trusts: the IRS Commissioner himself should come in - or will come in - after Cohen and his lawyers and accountants. Every time I think of that, I think that Westin, Kory, Rice, and others, should be arrested and prosecuted with Cohen. Rice lies on the stand, in her emails, etc. Do you think I care what Rice says. She's so insane, she thought I looked at her in court. We're coming up to Phil Spector. So, I'll have a cigarette first. I feel terribly sad about this. People have written that Paulette's email to me is horrifying and this is a tragedy. So, we're looking forward to the movie and Paulette and I will write him because we just feel so terrible. We know they've set him up and we worry he'll spend his life in prison. It's cruel. I've been talking to Paulette about what's going on in LA with these horrifying prosecutors and me. My lawyer yesterday was disgusted, sees right through these people, and had some very choice words about the prosecutors and my so-called judge. He thinks he's a rotten, bad judge, who helped target me. That's great. Many people feel this way. They think LA is corrupt and they are so right. They can now talk behind my back. Nobody even wants to talk about them. They shock the conscience.
All the best,
Kelley
Here, there was overwhelming evidence appellant know of the court order she permanently have no contact with Cohen. In addition to Michelle Rice testifying appellant was present at the hearing in which Judge Enichen ordered appellant not to contact Cohen , appellant acknowledged during testimony she was present in that court proceeding and had asked to make the restraining order permanent. RT 325, RT 473. Additionally, Rice attached a copy of that order to an email she sent appellant in February 2011, advising appellant to cease contacting Cohen. RT 330-331. Appellant clearly received this email, responding to it, claiming the order fraudulent. RT 333. That same order is the ONE registered in California. RT 328. Clearly, appellant know a court had ordered her not to contact Cohen under any circumstance; the fact she was unaware the order had been registered in California is irrelevant.
--
The
Judge admonished the witness, “Do you understand that you have sworn to
tell the truth?” “I do.” “Do you understand what will happen if you are
not truthful?” “Sure,” said the witness. “My side will win.”
