Tuesday, April 21, 2015

The Criminal Stalker's Motive, Tactics, & Rotten Logic

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:19 AM
To: "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "USLawEnforcement@google.com" <USLawEnforcement@google.com>, Feedback <feedback@calbar.ca.gov>, mike.feuer@lacity.org

Hello IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

I don't know why the Criminal Stalker has written me and stated that Linda Carol's declaration is unsigned.  There was a minor correction that I've addressed with you privately.  I do not know Karina Von Watteville so her "degenerate" nature is not anything that concerns me.  I have hardly ever spoken to this woman and wouldn't associate with her if my life depended on it. 

Stephen Gianelli is very clear that his criminal harassment and stalking is meant to make it appear that I am the individual engaged in "pure harassment."  I would like to know where it states in any law book or statute that I should address the legal issues he writes me about re. Cohen matters with an attorney that has not formally entered an appearance with the court.

Stephen Gianelli does not know where I reside or with whom.  I do not know this stalker at all.  He has simply targeted me, my sons, sister, and every witness who has provided me with a declaration.  This criminal conduct has gone on for nearly six straight years - since this criminal first allegedly communicated with Kory/Rice.  

For the record, Von Watteville's drama (and attempt to defraud Paulette Brandt) is not my soap opera.  This woman does not know me.  At the first hearing, she began raising Robert Kory as her defense and even confused the mediator.  At the second hearing, she began ranting in the hallway about Leonard Cohen.  She is the individual who contacted Robert Kory after receiving Paulette Brandt's rent demand letter and then obtained legal representation from the criminal stalker, Stephen Gianelli, in Paulette Brandt's Small Claims matter.  She is also the individual who began slandering and lying about people.  I have discovered a number of other very disturbing issues but will discuss them with you privately at this time until these matters are confirmed.

I would like to point out that this declaration does not contain the information that Linda Carol provided about Von Watteville's past (as told to Ms. Carol and Ms. Jones) life as a hooker and stripper.  I don't think all of these issues need to be addressed at this point in time.

All the best,

I, LINDA CAROL, declare:

1.        I am a citizen of the United States who currently resides in Los Angeles, California.  I am Paulette Brandt’s roommate.  I am over the age of 18 years.  I have personal knowledge of the facts contained in this declaration and if called upon to testify I could and would testify competently as to the truth of the facts stated herein.

2.         At some point in or around October 2013, I began an apartment search in the Los Angeles area.  I searched Craig’s List.  Marie Jones posted an ad and I rented a room from her for the months of November and December 2013.  At that time, I met Karina Von Watteville a/k/a Karina Fimbel.  Ms. Von Watteville was living with Marie Jones and that is how I became acquainted with her.   I lived with Marie Jones, Karina Von Watteville, and Marie Jones for two months.

3.         Problems arose between Marie Jones and Karina Von Watteville related to monies allegedly owed Ms. Jones with respect to Ms. Watteville’s cats.  The money may have related to a security deposit.  The cats were using the apartment as their kitty litter box and this upset Ms. Jones.  I personally witnessed an incident that involved the police.  Ms. Jones and Ms. Von Watteville were arguing about money owed to Ms. Jones and someone called the police.  An incident report was taken.  Marie Jones was also upset that, due to her habit of trash picking, Karina Von Watteville infested her apartment with bed bugs and cock roaches.  I personally witnessed this. 

4.         I continued to look for a permanent and more appropriate room to rent.  Karina Von Watteville advised me that she lived with a woman by the name of Paulette Brandt who had an available guest room for rent.  Ms. Von Watteville liked Ms. Brandt very much and said she enjoyed living with her and strongly encouraged me to contact Ms. Brandt about the room.  Ms. Von Watteville also explained to me that the apartment was clean, pretty, and assured me that Paulette Brandt was an excellent roommate and friend.  At this time, Karina Von Watteville informed me that she paid Paulette Brandt rent of $500/month plus $50/month utilities.  I specifically asked about this because Ms. Von Watteville recommended Paulette Brandt and I needed to know what type of rent I would be expected to pay.  Ms. Von Watteville also informed me that, prior to moving in with Ms. Brandt, she did not know her.  They had a mutual friend who Paulette Brandt knew years earlier in New York City who asked if Ms. Brandt would do her a favor and rent the room to Karina Von Watteville. 

5.         I contacted Ms. Brandt, visited the apartment, rented the room, and have lived here for over a year now.  We get along extremely well.  The apartment is well kept, clean, and very pretty.  I have my own room, enjoy my privacy, and love living here.  I am extremely fond of Paulette Brandt.  She is a lovely woman, gracious, generous, extremely intelligent, and funny.

6.         At some point, after I moved in, Paulette Brandt and I discussed the fact that Karina Von Watteville owes her rent for the 14 months she lived here.  I spoke to Ms. Von Watteville who personally informed me that she felt bad about the situation.  Both individuals (Paulette Brandt and Karina Von Watteville) advised me that Ms. Von Watteville intended to pay Ms. Brandt in full when she received her social security check.  Ms. Von Watteville confirmed this for me after I moved in with Paulette Brandt.

7.         At some point in or around June 2014, Karina Von Watteville advised me that she had received her social security check.  After showing me a copy of the lump sum check, Ms. Von Watteville informed me that she had no intention of paying Paulette Brandt.  She did not explain why.  Ms. Brandt also ran into Karina Von Watteville who advised her that she received the lump sum check and evidently showed her a copy as well. 

8.         Paulette Brandt sent Ms. Von Watteville a rent demand letter.  Karina Von Watteville then began slandering Paulette Brandt and seemed obsessed with a friend of ours, Kelley Lynch.  I have known Kelley Lynch for over a year and she is a very nice, courteous, and respectful individual.  Karina Von Watteville does not know Ms. Lynch but became increasingly upset with her over Paulette Brandt’s rent demands.  Ms. Von Watteville began calling me obsessively about Kelley Lynch.  She was bad mouthing her relentlessly.  I did not understand why, felt extremely uncomfortable being placed in this position, and felt it simply related to Paulette Brandt’s rent demands.  Karina Von Watteville informed me that she planned to have Kelley Lynch investigated and wanted to get her in trouble.  Those are her exact words. 

9.         In or around November 2014, Paulette Brandt filed a Small Claims Complaint against Karina Von Watteville asking that she pay her the rental arrears due and owing.  I personally served Karina Von Watteville the Small Claims Complaint.  She was extremely angry and completely turned on Ms. Brandt.  She continued to slander Paulette Brandt and Kelley Lynch.

10.       In or around June 2014, Karina Von Watteville was living in a commercial space she rented under the name of Cover Girl Models.  She lived in the space with her two cats.  I visited her there on one occasion and was shocked to note that garbage and trash was piled around the room, the cats were using the entire space as their kitty litter box, and it smelled terribly. 

11.       I also dated a man who informed me that he permitted Karina Von Watteville to stay with him.  She left his apartment a mess, infested the apartment with cock roaches, and permitted someone else to stay there with her. 

12.       Karina Von Watteville evidently permitted her cats to use her room at Paulette Brandt’s apartment as a kitty litter box as well.  She personally informed me that, after receiving the formal two months notice to vacate Ms. Brandt’s property, she retaliated by leaving bags of garbage and trash behind and intentionally permitted her cats to urinate and defecate in the room.  She also apparently infested Paulette Brandt’s apartment with cock roaches.  Karina Von Watteville has infested numerous apartments with bed bugs and cock roaches.

13.       I do see Karina Von Watteville from time to time but she no longer speaks to me.  I am aware that, after receiving Paulette Brandt’s paperwork, she contacted Leonard Cohen’s lawyer.  Kelley Lynch was Cohen’s personal manager, is involved with legal matters related to him, and reported allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud to Internal Revenue Service.

14.       Since I have known Kelley Lynch she has informed me that a man by the name of Stephen Gianelli has criminally harassed and stalked her, members of her family, and others.  He is now sending Kelley Lynch highly slanderous and harassing emails about me and Paulette Brandt.  I do not know this individual.  It is my understanding that he offered Karina Von Watteville legal assistance with the Small Claims matter involving Paulette Brandt.  Neither Kelley Lynch nor I are parties to that matter.  I have seen some of the slanderous and threatening emails Stephen Gianelli has sent Ms. Lynch and have had numerous discussions with people who were present at both Small Claims hearings.  This is an excerpt of Stephen Gianelli’s email confirming that he provided Karina Von Watteville with legal advice and referred to her phone call to Leonard Cohen’s lawyer, Robert Kory. 

EXCERPT OF STALKER STEPHEN GIANELLI'S EMAIL TO KELLEY LYNCH (See Exhibit Attached hereto and made a part hereof):

Ms. Von Watteville followed my advice and never even had to get to the other two defenses I specified; she won the hearing with the first issue out of the box:  The claim is time barred under CCP § 339 as arising from the breach of an alleged oral contract. Simple and elegant. No credibility issues to resolve. The shortest distance between point “A” and point “B”.  Game, set match.

In contacting Robert Kory with advice about what to do about your disparagement, Ms.Von Watteville  did not thereby “insert herself into Leonard Cohen's Criminal Tax Fraud matter”, first because all she did was contact a lawyer who (according to your blog) has extensive knowledge about Kelley Lynch for advice about what do about your email harassment;  and second, because there is no pending “Criminal Tax Fraud matter” for Ms.Von Watteville to have inserted herself into.

15.       I was copied in on Kelley Lynch’s legal cease and desist letters addressing Ms. Von Watteville’s slanderous comments I (and others) repeated to Ms. Lynch.  I felt Ms. Lynch should be aware of what was being said as Ms. Von Watteville does not know her, seemed obsessed with her, and was repeating false information about her.  Karina Von Watteville also posted a Gold Record Leonard Cohen gave Kelley Lynch (that Von Watteville photographed) on her Google Plus account, and advised me that Ms. Lynch is an alcoholic.  I have no idea why she said this.  She has never seen Kelley Lynch drink and Kelley Lynch does not have a substance abuse problems and is most definitely not an alcoholic.  These are merely slanderous allegations meant to undermine her credibility.  The slander now appears to be retaliation over Paulette Brandt’s attempts to collect the outstanding rent she is owed.  I confirmed receipt of Kelley Lynch’s cease and desist letters and assured her that they accurately reflected what I had been told specifically by Karina Von Watteville.

16.       I want to reiterate that Karina Von Watteville a/k/a Karina Fimbel personally advised me that she owed Paulette Brandt 14 months rent and utilities and planned to pay her in full once she received her lump sum social security check.  I personally saw her waving around a wad of money at the food bank, bragging that she received money (including with respect to an accident she had) and informing people that it was $10,000 in cash.  I found it rather disturbing to witness her waving around so much cash in public and bragging about it.

17.       I didn’t share most of what I know about Karina Von Watteville, and what she has advised me, with Paulette Brandt because I didn’t want to get in the middle of the situation between them.  I considered both women my friends.  I am, however, deeply upset that I am now being slandered, by Stephen Gianelli (a man I don’t know), who is attributing the comments he has made to Karina Von Watteville.  It is a very disturbing situation.  I have never seen any of the activity this individual has now accused Paulette Brandt, Kelley Lynch, or myself of engaging in.  We have stable, simple, and down to earth lifestyles.  I personally believe this man, a complete stranger, is attempting to intimidate and threaten me and Ms. Von Watteville simply doesn’t want to pay her debts and probably feels she can benefit from a potential relationship with Leonard Cohen.  Ms. Von Watteville spends a tremendous amount of energy talking about how attractive she is, the royal families she knows, celebrities she has met, and gifts men shower upon her. 

18.       I have spent most of my adult life working as a model and actress and am now pursuing a college degree. 

I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
This declaration is executed on this 18th day of April 2015 in Los Angeles, California.

                                                                        Linda Carol

From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:45 AM
Subject: Linda Carol declaration posted on your blog
To: kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com

Ms. Lynch,

The general pathos you seek to evoke by attempting to inject the soap opera increasingly is your life into a pending motion to reconsider vacating a decade old default judgment entered in BC338322, dismissing it and/or allowing you to defend it on the merits (originally filed during the fall of 2013 and denied January 17, 2014) is not aiding your cause.

It just makes the body of your prolific post judgment email communications to the plaintiff and his counsel, and your never-ending attempts to relitigate that which was finally determined in 2006 look exactly like what it is: Pure harassment.

Second, the more you denigrate the associates of your associates by painting them as lowlife degenerates, the more you clarify to the world how low you – and they – have all fallen, Paulette Brandt included. If you associate with trash, and live with trash, what does that say about you? Therefore, if your characterizations of Ms. Von Watteville that you have cobbled together in the form of Ms. Carol’s unsigned declaration are accurate, you are not only sliming her, you are sliming her long term friend Linda Carol and you are sliming Ms. Von Watteville’s long term housemate Paulette Brandt, and (because you are a long term housemate of Carol and Brandt as well) you are sliming yourself.

Slander is not a zero sum game, where the slandered is diminished and the slanderer is acquitted or elevated. Often, as in this instance, the slandered only diminishes herself.

Of course, logic is not your strong suit, and neither is it Ms. Brandt’s or Ms. Carole’s.