Monday, November 3, 2014

Kelley Lynch's Response To The Innocence Project Re. Phil Spector

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: California Family Code Section 6404 - California Attorney Resources - California Laws
To: Innocence Project <>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, "g.robertson" <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, woodwardb <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, sedelman <>, JFeuer <>, "stan.garnett" <>, police <>, bailelliott <>, The Scientist <>, "Division, Criminal" <>

Hello Innocence Project,

Thank you for your email.  I do believe Phil Spector's case revolves around DNA.  

I will review the form.  I believe Mr. Spector's case deserves to be exposed.  I will also say that there is serious corruption in Los Angeles and former DA Steve Cooley aligned himself with Leonard Cohen and the City Attorney in targeting me.  What were the issues in the fraudulent domestic violence case?  The IRS, federal tax fraud, Phil Spector, Cohen's gun story about Phillip (there now three versions before LA Superior Court), Steve Cooley, and Alan Jackson.  Also, there appears to be serious problems with the judiciary in Los Angeles.  They have repeatedly violated my rights to due process; do not have jurisdiction over me in many matters; failed to review a serious Brady Motion; and, from what I can tell, aided and abetted theft, attempted to extort money from me, participated in a cover up related to criminal tax fraud, and helped retaliate.

In any event, thank you for all the hard work you do.  It is incredible to realize how many innocent people are trapped in this system and how many years it takes to tackle that fact. 

The former DA of Los Angeles, Steve Cooley, also has a pattern and practice of retaliating.  I believe Phil Spector's case was important because they haven't nailed a celebrity since Fatty Arbuckle.  Also, jurors prefer a Lifetime Movie narrative to DNA.  My friend, The Scientist, had a similar situation where a woman tried to kill herself at his house.  I believe he recorded her advising him that her plan involved framing him for murder.  As we all know, people high on drugs do not think correctly.

Perhaps the Innocence Project would consider assisting Mr. Spector.  As many people have noted, it raises very serious issues that involve putting people on the witness stand who embellish stories, have vendettas, and are willing to do or say anything.  

All the best,

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Innocence Project <> wrote:

Thank you for contacting the Innocence Project.  The Innocence Project only handles post-conviction cases in which DNA testing can prove innocence and overturn a wrongful conviction.  If the case does not involve biological evidence or DNA, please visit the Other Innocence Organizations page of our website to see if there is a program in your area that provides broader legal and investigative assistance.

Unfortunately, we are not equipped at this time to handle requests for assistance submitted via e-mail.  All cases for consideration should complete this form.  Requests for status updates, should be mailed to the below address.  No other documents should be submitted for initial review.  We review all written inquiries submitted via postal mail.  If you need more information on submitting a case, please click here.  
Innocence Project,
40 Worth Street, Suite 701
New York, NY 10013

If you would like to make a donation, please click here. If you are experiencing any issues making a donation, please call 212-364-5976.

If you are a journalist and would like to speak with someone in our Communications department, please call 212-364-5346.

If this is an employment, internship, or volunteer inquiry, please note that all available positions can be found on our website.

If your query does not fall under any of the above categories, we will do our best to respond to you in a timely manner.  


The Innocence Project

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Gianelli <>
Date: Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:53 PM
Subject: California Family Code Section 6404 - California Attorney Resources - California Laws
To: Kelley Lynch <>
Cc: blind <>

Ms. Lynch,

The Judicial Counsel form application and order for the registration of the Colorado protection order was authorized by Family Code Section 6404, which section number appears at the bottom left of form.

That section, linked above, requires the California registration of ANY out-of-state protection order, not just a domestic violence order.  

The form is mandatory for both types of orders and it's use does not change the character of the registered order. 

Nor does the clerk's summary in the court docket govern. 

You are simply wrong.
This e-mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential information that is privileged or that constitutes attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you.