Saturday, November 8, 2014

Kelley Lynch's Email To IRS Re. The Allegations That Leonard Cohen Committed Criminal Tax Fraud, Possible Fraudulent Tax Returns, & Other Legitimate Tax & Corporate Matters

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 5:15 PM
Subject: Re:
To:, "irs.commissioner" <>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, woodwardb <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, police <>, sedelman <>, JFeuer <>, "kevin.prins" <>, Sherab Posel <>, "" <>, "" <>


Since I did not handle corporate, tax, accounting, financial, or investment matters, I cannot take a position with respect to the federal or state corporate tax returns.  Leonard Cohen appears to have argued that the federal and state corporate tax returns for a number of entities are fraudulent.  I have asked his representative to confirm this.  It seems like a very [serious] matter potentially involving criminal conduct.  I can now unequivocally state that I was fraudulently induced to enter into many agreements with Leonard Cohen and various corporations.

I believe the corporate books and records, and K-1 partnership information, related to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and Traditional Holdings, LLC are accurate.  I believe the LCI K-1s are illegal and evidence of criminal conduct.  Cohen's own declaration contradicts these K-1s and the K-1s contradict and prove fraud with respect to the fabricated and fraudulent financial ledger that willfully disregards corporate governance, federal and state tax returns, corporate accounting practices (that would address ownership interests, equity, liabilities, corporate distributions and shareholder loans - including Cohen's nearly $6.7 million in loans/expenditures re. TH that he is contractually obligated to repay with interest, approximating $4 million now), etc.

I do not know what to say about the TH phantom income shifted to me but not distributed.  

It is my personal belief that not only is the judgment void and evidence of theft and fraud but the settlement agreement between Westin and Cohen is void.  

Having said all of this, LA Superior Court has no jurisdiction to hear federal tax matters.  Their illegal judgment essentially altered my federal tax returns with respect to ownership interests.  My interests were not held in trust for Cohen.  There is no trust.  I am unaware of a LC Family Trust account with Greenberg.  The only two trusts I know of that Greenberg invested for Cohen are the two charitable remainder trusts so assume that aspect of the "ledger" has to do with shenanigans.

People have gone to great lengths to destroy my life over this situation.  Lindsey even involved himself with Cohen and Kory.  The custody matter was clearly coordinated.  I believe the same is true for SWAT.  I cannot explain Killer King or the entirely fraudulent file.  There are no legal merits to any of these matters.  There are simply fabricated narratives and vicious tactics.  Leonard Cohen retaliated with his law suit against me because I reported the allegations of his criminal tax fraud to IRS and other authorities.  I suppose he feels his fraudulent Lifetime Movie narrative about an [allegedly & fictitious] disgruntled ex-lover, who contacted him for no legitimate reason, and evidently wants to attend his concert, explains away tax fraud, theft, witness tampering, extortion attempts, bribery, legal conspiracy, etc.

I would like to reiterate that Stephen Gianelli and Susanne Walsh's ongoing obsession with me, my sons, family members, friends, and others is gravely disturbing and alarming.  That includes, but is not limited to, their writing the City Attorney and copying us in on those slanderous, harassing emails.  I want nothing to do with that office and view it as a Criminal Enterprise per RICO.  

All the best,

On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

Richard Westin,

I have been attempting to determine what "mistake" you rectified with respect to Traditional Holdings, LLC.  Leonard Cohen appeared to testify that the "mistake" related to my ownership interest in that entity.  I do not know how that would relate to my ownership interest in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc.  

It is very clear that Leonard Cohen and his representatives feel very comfortable disregarding my requests for IRS required form 1099 for 2004; disregarding my request that Cohen rescind illegal K-1s (transmitted to State of Kentucky and IRS) indicating that I have an ownership in LCI and advising tax authorities that I received $0 income from that entity for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005; disregarding my requests asking that they explain the TH partnership K-1s (transmitted to IRS and others) for the years 2001, 2002, and 2003 indicating that i am partner in TH and received income for those years; disregarding my requests that they explain how they view the federal tax returns with respect to these entities and partnership documents provided to tax authorities re. my ownership; disregarding my request (including to you) to inspect all corporate books and records related to LC Productions, Inc., Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., LC Investments, LLC, Traditional Holdings, LLC, and Old Ideas, LLC.  I have made other requests as well.  I have also asked if they are taking the position that fraudulent tax returns were prepared and transmitted to IRS, State of Kentucky, FTB, or other tax authorities.  These are entirely legitimate legal, tax, financial, business and accounting matters.

Leonard Cohen testified that he entered into a settlement agreement with you, related to the mistake that may involve Traditional Holdings, and publicly stated that you compensated him with substantial monies.  I have no information about that matter and was wrongfully excluded from any and [all] settlement discussions and agreements.

It is my firm belief, based on Cohen's actions, testimony, legal documents, and conduct, that I was fraudulently induced into entering into many agreements with Cohen and these corporate entities.  Leonard Cohen engaged in willful tax evasion; he has acted negligently with respect to many matters - including his nearly $6.7 million loans/expenditures re TH corporate assets.  He had and has a legally binding obligation to repay those loans/expenditures within 3 years at 6 percent interest.  I have no idea who was supposed to create the loan documents.  I was clear with Cohen - I do not handle corporate, tax, accounting, IRS, legal matters or loan documents.  That was not my job.  

I personally believe the settlement agreement is illegal.  I know the default judgment is because I was not served.  I didn't resemble the individual.  I have witnesses that attended the hearing where the judge appeared to argue Leonard Cohen's case.  Leonard Cohen has obtained judgments, orders, and verdicts based on fraud and perjury.

I am attempting to address federal tax and corporate.  What mistake did you rectify?  How can Leonard Cohen or his representatives willfully disregard all corporate books, records, stock shares, agreements, my Indemnity Agreement, the Annuity Agreement, other documents and information, and federal and state tax returns?  The judgment is evidence of theft and there issues with the ongoing accumulation of fraudulent financial interest based on a fabricated fraudulent expense ledger.  The ledger in no way resembles an actual accounting.

I would appreciate your response.  I believe I have been extremely diligent and have been "arrested" for, as LAPD noted in their report, requesting tax information.  According to Detective Viramontes, Leonard Cohen was not comfortable with my requests for tax information.  Cohen has used a fraudulently registered "domestic violence" order to prevent me from requesting and receiving IRS required documents and information and effecting serving on a corporate entity although that corporation advised IRS, via K-1s, that I have an ownership interest in the entity.  Cohen also refuses to provide me with the back-up documentation necessary to prepare a proper accounting that addresses assets, liabilities, equity, and - all corporate distributions and shareholder loans.  He has not explained why LCI and others (including himself) collected royalty income with respect to intellectual property assets owned by Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc.  The State of Kentucky advised me to place the non-revocable assignments in a safety deposit box and both Ken Cleveland and my former accountant, Dale Burgess, believe the assets are still in Blue Mist.  Cohen's complaint confirms that nothing with respect to BMT or the assignments was unwound. 

There are formalities involved with dissolving or winding of corporate structures.  Those are being willfully disregarded.

Because of this situation, a Bay Area lawyer (Stephen Gianelli), Cohen's fan (Susanne Walsh), and possibly others, believe they have a right to criminally harass, stalk, intimidate, and threaten, me, my sons, sister, friends, and others.  It is a highly coordinated campaign.  These individuals are affiliated or aligned with Leonard Cohen.  It's possible Gianelli found a "sympathetic ear" with Phil Spector's prosecutor about me.  It's factual that Phil Spector's DA joined forces with Cohen and the City Attorney to target me, lie about me, falsely arrest and imprison me, retaliate against me.  The stakes are evidently high.  My sons lives have been destroyed over this situation.

Leonard Cohen, as a Buddhist teacher of mine noted, is an incredibly aggressive, vengeful, and vindictive individual.  He also appears to be a thief.  See Steven Machat and Phil Spector.  LA Superior Court has no right or authority to aid and abet theft.  They have no jurisdiction over me or the corporations inserted into the default.  I can assure you that there is no public policy favoring theft, fraud, perjury, concealment, obstruction of justice, prosecutorial misconduct, witness tampering, etc.

The judgment is void and I believe the settlement agree is as well.  Cohen refuses to provide me with a copy of that agreement or any details regarding the settlement negotiations.  

Kelley Lynch

Section 1668 of the Civil Code provides that “[a]ll contracts which have for their object, directly or indirectly, to exempt any one from responsibility for his own fraud, . . . whether willful or negligent, are against the policy of the law.”  This provision encompasses intentional and negligent misrepresentation.  (Blankenheim v. E. F. Hutton & Co. (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 1463, 1471-1473.)  Accordingly, as Witkin explains:  “A party to a contract who has been guilty of fraud in its inducement cannot absolve himself or herself from the effects of his or her fraud by any stipulation in the contract, either that no representations have been made, or that any right that might be grounded upon them is waived.  Such a stipulation or waiver will be ignored, and parol evidence of misrepresentations will be admitted, for the reason that fraud renders the whole agreement voidable, including the waiver provision.”  (1 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (10th ed. 2005) Contracts, § 304, p. 330.)