Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Leonard Cohen's Operative, the 14th Sheepdog (Stephen Gianelli) - Continues To Target Me Over My Appeal & Writ Of Habeas Corpus, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Re:
To: The-14th Sheepdog <>, STEPHEN GIANELLI <>, Washington Field <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, ASKDOJ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, rbyucaipa <>, Robert MacMillan <>, moseszzz <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, "Hoffman, Rand" <>, Mick Brown <>, woodwardb <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, info <>, "" <>

To the FBI,

I have the Sheepdog mixed up with no one.  See Gianelli's article about his 14th Sheepdog.  Then see this email address from the man criminally harassing me.  Dangerously unstable hardly begins to describe this lunatic whose dog shits/vomits religious pujas onto a carpet - as he wrote in his article (which I have in my possession) regarding the 14th Sheepdog, targeting the 14th Sharmapa. 

 I never had booze fueled anything.  This known as slander.  I had a lot of friends living with me and their names are - Gesar Mukpo, His Holiness Kusum Lingpa, His Eminence Yongzin Rinpoche, His Eminence Choegon Rinpoche, and others.  I also had friends such as Dr. Yeshe Dhonden (the Dalai Lama's doctor) stay with me.  Bhakha Tulku Rinpoche visited frequently as did many lamas.  This is a bald-faced lie and Leonard Cohen, Steve Lindsey, and others think slander is a defense to their conduct?  Even Superfon knows I didn't drink.  This man is insane.

Did Doug Davis/FTB laugh about me?" Are the stewards of the taxpayer's money laughing about Leonard Cohen's attempts to defraud the U.S. and various state governments.  Doug Davis  never advised me that he blocked me.  It is interesting that Gianelli (the 14th Sheepdog) is focused on the FTB.  I know Cohen's tax lawyer, Westin, was and just wrote the FTB about issues related to Cohen, LCI, and TH. 
I've been clear about Cutler.  I could care less about this alleged tough guy.  I've addressed this with Phil Spector and, after doing so, heard from Phil Spector personally.  I view Bruce Cutler as a coward who was unable to help his client.  I've been clear - Gianelli should call Cutler up and ask him to marry him.  What point is the Sheepdog making - that he is Gianelli?  Gianelli withdrew from what field?  Advocacy of Leonard Cohen?  Or, setting up reasonable doubt theories about Phil Spector on the internet so they could be attacked and refuted.  Gianelli and Michelle Blaine (who stole nearly $900,000 from Phil Spector and someone I view as the female Leonard Cohen - a bald-faced liar and thief) aligned herself with Gianelli/Blogonaut to target my email accounts and blogs.  They have tried everything to silence me. 
My lawyer is in possession of the Writ and either filed it or will file it.  I see Gianelli's obsessed with my case.  There's no Reply because we attempted to abandon the appeal - due to ongoing prosecutorial misconduct, retaliation, further lies on the part of the City Attorney, etc.  I have a constitutional right to abandon that appeal and this is going to become a legal issue with the County of Los Angeles.

Gianelli and the 14th Sheepdog have  been advised relentlessly to CEASE AND DESIST.

All the best,

Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information
Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order) 04/12/2013 Notice-Hearing (Appellate)
Filed by Clerk
04/10/2013 Order (Appellant's motions for relief from default to file reply brief and continue hearing date are granted. FL=RC )
Filed by Court
Filed by Clerk

On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:19 AM, The-14th Sheepdog <> wrote:
As I said, you have me confused with someone else - but that is not the first time you made that mistake.

This is the liar known as Stephen Gianelli.  See his article on this Blog targeting me and the 14th Sharmapa - as the 14th Sheepdog.  What a dangerously unstable stark raving lunatic.
You have a perceptual blind-spot: You always attribute things that bother/annoy you, even against the evidence, to persons you dislike.
You always assume that those who humor you the most agree with you. (Case in point, you assumed that the former friend from LA who wrote Blogonaut to describe your booze fueled excesses in the old days was Betsy Superfon [WRONG] and you made similar mistakes with your public defenders [it is the one who blew the most smoke up your behind that thinks you are in total denial about your mental health].

I don't have a drinking problem.  Never had one.  And, my three witnesses confirmed this for my public defender at my alleged probation hearing which was and remains unconscionable.  Cohen's slander is not a defense to the allegations I am now raising in my lawsuit against him and his testimony - at my alleged intent to annoy Stalinesque Show Trial was preposterous (and perjured).  Who cares?  My public defender, who contacted Gianelli, re. witnesses and what they could or could not corroborate, has some serious problems with lying.  I suppose that's why he thinks I have mental health issues.  How do you know when a lawyer's lying?  Their lips are moving.  
You thought that the man from the FTB Doug Davis (the one who laughed about you in an email and who blocked you in 2012) was a "nice man" who "understood what I was going through" (or so you testified in trial transcript excerpts you posted on your blog).

Doug Davis/FTB never blocked my emails.  I thought Doug Davis was a nice man.  What's the issue?  My colleagues were with me when Doug Davis and I spoke.  
You were still emailing Cutler in late 2011 - even AFTER you were told in 2009 he had spoken to Pat Dixon about your UNWANTED communications and viewed you as a crazy stalker.
 Cutler and Dixon can get married for all I care.  I've addressed Cutler and my views on him with Phil Spector and could care less about this coward.  
I could go on but my point is made.
As I said, Gianelli lives abroad and has withdrawn from the field.

I don't think Gianelli's withdrawn from the cyber-terrorism/criminal harassment field.  See the 14th Sheepdog.  
As of this moment, no "writ" and no "motion to consolidate" and no "reply brief" has been filed.


No Reply Brief was filed because we attempted to abandon the appeal.  The appellate division evidently has something else in mind for me.  Covering for the lower court, no doubt?  I do know how appellate division's work and will be litigating their refusal to permit me to abandon my appeal in due course.  Oral arguments have been scheduled.  The Writ has or will be filed. 

Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order) 04/12/2013 Notice-Hearing (Appellate)
Filed by Clerk

04/10/2013 Order (Appellant's motions for relief from default to file reply brief and continue hearing date are granted. FL=RC )
Filed by Court

Filed by Clerk