Sunday, December 6, 2015

The Criminal's Conduct Will Be Carefully Documented

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 11:52 AM
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,, alan hootnick <>

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

The criminal's attempts to dissuade me have failed miserably.  The man is a chronic liar who represents Cohen.  That is exceedingly apparent.  Is the criminal coming to California?  I'll document his conduct carefully and give my family and friends a head's up that there's a criminal on the loose.

These are not allegations about Cohen.  He has stolen IP and my share of companies.  He has embezzled approximately $6.7 million from one corporation alone.  The man is a common thief who has also stolen from Machat & Machat and probably Phil Spector (according to Machat who negotiated the album contract between the two of them and Warner Bros.). 

Were Steve Ipsen's retaliation claims against Cooley also a "conspiracy?"  Well, not according to the federal court.  This is evidently standard operating procedure in Los Angeles.  

I am focused on finalizing my new document for Tax Court re. the evidence blog tampering and request for that court to refer the matter to federal law enforcement for an investigation.  I remain convinced it is Gianelli.  His criminal conduct is blatant but he's clear that no one has done anything.  Cohen's clear about that too.  They think alike.


From: Stephen Gianelli <>
Date: Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: LYNCH: "May I attack this later as fraud and perjury?" THE COURT: "No." (Nice try changing the subject to everting but the transcript that proves you a liar, Lynch.)
To: Kelley Lynch <>

Once again Ms. Lynch you change the subject.

I wish you the very best of luck with your suit.

I want to hear all about it just as soon as I return from sunnier climes in March of next year.

But I have no doubt - none - that any judge in the Central District of California will conclude that your complaint is prolix, your conspiracy allegations implausible, your damage theories time barred, your allegations of theft by Cohen and claim to property precluded by the. 2006 J, that the litigation conduct you reference privileged, and that you lack standing as a RICO plaintiff. It is THAT clear. Crystal in fact.

On Sunday, December 6, 2015, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:
Stephen Gianelli,
Since you are clear that your attempts to dissuade me haven't worked, why not confess to your actual motives.  A federal judge will decide if I have the right to attack the fraud judgments, orders, and verdicts for what they are:  a criminal legal conspiracy that is playing out across certain state borders.  And Cooley even got in on the fun.  I think you've made it clear that certain actors in Los Angeles view my trial as somehow related to Spector's appeal.  I suppose that might involve the DA's re-election campaign where Jackson and Trutanich were running for DA.  That would explain Cohen's testimony about Spector and a gun.  Unfortunately, Cohen's testimony contradicts the versions the prosecutors used in motions re. prior bad acts and both of those are contradicted by Cohen's email to my so-called prosecutor.  That doesn't explain the lies about federal tax matters.  Nothing is going to change the record now.
Perhaps a federal judge will understand how a discussion about the definition of directly and indirectly and insane people (Cohen and his witness lawyers) led to a fraudulent domestic violence order in California.  However, you are not a federal court and you will not be deciding any matter.  You do not represent me. You have engaged in egregious criminal conduct and that includes relentlessly targeting my sons, family members, friends, Paulette Brandt, and witnesses.
It is obvious that you represent Cohen and are moonlighting for Spector's prosecutors.  You argue Spector's prosecutors theories online.  For instance, when you descended on Truth Sentinel to slander me and Ann Diamond, you argued that Clarkson's DNA was not on the bullets when in fact it was.  You argued that Spector's defense never stated that the gun was not his but they did.  You are a chronic liar.  Perhaps your next gig could be infiltrating matters for ISIS.  Ask Alan Hootnick, since you are clearly impressed he was in CIA, for some tips since your act is fairly blatant and people believe you belong in prison.  I believe you are "Kelly Green" and know you are the 14th Sheepdog and 17th Shitzu.  I do have an email from a computer engineer confirming information about Green's IP address and who they think Green is:: YOU.
Cease and desist, criminal.
Kelley Lynch

Do you think this man is also a drug addict or just a common criminal.  Carolyn Enichen retired and this is now a federal matter so a federal court will decide if the rest of the sentence said "I cannot give you legal advice."  Perhaps the federal judge will understand why a discussion about directly v. indirectly and insane people (Cohen and his witness lawyers) led to a fraud domestic violence order in Cali.  I have no details about the temporary orders or Cohen's testimony.  I know he made an extraordinary flight into Colorado in the midst of his European tour the day after his lawyers threatened Ann Diamond and raised criminal tax fraud as one of the issues.  Only a sycophant or narcissist would conclude that I want to have contact with the aggressive thief, con artist Leonard Cohen.  Or, certain local government actors that have careers to advance.
One thing is certain - Gianelli will not be the federal judge.  And, Cooley retaliates and the federal court is well aware of that fact so I'll ask the federal court to take judicial notice of the lawsuit Cooley's deputies filed against him.