Sunday, December 6, 2015

The Criminal Stalker Is Amused With Himself

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:52 AM
Subject: Fwd: FW: More lies from Lynch - here is the transcript
To: Stephen Gianelli <>, alan hootnick <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, ": Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>,, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,

Alan Hootnick,

Gianelli seems quite pissed off about this issue.  The man uses monikers such as 14th Sheepdog, Mongochili, 17th Shitzu, etc.  How would Gianelli know where "Kelly Green" lives?  Does he have a copy of her driver's license?  This is best posting pal.  Ann Diamond sees through his use of monikers.  He harasses and slanders her as well.  I'll privately send you the email a computer engineer sent me advising me that Green's IP address was a Pennsylvania IP and why he personally felt it was Gianelli.  Decide for yourself.  This man is a professional criminal.  

I'm reviewing his emails for my RICO suits.  Isn't the criminal spending Christmas in California and Mexico?  Perhaps he'll have Christmas dinner with Spector's prosecutors.  Cooley's investigator, Marko, asked me to convey the following message to Denver FBI:  "Merry Christmas."  That led my colleague to conclude that it sounded like something the Sopranos would say prior to riddling a car with bullets.  Others concluded it meant "F.U" to FBI.  

In any event, the operative's attempts to dissuade me have not accomplished the desired results.  I suppose targeting my sons for six and a half straight years; lying about me while writing my prosecutor; etc. were part of those attempts to dissuade me.  Or, lying to IRS Chief Trial Counsel's office.  I am about to file a new document in the Tax Court matter asking the Court to refer the situation with my Tax Petition evidence blog to federal law enforcement for an investigation.  Gianelli wrote that even if it was him, I couldn't prove that because he uses TOR.  He also apparently uses "cover my ass."  

Kelley Lynch

When Stephen Gianelli’s emails land in my inbox, mostly out of the blue and unsolicited, they are so overflowing with repetitive accusations, misinformation, threats, self-aggrandizing boasts, undiluted rage, and general nastiness that it's next to impossible to read to the end of one of them. My impulse is always to ignore them and tell him to stop sending them. That he seems to have unlimited energy  and endless time to go over all these details with someone he does not know in an attempt to win me over, while at the same time he constantly accuses me of having an ancient axe to grind with Cohen (i.e. I'm a hopeless case, as far as he's concerned, so he's barking furiously up the wrong tree), would under normal circumstances be a sign of mental imbalance.

He always throws in plenty of insults, false statements and fanciful deductions. His tone is that of a pitbull straining at the leash and gives me flashbacks of a courtroom where I’m being cross-examined by a vicious criminal lawyer whose whole strategy is to exhaust and terrorize the witness. Gianelli’s game is to complicate and obfuscate, mixing legal arguments with irrelevant nonsense. He seems to assume his opponent is stupid and weak and can be overwhelmed by a word-salad. I think some of this could be caused by his overuse of "copy and paste" --  he's in a hurry and not really writing "to me" or trying to make a persuasive argument. He doesnt reread his emails to see what kind of message they actually convey: that the writer is standing on some soapbox in his mind, shouting at the world, like certain mental patients you see walking the streets who seem to be mad at the air, the cars, the sidewalk.

He's obviously not interested in holding a discussion, getting to the truth, or looking beyond the various documents he "downloaded at his own expense"  -- and as anyone with common sense knows, legal documents don't prove what really happened in 2004-5.  They convey some of the evidence, all of it coming from one side.

Gianelli's explanation as to why he's been out to get Kelley Lynch since 2008, does not make sense either. He claims she slandered him and called him names on the internet, and in revenge he has totally immersed himself in her legal case. To the point of contacting her relatives and friends, spreading false stories about her, making up quotes, “writing her in jail”, posting photos of her residence and roommates on his blog – for the past seven years. Nobody in their right mind, let alone a 'successful trial lawyer' -- who has no material interest in this case, and is not a paid shill -- behaves like this. It's not just extremely unprofessional, it would land him on 'stress leave' or in serious trouble with his colleagues and peers if he were still practicing. Hiding behind the handle Blogonaut would not conceal his identity for long, especially not on the porous internet. His badly written and often illogical, emotional rants would embarrass and bring him close to  professional suicide.

But apparently since he's retired, and apparently well-off, and lives in a comfortable tax haven on Crete, he doesn't seem to care and just indulges his childish fantasies and catty remarks with his tiny circle of  cronies. It’s fairly obvious he uses alternate accounts and different IDs, e.g. “Mongochili,” to make it appear others read his blog and share his ‘obcession’ with Lynch. His sheer extremism indicates he is either a “rogue criminal lawyer” gone slightly postal, or a paid agent of Leonard Cohen and/or his legal team.  I think the latter.

I think his over-the-top campaign will have the opposite effect than the one intended: it can only make people suspicious of the case against Kelley Lynch. Otherwise, why not let justice take its course? Why subject her to endless attacks over the internet if she has already been declared guilty? This kind of harassment resembles 'gang stalking' -- except that Gianelli seems to be both the leader and most of the membership of his own gang.

Gianelli is like no other email correspondent I have ever had. A single-paragraph response from my end always leads to a flood from his. Each exchange is like a trip down a rabbithole of  irrational rage. Here and there he mixes in details and facts which might be worth discussing, if they weren’t drowned by high-volume invective. Of course this could be a tactic:  if he really was ever a successful trial lawyer, it may have been by being an insufferable bully. Or maybe most of his cases involved low-life criminals or people with little or no education.

He claims to have accurately predicted the outcome of every Lynch hearing -- but then so could I. As we all know, cases are won on technicalities. That's one of the reasons, including the 10-year series of precedents, that I am not surprised the judge dismissed Kelley's motion.

If Gianelli were truly a respectable lawyer, he would restrict his comments to these legal matters, and not engage in bizarre slander and speculation. He would have no need to bring up my "past" - or a wacked version of it that sounds like it came from someone on Cohen's disinfo team. He draws from a psychological profile that is easily recognizable because I have heard it from other Cohen groupies. As someone who saw a bit too much when I knew Cohen, I’m no stranger to slander, I've written out my story on a public blog etc. where anyone can read what I have to say. Much of what I have written on Cohen was initially to defend myself against gossip and rumours that were circulated (and believed) by some of his friends. My side is completely different, much more detailed and accurate. It's also quite revealing of the life of a clever pop idol in our celebrity-worshiping culture. There's no point in my arguing with people who base their opinions on ridiculous myths, like the 'restraining order' that never was. Cohen's deceptive tactics have not really evolved in the past twenty years, since he used them on me.

I really don't care if Gianelli thinks I am a star-struck 'scorned woman' who never got over her passing encounter with greatness. This Mafia-style lawyer's fixed opinions, based on trashy clichés say much more about him than they do about me or my writing, or why I became interested in what really happened to Kelley Lynch.

And of course, no one would ever suspect Leonard Cohen of encouraging Gianelli. But in my experience, Gianelli is exactly the kind of human megaphone Cohen places in charge of his 'secret business.' Like other clowns from Cohen's private entourage that I have met over the years, he may not even realize he's being used because he is ridiculous and therefore disposable. It's a fascinating system that owes much to the criminal underworld that Leonard Cohen skirts with all the skill of someone born into it. I'm sure Gianelli feels at home, and knows his place, in that world where he acts the part of a useful idiot whose job is to create a circus atmosphere and put the audience into a deeper state of trance.

I am by now firmly convinced Lynch is a patsy/victim of a weird consortium of Cohen associates, clueless supporters, and Cohen himself. If I hadn't lived next door to Leonard Cohen, and witnessed similar dynamics twenty years ago, I might believe differently. But the essence of what happened to Kelley also happened to me, two decades ago, on a lesser scale with lower stakes. It was relatively easy for me to walk away from it back then – my reputation was damaged but my life was not utterly destroyed by my association with Leonard Cohen, as Kelley's was.

I empathize with her situation, and see it as just one more story of the corruption that is sinking the whole world. I know Leonard Cohen would agree with that. He would only disagree with the idea that we all have an obligation to oppose injustice, rather than 'let it go by' and even profit from it. 

Ann D.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 8:55 AM
Subject: FW: More lies from Lynch - here is the transcript
To: Kelley Lynch <>
Cc: alan hootnick <>

NEWSFLASH: I live fulltime on Crete. And Kelley Green lives somewhere in Michigan. Computer engineer my ass! Ha!

From: Kelley Lynch []
Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2015 6:46 PM
To: Stephen Gianelli; alan hootnick
Subject: Fwd: More lies from Lynch - here is the transcript

Alan Hootnick,

A computer engineer tracked Green's IP address to Pennsylvania and believes it is Gianelli.  The man's a chronic liar with motive so I don't think he'll confess.  

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 8:39 AM
Subject: RE: More lies from Lynch - here is the transcript
To: Kelley Lynch <>
Cc: alan hootnick <>

Oh, shut up and give it a rest, Lynch. I am sure Kelly Green, who is a female paramedic in the middle United States, will have a nice laugh about this email (via blind cc).

From: Kelley Lynch []
Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2015 6:03 PM
To: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI; *irs. commissioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; : Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; nsapao; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; Harriet Ryan; hailey.branson; Stan Garnett;; mayor.garcetti; Opla-pd-los-occ; Kelly.Sopko; Whistleblower; Attacheottawa;
Cc: alan hootnick
Subject: Re: More lies from Lynch - here is the transcript

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

Gianelli continues to criminally harass and slander me to third parties.  He uses monikers.  I personally believe Gianelli is "Kelly Green" his best posting pal.  He has once again been advised to cease and desist.  The man's obsessed with me, my set up trial, Phil Spector, and Cohen's criminal tax fraud.  He argues that Cohen had a right essentially to steal $6.7 million in TH assets.  The federal tax issues have not been litigated and that includes Cohen's criminal and illegal refusal to provide me with 1099, K-1s, and the refusal to rescind the illegal K-1s LCI transmitted to IRS.  Did my trial relate to Spector's appeal?  Is the Pope Catholic?  Streeter elicited testimony about the gun incident re. Spector using an email Cohen was NOT copied on.  He lied and perjured himself.  She concealed the portion of that email to IRS Commissioner's Staff.  She "misspoke."  She also lies and tried to put words into my mouth.  It's all on the record.  The woman lies and she lied extensively about federal tax matters.  Cohen's the thief.  Cohen embezzled corporate assets.  And the judgment is evidence of theft, extortion, embezzlement, self-dealing, and money laundering.  LA Superior Court provides dime-a-dozen restraining orders to malign, discredit, and witness tampering with others.  That's entirely clear.  The VAWA funding fraud demands an investigation.  There is no domestic violence order.  There is further fraud.  The ambulance chaser continues to represent Leonard Cohen and is on a fishing expedition re. Phil Spector.  Everyone has been advised to maintain his harassing, slanderous emails.  


On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:
Alan Hootnick,

This criminal is out of control.  The judge said, and feel free to read the transcript, that she could not give me legal advice.  Furthermore, my alleged accuser was not present and available for confrontation.  That order, issued without findings, has now been fraudulently registered in California as a new "domestic violence order."  Therefore, DOJ and Senate Judiciary should investigate it as VAWA funding fraud which is precisely what it is.  Cohen was desperate to silence me; flew into Colorado in the midst of his European tour; lied extensively in his declaration (that I was unaware of until after the hearing); and threatened journalist Ann Diamond.  One of the issues he threatened her over - mentioning his criminal tax fraud although I have Kory's memorandum confirming that Cohen and his representatives failed to report $8 million gross income to IRS in 2001.  Cohen personally borrowed and/or caused to be expended approximately $6.7 million from TH alone.  He failed to address that fact in the LA Superior Court fraudulent judgment case.  The judgment is evidence of theft and Cohen's attempt to extort further financial interest from me (when renewing the judgment in July 2015) will be addressed as extortion.  

Gianelli's emails have not dissuaded me.  I do take great offense at this criminal slandering me to third parties.  He is the individual who contacted my alleged prosecutor and began lying to her about me; slandering me; and copying in my sons, family, and Paulette Brandt.  Cohen's lawyer, Rice, was copied on some of those emails.  Gianelli and Cohen's lawyers are now engaged in a moronic cover-your-ass operation.  He has attempted to interfere with an IRS Tax Court case, routinely lies to federal authorities, and definitely appears to be affiliated with Spector's prosecutors.  Perhaps that's why this criminal is now harassing me over my trial (featuring the City Attorney's lies about federal tax matters) and the Spector appeal.  It was very coincidental that Cooley and Cohen were publicly aligned in targeting me over the fraud domestic violence order, no?  And, there appears to have been a quid pro quo that resulted in Cohen's testimony about Spector and a gun.  The email the prosecutor used was NOT cc'd to Cohen.  He merely perjured himself over that issue.  He perjured himself, and confessed to this, over the "dating relationship"  There was not a dating relationship and the Colorado order is not a "domestic violence order."  This is now a federal matter that crossed state borders.  Cohen also testified that I never stole from him - just his peace of mind.

In any event, I think my lawyers should have questioned him extensively over his role in CIA's MKULTRA; as recon during the Bay of Pigs; and with respect to his other deranged statements.  Cohen is the individual with the long and publicly documented history of drug abuse, alcoholism, and mental health issues.  Gianelli doesn't know me but slanders me for Cohen and LA Confidential.  He's on someone's payroll.  

Read the transcript:  the judge said she could not give me legal advice.  Leonard Cohen uses fraud and perjury to obtain judgments, verdicts, and dime-a-dozen "restraining orders."  His financial investor was clear in June 2005 (before Cohen retaliated with his bullshit Complaint that is not supported by the evidence) that Cohen/Kory planned to use fraudulent restraining orders to discredit me.  It's nothing other than slander and witness tampering.  

If Gianelli wants to slander me to you, I would prefer not being copied in because this man is a criminal who belongs in prison and has relentlessly targeted my sons, family members, Paulette Brandt, witnesses, and others.  

Is he Anabelle Baile?  Let's see what unfolds.  Gianelli uses monikers.  I have evidence of that fact.  

Kelley Lynch

Annabelle Balle Alan Hootnick are you an attorney? This is good news?
Alan Hootnick
Alan Hootnick well, Dennis Riordan is the best appeals lawyer in California, and he has a good record of winning appeals in the 9th Circuit Court
Odzer Chenma
Odzer Chenma And that's why people are so desperate. Phil Spector should prevail before the 9th Circuit and his prosecutors held accountable for what they have done here. The 9th Circuit is sick and tired of prosecutorial misconduct and actually believes prosecut...See More
Like · Reply · 2 · 19 hrs · Edited
Annabelle Balle
Annabelle Balle Are there really that many haters and are they that aggressive as to harm those that stand on the Spector side?
Unlike · Reply · 1 · 17 hrs
Odzer Chenma
Odzer Chenma I don't know if there are that many haters, Annabelle but they are prolific and have trapped themselves.
Like · Reply · 2 · 12 hrs
Odzer Chenma
Odzer Chenma Exhibit A: Blog was evidently created for Spector trials. Lawyer obviously wrote the text. Hatred towards Cutler. This has taken place all over the internet and people understand it. The motive is to harm people who support Spector. It has rebounded.
Like · Reply · 1 · 12 hrs
Annabelle Balle
Annabelle Balle Odzer, do you have the link to the site you mention?
Unlike · Reply · 1 · 11 hrs
Odzer Chenma
Odzer Chenma Just click on the link above. The site appears to be speaking directly to the jurors and a lawyer clearly wrote the summaries. There were many blogs dedicated to this type of activity. Also, a highly organized campaign of slander and defamation throughout the internet. Some of it run by the "Friends of Lana Clarkson," which is really Clarkson's publicist who represents aging stars.
Like · Reply · 47 mins

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:
Cease and desist, Gianelli.

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 3:36 AM, STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <> wrote:
Here is the link where I posted Lynch’s Colorado civil harassment hearing on September 12, 2008 – where (at about page 22) Lynch asks the court to stop the hearing in progress and to simply issue the permanent order.

She is told that SHE CANNOT later attack the order as “fraudulent” if she agreed to it.