Thursday, November 26, 2015

The Criminal Stalker Wants To Harass Me Over The Fraud Domestic Violence Program Being Run Out Of Los Angeles & VAWA Funding Fraud

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:57 AM
Subject: Domestic Violence Order & VAWA Funding Fraud
To: Whistleblower <>, alan hootnick <>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Attacheottawa <>,, Paulette Brandt <>

Hello Senate Judiciary,

The Criminal Stalker (who routinely lies to IRS, FBI, DOJ, etc.) is all over the place today, Thanksgiving.  His employers must be paying him overtime for his holiday work, no?  The Criminal has attached the transcript of the so-called hearing re. my motion to vacate the fraudulent domestic violence order.  However, there are bigger issues here.  That would include, but is not limited to, California's use of Domestic Violence form DV-600 to register all non-domestic violence orders in California and fraudulently register them in domestic violence data bases which is wire fraud.  LA Superior Court illegally sentences people for "domestic violence" fraud orders; issues fraudulent domestic violence related orders (after the trial re. "witnesses" who are also Cohen's paid lawyers); and attempts to extort domestic violence fines out of individuals like myself.  Vanderet had no jurisdiction over me; Boulder Combined Court advised me that the fraud Colorado order (issued without "findings" prior to my discovering Cohen's entirely perjured declaration) expired on February 15, 2009; and this does not meet VAWA requirements.  That's the end of it for Colorado and California's picks up with a willful failure to serve me and notify me of the false allegations against me.  There is no due process in California.  I would appreciate Senate Judiciary reviewing this transcript.  LA Superior Court has an excuse for everything and most of it involves their notion of "timing" but not due process or one's constitutional rights.  

I didn't send anything obscene to Cohen but I believe Gianelli wrote the "bloody stump" email and then tried to blame it on my friends in the LGBT community in the Bay Area.  Two people he does not know.

Gianelli was just harassing me over "profanities."  It's fine for Justin Bieber's fans.  It's fine for Cohen.  The prosecutor thought the "curse words" were an issue so Gianelli's lying.  Also, the voice mail messages were altered and tampered with.  That's why Cohen is heard speaking over me.  Does that sound like it would meet evidence standards anywhere? Streeter elicited testimony related to His Holiness Kusum Lingpa's conclusion that "Leonard Cohen is an a&^hole" who is going to hell."  Cohen attempted to conceal that but was then asked to read the quote in context.  This happened time after time. The alleged voice mails were tampered with and altered.  The transcripts were incoherent.  I have transcribed most of them and there's nothing threatening in them.  There are legitimate requests for tax information.  And LAPD's report noted that my alleged emails were generally requests for "tax information."  Regardless of the fact that the prosecutor lied about this during my trial, I don't have the IRS required tax and corporate (K-1s, financial statements, corporate accountings) that I was requesting.  The prosecutor felt that was the most important part of my trial.  However, she lied about this and the jurors clearly relied on that and wanted to hear from IRS.  But, Judge Vanderet wouldn't permit Agent Luis Tejeda, head of IRS fraud unit, to take the stand.  He had something else in mind such as sabotaging my trial and, from what I could tell, condoning Cohen's perjury confession on the stand.  Maybe he relied on the "perjured" testimony over the "dating relationship."  i legitimately want the tax information and I legitimately want Cohen to rescind the illegal K-1s LCI issued and transmitted to IRS.  Who is the City Attorney to lie about federal tax matters and where did their jurisdiction come from to lie about federal tax matters?  The jurors told my lawyers in debriefing that they wanted to hear from IRS and relied on the prosecutor's lies about corporate assets.  Cohen personally borrowed or caused to expended nearly $6.7 million from one entity alone.  But the juror felt sorry for Cohen because "he" believed the lies.  Does that sound like due process or a fair trial?  They don't exist, as far as I'm concerned, before LA Superior Court.
And then there's the evidence that Cohen and Kory planned to use fraud restraining orders to discredit me as a "witness."  Boies Schiller was very clear about that and confirmed in writing that they felt Cohen/Kory were attempting to engage me in criminal conduct and wanted Investigator Brian Bennett (DA, Spector's case) to wire me for any meetings with Cohen/Kory.  They also told me in writing that they view Cohen as "another Hollywood fraud" who owes me millions and advised me to find a lawyer to help me "take down" another Hollywood fraud.  I didn't think they were threatening Cohen but I wasn't attempting to set Boies Schiller up with a false threat scam.

I think the ambulance chaser, Gianelli, is wrong legally but we'll see what a federal court thinks.  I also think Senate Judiciary and DOJ should investigate the VAWA funding fraud and extortion attempts re. fraud domestic violence orders in Los Angeles.


Streeter:  Did Ms. Lynch ever curse on the voicemail messages? 
Streeter Closing:

This is the other thing the people found a little interesting.  She knows what a 1099 is a K-1 -- a K-1.  Whoever heard of a K-1 before this case?  The FTB and the IRS.  Did anyone know there was a difference between the FTB and the IRS?  Or what the FTB is?  … This is a woman who knows what a K-1 is … RT 566

So this isn’t about Ms. Lynch being angry that she didn’t get her tax documents.  RT 577  So what you have here, what this is proof of is not a woman who legitimately wants her IRS records or documents.  It’s the unraveling of a con.  RT 578

From: Stephen R. Gianelli <>
Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:18 AM
Subject: Your blog post "Did Leonard Cohen Call The City Attorney Or LAPD's TMU To Have Justin Bieber's Fans Arrested For Their Use Of The "F" Word?"

Ms. Lynch,

You were not arrested for using profanity in a tweet or a blog post.

You were arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced for unapologetically sending obscene, threatening, and abusive emails to Leonard Cohen’s personal email address  and leaving obscene, threatening, and abusive emails on Leonard Cohen’s home answering machine – all in violation of a 2008 Colorado restraining order that you consented to and signed for, after the judge who issued it explicitly warned you that if you violated the order by contacting Cohen you could be sentenced to up to 18-months in jail for each violation.

Therefore, the Justin Bieber fan tweets you reference are in no way analogous to the criminal conduct for which you were arrested.

Yes, I know, you claim that you thought the Colorado order had expired. So you told the jury. They didn’t buy it and convicted you – probably because the Colorado order that  you signed for says in big, bold type on the first page:

This Protection Order DOES NOT EXPIRE and only the Court can change this Order.

You are also fond of saying that the California registration of the Colorado order on May 25, 2011 was “fraudulent”. On September 1, 2015 the Los Angeles County Superior Court (Silverman, J. presiding) DISAGREED, and DENIED your BELATED motion to vacate the California registration. (See attached transcript.)

More to the point, though, you could have been arrested and prosecuted for violating the Colorado order WHETHER IT WAS REGISTERED IN CALIFORNIA OR NOT. (See Calif. Fam. Code §6403, subd. (d) “Registration or filing of an order in this state is not required for the enforcement of a valid foreign protection order…”.)