Wednesday, June 3, 2015

Leonard Cohen's Arguments Are Obscene, Sophomoric & Blatantly False

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:30 AM
Subject: Kelley Lynch Business Files
To: Dan Bergman <>, Michelle Rice <>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, "" <>, Feedback <>,, "mayor.garcetti" <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>,

Daniel Bergman and Michelle Rice,

For the past 10 years, I have requested (among other materials), the immediate return of my business files.  My business files were not Leonard Cohen's files.  He and/or his daughter entered my office, in the presence of my mother, and removed nearly every business file belonging to me and Stranger Management.

Also, for 10 years, I have requested the following information:  1) 1099 from Leonard Cohen for the year 2004; 2) corporate tax information for 2003, 2004, and 2006 related to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., Traditional Holdings, LLC, and Old Ideas, LLC; 3) Corporate financial statements; and, 4) all materials necessary to prepare corporate accountings (the Court was provided with a fraudulent expense ledger).  I have also asked that Leonard Cohen, on behalf of LC Investments, LLC rescind the illegal K-1s that were transmitted to the State of Kentucky and Internal Revenue Service indicating that I have a 99.5% ownership interest in that entity and received $0 income for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005.  I would like to remind you that this information was required to be provided to me (for all periods) prior to the entry of the fraudulent default in Case No. BC338322, a matter where I was not served the summons and complaint.

I have also asked for the return of my bank records that were illegally seized but not required to prepare these accountings.  Leonard Cohen, LC Investments, LLC, and possibly others, are essentially (or were) embezzling income related to assets belonging to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. 

Richard Westin represented a shareholder - not the corporations or LLCs.  That shareholder was Leonard Cohen.  I was willfully excluded from attorney/client privilege when Cohen wrote and wrapped Neal Greenberg into attorney/client privilege with him and Richard Westin.

Leonard Cohen's transaction fees are not corporate expenses and yet the Complaint argues that they were.  The federal and state tax returns are not Leonard Cohen's sole property and neither are any of the corporate records.  I - not Leonard Cohen - asked Westin to prepare the March 2002 letter explaining these entities and my role in them.  The reason I asked for this letter is explained, to some degree, in my February 2002 letter to Cohen and Westin.  That letter is my position vis a vis my duties and Westin confirmed that he agreed with Cohen copied in.  My emails advising Westin that the corporate offices were not located in my personal offices (that were not Cohen's) is not Cohen's property.  

I intend to raise issues related to obstruction of justice, spoliation, and a willful intent to conceal evidence of fraud.  

I would appreciate one of you addressing the information I have been forced to address endlessly.  This is not a matter that LAPD's TMU, District Attorney, or City Attorney would have jurisdiction over.  I will remind you that Traditional Holdings, LLC did not have even minimal ties to California and all entities appear to be shams.  This will be addressed in federal court and I have been clear that I am filing a RICO suit.

As for your inane arguments that I have acted in bad faith, I would like to remind you that lying in court documents, perjuring oneself under oath, and making fraudulent misrepresentations is indeed the basis to vacate Judge Hess' January 2014 order.  I was not served the order that Judge Hess and I discussed.  Jeffrey Korn advised me that he would mail that document to me but failed to do so.

The argument with respect to the declarations submitted to the Court (without any evidence whatsoever to support such outrageous accusations) and the fraudulent domestic violence order remain unconscionable.  

The "argument" that I am harassing Leonard Cohen and his lawyers is obscene, sophomoric, and blatantly false.

Kelley Lynch