Friday, April 17, 2015

Evidence Provided To Los Angeles City Attorney

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:54 PM
Subject: Re:
To: "irs.commissioner" <>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, "" <>, Feedback <>,

Mike Feuer,

I've now provided you, and others, with all communications from me to Karina Von Watteville.  The Criminal Stalker is lying as usual.  This is evidence of retaliation and I will note that Paulette Brandt provided declarations and I view this as criminal witness tampering.  LAPD's TMU can review these cease and desist letters with a fine tooth comb.  They may wonder what ordinary people are wondering.  Why did Leonard Cohen's lawyer get involved with Karina Von Watteville and Paulette Brandt's Small Claims matter?  What was his motive?  The Criminal Stalker can lie to me until he's blue in the face.  He ended up representing or advising Von Watteville.  I documented all of this (for the past year) privately for IRS, FBI, and DOJ.  I also view it as blatant blackmail.  This is going to become an issue in my federal RICO suit against Leonard Cohen.  

Who is Stephen Gianelli and what his obsessive interest in me, my sons, sister, friends, etc.?  It's not what he says it is because he is lying.  Why do you think he and "Michelle Blaine" targeted my email accounts and blogs about Phil Spector's innocence?  She publicly congratulated him for coming up with the idea.  I captured that evidence.  I have everything from his slanderous blogs dedicated to "reasonable doubt theories," Phil Spector, and me.  

I didn't harass Von Watteville.  I was told she was obsessed with me, advising people that she intended to get me in trouble, name dropping "Leonard Cohen," and she personally confirmed that she spoke with Robert Kory.  I think Steven Machat is correct - Kory and Cohen are evil liars.  That's obvious.  

Apart from her declarations, why would Leonard Cohen want to retaliate against Paulette Brandt?  Give them some thought, Mike.  Why was he testifying about Phil Spector and a gun during my trial?  I willfully violated nothing and you now have the evidence proving why Boulder Combined Court told me (and others) the order expired on February 15, 2009.  Your prosecutor just made up an entire "theory" and lied about IRS matters.  I don't have the IRS required information from Cohen and just provided Judge Hess with my IRS transcript proving that and proving that illegal K-1s from LCI were transmitted to IRS.  Many federal matters have arisen that will be addressed in federal court.  That includes the illegal use of my SSN and Cohen's fraud refunds.  The entire matter before LA Superior Court is essentially Cohen's defense to the allegations re. criminal tax fraud.  That's why he rushed over to obtain a refund (totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars) using the Complaint - six months before the default was entered.  He understood I wasn't served the lawsuit.  

Leonard Cohen is obviously a desperate man whose greed caught up with him.  As far as I'm concerned, he should marry the grifter.

Kelley Lynch