Monday, November 10, 2014

Kelley Lynch's Email To Leonard Cohen's Lawyer About Their Alleged "Dating Relationship"

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:18 PM
Subject: Fwd:
To: Jeffrey Korn <>, "irs.commissioner" <>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, MollyHale <>, nsapao <>, fsb <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, woodwardb <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>,, JFeuer <>, "kevin.prins" <>, "stan.garnett" <>, police <>, "" <>, "" <>, Daniel Meade <>, Palden Ronge <>


I don't want my son's friend targeted over this situation.  Is this the type of relationship Cohen thinks we were in?  What does he think of Dan Meade's declaration?  Is everyone, but Cohen, a liar.  Is that your position.  Did Cohen view me as his whore, who could be sexually abused, and personal, busines manager, and personal assistant, etc?  What's Gianelli's interest in IRS Commissioner Everson?

I have revised the demand letter.  See attached.

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:33 PM
Subject: RE:
Cc: blind <>

Ms. Lynch,

Not so.

Actually, Ms. Lynch, I called you a liar for stating in your moving papers that you did not have a chance to read Cohen’s suit or the papers supporting the default judgment until I brought them to your attention 4-years later in 2010 – when in fact you had Chad phone the plaintiff’s firm listed on the papers served on you (which contact information you would not have known unless you had the papers in hand) within hours of service (with you screaming in the background “this is tax fraud!) and confirmed this call with a same day email (which email address you would not have known but for the service on you), and additionally replied to an email from plaintiff’s counsel attaching the complaint and all papers supporting the default, which email notified you of the time, date and place of the default hearing you chose not to attend.

Which is why the judge concluded you were not credible and denied the 2014 motion to set aside the judgment.

Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 2:01 PM

You called me a liar for stating that the documents appended to the opposition prove that you were given advance notice of the ex parte hearing for entry of default judgment and responded via email stating that you were not attending for the “sole reason” that the suit against you constituted “tax fraud”.

Here is a cut and paste of your email to GB&C dated January 19, 2006: