Friday, October 24, 2014

Kelley Lynch's Emails To IRS, FTB, & Leonard Cohen's Lawyer Re. Serious Federal Tax & Corporate Matters


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Fwd: Criminal Harassment
To: Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao@nsa.gov, fsb@fsb.ru, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane@caa.com, blourd@caa.com, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, Sherab Posel <poselaw@gmail.com>, rwest0@gmx.com


IRS and FTB,

Cohen and Kory testified that IRS and FTB are pursuing me.  I have never said that.  Cohen's "Victim Impact Statement" was utterly and thoroughly deranged.  He seems to believe that all corporate governance can be ignored and he can simply come up with a new narrative or have his personal tax lawyer rectify some mysterious "mistake."  I have asked Korn to provide me with evidence of the trust document or terms of the alleged trust.  It is my personal opinion that Cohen merely conjured up a fraudulent trust "agreement" out of thin air.  Cohen simply views corporate assets as his personal assets.  

For the record, look at Greenberg's "warning letters" now.  I was aware that Cohen was pursuing the lithograph deal I was negotiating; planned to tour (he has evidently grossed $50 million); had income coming in from "Dear Heather" (including the September 2004 $1 million advance he didn't want Greenberg to know about); and was pursuing a third intellectual property deal.  Greenberg's letters were cover your ass letters and they look positively laughable right now.  Cohen was contractually obligated to tour.  In the fall of 2004, Kory advised my lawyers that Cohen planned to tour and would go on Oprah to blow the whistle on Greenberg and Westin.  What issues were raised in those letters that are relevant rather than laughable?  IRS warnings re. Cohen's loans, IRS "dangers," and the need to document these loans and repay them.  Cohen signed the Annuity Agreement and this is also addressed therein.  So, even if Cohen wants to lie and say he never received those letters, he understood he had to repay his loans/advances/expenditures with interest.  He also acknowledged receiving Westin's March 2002 letter that arose after the insanity with respect to Sony issuing the $7 million 1099 to Cohen personally.  However, no discussions about Cohen's personal transaction fees arose.  Cohen and Kory simply fabricated that assertion.  Kory was probably doing his best to step into the role of Cohen's manager.  

In any event, federal tax matters are at issue and Gianelli continues to criminally harass me over those issues.  I am also addressing extremely relevant issues related to the fact that the Colorado order is NOT a domestic violence order but I was prosecuted by the Domestic Violence Unit of the City Attorney's office and LA Superior Court sentenced me using a domestic violence statute and attempted to extort money from me re. domestic violence restitution, etc.  The anti-stalking laws do not permit someone to change the nature of the original order and the Full Faith and Credit only permits one court to honor another court's order.  Boulder Combined Court has written me to confirm that their order was not "domestic violence."  Also, I finally obtained the transcript of the March 23, 2012 hearing where Cohen testified that i never stole from him - just his "peace of mind."  He also advised MacLean's, the interview he gave at the time the lawsut was filed that he wasn't accusing me of "theft."  There is no theft - see the corporate books, records, agreements, stock certificates, Annuity Agreement, my Indemnity Agreement, tax returns, etc.  The expense ledger is evidence of financial and accounting fraud.  I never stalked Cohen.  LAPD's report clearly notes that my emails were generally requests for tax information.  Detective Viramontes, who phoned Agent Tejeda/IRS, advised me that Cohen told him he didn't feel comfortable with my requests for tax information and asked why Cohen wouldn't simply provide me with this information.  I have no idea.  Cohen's very clear in the motion he filed re. the Boulder order:  the issue had to do with my communications with third parties (IRS, FBI, DOJ, journalists, Dennis Riordan, etc.) and my online posts refuting the slander.  He had just threatened Ann Diamond over her article so this is what led to his extraordinary flight from Europe to Boulder in the middle of his tour.  Cohen testified that he hasn't seen me in 7 years.  There is no way in hell I would attend this man's concert.  I wouldn't even attend the meeting he did at my lawyers' office.  He is a narcissist who will evidently say anything..  My doctor just asked me, after hearing some of Cohen's statements, if he has a history of drug abuse.  While Cohen was testifying that I assailed his reputation over his own drug use, he granted interviews to Sylvie Simmons discussing his meth use, LSD, etc.  Leonard Cohen will say anything.  

The issues I am addressing have nothing to do with gossip, rumors, or salacious fraudulent narratives meant to dazzle awe inspired journalists and others.  They are serious federal tax and corporate matters.  

All the best,
Kelley

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:
Jeffrey,

Stephen Gianelli continues to write me about Leonard Cohen.  Of course there are outstanding and highly legitimate matters that have not been litigated.  Those matters involve federal tax matters, the abuse of the restraining order system to prevent me from requesting tax information and effecting service, the issues with the fraudulently registered domestic violence order, and the fact that IRS and FTB view me as a partner on numerous entities inserted into the default but not named as parties to the lawsuit.

Paulette Brandt and I have discussed this harassment with LAPD detectives.  It is impossible to believe that Stephen Gianelli has simply decided to target me, my sons, sister, and so many others.  He works in tandem with Susanne Walsh, Cohen's fan, and has worked in tandem with Michelle Blaine, Phil Spector's former assistant. She publicly congratulated Gianelli for targeting my email accounts and blogs.  

Gianelli has publicly stated that he has spoken to Michelle Rice on numerous occasions.  In fact, after he initially spoke with her in May 2009, he began criminally harassing me, my sons, sister, and others.  My sister's lawyer spoke to him and advised him to cease and desist.  My younger son advised him, Walsh, and others, that these emails were making him physically ill.  My older son was a bit more forceful when he advised them to cease and desist.  Other people have hired lawyers or filed police reports with respect to this ongoing criminal harassment.  I would like to remind you that Greenberg's lawsut addressed very serious issues related to conspiracy, witness tampering, witness intimidation, exotrtion, etc.  These issues have not been litigated. 

The District Attorney's office advised me that they felt Gianelli might be working as an "investigator."   Paulette Brandt and I have both spoken with investigators on the Phil Spector matter about this situation.  She confirmed the ongoing harassment and I have discussed the targeting of my sons, sister, friends, and others.  Since Michelle Rice was able to communicate with Gianelli, felt comfortable with Walsh copying her in on these emails (including when she wrote my prosecutor slandering me), it does not seem all that difficult to draw the conclusion that she could as Gianelli and Walsh to - at the very least - stop criminally harassing me, my sons, sister, Paulette Brandt, and others over very serious federal tax and corporate matters related to Leonard Cohen and my ownership interest in those entities. 

I am awaiting your response re. the IRS required form 1099 from Cohen for the year 2004; LCI K-1s showing $0 income for 2003, 2004, and 2005; Traditional Holdings K-1s for the years 2001, 2003, and 2004 showing income to me from that entity; phantom income TH shifted to me that was not distributed; Leonard Cohen's approximately $6.7 million in loans from TH and the interest due per the Annuity Agreement; the fraudulent and meaningless expense ledger; and how to handle the dissolution of the entities I have an ownership interest in.  LA Superior Court's fraudulent default, in a matter where i was not served, does not resolve the outstanding federal tax matters.  IRS, FTB, and State of Kentucky continue to advise me to contact Cohen and the corporations about these matters.  

I would like to remind you that Doug Davis/FTB agreed to remove the state tax lien placed on my account.  That lien related to the year 2004 and was based on a guesstimate related to my 2003 returns.  I owe no taxes although that is none of your client's business as he and I did not file returns together indicating that we were a legally married couple.  We filed corporate returns together - or so I believed we did.  The IRS and FTB refunds have been challenged as fraud.  Leonard Cohen has taken the position that he is the alter ego who engaged in self-dealing.  He has failed to address his loans, interest totaling approximately $4 million, assets owned by Blue Mist, loans to LCI re. the BMT assets, etc.  These assets must be valued and I will refer you to the signed and notarized non-revocable assignments.  The corporate records are not hearsay.  They were transmitted to Greenberg, Glusker in October 2004 for your client.  He had all other records.  

Kelley Lynch

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 2:50 AM
Subject: Fw: Fwd: Criminal Harassment
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>


Ms. Lynch,

You write to Leonard Cohen’s counsel in the (now long ago concluded) motion to set aside the default judgment matter (copy to the world) and say in part:

“If Gianelli is not representing Cohen in these matters, would it be possible to advise him to stop contacting me, my sons, sister, and Paulette Brandt.”

1.      As I have told you before, I am retired, living in Crete. I don’t have any clients at all, not anyone in the world and certainly not Leonard Cohen.

2.      Neither Leonard Cohen, nor his attorneys or former attorneys have authority to “advise” me to do anything. If you insist on informing the world every time you do or plan to do anything and everything, and insist on sharing with the world your intention  to file silly, stupid motions that ignore clear statutory law, and insist on sharing with the world your laughable, self-serving interpretations of brush-off letters from various public agencies, they be prepared for my take.

That is all.

Very truly yours,

Stephen R. Gianelli
Attorney-at-Law (ret.)
Crete, Greece
___________________________________________________


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:13 AM
Subject: Fwd: Criminal Harassment
To: Jeffrey Korn <jeffkornlaw@live.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane@caa.comblourd@caa.com, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, rwest0@gmx.com, Sherab Posel <poselaw@gmail.com>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->
Jeffrey,

I have just opened emails in this account.  In the month of October 2014, Gianelli and Walsh have sent me, my sons, sister, and Paulette Brandt many, many criminally harassing emails.  I have enclosed some and privately forwarded others to IRS, FBI, DOJ, FTB, and others.

I have asked you if Gianelli is authorized to represent Leonard Cohen in the federal tax and corporate matters I am attempting to address.  I would like to remind you that FTB removed a tax lien, based on guesstimates re. my 2003 tax returns, and gave me time to obtain IRS required form 1099 from Cohen and other information.  I have attempted to address the LCI K-1s, TH K-1s, Cohen's loans approximately $6.7 million from TH (that are required to be repaid with interest); phantom income shifted to me but not distributed by TH; the contradictory information provided to IRS by Cohen, his representatives, LCI, TH, and possibly others.  

IRS, FTB, and State of Kentucky have continually advised me to contact Leonard Cohen or the corporations re. this information.  It doesn't matter if Streeter and others lied throughout my 2012 trial.  IRS doesn't require me to explain to a man who has been criminally harassing me since May 2009 why I am requesting this information.  IRS requires Cohen to provide it to me.  I have an IRS transcript for 2004 and 2005.  The LCI K-1s appear on that transcript showing $0 income.  The fraudulent ledger, also transmitted to IRS (per documents you filed with LA Superior Court), shows income.  The fraudulent ledger apparently contains income from Cohen to me.  I had a right to be paid from Leonard Cohen' s personal account because royalty income was deposited there so I find that allegation bizarre.  Cohen has not provided IRS required form 1099 for the year 2004 to me.  I received nothing from TH for the year 2004.  I have no idea what happened and Cohen testified that a mistake was made re. my ownership interest and Westin rectified that.  The IRS confirmed that no tax returns or amended returns were received by them from TH for any period beyond 2003.  I received a K-1 showing substantial income for 2003.  That information does not appear on the fraud expense ledger.

If Gianelli is not representing Cohen in these matters, would it be possible to advise him to stop contacting me, my sons, sister, and Paulette Brandt.  They should not be copied in for any reason whatsoever.  My sons have addressed the situation with Gianelli, Walsh, and Lawrence and that information has been provided to you.  Your co-counsel, Michelle Rice, has evidently communicated with Gianelli and was copied in on emails from Walsh harassing me, my family, and others.  Clearly, you or she can ask them to stop harassing me over matters related to Cohen, federal tax matters, and corporations inserted into a default judgment but not named as parties to the suit.  

Gianelli has written me this morning about the DOJ's Criminal Division's email to me.  Neither I - nor DOJ's Criminal Division - mentioned Kory or Streeter.  I have asked the DOJ to investigate all issues related to "domestic violence' - including the City Attorney's role in prosecuting me for "domestic violence" issues; LA Superior Court's attempting to extort fines/fees from me for "domestic violence."  Boulder Combined Court wrote me that the original order was NOT domestic violence and provided me with evidence I had not previously seen - confirming that Cohen informed the Court that his issues with me related to my communications with third parties (he testified about IRS, DOJ, FBI, Dennis Riordan, Paul Shaffer, Bob Dylan, and Oliver Stone); my communications with journalists and online posts refuting the slanderous and defamatory statements.  

I would appreciate your response.  These are legitimate matters.  The federal tax matters have NOT been litigated.  Nothing has.  I was not served Cohen's lawsuit and the proof of service is evidence of fraud.  I have no idea why Judge Hess was arguing your case but I can assure you that I didn't resemble that individual and a process server cannot legally get every detail of someone's appearance wrong.  Furthermore, I intend to litigate the issues you've raised in your documents including the attempt to use a domestic violence-related order (for Kory and Rice), issued without a trial on the matter, to prevent me from effecting service on a corporate entity.  

Let me know if you're unclear.  I've forwarded Steven Machat's private email to me to IRS, FBI, DOJ, FTB, Dennis Riordan, etc.

Kelley Lynch