From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:52 AM
Subject:
To: "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>
Stan,
Leonard Cohen took the witness stand, acknowledged he changed his testimony re. the statutory required "dating relationship," and I have witnesses that he offered me 50% community property (palimony).
I would like to point out that Enichen was wrong when she advised me that the TRO matter was not an IRS matter. Robert Kory wrote the IRS advising them that the Boulder order prohibited me from transmitting IRS form 1099 to Leonard Cohen. Cohen's lawyer, Michelle Rice, testified that the Boulder order prevents Cohen from providing me with IRS required information - including the IRS required form 1099 Cohen refuses to provide me. Of course, Rice felt comfortable writing me on February 14, 2011 and lying to me with IRS, FBI, Treasury, Dennis Riordan, and Ron Burkle copied in. Cohen's lawyers have also attempted to argue that the order prevents me from effecting service on a corporation.
What authority to you believe Los Angeles Superior Court had to modify the Boulder, Colorado order and transform it into a domestic violence order? Boulder Combined Court has confirmed that the order was not a domestic violence order but I was prosecuted by the City Attorney using domestic violence statutes. I was sentenced in accordance with those statutes and LA Superior Court attempted to extort fines/fees from me for domestic violence.
Leonard Cohen took the witness stand, acknowledged he changed his testimony re. the statutory required "dating relationship," and I have witnesses that he offered me 50% community property (palimony).
The paperwork Boulder Combine Court provided me prove why I was repeatedly advised that this order expired on February 15, 2009. Unfortunately, Judge Robert Vanderet evidently told my lawyers that we could not attack the judgment. Strange since Boulder Combined Court's statements are what I relied on re. the order expiring on February 15, 2009. Paulette Brandt has testified that she was provided the same information - well in advance of the Court sending me the documents. I did not willfully violate anything but think Enichen should have vacated this order due to the perjury.
I would like to point out that Enichen was wrong when she advised me that the TRO matter was not an IRS matter. Robert Kory wrote the IRS advising them that the Boulder order prohibited me from transmitting IRS form 1099 to Leonard Cohen. Cohen's lawyer, Michelle Rice, testified that the Boulder order prevents Cohen from providing me with IRS required information - including the IRS required form 1099 Cohen refuses to provide me. Of course, Rice felt comfortable writing me on February 14, 2011 and lying to me with IRS, FBI, Treasury, Dennis Riordan, and Ron Burkle copied in. Cohen's lawyers have also attempted to argue that the order prevents me from effecting service on a corporation.
Where did Judge Enichen obtain jurisdiction that would permit her to subvert IRS requirements? I personally cannot see it. I also do not understand why so many judges in LA Superior Court are hearing IRS and federal tax matters.
See attached. The issue with the Boulder, Colorado order also resulted in a probation violation. Of course, the prosecutor - who lied extensively throughout my trial (including about IRS matters) - retaliated against me. That is overwhelmingly obvious.
Stan, Stephen Gianelli continues to criminally harass me. He evidently wrote Boulder PD. I would like those communications preserved. This activity has crossed many state borders and is now federal. The same is true for the fraudulently registered California order. I cannot see how a modified and fraudulent order can be given full faith and credit. We shall see if "Family Court" agrees to dismiss it. Possibly not - because that would mean liability for Los Angeles as it would involve two false arrests and imprisonments. Also kidnapping when I was taken from the Bay Area to California on federal highways. That's a federal matter that I'll address in my federal lawsuits against the City and County of Los Angeles.
Kelley Lynch
