Email To IRS Commissioner's Staff (Who Confirmed They Receive My Emails & Various Parties Are Handling Various Aspects) Re. Cohen's Fraud, Lies & Perjury & The Need For Further IRS Opinions

elley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>	Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:47 AM
To: Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, "Francisco.A.Suarez" <Francisco.A.Suarez@verizon.net>, *IRS.commissioner@irs.gov, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "harriet.ryan" <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>
To the IRS Commissioner's Staff, Please read the following.  Many serious issues have been raised. They extend from the court preventing me from contacting Cohen (or his representatives) with respect to tax, financial, and accounting information I need to file my 2004 and 2005 federal and state tax returns TO Cohen's false accusation that I have stolen money or owe taxes on that alleged money.  Please refer to all corporate books, records, etc.  There is no forensic accounting.  There is an expense ledger and Cohen lied when he testified that "Dear Heather" was on the accounting.  No income or assets - related to anything (including Cohen's LOANS) appear on the fraudulent ledger that was transmitted to the IRS with fraudulent legal documents. I only discovered, at trial, Cohen's outrageous refunds so that should have been part of what Agent Tejeda/IRS could have testified about. I would like an IRS Opinion (and am entitled to one) on the issues that were addressed at my so-called trial.  Francisco Suarez will also provide me with the transcripts - once the appeal is filed - and at that time I will point out every single lie of Cohen's, Kory's, Rice's, and Steeter's.  I have no respect for anyone who walks into a court of law (or anywhere else, including a kitchen) and lies through their teeth which is precisely what the prosecutor did.  As for the judge, I have no idea why he acted in the way he did but OTHER PEOPLE are noting that he may be corrupt, in bed with others, or on the take.  I have no idea and have been clear about that.  I personally think IRS and FBI investigators should depose the judge and - most definitely - the Deputy City Attorney who appeared dead set on sabotaging an IRS matter.  She has no idea what the IRS is or isn't doing and when it was obvious that Agent Tejeda/IRS received a subpoena she should have been very clear about what was going on SINCE Agent Sopko's letter was entered into evidence in the IRS binder and Kory testified that Tejeda is the head of fraud for the Western United States.  Whether or not that is true is another matter.  Agent Sopko told me he was the head of a fraud group at the IRS.  I reported Cohen's tax fraud and have provided the IRS with an abundance of evidence with which to prosecute Leonard Cohen and others. All the best, Kelley Kelley understands, from his perspective, that I was not a resident of Southern California the entire period.  Where did the judge get his jurisdiction?  In the sentencing transcript, Mike Kelly refers to multiple emails (notes that there is “no legitimate threat”) – he then states that there were other 1101 evidence emails.  To say that the content of the alleged emails improved is totally relative and unsubstantiated and not at issue.  Cohen and I were NOT in a "dating relationship" and he testified that we had a brief fling and has stated that it was in the 80s.  That is nearly 25 years ago and while this man may be obsessed with me - that is not a "dating relationship" and there is no "domestic violence."  There are just abused restraining orders procured by FRAUD, lies, and perjury - issued to a man who is a proven liar, perjurer, and an individual with motive. Viramontes/LAPD was well aware – and noted in his report – that the emails were generally requests for tax information.  Kelly asks the judge to admonish me not to contact Cohen or his representatives – would that include unnamed representatives?  Kory and Rice were not on the original restraining order – their physical address was.  That’s why the charges were dropped but does not explain why they were added based on an insane lie about Jonathan Maihart, a Persian male – not Hispanic and not a member of any Persian gang that I have any awareness of.  I have not seen Maihart since 2005 and Streeter/Rice lied about the years as well – 2007 and 2009.  Kelly goes on to say: “There is still a mechanism perhaps of which, if there are documents that she does need, there could be a mechanism to obtain those records not directly through Ms. Lynch and between Ms. Lynch and any representative of Mr. Cohen.” Cohen thanks me for insisting on a trial although I was told the City Attorney wanted to go to trial and was never advised of a plea deal, the terms of which are still rather unclear but I believe the offer was 180 days (which would have been time served by April 17 – sentencing) and two years probation.  This was not discussed – with me – by John Perroni (who handled the arraignment and bail hearing) or Mike Kelly and Nikhil Ramnaney (who handled the trial). Leonard Cohen, in his Victim Impact Statement, raises my “evasions.” What is he referring to?  Is he publicly lying that I have engaged in tax evasion?  The IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Agent Tejeda/IRS, Agent Sopko/Treasury, and Doug Davis/FTB are aware of the reasons I have been unable to file my 2004 and 2005 tax returns.  Leonard Cohen and his lawyers, together with the actions of the City Attorney and the court, are preventing me from obtaining the information I need which would not violate a restraining order.  There are IRS rules and regulations re. filing and reporting requirements – that extend to laws about providing individuals with tax forms (in this instance, a 1099, and the revocation of three illegal K-1s – one transmitted to the State of Kentucky and two transmitted to the Internal Revenue Service illegally making me a partner on LC Investments, LLC). Essentially, while Kelly raises it, the court has most definitely taken the position that I must use extraordinary means (possibly a subpoena?) to obtain the tax, accounting, and financial data I am entitled to – that would relate to corporate entities, commissions wrongfully withheld, non-revocable assignments and other evidence of my ownership interest in the intellectual property (as my lawyers stated – wherever that has gone), etc. Leonard Cohen, a man whose book is viewed as the most “obscene” ever published in Canada (“Beautiful Losers”) is calling me “profoundly unwholesome” and “obscene?”  How about his song “Don’t Go Home With Your Hard On” or a sample lyric “Give me crack and anal sex,” a poem about a 15-year old girl, and his authorized biographer writing a chapter called “Taxes, Children, and Lost Pussy.”  Is Cohen’s tolerance for obscenities limited to people he is targeting due to the fact that I reported his tax fraud (that is obviously fraud and not negligence – hence criminal)?  Seems rather random and self-serving. “The eight-year ordeal … was designed specifically to avoid or postpone the inevitable day of reckoning with the IRS, the day when she will be bound to account for the taxes she has neglected to pay on the stolen money that she received and failed to report.  NOTE:  Ask the IRS to review all corporate books and records – regardless of Cohen’s fraudulent default judgment – when reading this sentence.  No forensic accounting was provided, and Cohen is lying here and lying to the IRS – it was an expense ledger and my accountant was clear about this.  Cohen testified that income from “Dear Heather” was on that ledger and that was a bald-faced lie.  No income or assets are listed on the ledger that also glaringly ignores Cohen’s loans (including his personal transaction fees which are not a corporate expense related to TH).  Cohen lies in his Victim Impact Statement about “death threats.”  No “death threats” exist and saying “should” is not a threat. Neither is the comment about his desire to die by firing squad – which he repeated to me constantly after Mikal Gilmore/Rolling Stone interviewed him in the late 80s.  Mikal Gilmore’s brother was executed by a firing squad and Cohen appeared obsessed with that detail.  I wonder what “institution” hasn’t affirmed me – the District Attorney’s office or the court?  Streeter’s comment “the unraveling of a con” should be addressed on appeal and by the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. She must be referring to herself and Cohen, Kory, Rice, etc.  Cohen’s comment about my defiance of the law is astounding – based on his lies, fraud, perjury, and concealment (not to mention his egregrious tax fraud that may date back to the time he originally obtained a green card, which he then abandoned after Marty Machat’s death – and went to the extraordinary lengths to re-obtain a green card, advising me that the IRS does not ask where you paid your taxes the prior year while Canada Revenue does HENCE the reason Canada’s National Treasure can’t live in Canada. MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL should have contained the fact that I had only found out – at trial – that Cohen received refunds totally nearly $700,000 based on false accusations to the IRS. NOTE:  Francisco, the Constitution demands a fair trial which does not end prior to Sentencing.  How did Cooley prove I sent that email?  I have conceded, after the fact, that I did send satirical emails and they concealed the original email which makes that abundantly clear. While the judge didn’t provide Cooley with a restraining order (which is unconscionable governmental conduct – based on the facts and totality of circumstances) that action needs to be raised in the appeal.  Bruce Cutler’s letter was hearsay and that restraining order must be challenged – Cutler did ask for a restraining order and the judge has no jurisdiction over Cutler and there was no evidentiary hearing.  There must have been communications between the City Attorney and District Attorney’s office and that has been concealed from me – as well as the name of the investigator sitting in the courtroom while Leonard Cohen testified about another version of the alleged Phil Spector gun story that does not coincide with the prosecutors’ version of events.  To say that the DA didn’t have his investigator there for this (and other sinister) reasons is absolutely farcical.  Who would believe that?  Captain Jack Horvath?