Tuesday, August 23, 2016

Kelley Lynch's Email to IRS, FBI, & DOJ Re. Leonard Cohen, Phil Spector & Karina Von Watteville's Case Management Statement

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:03 AM
Subject: Karina Von Watteville
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, bruce <bruce@brucecutler.com>

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

I will scan and submit KVW's slanderous Case Management Statement for you later today.  As you know, Greenberg's lawsuit confirmed, six months in advance of Cohen obtaining his first fraudulent restraining order (that is NOT a domestic violence order), that Cohen and Kory planned to use restraining orders to discredit me.  It is also apparent that the Killer King situation is at issue although that file does not relate to me, contains someone else's medical information, and is evidence of fraud.  I have asked IRS, FBI, and DOJ to investigate the Killer King and SWAT incidents.

I have also put the City and County on notice that I plan to file RICO suits over these, and other, issues.  See letters below.

I have now sent you my notes re. yesterday's hearing.  KVW's Case Management Statement refers to Leonard Cohen's fraudulent default judgment and fraudulent domestic violence order.  [The Court understands that these matters are under appeal and took the case numbers.]  The Case Management Statement also notes that she plans to file a motion for protective order re. discovery where I will allegedly "abuse the discovery process to delve into unsubstantiated beliefs, perpetuate slanderous, libelous, defamatory statements, harass, vex, and annoy.  KVW obviously did not write this Case Management Statement and her name is misspelled ("Von Watterville") throughout the document.  The following discovery was raised:  Recovery of information cast out on the world wide web; Defendant Lynch has an existing RO against her for protection of another, that she continues to violate to this very day.  It mentions that the alleged emails were sent to the "protected person," Leonard Cohen, and copied to government agencies.  It also mentions that I have had a psychiatric hold or holds.  I wasn't under a psychiatric hold at Killer King.  These matters do not involve KVW; this is illegal discovery; and I have not violated any order re. Cohen since my alleged trial.  During that Trial he and his lawyers lied that I was provided with the IRS required tax/corporate information.  The prosecutor lied about these issues as well.  I just spoke to an IRS agent who confirmed that Cohen cannot use this order to prevent me from requesting tax/corporate information.  I did send Cohen a request for this information recently as he continues to obstruct justice over these matters.

I think it is highly relevant and material that KVW phoned Robert Kory after receiving Paulette Brandt's rental arrears demand letter; ended up represented by Stephen Gianelli; and now believes she is entitled to engage in illegal discovery.  I intend to inform the Court that I am suing the City and County over these matters and will submit the letters I have transmitted to their representatives.


Kelley Lynch
c/o Paulette Brandt
1754 N. Van Ness Avenue
Hollywood, California  90028

                                                                        31 July 2014

Thonas Wong                                                  Jessica Rivas
Chief Investigator                                            Associate County Counsel
City of Los Angeles                                         General Litigation Division
City Hall East                                                  648 Kenneth Hahn Hall                                 
200 N. Main Street                                          500 W. Temple Street
Room 800                                                        Los Angeles, California  90012
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Executive Offices of the Board of Supervisors
Room 383 Hall of Administration
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, California  90012

Re:  City of Los Angeles Claim No. C15-0063
       County of Los Angeles Claim No. 14-1115711*001

Thomas Wong, Jessica Rivas, and Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors,

Thank you for your letters dated July 8, 2014 (LA County), July 21, 2014 (LA County), and July 25, 2014 (City of Los Angeles). 

There seems to be some confusion with respect to the various dates and time frames addressed in my original claims.  I would like to reiterate the following:  These claims arise from a prolonged and sustained course of conduct that involves both the City and County of Los Angeles City.   
The course of conduct culminated with my false arrest and imprisonment on January 22, 2014 (Case No. 2CA0459) and LA Superior Court’s refusal to vacate a fraudulently obtained default judgment on January 17, 2014 (Case No. BC338322). 

This course of conduct also relates to the fraudulent registration of a foreign restraining order with Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC033717).  The City and County of Los Angeles failed to verify the nature of the foreign order.  It is not a domestic violence order and I received written confirmation of this fact from the Boulder Combined Court on April 10, 2014

On June 17, 2014, after diligently pursuing the matter for nearly two years, I finally located the Court Reporter from the March 23, 2012 bail hearing (Case No. 2CA0459).  I and others have repeatedly been advised, for a variety of reasons, that this transcript was unavailable.  The Court Reporter is currently on vacation and will provide me with a transcript of that hearing when she returns.  That transcript should successfully prove that Leonard Cohen testified (accurately, I might note) that we were in a purely business relationship and I never stole from him.  His perjury with respect to the “dating relationship” was addressed during my 2012 trial in connection with the violation of the domestic violence order.  When confronted, Leonard Cohen admitted changing his testimony from one hearing to the next.  He was not prosecuted for perjury and DCA Streeter’s attempt to rehabilitate him was farcical. 

The governments of the City and County of Los Angeles have simply assigned me a “brief intimate dating relationship” with Leonard Cohen.  The fraudulently registered foreign order remains in full force and effect.  That order prevents me from requesting information I require to file and/or amend federal and state tax returns and payment for work I’ve done and assets I own.  Additional problems have arisen due to the fact that Internal Revenue Service views me as a partner on entities LA Superior Court has concluded is the sole property of Leonard Cohen.

The California Tort Claims Act mandates that all claims for money or damages against a public entity must be presented in writing to the entity prior to filing suit.  My claims were presented in writing and were filed in a timely manner.  Both the City and County of Los Angeles have acknowledged receipt of my tort claims.  Federal civil rights violation claims are not subject to California’s tort claim requirements because such would violate the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution. Williams v. Horvath, 16 Cal.3d 834, 842 (1976). 

Pursuant to government codes and regulations, the claims must be in writing and signed by the claimant.  The claim must contain:  information to be a sufficient claim; claimant’s name and mailing address; date, place, and circumstances of the claim; description of the injury, damage, or loss for which recovery is sought; name of any public employees causing the loss if known and an indication as to whether the claim would be made in limited jurisdiction court or not.  My original claims satisfied these elements.  The descriptions need not provide evidentiary detail and I have outlined the prolonged and sustained course of conduct in relatively great detail.  My original claims were detailed enough to allow the City and County of Los Angeles to investigate and consider them.  Furthermore, I am available to answer any questions with respect to complexities that may appear “vague.”  It is my personal opinion that neither the City nor County of Los Angeles have provided an adequate explanation for the denial or insufficiency of my claims.  The City and County of Los Angeles have also not explained precisely what dates they believe do not fall within the legal claim periods. 

I look forward to your response.

                                                                        Very truly yours,

                                                                        Kelley Lynch

cc:  IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and Dennis Riordan, Esquire

 Kelley Lynch
1754 N. Van Ness Avenue
Hollywood, California  90028
Phone:  323.331.4250

                                                                        July 15, 2014

Executive Offices of the Board of Supervisors
Room 383 Hall of Administration
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, California  90012

Re:  Kelley Lynch:  Claims for Damages submitted July 3, 2014
       File No.  14-1115711*001
Latest False Arrest & False Imprisonment:  January 22, 2014

To Whom It May Concern:

I am in receipt of the Office of the County Counsel's letter dated July 8, 2014 (mailed July 9, 2014) with respect to the above referenced matter.  My claim for damages was submitted and received by that office on July 3, 2014.  It relates to a prolonged and sustained course of conduct, that involves LA County (and others), that culminated in a false arrest and imprisonment (Case No. 2CA0459) on January 22, 2014 and relates to at least two other cases before LA Superior Court.  One is a civil matter (BC338322) involving Leonard Cohen and a default judgment entered against me by Los Angeles Superior Court.  I was not served the summons and complaint is this matter.  That judgment wrongfully conveyed my intellectual property to Leonard Cohen; prevents me from being paid by Cohen for services I provided; has had the effect of wrongfully altering tax returns I've filed with the state and federal governments; and, includes millions of dollars in pre-judgment interest.  It also continues to accrue approximately 10% interest per year.  I am the rightful owner of the property converted to Leonard Cohen.  His fraudulent expense ledger, that is not an accounting, includes income I was paid for services rendered.  On January 17, 2014, LA Superior Court refused to vacate the default.

A third case (BC033717) relates to the registration of a foreign restraining order.  The registration of this order with Los Angeles Superior Court on May 25, 2011 is what led to my arrest on March 1, 2012 in Berkeley, California.  That registration is fraudulent.  The original Boulder, Colorado order was not a domestic violence order.  See Boulder Combined Court email dated April 10, 2014 attached hereto as Exhibit A.  This is the first time, after diligently pursuing this matter, that I received confirmation of this in writing.  I intend to file a motion to vacate this fraudulent registration.  However, I was arrested (in Berkeley, California), tried, sentenced, and received probation for violating a domestic violence order.  I was also assessed fines/fees for matters related to domestic violence and effective assistance of counsel.  There was and is no domestic violence and I was not represented by the court appointed lawyers.  I intend to legally challenge the constitutionality of the domestic violence statute's vague use of the term "dating relationship."  The

Executive Offices of the Board of Supervisors
July 15, 2014
Page Two

government of Los Angeles has merely assigned me a "dating relationship" and Leonard Cohen's testimony with respect to this matter is perjured. 

On January 22, 2014, I was arrested again in connection with this restraining order.  At that hearing, Paulette Brandt testified that she was advised, by the Boulder Combined Court, that this order expired on February 15, 2009.  As I explained to the Court, this is precisely what I have been told by the Boulder Combined Court since sometime in 2009.  Therefore, I could not willfully or knowingly violate the Boulder, Colorado order or the May 25, 2011.  I was not served the new California order and had no opportunity to defend myself against allegations of domestic violence.  The City Attorney charged me with a probation violation related to Section 653 (m) of the Penal Code.  This section is unconstitutionally vague and overly broad and that is particularly so as it relates to the government.  I filed legitimate grievances with the City Attorney; contacted them while representing myself; and addressed criminal conduct.  With respect to both my original 2012 trial and the probation violation, the City Attorney refused to provide me with Brady materials and LA Superior Court could not be bothered to hear my Brady Motion. 

I was never told by the Court that I could not contact the City Attorney; they appear to have been involved with a man who was stalking/harassing me (and others) and expressly directed him to further email/harass me; and to communicate an official message to me.  Judge Robert Vanderet advised me during sentencing that he was not going to prevent someone from
contacting their government.  I have also reported quite a number of criminal matters to both the Los Angeles City Attorney and District Attorney.  Furthermore, I have contacted DOJ, FBI, Attorney General of California, the Mayor's Office, LAPD's TMU, and the Ethics Commission.  The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the 1971 case Coates v. Cincinnati that the word "annoying" was too vague to support a criminal charge. The decision struck down an ordinance that made it illegal to assemble on the sidewalk "in a manner annoying to passersby."  "Conduct that annoys some people does not annoy others," wrote Justice Potter Stewart.

The letter from the City Counsel's Office advised me that I did not submit my claim(s) within either the six month or one year period in accordance with Sections 901, 911.2 of the Government Code.  That is completely inaccurate.  I was very clear, in my claim form and the attendant declaration, that my claims, injuries, and damages arise from a prolonged and sustained course of conduct that culminated with my arrest on January 22, 2014 and with respect to a denial of my Motion to Vacate Leonard Cohen's default judgment against me on January 17, 2014.  As my claims were received on July 3, 2014, it is obvious that they were made in a timely manner.  LA Superior Court does not have jurisdiction over me in either of these matters.  I am also awaiting a transcript of the March 23, 2012 bail hearing because Leonard Cohen testified that I never stole from him and confirmed that we were in a purely business relationship.  We were never in a domestic violence statutory required "dating relationship."  The domestic violence order remains in effect.  Furthermore, Judge Robert Vanderet granted (without evidentiary hearings) domestic violence related orders to Leonard Cohen's lawyers (Michelle Rice and Robert Kory) and Bruce Cutler who did not request one.  I have asked the Department of Justice to investigate the abuse of domestic violence orders and the fines/fees LA Superior Court charged me for domestic violence related matters.  The transcript of the bail hearing will permit me to file a new motion with the Court in LA Superior Court Case No.
Executive Offices of the Board of Supervisors
July 15, 2014
Page Three

BC338322.  Leonard Cohen's testimony on March 23, 2012 that I never stole from him undermines his entire case against me and IRS and FTB refunds he received using some version of the expense ledger attached to the default judgment and the complaint.  This judgment has caused me to alter one federal tax return and the unconscionable situation it places me in continues.  The registration of the fraudulent domestic violence order prohibits me from contacting Leonard Cohen with respect to IRS required form 1099 (which he has not provided me for the year 2004) and IRS form K-1 which Cohen transmitted to IRS in 2004 and 2005 indicating that I am a partner on LC Investments, LLC although I am no such thing.  I also require other information, including as it relates to my ownership interest in a number of entities.  According to both Robert Kory and Michelle Rice, the restraining order prohibits me (or a corporate entity) from transmitting tax information to Cohen and, conversely, prohibits them from transmitting IRS required information to me.  Detective Viramontes, LAPD's TMU, advised me that the restraining order prohibits me from requesting this information.  He also advised me that Leonard Cohen did not feel comfortable with my requests for tax information.  These matters are ongoing.

On July 11, 2014 and July 13, 2014, I followed up with Assistant Chief George Mueller, DA's Office, with respect to any investigation (or the outcome of any investigations) into matters I have reported to them.  These would include, but are not limited to, SWAT/Killer King incident of May 25, 2005 (and entirely fraudulent Killer King report); criminal negligence in Rutger Penick's Whole Foods matter; Complaint re. Leonard Cohen to Los Angeles District Attorney's Major Fraud Unit (re. theft/fraud); automobile accident of June 13, 2005 (I was rear-ended on Mandeville Canyon Road by Thomas Bradshaw); and with respect to other matters.  I have diligently pursued these matters with the District Attorney's Office and evidently reporting criminal conduct to the District Attorney and District Attorney of Los Angeles is viewed, at least with respect to me, as harassing or annoying.  That would include, but is not limited to, my emails advising the DA (and other parties) that Leonard Cohen told me for 20 years that Phil Spector never held a gun on him and he lies/embellishes stories about Phil Spector (and others).  This seems like a highly material issue and it is important to note that the DA stopped by my former house unannounced and dragged me into the Phil Spector matter.  I most certainly did not simply contact the District Attorney out of the blue.  The Attorney General of California, City Attorney of California, law enforcement, and others, all directed me to the District Attorney with respect to SWAT, Killer King, and other criminal matters.

I was advised that my only "recourse" at this time is to ask the County of Los Angeles, Board of Supervisors for leave to present a late claim.  I would like to point out to the County Board of Supervisors that my original claim clearly stated that this was a prolonged and sustained course of conduct on the part of both LA County and LA City officials, agents, and employees and frequently the County and City worked in tandem in these matters.  This government misconduct took place on many occasions and took many forms.  I have detailed, with as much specificity as possible (without writing an actual legal complaint), much of this ongoing course of conduct.  I have alleged
Executive Offices of the Board of Supervisors
July 15, 2014
Page Four

significant violations of my fundamental constitutional rights and other damages and injuries.  I have addressed a number of relevant dates above.

The County's response to my claim seeks to deal with each specification of misconduct in isolation.  This misconduct was not isolated and, at a certain point in time, the District Attorney, City Attorney, and Leonard Cohen joined forces with respect to me.  The government's acts of misconduct did not take place in isolation or in a vacuum.  The government must view the totality
of circumstances that have led to the damage and injuries and represent their client, the citizens of the County of Los Angeles, in an impartial and effective manner.  All matters before LA Superior Court with respect to me are interrelated.  These matters are not vague but they most certainly are complicated. 

The July 8, 2014 letter from the County Counsel goes into certain detail.  It notes that I failed to state with particularity the following:

1.         Each allegation of damage or injury must be submitted on a separate claim form.  I have reviewed the County Claim for Damages and this is stated nowhere on this form.  Furthermore, I indicated - clearly - on the original claim form that this is a prolonged and sustained course of conduct that culminated with a false arrest on January 22, 2014.  The matters are interrelated.

2.         The claim does not specify a clear date when the damage or injury occurred.  The claim does specify clear dates and that is evident in this sentence contained in my declaration attached thereto:  "The damages and injuries involve a prolonged and sustained course of conduct, beginning in 2005 (with a SWAT incident on May 25, 2005), culminating with my January 22, 2014 false arrest and imprisonment, and continuing."  I have addressed this above.  I also left a message for Jessica Rivas clarifying much of this and referred her again to my declaration. 

3.         The claim is vague as to the circumstances of the alleged occurrence or transaction giving rise to damage or injury.  I completely disagree with this assessment.  See new Declaration attached hereto as Exhibit B.

4.         The claim is vague as to the place of the alleged occurrence or transaction giving rise to damage or injury.  I do not believe this is the case.  Most of the activity took place in Los Angeles County.  However, when I was not residing in Los Angeles County, the conduct crossed state borders.  That would include, but is not limited to, when I resided in Boulder, Colorado, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, Northern New Jersey, and Houston, Texas.  A great deal of the activity has been documented for the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, Dennis Riordan, and others. 

5.         The claims do not specify the injury or damage.  The claim specifies that the damages and injuries are to be determined and indicates that these claims are not less than $25,000 but are unlimited civil damages. 

Executive Offices of the Board of Supervisors
July 15, 2014
Page Five

6.         The claim does not provide facts which support the conclusion that the County of Los Angeles, its officers, agents, or employees, are responsible for the alleged damage or injury.  The original claim does indeed provide facts which support this conclusion. 

This letter than asks me to respond to the Executive Offices of the Board of Supervisors within 15 days of the date of mailing of this letter (July 9, 2014).

I would like to point out that I have consistently and repeatedly attempted to discover facts with respect to the various matters addressed in this or these claims.  This actually caused former DA Steve Cooley to align himself with the City Attorney of Los Angeles and Leonard Cohen (Case No. 2CA0459); have an investigator in the courtroom throughout these proceedings (who was seen hanging out and lunching with Cohen); have his office contact the City Attorney with respect to me; and attempt to obtain a restraining order against me.  Please see my letter to DCA Alan Jackson, dated September 2008, that was hand delivered by Investigator William Frayeh to DA Steve Cooley, DDA Alan Jackson, and DDA Truc Do.  Exhibit C.  Relevant facts have been concealed from me, cannot be discovered on my own, and I have been stonewalled and stymied in my attempts to get answers from 2005 until the present.  Steve Cooley has a pattern of retaliating against people. 

It is my personal belief that I have been prevented from speaking to individuals; addressing my legitimate grievances with LA County officials and employees; and discovering the facts of these (and other) matters in an attempt to permit statutes and time frames for filing complaints to run.  FOIA requests to the District Attorney's Office have also failed to uncover any relevant or material facts. 

I am, of course, requesting that the Board of Supervisors accept my claim, which is most certainly not late, and/or reconsider the time period with respect to the initial conclusion that this is a "late claim."

                                                                        Very truly yours,

                                                                        Kelley Lynch

cc:  IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and Dennis Riordan, Esquire

Exhibit A
Email:  Boulder Combined Court
& LA Superior Court Case Summary
Re:  Domestic Violence Order

Date: Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:32 PM
Subject: RE: Boulder Combined Courts - Records Request
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

Thank you,

You may refer to the attachment (ICON) and Motion for Civil Protection Order I have sent you to verify my answers. I will not charge you for this document.

1. The Order regarding the motion to dismiss PPO was denied on 1/12/09.

2. The temporary restraining order expired on that date (2/15/09) and the PPO was granted on 9/2/08.

3. This case is not a domestic violence case which can be verified on the top right of the first page of the ICON;  noted as "Type: Protection Order". On the motion for civil protection order, the Petitioner only checked off Stalking and Physical Assault, Threat, or Other Situation but not Domestic Abuse.

4. I cannot verify when the PPO was received from any other agencies besides the Court. Again the court granted the PPO on 9/2/08.

5. The PPO hearing was held on 9/2/08 and will cost $35 for an audio recording. If you require a written transcript you will need to go through Tami with CTS West and her contact number is 720-922-3581.

6. If the PPO has restricted you from filing your taxes then you would need to motion the court to request specifically what you need or require to complete your taxes. The motion will then be determined by the Judge to either grant or dismiss the motion.

I will waive the request fee as this was completed in November of 2013. If you require anymore documents from this case I will need to charge you  a $5 research fee and $.25 per copy.

Thank you,

Feng Xie
Judicial Assistant - Research
20th Judicial District

LA Superior Court Case Summary
Foreign Restraining Order Registered
As A Domestic Violence Order

Case Number:  BQ033717

Filing Date:  05/25/2011
Case Type:  Civil Petition - TRO/Dom Violence (General Jurisdiction)
Status:  Pending
Future Hearings

Documents Filed | Proceeding Information




RICE MICHELLE L. - Attorney for Petitioner

Exhibit B
Kelley Lynch Supplemental Declaration

            I, Kelley Lynch, am a resident of the City and County of Los Angeles and am providing the information contained in this Declaration for informational purposes.  For the sake of clarity, it is necessary that the information contained herein be part of the record.  Since parting ways with singer-songwriter Leonard Cohen in October 2004, I have maintained that he has misused, abused, manipulated, and exploited the restraining order process, as a means of revenge and retaliation for my reporting the allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud to IRS and others.
            Since 2004, I have been subjected to a plethora of false allegations by Leonard Cohen (and others, including his lawyers who are compensated and now serve as paid witnesses) that have resulted in numerous restraining orders, manufactured criminal actions, frivolous and malicious legal actions, countless expenditures of time and energy related to court filings, charges, and documents, the loss of custody of Ray Charles Lindsey, the loss of my son Rutger's fingers, the loss of my home, the loss of two businesses, the loss of my animals, the destruction of my reputation and credibility, and irreversible financial devastation. 

            I have experienced medical complications, have been threatened and received death threats, and my family, friends, and supporters have been threatened and intimidated by a number of individuals.  This would include my son, Rutger Penick, who was advised by LAPD during the absurd SWAT incident that they would shoot me and/or my dog.  My ability to offer a competent defense, or serve as a credible witness, has been rendered moot.  For the past 10 years, my family, friends, and I have suffered at the hands of Leonard Cohen in his insatiable and psychologically disturbing question and campaign for revenge and retribution.  It is important to note that Investigator William Frayeh felt that Stephen Gianelli, a Bay Area lawyer who has relentlessly targeted me and others, may have found a sympathetic ear with former DDA Alan Jackson. 

            Due to this most egregious manipulation and exploitation of the restraining order system, including the fraudulent registration of a foreign order in Los Angeles, California, I have asked the DOJ (and others) to investigate this matter thoroughly.  Evidence exists that Leonard Cohen, and others, planned to use restraining orders against me to prevent me from serving credibly as a witness to numerous matters. 

            This nearly decade long crusade on the part of Leonard Cohen, and others, has resulted in a long pattern and practice of the violation of my civil and constitutional rights, as a result of being the repeated victim of a heartless and indifferent restraining order system, court system, and criminal justice system that facilitates and rewards individuals who exploit the system, and commit multiple acts of perjury, and other crimes.  The LA Superior Court system requires one to literally fight for the right to be heard.  Not only has Leonard Cohen perjured himself extensively and provided false statements to a variety of courts, including Los Angeles Superior Court, so have prosecutors and other employees of Los Angeles Superior Court.  In fact, Judge Robert Vanderet publicly stated that I would not abide by a court order.  This was a complete fabrication on his part.  I was told that the Boulder, Colorado order expired on February 15, 2009 and that my Motion to Quash Cohen's Boulder, Colorado restraining order was entered on January 12, 2009.  The individuals who advised me of this were employees of the Boulder court system.  My public defenders advised me that Judge Vanderet refused to permit me to attack this order (or the California registration) and he clearly advised my lawyers that I was aware of the IRS matters all along.  I was not aware, until April 9, 2012 (when the City Attorney provided my lawyers with an IRS binder), that Leonard Cohen obtained a federal tax refund by using the complaint in Case No. 322388 and some version of the fraudulent expense ledger filed in that case.  Judge Vanderet refused to permit Agent Tejeda/IRS to testify.  In debriefing, the jurors advised my lawyers that they wanted to hear from the IRS and at least one of them relied on the City Attorney's fraudulent statements as to assets related to Traditional Holdings, LLC.  Leonard Cohen took millions in loans/advances and paid personal expenses through this entity and those loans are assets of this entity.  He was contractually obligated to repay those loans within three years at 6% interest.  At least one juror, therefore, relied on statements made by the City Attorney that they were advised were not "evidence."  My public defender advised me that he felt the City Attorney was attempting to sabotage the IRS; discredit me; and the District Attorney did not want the Phil Spector verdict overturned.  This public defender later told me that he felt there might have been a "prosecution plant" on the jury.  That issue demands an investigation.  The trial was replete with statements and testimony about Phil Spector, former DA Steve Cooley, and DDA Alan Jackson.  My lawyers repeatedly objected to this testimony. 

            This situation, which is ongoing and all matters are interrelated, is egregious.  That would include the egregious misuse, abuse, manipulation, exploitation, and criminal procurement of temporary and permanent restraining orders by Leonard Cohen and others.  The abuse of these orders appears to be rampant in the civil and family courts.

            The evidence I have been able to discover indicates that Leonard Cohen's abuse of the restraining order process and court system itself has been exacerbated and facilitated by the compromise of a number of public officials.  A plethora of federal and state criminal law violations have occurred, been discovered, and reported.  Or, I have attempted to report this conduct and have been stonewalled, stymied, and retaliated against for doing so.  In addition to professional violations and civil torts; a partial list of federal criminal law violations includes:  civil rights violations, deprivation of rights under color of law, honest services fraud, and wire fraud.  State criminal violations include:  perjury, legal conspiracy, obstruction of justice, witness intimidation, evidence tampering, fraud, and grand theft with respect to the intellectual property LA Superior Court willfully conveyed to Leonard Cohen via default in a matter whvere I was not served the summons and complaint.  The complete lack of jurisdiction over me, with respect to LA Superior Court, in at least three related cases is also at issue.

            Due to the compromise of public officials, Cohen's crimes and the crimes of others have yet to be prosecuted.  That would include with respect to Cohen's actual perjury confession during my 2012 trial (Case No. BC338322).  The crimes of Cohen's legal counsel have so far managed to escape disciplinary sanctions.  Conduct related to collusion and corruption by a handful of public officials has been documented, but yet to be prosecuted. 

            Leonard Cohen has a pattern of falsely accusing individuals of ripping him off in order to breach contracts and planned, from as early as 2005, to use restraining orders and other tactics to discredit me and for other reasons - not least of which would be to defend himself against allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud and stole from me. 

            Furthermore, independent parties (including Neal Greenberg) have testified or presented at least one court (U.S. District Court in Denver, Colorado) with evidence of Leonard Cohen and Robert Kory's plans with respect to me and the role Steve Lindsey and Betsy Superfon played in those plans.  For some reason, former DA Steve Cooley and the City Attorney of Los Angeles have aligned themselves with Leonard Cohen.  One reason appears to be the Phil Spector murder trials.

Los Angeles County also appears to be monitoring my blog.  I have been advised that LAPD's TMU has a file on me and monitors my blog although I have no further details.  I have brought this to the attention of IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and others.

    Los Angeles, California, United States
IP Address:
    Los Angeles County - Internal Servicesdivision (
[Label IP Address]
Referring URL:
Entry Page:
Exit Page:

            It seems more than apparent that Leonard Cohen has retaliated against me, and relentlessly targeted me (with others), due to the fact that he and others have violated numerous tax laws which have been reported to Internal Revenue Service. 

            Despite countless warning signs, red flags, and numerous reports to authorities, with proof, Leonard Cohen and his handful of compensated co-conspirators (and others) have, so far, managed to avoid criminal prosecution.  It is my personal opinion that an independent body unaffected by special interests and political interference should handle the investigations.  Therefore, I have also brought these matters to the attention of IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and Phil Spector's legal team.  I spoke with Judge Fidler's clerk, Wendy, and she advised me to write the District Attorney of Los Angeles about the fact that Cohen now has three versions of his highly embellished gun story about Phil Spector before LA Superior Court.  When I explained that the District Attorney had become hostile and threatening with respect to me, I was advised to copy Judge Fidler in on the letter.  I also contacted the Los Angeles Grand Jury's Legal Advisor in an attempt to determine what statement/testimony of Leonard Cohen's was provided to the Grand Jury in the Phil Spector matter.  Due to the fact that she was unable to determine what witness would have provided this evidence, she was unable to assist me further and advised me to contact Phil Spector's attorney which I have done. 

            The primary goal of any and all investigations must be the determination of the truth, instead of protecting the professional reputations of private individuals and public officials.  Any and all investigations must be done honestly, with transparency, and there must be no consideration for the protection of private individuals or governmental entities or their employees, from exposure to civil liability. 

            The next legal issues related to these matters will be to address Leonard Cohen's excessive perjury before LA Superior Court and the filing of a motion to vacate the fraudulently registered foreign order as a domestic violence order.  LA Superior Court, the Public Defender's Office, City Attorney of Los Angeles, LAPD and other relevant parties, failed to validate the underlying Boulder, Colorado order.  LAPD's TMU has noted, in their report, that Leonard Cohen and I were in a "sexual relationship."  I have no idea what that means as I worked as his personal manager, and not his prostitute, for approximately 17 years.  The government has simply assigned me a "brief intimate dating relationship" with Leonard Cohen.  In the probation violation matter, I provided the Probation Department with a declaration from my mother and letters from approximately 5-6 individuals all confirming that Leonard Cohen and I were never in an intimate, brief, dating relationship.  I believe this may have been Leonard Cohen's defense to allegations of sexual harassment and indecent exposure. 

            The fraudulent restraining orders continue to prevent me from obtaining IRS required information needed to file my 2004 and 2005 tax returns.  I am being willfully prevented from filing these returns.  I am also facing a multi-million judgment with interest that accrues at a rate of 10% per year and a potential state wage garnishment.  Leonard Cohen's refusal to provide me with IRS required form 1099; rescind illegal K-1s I received (that were transmitted to IRS and State of Kentucky), and provide me with other information has now prevented me from filing my 2004 and 2005 federal and state tax returns.  I am the rightful owner of Traditional Holdings, LLC and Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., all intellectual property assigned to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., possibly other entities, and am owed commissions for services I provided Leonard Cohen.  LA Superior Court disregarded corporate books, records, stock units, agreements and other documents.  My ownership interest in these entities was not held in trust for Leonard Cohen and there was no agreement to hold them in trust for Leonard Cohen.  A fraudulent and self-serving narrative does not change the fact that Leonard Cohen has stolen from me and has taken the legal position that he is the alter ego of these, and other, entities.  LA Superior Court, in numerous matters, is involved with a case that is nothing other than a federal tax matter.  It has no jurisdiction to hear any such case.
            A copy of this Declaration will be provided to IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and Dennis Riordan, Esquire.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

July 15, 2014

                                                                        Kelley Lynch

Exhibit C
Letter to DDA Alan Jackson

Hand Delivered to DA Steve Cooley, DDA Alan Jackson, and DDA Truc Do by Investigator William Frayeh

Kelley Lynch

September 17, 2009

Alan Jackson
District Attorney’s Office
County of Los Angeles
210 Temple Street
Suite 18000
Los Angeles, California 90012-3210

Re: Kelley Lynch vs. the District Attorney of Los Angeles, et al.

Alan Jackson:

I am in receipt of your email dated September 9, 2009 demanding that I remove you from my “recipients list.” My emails, as I have repeatedly stated, document the destruction of my life, the destruction of my children and parent’s lives, the targeting of my family, etc., due solely to the fact that I was told Leonard Norman Cohen committed criminal tax fraud and reported that to the IRS and others. I can assure you that everything that has occurred with Cohen is nothing other than an IRS matter and there is need to “convert” them into anything other than what they are. I would not be in an adversarial situation with Cohen had I not reported his tax fraud and accepted 50% community property or whatever “bribes” I was being offered. I also refused to cave into extremely vicious coercive tactics – such as Ray Charles Lindsey’s custody matter. I am assuming that you are not a parent because I cannot imagine the type of person or people who would target a Mother and her children. I am absolutely convinced that Cohen’s tax fraud relates to the Phil Spector murder trial. Furthermore, I am absolutely convinced that I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector in an attempt to prevent me from testifying against Cohen in any IRS matter - whether it is currently privately “pending.” It is pending for me because I intend to litigate this situation and at the very heart of my lawsuit will be the fact that my life has been destroyed because I had the audacity to report his tax fraud and Cohen seemed to think Phil Spector and I would take the fall for him and his actions. He is sadly mistaken.

Not only do I believe Cohen committed tax fraud with respect to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., LC Investments, LLC, Traditional Holdings, LLC, possibly Old Ideas, LLC, personally and in connection with other entities, I believe he may have a lifelong history of tax fraud in the United States and Canada. In fact, I emailed the IRS Commissioner’s Staff a 1977 tax memo prepared specifically for “Cohen” advising him that he did not have to pay taxes anywhere he had residences (United States, Canada, and Greece) but cautioning him not to have a green card. Cohen had a green card and informed me that he abandoned it because the IRS does not ask where you paid taxes the prior year while Canada does. This would explain why he applied for and obtained a new green card in 1991. It would also explain the social security number insanity his accountant, Burt Goldstein, sorted out after Marty Machat’s death in 1988. Marty Machat was Phil Spector and Cohen’s attorney and I worked for him from approximately 1984 until his death in April 1988. The lengths Cohen went to obtain a new green card were extraordinary.

Cohen’s tax fraud, that I was told is criminal, appears to follow him from adviser to adviser. He also has a pattern of blaming advisers and stealing from them. I provided Boies Schiller (who I permitted to review a great deal of evidence relating to the Leonard Cohen Tax Fraud Matter) with Marty Machat’s letter to Irving Trust transmitting a $30,000.00 final payment for his and Bob Johnston’s share of Stranger Music, Inc. Unfortunately, when Cohen sold Leonard Cohen Stranger Music, Inc. and Bad Monk Publishing Company (a d/b/a of Cohen’s) to Sony he did not inform me that he was selling Mr. Machat and Mr. Johnston’s shares. I personally believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff should review that sale and, specifically, look into why Cohen and Westin were concerned about issues relating to the assignments of copyrights into Bad Monk Publishing. I also believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff should look into the failed C.A.K. bond deal (that apparently concerned Robert Kory) and the formation of Cohen’s two charitable remainder trusts. Ed Dean, Cohen’s lawyer, was concerned about personal service contracts being assigned to these trusts and other legal issues relating to the assignments. Robert Kory advised me, at our luncheon, that I had a cause of action against every one of Cohen’s advisers and confirmed my suspicions: the holding periods were illegal. Kory also emailed me on May 24, 2005 that the IRS would demand answers to questions, relating to Cohen’s taxes, going back many years. I was also told by Steve Blanq of Hochman, Rettig that Richard Westin, Cohen’s tax lawyer, made the IRS nervous with his evasiveness. I can understand why. He made me nervous – particularly when he wrote that Neal Greenberg was going to screw me over and he would stand up for me. I have no idea what that means but intend to find out. Fortunately, Westin confirmed – via email – that Traditional Holdings, LLC was a “real entity” (although I personally believe it is a “sham”) and the annuity obligation was real. Unfortunately, Westin had already extinguished the annuity obligation from the tax return at that time. He also extinguished the promissory note and did not report the Sony sale on the 2001 tax returns. He also used two separate tax identification numbers which was probably done purposely to deceive the IRS. Westin also confirmed – via email – that he only represented Leonard Norman Cohen. Truer words have rarely been spoken.

My advisers, DiMascio & Berardo and Dale Burgess, confirmed that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud and “exposed” me to that fraud. In our last meeting, inexplicably, DiMascio & Berardo wanted to figure in a “settlement” amount for my exposure to Cohen’s fraud. In our first meeting, however, they advised me that I had two choices once fraud was brought to my attention: report it to the IRS and/or amend the tax returns. Reporting tax fraud to the IRS turned out to be incredibly dangerous for me and my family but I did not trust anyone to amend the returns and felt a better course of action would be to report what I was told to the IRS, the State of Kentucky, and others. After all, DiMascio & Berardo calculated the penalties and interest – as of the fall of 2004 – with respect to Traditional Holdings, LLC at approximately $10 million. This is what they told me Cohen would have to pay if he personally wanted to report the tax fraud. I believe, were Cohen’s allegations that he was defrauded by his advisers realistic, he would have gone to the IRS with me. I was also told, by DiMascio & Berardo, that similar penalties and interest were accumulating with respect to Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and LC Investments, LLC. Dale Burgess, my former accountant advised me that there is fraud on three entities and both he and Ken Cleveland, Cohen’s former accountant, believe the intellectual property is still in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. I own 15% of that intellectual property – wherever it has gone - and have repeatedly requested a complete and proper forensic accounting of Cohen with all assets on the table. I would like the IRS Commissioner’s Staff’s Opinion on that issue. Agent Betzer, a Collection Agent with the IRS also believed I owned 15% of Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and 99.5% Traditional Holdings, LLC. He advised me to go get what was rightfully mine and he appeared to be an exceptionally helpful and brilliant man. Agent Betzer also understood that I paid approximately $165,000.00 in taxes on a company that Cohen has attempted to prove I do not own. I believed I owned it and I believed there might be something suspect about that entity and the promissory note – which is why I demanded and received an “Indemnity Agreement” from Cohen. For these reasons, one might imagine, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, and Agent Kelly Sopko-Treasury Department are copied in on my emails.

DiMascio & Berardo were apparently impressed and/or intimidated by the fact that Cohen was represented by former District Attorney Ira Reiner and perhaps this is why they encouraged me to participate in what I believe would have been an illegal deal, illegal meditation, and possibly insurance fraud. Ira Reiner was brought in, according to Kory, to handle the mediations for Cohen because Kory does not understand litigation. I would like to point out that Dale Burgess asked me to confirm for the IRS Commissioner’s Staff and the Treasury Department that my lawyers understood this was criminal tax fraud and he would testify to the fact that I was offered 50% community property by Cohen – presumably to lie and say he was defrauded by his advisers.

The IRS Commissioner’s Staff and Department of Justice are referenced in the subject line of the email you responded to and it seems odd that you would permit yourself to be copied in on so many emails from odzerchenma@gmail.com and twiggy.ahmadinejad@gmail.com (and other email accounts) and only now ask me to “immediately” remove you. I have asked you to explain why I was taken to Killer King and questioned about Phil Spector. Please see relevant pages of the Killer King report – which I previously mailed Detective Silva and emailed you and Truc Do. My email accounts and Blogs, I might note, have been targeted by Michelle Blaine (who confirmed this publicly and thanked Blogonaut for his assistance in targeting them), Gianelli, Blogonaut, Belark, and others – including someone who posts as “Bird.” That is the “crowd” that you are apparently affiliated with which is unconscionable – given what has gone on and what is going on with those Blogs. Investigator William Frayeh, of your office, felt Gianelli might have found a sympathetic ear – yours. That is truly appalling and I absolutely believe the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, the FBI, DEA, Immigration, Phil Spector, and his legal team should investigate what is going on here and what has gone on. Stephen Gianelli has, from my perspective, lied to Special Agent Wynar of Oakland FBI. He had the audacity, from what Belark-Gianelli-Blogonaut advised me, to go to the FBI with allegations that I am spamming Agent Kelly Sopko of the United States Treasury Department. It would seem that Gianelli now has the FBI investigating the Treasury. Given the fact that Agent Sopko was able to call me, fly into see me in Santa Ana, California, and email me Agent Tejeda’s information (IRS-Fraud Unit-Los Angeles), one can safely assume that she personally can determine whether or not I am spamming her and advise me to stop. Gianelli also phoned Bruce Cutler who, as you well know, represented Phil Spector. Gianelli is apparently extremely eager to determine what’s on Bruce Cutler’s mind. One thing that should be on Bruce Cutler’s mind is the fact that Nat McBride, an acquaintance of Nicole Spector’s, received a “death threat” from one Brian Peterson (bpeterson999@yahoo) and received at least one email from someone purporting to be Bruce Cutler. I, naturally, have been accused of sending that email. I can assure you that I would not criminally impersonate Bruce Cutler and have now reported those threats and the criminal impersonation of Mr. Cutler to the Department of Justice and Interpol.

Gianelli, amazingly enough, also phoned Investigator Frayeh to determine, from what I can tell, if William Frayeh thinks Prosecutor/Judge Pat Dixon is “good looking.” Please keep in mind that this is a murder trial that has now taken surreal turns. Gianelli/Blogonaut is all over this story and his role seems sinister – particularly given the fact that Blogonaut publicly stated (and emailed me) that “it” had been in contact with Cohen’s advisers on three separate occasions, was communicating with people who knew me in Los Angeles, and offered to put me in touch with Cohen who is apparently willing to help me. All I have to do in order to get my life and children back is lie. I have captured much of the activity on Blaine’s Blog, Blogonaut’s Blog, the Hartford Courant, my own Blogs, and so forth because I thought some of the slander and malicious allegations might ultimately be pulled down which is precisely what has occurred. I have forwarded the captured Blog content to Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, and others. Lying seems to be the name of the game. I was offered 50% of Cohen’s “community property” – presumably to lie to the IRS and others that Cohen was defrauded by his advisers (which is not what I witnessed) – and declined that. The idea of Cohen being defrauded by his advisers is laughable. His disdain for “ordinary income taxes” may be unprecedented and he appeared to grow greedier and greedier with time. He had similarly disdainful views on gift taxes and his own lawyer, Reeve Chudd, emailed me that he was not an “alchemist” when Cohen attempted to donate his body of work to the Toronto Library in exchange for a United States tax credit.

I realize this may complicate matters for the District Attorney as it seems that Cohen probably perjured himself in Phil Spector’s grand jury but let me state, for the record, what Boies Schiller advised me to do when they realized I was meeting Robert Kory for our luncheon: Call Brian Bennett and have him wire me. They seemed to believe I was being asked to participate in criminal activity and were clear – in their emails – that recording Kory would not be a “set up” because what I was being asked to do was illegal. Betsy Superfon, who was apparently negotiating (on my behalf) with Cohen and Kory (without my knowledge, awareness and/or consent) ultimately spoke to Cohen/Kory. Yongzin Rinpoche, who was visiting with his wife, advised me to have her drop by. I asked her to have Cohen/Kory put the terms of their “deal” in writing and fax it to me. Kory advised Superfon that this is not the type of deal that could be faxed and suggested that he, Superfon, and I meet for lunch. Later, Superfon told me the type of deal was an illegal one and advised me that Lindsey took my son away from me to keep him out of Cohen’s tax fraud and there was something – like money – in it for him. There must have been. Why else would my “ex-husband” meet with Cohen and Kory. I was initially told that Cohen and Kory went into Lindsey’s office and accused me of having sex with Oliver Stone. I remain unconvinced that this is defense to tax fraud and tend to doubt it’s a “crime” in any event. Why would my son’s grandfather, Mort Lindsey, contact Cohen and/or Kory and phone me in an attempt to have me make what I was told would have been an illegal deal? Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and Superfon have been “named” in Greenberg’s lawsuit against Cohen. The FBI in Denver told me they would be brought in if there was witness or evidence tampering and explained that it is criminal. Dan Scheid, Greenberg’s lawyer who apparently has evidence relating to criminal witness and evidence tampering, told me and emailed me that this relates to Cohen and Kory. Ed Dean informed me that if the IRS Commissioner’s Staff views what has occurred as fraud and not negligence he will come in after the lawyers and accountants as well. One can only hope and pray that Kory is at the top of the list of lawyers – together with Scott Edelman/Gibson, Dumb and Dumber who had no qualms “seizing” evidence that he knew I intended to send to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff. Of course, I wasn’t served that lawsuit and have noticed that rotten lawyers who lie for a living think they are above the law and tend to ignore due process. In light of what has happened here hearing that you view my emails as “spam” makes me realize that you are a vicious and sadistic individual who is capable of anything. I realize my emails may be unwanted but they are definitely not “spam.”

I would strongly suggest that you review the police reports of Cohen’s interview with the detectives Steve Cron and I met at his house. He either lied to them or, if Mick Brown was accurate when he advised me that Cohen testified in Phil Spector’s grand jury, perjured himself. That would seem to raise issues having to do with obstruction of justice as well. The detectives I met seemed professional so perhaps they will be confused about Cohen’s testimony before the grand jury – or, possibly, that you have referred to an incident between him and Phil Spector in the Motion In Limine. For the record, Cohen advised me that he confirmed – for the detectives – that his comments, over the years about Phil Spector, were good rock ‘n roll comments which is precisely what he told me over the course of 20 years. He also told me that he did not like his vocals and felt humiliated that Phillip did not want to mix the album – putting him in the position of being forced to telegram Phillip. Phillip told me he received hate mail from all 8 of Cohen’s fans and found working with Cohen depressing. I can assure you that I found working with Cohen unbelievably depressing. Cohen certainly did not mind his daughter, Lorca Cohen, accompanying me to visit Phil Spector one night at the Bel Air Hotel. In fact, he seemed rather delighted and intrigued. That is precisely how he felt when he heard that I was having dinner with Phillip in Beverly Hills after the Clarkson incident.

I also reported Cohen’s tax fraud and the fact that he has defrauded me of millions to the District Attorney’s Major Fraud Unit. Please speak to Jeff Jonas about this Complaint. He may be the same Jeff Jonas referred to in your office’s Internal Memorandum relating to King Drew and questioning the credibility of coroner Luis Pena. Apparently my Complaint to your Major Fraud Unit was problematic for the District Attorney as it resulted in Brian Bennett threatening to report me to someone. To whom I cannot say.

Why have I been emailing you and Truc Do and leaving messages for various people at the District Attorney’s Office? I can assure you this is not “harassment.” Your office dragged me into the Phil Spector murder trial – not I. On May 25, 2005, I was held hostage by a S.W.A.T. Team comprised of Los Angeles Police Department and Inglewood Police Department. Sergeant Joe ___________/LAPD, who monitored my only visit with Ray Charles Lindsey since May 25, 2005, told me Beverly Hills Police Department may have been present as well. There is apparently evidence – with Neal Greenberg and/or his lawyers – in Colorado that Cohen, Kory, Lindsey, and Superfon somehow conspired to have me falsely arrested. I was taken to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and ultimately determined that the entire King Drew file was falsified. The individual in that file is apparently one Kelly Annette Lynch who would have been 19 at the time. Rutger and I did not spontaneously manifest on this planet at the same moment in time – which is basically what would have needed to occur were Kelly Annette Lynch actually his mother. She is, however, the woman that seems to have lost custody of my son Ray Charles Lindsey. The bizarre part of this is that my address is correct. My name, however, is spelled incorrectly and on one page alone the following details are false and/or wrong: the social security number, my place of birth, date of birth, religion, and the insurance number. Very little, if anything, in that file relates to me. A nurse informed me that there was fraudulent information in the file and someone was planning to transfer me. Fortunately, after requesting a new doctor, Dr. D’Angelo took my file and determined that I was not dangerous to myself and/or others. Most people who are held at gunpoint by approximately 30 armed men aren’t dangerous – particularly when they are alone in their homes and wearing a bikini which is what I was wearing.

A custody matter was obviously coordinated with my “visit” to Killer King and Steven Clark Lindsey’s cell phone number appears in the attendant falsified report. For the record, the actual conversation Rutger had with “Erma Oppenhein” after the S.W.A.T. incident was limited to two questions: Is your Mother on any medication and are you ok? His answers: Yes, heart medication and yes, he was ok. Steven Clark Lindsey is my younger son’s father and, after inserting himself into the Leonard Norman Cohen Tax Fraud Matter, filed Robert Kory’s Declaration in that matter. My son, Rutger, was asked to go in and sign over/transfer/sell my former house to Cohen/Kory – by Lindsey – while I was en route to Killer King. I would like to point out that there is no signature permitting anyone to treat me at King Drew and Steven Clark Lindsey had no legal right, whatsoever, to speak to any doctor or medical provider on my behalf. His lawyer, Daniel A. Bergman, was apparently faxing Betsy Superfon a Declaration to sign while I was being taken to King Drew. I noticed that at the top of her Declaration. When I have the money I intend to obtain a complete copy of the custody file – including transcripts of hearings – and will turn that over to the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, and – most definitely, Phil Spector. For now, I am living in a homeless shelter in Houston and Blogonaut/Gianelli have “urged” Boulder Police Department and Los Angeles Police Department to further target me. Law enforcement is all over this story and it is revolting. This is the reason why I contacted the Department of Justice and the FBI.

I have brought the fraudulent use of someone else’s social security number (in the King Drew file and in the so-called “police report”) to the attention of the Social Security Administration, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – Treasury Department, the FTC, Phil Spector and his legal team, and others. The Social Security Administration advised me to file a criminal complaint with the Houston Police Department after I discussed, with a representative, the fact that Cohen issued illegal K1s using my Social Security number and with respect to the number that appears in the King Drew file. Apparently it is also identity theft.

I advised Agent Sopko and her partner, in our meeting, that I believe the custody matter arose from Cohen’s tax fraud – that I was told is criminal and relates to the Phil Spector murder trial that I definitely view as a set up. I have provided the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Phil Spector, and others, with Robert Kory and Betsy Superfon’s Declarations that were filed in the custody matter. Ray Charles Lindsey, my son, witnessed a conversation between me and Kory about 1) Cohen’s tax fraud that I was told is criminal; 2) the missing state tax returns; 3) my intellectual property that appears to have been stolen (see Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. and evidence I filed in Boulder, Colorado with my Motion to Quash Cohen’s fraudulent restraining order – meant to silence me and prevent me from contacting Kory with respect to 1099s, illegal K1s issued me by LC Investments, LLC, my intellectual property, a complete and proper forensic accounting, etc. – all of which is an “IRS matter”); and, 4) their threats. I would like to point out that I discussed Cohen and Kory’s threats to put me in jail with Agent Sopko and her partner. Agent Sopko asked me how “they” intended to do that. I have no idea and would have demanded a jury trial in any event. At this point, I would like to underscore this fact: I did not enter an appearance in Cohen’s bogus lawsuit with fraudulent financials attached because I believe it is an attempt to cover up criminal tax fraud and/or criminal conduct – an attempt to obstruct justice. The financial “ledger” attached thereto is fraudulent. Please see Dale Burgess’ fax to DiMascio & Berardo (also filed with my Motion to Quash in Boulder, Colorado) advising – after meeting with Kevin Prins/Moss Adam’s (Cohen’s accountant) – what was missing in terms of back-up documentation and asset valuations.

Leonard Norman Cohen has gone to extraordinary lengths to silence me and has noted, for the news media, the massive tax hit he will take in connection with his creative tax planning. This clearly is his motive. Let me explain how DiMascio & Berardo saw these entities: Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. owns the assets; LC Investments and Leonard Cohen personally collect the income; and Traditional Holdings, LLC sold something it did not own. I was not part of the team of legal and accounting professionals who tended to the tax planning and/or corporate structures but I do know this: Cohen’s tax lawyer, Richard Westin, wrote that Cohen’s level of borrowing from Traditional Holdings, LLC was “dangerous” and felt the IRS could overturn the entity if it noticed a disregard for substance and/or form. There seems to be a disregard for everything – including a “business purpose” as Mr. John Maunts/Kentucky Revenue Cabinet pointed out. I was not a trustee – constructive or otherwise – on any of these entities and am awaiting Opinion Letters from the IRS and State of Kentucky on that issue. There is no way I am in a position to respond legally to the allegations raised by Leonard Norman Cohen and/or Neal Greenberg in his “companion suit” filed in the U.S. District Court in Denver. Until I have the Opinion of the appropriate tax authorities. In the meantime, I have dissolved Traditional Holdings, LLC and filed final tax returns – so that nothing else can be done in my name.

After receiving your email I phoned Investigator William Frayeh. It seems inconceivably bizarre that Stephen Gianelli/Blogonaut had any indication as to what you may have written me. They were not copied in on that email. I tend to doubt “it” reads minds, has a crystal ball, or hacked into your email account. I have previously spoken with Investigator Frayeh regarding the Phil Spector murder trial. As you, no doubt, are aware Detective Brian Bennett came by my former house to interview me after the District Attorney received an anonymous call (from a woman) in connection with Phil Spector and my friendship. Phil Spector and I have known one another for approximately 25-years and I believe it is safe to say that we are dear friends. I worked for Mr. Spector, as an intern, in 1988 and 1989 (and at times thereafter) after Marty Machat’s death in 1988 and have remained friends with Mr. Spector and the Mother is his children, Janis Zavala Spector. Investigator John Thompson told me I was probably a witness in that matter when I met with him and Detective Silva in Santa Ana, California. At that time, we also discussed the fact that I was taken to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and the outrageous fact that “Inglewood Police Department” was present at my home on May 25, 2005. A sadistic police officer told my son, Rutger, that they intended to shoot me and my dog. Ultimately, they ended up informing Rutger that my dog was my hostage and they were merely taking precautions. That is ludicrous and absurd. The police were told, by Rutger and his friends, that my younger son Ray had been taken down the street and left with Cloris Leachman and there was no hostage situation.

Based upon what has unfolded it is nearly impossible for me to believe that you feel I am “spamming” you – as Gianelli stated. Apparently you and Gianelli/Blogonaut have this in common and, I suspect, you are or were communicating with Gianelli and Blogonaut. That seems like a very reasonable conclusion. It is shocking, however, given the attempts Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark-Blaine, and others, have gone (on Blogonaut’s Blog, mControl’s Blog, the Hartford Courtant’s site and elsewhere) to undermine my credibility through slander, malicious gossip, libel, defamation, bald-faced lies, etc. Of course, it is impossible to undermine someone based on lies that must now be proven – as fact – in a court of law. I have brought these Blogs to the attention of the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Sopko – Treasury Department, Agent Wynar-FBI Oakland, Doron Weinberg, Esquire, Dennis Riordan, Esquire, Ron Burkle, Robert MacMillan, Lee Kanon Alpert, Bruce Cutler, Esquire, KyabjeThinleyNorbu, Karmapa, Sharmapa, BhakhaTulku Rinpoche, and others. I am convinced that Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark, et al. have attempted to obstruct justice and have engaged in witness tampering, witness retaliation, witness intimidation, harassment, stalking, and a coordinated campaign of cyber-terrorism clearly designed to silence and undermine my credibility. They have also lied to the FBI in Oakland. Furthermore, they have publicly confirmed their communications (on at least three separate occasions) with Leonard Norman Cohen’s advisers and/or legal team. I am assuming this is the Law Offices of Robert Kory because they have mentioned Kory and his associate Michelle Rice. Blogonaut’s Blog appears to be affiliated with Michelle Blaine’s mControl Blog which is a vile, filthy site that was public but is now invitation only or private. I was also slandered on that Blog – that is obviously affiliated with Sprocket’s Trial & Tribulations Blog. It has been suggested, to me, that Sprocket’s Blog is the “mouth-piece” for Donna Clarkson.

Needless to say, this is an outrageous, outlandish, and unconscionable situation that has exposed Phil Spector, me, our families, and others, to the whims of possibly unstable people and vigilantism. I am absolutely convinced that the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, the Treasury Department, the FBI, the DEA, and Immigration should look into the role – if any – the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office played in having me dragged to Killer King, questioned about Phil Spector, and falsifying the file. It is my opinion that there was a two-fold reason for taking me to King Drew: 1) to determine what, if anything, I knew about Phil Spector and guns. Officer Maurice Hampton/LAPD and Erma Oppenhein/SMART questioned me about this en route to Killer King; and, 2) to prevent me from successfully reporting Cohen’s tax fraud to the IRS and serving as a credible witness. I informed Agent Bill Betzer/IRS on April 15, 2005 that I believed I had been exposed to tax fraud and he advised me to bring the fraud into the IRS with a lawyer. Agent Betzer then advised me to call the IRS Fraud Hotline – which I did. Ultimately, I contacted the IRS via its website – reporting the tax fraud – and called the IRS in Washington, D.C. I asked Miss Hall, who advised me that she could not talk to the public that I was in a very dangerous situation and she took down my name and certain information. Sometime thereafter I received an email from the IRS and began emailing the IRS Commissioner’s Staff evidence – including the corporate indexes, and other documents, that I filed with my Motion to Quash in Boulder, Colorado. I also gave the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, Phil Spector and his legal team, and others the passwords to my tsimar@aol.com and ekajati@aol.com accounts. The reason I did this is so the IRS, primarily, could make an independent determination – based on emails between me-Cohen-his advisers, etc. – as to what actually occurred. I thought this might prove helpful in conjunction with the evidence I sent them and the evidence I intended to send them – which was, from my perspective, unlawfully seized by the Sheriff’s Department on behalf of Cohen, Gibson Dumb & Dumber, and others.

Investigator Frayeh advised me to stop emailing you [for 10 days]. I have stopped. He also suggested that I ignore Blogonaut, Gianelli, and Belark. They have since removed the slanderous and vile articles and comments on their Blog but the lie disguised as an article (written by JoffBelark) remains and I would like to determine who released my so-called “booking” photograph to Belark in connection with some of the insanity I dealt with in Boulder, Colorado. I called Investigator Frayeh to inform him that I was being accused of having sexual fantasies about Pat Dixon. This is preposterous. I sarcastically put a photograph of Dixon and Judge Larry Fidler in one of my extremely public emails and quoted Eminem’s live version of “Puke.” Please review the lyrics to Eminem’s live version (MTV) of “Puke.” He, not I, refers to “dry humping.” Larry Fidler’s own remarks, about what he may or may not wear under his robes, have even come back to haunt me – as inconceivable as that may be.

Blogonaut publicly announced that Pat Dixon actually fears for his life because I informed government, law enforcement, and the news media – via my public emails documenting the destruction of my life – that every time I think of “Dixon” I want to “Puke.” Most parents would. I personally believe it is going to be impossible to prove I have a pattern of sexual fantasies involving Pat Dixon and others lawyers or judges. In any event, sexual fantasies – real or imagined – do not appear to constitute a predicate act under R.I.C.O.

Blogonaut-Gianelli-Belark targeted my son Rutger as well and sent him vicious and malicious emails (such as “Ding Dong The Witch Is Dead”) and – for reasons I cannot imagine – forward Douglas Penick’s dictated response to Boulder Police Department. Boulder Police Department is all over this story. After attempting to leave “Officer Maurice Hampton” a message with “Officer Garrin – LAPD” – some time ago – Officer Storbeck of Boulder Police Department came into Deneuve Construction (with the Police Chief’s secretary) to determine if I was dangerous to myself or others. He was armed and clearly far more dangerous than I. The Denver FBI instructed me to contact the Boulder District Attorney’s Office and the Attorney General of Colorado. To date, I have heard nothing from either with respect to their investigations into this deadly serious matter. Rutger has witnessed a tremendous amount of insanity during this ordeal and was actually asked by Steven Clark Lindsey (immediately following the S.W.A.T. incident) to go in to Cohen/Kory’s office and sign over/transfer/sell my house to Cohen and/or Kory. He also had his fingers ripped off in a meat grinder incident at Whole Foods. OSHA felt there might be criminal negligence involved. The targeting of children is inconceivably brutal and I personally believe you are involved in that. No one on earth can convince me otherwise. In any event, I view Rutger as a witness and am convinced that Gianelli-Blogonaut-Belark (and others) have engaged in witness retaliation with respect to my son. Since Lindsey emailed me that Cohen/Kory were encouraging him to take Ray away from me (after the conversation he witnessed) it is clear to me that he too is the victim of witness retaliation and intimidation. The entire custody matter appears to be nothing other than an attempt to coerce me into a deal with Cohen and an attempt to obstruct justice.

Blogonaut publicly noted that he/Gianelli made an “educated guess” about the content of your email to me. I find that absurd. Blogonaut also noted that you contacted its Blog with respect to my extremely public emails. Investigator William Frayeh, who will receive a copy of this letter, said he would look into this situation. I will, of course, copy in the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – the Treasury Department, Phil Spector, Bruce Cutler, Doron Weinberg and Dennis Riordan. And, I will await your response to my request that you explain precisely why you feel my emails to you (and others) are “spam” – if, in fact, that is your position.

Blogonaut said...
Uh, the reason that we knew that Alan Jackson's email to KL, that KL was touting to the DOJ (and her usual spam list) as a substantive communication from the Spector prosecutor was simply nothing more that a request to drop him from the cc list--was that we received the same request from Mr. Jackson yesterday, we pointed out that the only one that could do this was Lynch—but we said that we would endeavor when we hit “reply-all” to one of Lynch's emails to make sure he was not copied with our reply.
No, we cannot read minds; it was an educated guess—and a correct one at that—sending KL into a tizzy, and generating a half dozen emails to “high places” (cc to this blog).

For the record, Phil Spector and I had dinner and drinks after the Lana Clarkson incident and I asked him – point blank – if he shot Clarkson. He told me that he did not. Rather, Clarkson was apparently dancing around in his foyer singing “Da Doo Run Run” prior to shooting herself. This “theory” is supported by forensic science and the expert opinions of Dr. Henry Lee, Dr. Michael Baden, Dr. Werner Spitz, and Dr. James Pex. To assume that these men would conspire to lie and destroy their careers is blatantly ridiculous. Furthermore, I know Mr. Spector and I believe him and will continue to stand by him come hell or high water. That is what friends do. They do not betray people, sell stories to the news media, and fabricate or revise the past for their own suspect reasons and/or motives.

I await your response to this question: why are my emails documenting the destruction of my life spam and did Pat Dixon personally authorize Blogonaut/Gianelli to publicly state that he feared for his life when I quoted Eminem’s live version of “Puke?”


Kelley Lynch


Declaration of Bruce Cutler:

cc: Phil Spector, Doron Weinberg, Dennis Riordan, the IRS Commissioner’s Staff, the Department of Justice, Agent Kelly Sopko – the Treasury Department, Agent Wynar – the FBI, Ron Burkle, Robert MacMillan, Lee Kanon Alpert, Iris Keitel, Rutger Penick, Douglas Penick, Karen Lynch McCourt, David McCourt, Bruce Cutler, Investigator William Frayeh, ThinleyNorbu Rinpoche, Karmapa, Sharmapa, BhakhaTulku Rinpoche, and Rand Hoffman – Aftermath Records

Alan Jackson’s September 9, 2009 email


On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:35 PM, wrote:

Please take this address off your recipients list immediately. Thank you.

From: Kelley Lynch [odzerchenma3@gmail.com]
Sent: 09/09/2009 10:28 AM EST
To: Blogonaut Law-Blog ; *irs.
commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>; ASKDOJ ;
Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov; doronweinberg ; Dennis
rbyucaipa@yahoo.com; Robert MacMillan
; Lee K. Alpert" ;
moseszzz@mztv.com; Teresa Low ; PIU
Governor.ritter@state.co.us; attorney.general"
gordonj@bouldercolorado.gov; becknerm ; Hank,
Larry" ; John Hall, Chief of Police"
; m.j. smith" ; Alan Jackson; Truc
Cc: david@mccourt.orgkaren@mccourt.org; Jewel of Activity

Subject: Re: IRS Commissioner's Staff and the Department of Justice

Gianelli’s email to Kelley Lynch re. Alan Jackson’s Email

--- On Wed, 9/9/09, STEPHEN GIANELLI wrote:
Subject: Re: Attn: IRS Commissioner's Staff - Gianelli's Email Re. My Family, Etc.
Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 6:41 PM
"I hope you are in receipt of Alan Jackson's email to me - just received on odzerchenma3@gmail.com."

Do you mean the email where Mr. Jackson kindly asked you to stop spamming his office email address?

Comments from Blogonaut

Blogonaut said...
Uh, the reason that we knew that Alan Jackson's email to KL, that KL was touting to the DOJ (and her usual spam list) as a substantive communication from the Spector prosecutor was simply nothing more that a request to drop him from the cc list--was that we received the same request from Mr. Jackson yesterday, we pointed out that the only one that could do this was Lynch—but we said that we would endeavor when we hit “reply-all” to one of Lynch's emails to make sure he was not copied with our reply.

No, we cannot read minds; it was an educated guess—and a correct one at that—sending KL into a tizzy, and generating a half dozen emails to “high places” (cc to this blog).

"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we’re being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I’m liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That’s what’s insane about it." John Lennon