Saturday, April 30, 2016

Kelley Lynch's Email to IRS, FBI & DOJ Re. Leonard Cohen's Proxy Lawyer's Ongoing Criminal Harassment, Legal Opinions, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:14 PM
Subject: Fwd: Kelley Lynch email dated Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 11:17 AM - sticking her head in the sand through "redaction" of that pesky legal authority that proves her wrong
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ": Division, Criminal" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>, MollyHale <>, fsb <>, rbyucaipa <>, khuvane <>, blourd <>, Robert MacMillan <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, Mick Brown <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, Harriet Ryan <>, "hailey.branson" <>, Stan Garnett <>, Mike Feuer <>, "mayor.garcetti" <>, Opla-pd-los-occ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, Whistleblower <>, Attacheottawa <>,, alan hootnick <>, bruce <>

IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

The criminal stalker wants Alan Hootnick to read his highlighted emails.  My fraud upon the court motion was not a motion to reconsider.  I am very curious to know why these courts are permitted to willfully disregard the fact that judgments procured via fraud are invalid.  In any event, Leonard Cohen and his lawyers, who get "rich as fuck" (according to Michelle Rice, can argue this with the Appellate Division.  The fact that I wasn't served will never change.  I was not served Cohen's lawsuit and that is an operative fact.  I asked the Court to refer Cohen and his lawyers to the DA for a perjury prosecution, his lawyers to the state bar, and asked that the Court vacate it's January 17, 2014 decision based on the fraud used to procure it.  That's not asking for anything to be reconsidered since those issues were not considered to begin with. I am going to devote my life to finding legal remedies for this situation.  There are four appeals and a RICO suit. The Tax Court case is of no interest to me because I disagree with the 9th Circuit that fraud upon that court is frivolous based upon my fee waiver asking to file an appeal.  

Gianelli has no idea where I printed my document but is now once again focused on Rutger.  Do I have to spend $125 to bind the appellate briefs?  How sickening.  Gianelli is also focused on Paulette.  The U.S. Supreme Court has a form for people filing in forma pauperis.  In any event, I think I know how to print out four documents and put a green cover on it.

Leonard Cohen's legal defense team, that includes Gianelli, have their thinking caps on evidently.  So far they've managed to commit fraud upon every court they've rolled into and that's just fine with the courts themselves.  It is unconscionable.  Leonard Cohen, a religious sage, must be very relieved he was able to steal from me, bankrupt me, force me into homelessness, and now has an opportunity to argue that my fee waiver application should deprive me of my constitutional rights and permit him to engage in tax fraud and other sham transactions.  However, he particularly likes the fact that he has been unopposed and can lie with impunity.  He also has a proxy stalker to defend him, terrorize my sons, and slander me - and others - publicly.  That is precisely how Leonard Cohen operates.  Anyone who understands this will be rendered a "scorned woman."  It's his catchall.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <>
Date: Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 11:59 AM
Subject: Kelley Lynch email dated Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 11:17 AM - sticking her head in the sand through "redaction" of that pesky legal authority that proves her wrong