Monday, April 8, 2013

Stephen Gianelli's Obsession With Leonard Cohen's Tax Fraud Is Obscene - The Same Is True For The City Attorney Of Los Angeles

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: Jihad Gianelli's 14th Sheepdog Blog
To: "Francisco.A.Suarez" <>, Washington Field <>, Dennis <>, "*irs. commissioner" <*>, ASKDOJ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Robert MacMillan <>, moseszzz <>, a <>, wennermedia <>, "Hoffman, Rand" <>, Mick Brown <>, woodwardb <>, "glenn.greenwald" <>, lrohter <>
Cc: STEPHEN GIANELLI <>, The-14th Sheepdog <>

To the FBI,
Gianelli continues to criminally harass me over IRS matters that do not involve him.  What a lunatic.  He appears to have information from the IRS binders so one can assume he remains in contact with Cohen or his representatives.

He has been advised relentlessly to CEASE AND DESIST.

All the best,

On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Kelley Lynch <> wrote:

You and I have addressed the items in the IRS binder.  There is evidence proving that Cohen's refund did not close any IRS matter related to the allegations that he committed criminal tax fraud.  I was not terminated.  Cohen heard I was going to the IRS about his tax fraud and flew in from Montreal and was hysterical.  I refused to meet with him or his tax lawyer, hand over the corporate books and records (my lawyers transmitted them with a letter to Greenberg, Glusker who represented Cohen), and help them unravel their handiwork.  Cohen, Greenberg, and Westin were absolutely hysterical.  My lawyers then wrote Cohen's tax lawyer and arranged a meeting to discuss the fact that he created these entities.  This is where the fraud was originally addressed and that occurred in 2004.  Cohen then became creative and came up with the novel idea that my share of IP, corporate distributions, etc. were overpayments for  my personal management fees.  His accountant flew to San Francisco to meet with mine and explained that he did not have the corporate back-up information to prepare a proper accounting.  The ledger is fraudulent and I am sitting here with partnership K-1s for Traditional Holdings, LLC prepared by Cohen's tax lawyer listing income and interest and taxes were indeed paid on those sums.  I am dealing with the IRS on these issues now. 
Why is Gianelli writing me about issues between me and Cohen that will be legally addressed?  He doesn't know me and didn't know Cohen at the time but has some type of motive to lie about me and discredit me.  He also lies to the IRS and FBI - which is criminal conduct  - and criminally harasses me copying in my insane prosecutor who also feels that lying, concealment of evidence, etc. is perfectly acceptable. 
How does Gianelli know what is in the IRS binder?  I suppose he's been in touch with Cohen or his representatives.  Leonard Cohen retaliated after hearing I went to the IRS.  He advised MacLean's at that time that he was not accusing me of theft and testified at the March 23rd hearing that I never stole from him.  He also testified that our relationship was solely a business relationship and then perjured himself during the trial.  The perjury is on the record and he confessed to it. 
Gianelli has been relentlessly advised to CEASE AND DESIST.

All the best,

The criminal harassment re. Leonard Cohen's tax fraud continues.  Gianelli clearly has motive and his main issues are the IRS and Phil Spector.

From: The-14th Sheepdog <>
Date: Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: Jihad Gianelli's 14th Sheepdog Blog
To: Kelley Lynch <>

The "tax binder" - as you have chracterized it on your blog - contains correspondence from the IRS reiterating that you met with Agent Sopko in 2007, and that she subsequently emailed you with the contact information for an agent in the IRS criminal divison whom you reported alleged tax fraud to. The same binder also (you have claimed) reflects that the agent was in touch with Kory in 2007 and subsequently met with him.

The IRS binder proves that Leonard Cohen perjured himself when he testified that the IRS had sided with him over the default judgment, etc.  My meeting with Agent Sopko (and subsequent communications with Agent Tejeda/IRS) followed the fraudulent refund by over a year.  Furthermore, Cohen obtained the fraudulent refund - which has now been challenged with the IRS since I discovered it at trial - six months prior to obtaining a default judgment in a lawsuit I was not served and where I was not served or notified of the default.  The judgment is void but illegally alters my federal tax returns.  Leonard Cohen continues to conceal corporate books and records, etc.  The expense ledger is fraudulent.  
It simply cannot be disputed that Cohen fired you then sued you for embezzlement in 2004 and 2005 respectively, and that your 2007 report to the IRS (after meeting with  Agent Sopko at LAX) was to get even with Cohen for the former and not the other way around.

In the fall of 2004, my lawyers sent Cohen's tax lawyer a letter and demanded a meeting and an explanation for these corporate structures, etc.  I embezzled nothing.  When Cohen understood I had reported his tax fraud (and Greenberg raised Agent Betzer/IRS who advised me to report the fraud in 2005 to the IRS fraud unit) to the IRS, he retaliated with a lawsuit.  Cohen did NOT terminate me and no such discussion occurred.  Leonard Cohen was hysterical, heard I was going to the IRS, hired an accountant and lawyers, and was unable to make a deal with me that included - from my perspective - lying about his advisers.  I never met with Agent Sopko at LAX and have no idea where Gianelli would come up with any such insanity.  Agent Sopko flew in from Washington in March 2007 and I met with her and her partner, Brandon, at the house where I resided at the time.  Agent Sopko then emailed me Agent Tejeda/IRS contact information and I reported the allegations that Cohen committed criminal tax fraud to him.  I most certainly did not retaliate but Cohen did use me horrendously.  His argument is psychotic and does not address the corporate books, records, theft, his tax fraud which is egregious, or reality.  It seems as though Leonard Cohen now has Stephen Gianelli criminally harassing me over IRS matters and the appeal.  Gianelli's obsession with these matters - and Phil Spector - is utterly transparent.  My alleged prosecutor had no qualms permitting a man who has engaged in criminal harsassment, witness tampering, witness intimidation, etc. from copying her and my sister in on emails.  This went on for quite a long time and is extremely damning on the part of the City Attorney who appears extremely interested in federal tax matters although they have no jurisdiction to argue anything having to do with the IRS, tax matters, etc. but did - clearly in an attempt to sabotage me, the IRS, and the taxpayers who Leonard Cohen has defrauded.
You cannot fool the Dogster.