Wednesday, April 10, 2013

An Investigation Into Leonard Coihen's Insane Lawyer Operative Is Warranted

From: Kelley Lynch <>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:17 AM
Subject: Fwd: Your admission to tape recording your attorney-client communications at the courthouse
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*>, Washington Field <>, ASKDOJ <>, "Kelly.Sopko" <>, "Doug.Davis" <>, Dennis <>

To the FBI,

The criminal harassment continues.  I did not record any proceedings.  I am entitled to record a meeting with my lawyer.  In any event, Gianelli is out of control, dangerously unstable, and obsessed. This is the lunatic who - after hearing from Cohen's lawyers - relentlessly targeted my children and elderly parents, attempted to blackmail my sister, phoned people and lied to them about me, and has most definitely engaged in criminal witness tampering, witness intimidation, stalking, harassment, etc.  Leonard Cohen's role in this activity demands an investigation.  Slandering me is not a defense to criminal tax fraud and neither is his theft from me in the millions.  My appellate attorney is now very familiar with the evidence and understands this - I had to be served or notified of the Califiornia order.  That will be addressed in oral arguments and the writ of habeas corpus wil addressl the concealed evidence, including the IRS binder.  The IRS binder opens a can of worms since Cohen's lies, fraud, perjury, and concealment are excessive. 

All the best,

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: The-14th Sheepdog <>
Date: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:10 AM
Subject: Your admission to tape recording your attorney-client communications at the courthouse
To: Kelley Lynch <>

California Penal Code Section 632, subdivision (a):

Every person who, intentionally and without the consent of

all parties to a confidential communication, by means of any

electronic amplifying or recording device, eavesdrops upon or records

the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried

on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a

telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be

punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars

($2,500), or imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year,

or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

A conversation between an attorney and a client is a confidential communication. (See Evidence Code section 952.)

Leonard Cohen's operative has a tremendous amount of time for his obsession with me.  A conversation with a public defender - in front of three witnesses - is NOT confidential, particularly when the man is lying and his supervisor confirmed that.  In any event, the tape has been sent to the IRS.  

Congratulations, you just posted an admission that you committed a felony offense on the Internet. However, that was not the point of my earlier email regarding the Los Angeles County Superior Court Local Rules prohibiting the recording of court proceedings. I was addressing your stated intention to have the April 18, 2013 oral argument in your criminal appeal electronically recorded on your behalf - which would be a violation of local rule.

No court proceedings were taped but this man is dangerously unstable and insane.  I think I can get the transcript and wouldn't go near LA Superior Court without a litigator if my life depended on it.  They lie, cheat, set up innocent people, and it is nasty.  LA Confidential is vile and vulgar up close and personal.  But, they met a celebrity who could help them with Phil Spector - Leonard Cohen.  
You essentially gratuitously admitted to a felony offense by way of a rebuttal to a point the Dogster never made.

Writing to the IRS and FBI about the ongoing criminal harassment - involving Leonard Cohen's operative - is not a rebuttal and I admitted to no such thing because that's a bald faced lie by the bald faced liar with motive - Stephen Gianelli.