From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:47 PM
Subject:
To: rwest0@gmx.com, "irs.commissioner" <irs.commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, "stan.garnett" <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, police <police@cityofberkeley.info>, sedelman <sedelman@gibsondunn.com>, JFeuer <JFeuer@gibsondunn.com>, "kevin.prins" <kevin.prins@ryan.com>, Sherab Posel <poselaw@gmail.com>, "steve@blottermusic.com" <steve@blottermusic.com>, "steve@radicalmusic.com" <steve@radicalmusic.com>
Richard Westin,
I have been attempting to determine what "mistake" you rectified with respect to Traditional Holdings, LLC. Leonard Cohen appeared to testify that the "mistake" related to my ownership interest in that entity. I do not know how that would relate to my ownership interest in Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc.
It is very clear that Leonard Cohen and his representatives feel very comfortable disregarding my requests for IRS required form 1099 for 2004; disregarding my request that Cohen rescind illegal K-1s (transmitted to State of Kentucky and IRS) indicating that I have an ownership in LCI and advising tax authorities that I received $0 income from that entity for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005; disregarding my requests asking that they explain the TH partnership K-1s (transmitted to IRS and others) for the years 2001, 2002, and 2003 indicating that i am partner in TH and received income for those years; disregarding my requests that they explain how they view the federal tax returns with respect to these entities and partnership documents provided to tax authorities re. my ownership; disregarding my request (including to you) to inspect all corporate books and records related to LC Productions, Inc., Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc., LC Investments, LLC, Traditional Holdings, LLC, and Old Ideas, LLC. I have made other requests as well. I have also asked if they are taking the position that fraudulent tax returns were prepared and transmitted to IRS, State of Kentucky, FTB, or other tax authorities. These are entirely legitimate legal, tax, financial, business and accounting matters.
Leonard Cohen testified that he entered into a settlement agreement with you, related to the mistake that may involve Traditional Holdings, and publicly stated that you compensated him with substantial monies. I have no information about that matter and was wrongfully excluded from any and [all] settlement discussions and agreements.
It is my firm belief, based on Cohen's actions, testimony, legal documents, and conduct, that I was fraudulently induced into entering into many agreements with Cohen and these corporate entities. Leonard Cohen engaged in willful tax evasion; he has acted negligently with respect to many matters - including his nearly $6.7 million loans/expenditures re TH corporate assets. He had and has a legally binding obligation to repay those loans/expenditures within 3 years at 6 percent interest. I have no idea who was supposed to create the loan documents. I was clear with Cohen - I do not handle corporate, tax, accounting, IRS, legal matters or loan documents. That was not my job.
I personally believe the settlement agreement is illegal. I know the default judgment is because I was not served. I didn't resemble the individual. I have witnesses that attended the hearing where the judge appeared to argue Leonard Cohen's case. Leonard Cohen has obtained judgments, orders, and verdicts based on fraud and perjury.
I am attempting to address federal tax and corporate. What mistake did you rectify? How can Leonard Cohen or his representatives willfully disregard all corporate books, records, stock shares, agreements, my Indemnity Agreement, the Annuity Agreement, other documents and information, and federal and state tax returns? The judgment is evidence of theft and there issues with the ongoing accumulation of fraudulent financial interest based on a fabricated fraudulent expense ledger. The ledger in no way resembles an actual accounting.
I would appreciate your response. I believe I have been extremely diligent and have been "arrested" for, as LAPD noted in their report, requesting tax information. According to Detective Viramontes, Leonard Cohen was not comfortable with my requests for tax information. Cohen has used a fraudulently registered "domestic violence" order to prevent me from requesting and receiving IRS required documents and information and effecting serving on a corporate entity although that corporation advised IRS, via K-1s, that I have an ownership interest in the entity. Cohen also refuses to provide me with the back-up documentation necessary to prepare a proper accounting that addresses assets, liabilities, equity, and - all corporate distributions and shareholder loans. He has not explained why LCI and others (including himself) collected royalty income with respect to intellectual property assets owned by Blue Mist Touring Company, Inc. The State of Kentucky advised me to place the non-revocable assignments in a safety deposit box and both Ken Cleveland and my former accountant, Dale Burgess, believe the assets are still in Blue Mist. Cohen's complaint confirms that nothing with respect to BMT or the assignments was unwound.
There are formalities involved with dissolving or winding of corporate structures. Those are being willfully disregarded.
Because of this situation, a Bay Area lawyer (Stephen Gianelli), Cohen's fan (Susanne Walsh), and possibly others, believe they have a right to criminally harass, stalk, intimidate, and threaten, me, my sons, sister, friends, and others. It is a highly coordinated campaign. These individuals are affiliated or aligned with Leonard Cohen. It's possible Gianelli found a "sympathetic ear" with Phil Spector's prosecutor about me. It's factual that Phil Spector's DA joined forces with Cohen and the City Attorney to target me, lie about me, falsely arrest and imprison me, retaliate against me. The stakes are evidently high. My sons lives have been destroyed over this situation.
Leonard Cohen, as a Buddhist teacher of mine noted, is an incredibly aggressive, vengeful, and vindictive individual. He also appears to be a thief. See Steven Machat and Phil Spector. LA Superior Court has no right or authority to aid and abet theft. They have no jurisdiction over me or the corporations inserted into the default. I can assure you that there is no public policy favoring theft, fraud, perjury, concealment, obstruction of justice, prosecutorial misconduct, witness tampering, etc.
The judgment is void and I believe the settlement agree is as well. Cohen refuses to provide me with a copy of that agreement or any details regarding the settlement negotiations.
Kelley Lynch
Section 1668 of the Civil Code provides that “[a]ll contracts which have for their object, directly or indirectly, to exempt any one from responsibility for his own fraud, . . . whether willful or negligent, are against the policy of the law.” This provision encompasses intentional and negligent misrepresentation. (Blankenheim v. E. F. Hutton & Co. (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 1463, 1471-1473.) Accordingly, as Witkin explains: “A party to a contract who has been guilty of fraud in its inducement cannot absolve himself or herself from the effects of his or her fraud by any stipulation in the contract, either that no representations have been made, or that any right that might be grounded upon them is waived. Such a stipulation or waiver will be ignored, and parol evidence of misrepresentations will be admitted, for the reason that fraud renders the whole agreement voidable, including the waiver provision.” (1 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (10th ed. 2005) Contracts, § 304, p. 330.)
