Thursday, November 26, 2015

Kelley Lynch's Email to the Los Angeles City Attorney & Mayor Garcetti Re. the Criminal Stalker, Steve Cooley & Bruce Cutler

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:10 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com


Mike Feuer and Mayor Garcetti,

Let me be clear:  I don't want to discuss Bruce Cutler or Steve Cooley with this criminal. I don't know one LA resident being harassed by him over Phil Spector, Leonard Cohen, and IRS federal tax matters who does.  That includes my sons.  Feel free to review their declarations.


The Criminal Stalker attempted to discuss Cooley and Bruce Cutler when he harassed me with this email.  I copied you on my cease and desist and those are very fundamental words and legal concepts.

I will be discussing the fraudulent DMV order, wire fraud, attempt to extort domestic violence fines from me, VAWA funding fraud, etc. with a federal court.  At that time, the appropriate parties in the City and County will be served.  Please see my original notices to City and County attached hereto.  I'm anticipating further deception, fraud, and lies.  I'll let the Court know.


Kelley Lynch

KELLEY LYNCH LEGAL NOTICE TO THE COUNTY AND CITY OF LOS ANGELES:

Kelley Lynch
1754 N. Van Ness Avenue
Hollywood, California  90028

                                                                        31 July 2014



Thonas Wong                                                  Jessica Rivas
Chief Investigator                                            Associate County Counsel
City of Los Angeles                                         General Litigation Division
City Hall East                                                  648 Kenneth Hahn Hall                                 
200 N. Main Street                                          500 W. Temple Street
Room 800                                                        Los Angeles, California  90012
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Executive Offices of the Board of Supervisors
Room 383 Hall of Administration
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, California  90012

Re:  City of Los Angeles Claim No. C15-0063
       County of Los Angeles Claim No. 14-1115711*001

Thomas Wong, Jessica Rivas, and Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors,

Thank you for your letters dated July 8, 2014 (LA County), July 21, 2014 (LA County), and July 25, 2014 (City of Los Angeles). 

There seems to be some confusion with respect to the various dates and time frames addressed in my original claims.  I would like to reiterate the following:  These claims arise from a prolonged and sustained course of conduct that involves both the City and County of Los Angeles City.   
.
The course of conduct culminated with my false arrest and imprisonment on January 22, 2014 (Case No. 2CA0459) and LA Superior Court’s refusal to vacate a fraudulently obtained default judgment on January 17, 2014 (Case No. BC338322). 

This course of conduct also relates to the fraudulent registration of a foreign restraining order with Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. BC033717).  The City and County of Los Angeles failed to verify the nature of the foreign order.  It is not a domestic violence order and I received written confirmation of this fact from the Boulder Combined Court on April 10, 2014

On June 17, 2014, after diligently pursuing the matter for nearly two years, I finally located the Court Reporter from the March 23, 2012 bail hearing (Case No. 2CA0459).  I and others have repeatedly been advised, for a variety of reasons, that this transcript was unavailable.  The Court Reporter is currently on vacation and will provide me with a transcript of that hearing when she returns.  That transcript should successfully prove that Leonard Cohen testified (accurately, I might note) that we were in a purely business relationship and I never stole from him.  His perjury with respect to the “dating relationship” was addressed during my 2012 trial in connection with the violation of the domestic violence order.  When confronted, Leonard Cohen admitted changing his testimony from one hearing to the next.  He was not prosecuted for perjury and DCA Streeter’s attempt to rehabilitate him was farcical. 

The governments of the City and County of Los Angeles have simply assigned me a “brief intimate dating relationship” with Leonard Cohen.  The fraudulently registered foreign order remains in full force and effect.  That order prevents me from requesting information I require to file and/or amend federal and state tax returns and payment for work I’ve done and assets I own.  Additional problems have arisen due to the fact that Internal Revenue Service views me as a partner on entities LA Superior Court has concluded is the sole property of Leonard Cohen.

The California Tort Claims Act mandates that all claims for money or damages against a public entity must be presented in writing to the entity prior to filing suit.  My claims were presented in writing and were filed in a timely manner.  Both the City and County of Los Angeles have acknowledged receipt of my tort claims.  Federal civil rights violation claims are not subject to California’s tort claim requirements because such would violate the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution. Williams v. Horvath, 16 Cal.3d 834, 842 (1976). 

Pursuant to government codes and regulations, the claims must be in writing and signed by the claimant.  The claim must contain:  information to be a sufficient claim; claimant’s name and mailing address; date, place, and circumstances of the claim; description of the injury, damage, or loss for which recovery is sought; name of any public employees causing the loss if known and an indication as to whether the claim would be made in limited jurisdiction court or not.  My original claims satisfied these elements.  The descriptions need not provide evidentiary detail and I have outlined the prolonged and sustained course of conduct in relatively great detail.  My original claims were detailed enough to allow the City and County of Los Angeles to investigate and consider them.  Furthermore, I am available to answer any questions with respect to complexities that may appear “vague.”  It is my personal opinion that neither the City nor County of Los Angeles have provided an adequate explanation for the denial or insufficiency of my claims.  The City and County of Los Angeles have also not explained precisely what dates they believe do not fall within the legal claim periods. 

I look forward to your response.

                                                                        Very truly yours,



                                                                        Kelley Lynch


cc:  IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and Dennis Riordan, Esquire






---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:42 AM
Subject: RE:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: ahootnick@yahoo.com

How could other people possibly know what you were “unclear on” and why do you think that the Mayor and the City attorney of the largest city in California would have the time to care? Your delusional sense of self-importance and entitlement is boundless.

From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 7:44 PM
To: Stephen Gianelli; alan hootnick; *IRS.Commisioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; nsapao; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; Harriet Ryan; hailey.branson; Stan Garnett; Mike Feuer; mayor.garcetti; Opla-pd-los-occ; Kelly.Sopko; Whistleblower; Attacheottawa; tips@radaronline.com
Subject: Re:

Mike Feuer and Mayor Garcetti,

Let me know if anything is unclear on my end.

Kelley Lynch

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Alan Hootnick,

Why does this criminal copy you on these criminally harassing emails?  If this criminal wants to talk about Cooley, Jackson, Dixon, Bruce Cutler, etc. he should call them directly.

His employers must pay him for working on holidays.

He should threaten Justin Bieber fans.  

Kelley

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Gianelli,

You want to talk about "Steve Cooley."  That's where you started.   Call LAPD's TMU and have them arrest Justin Bieber's fans for their use of the "F" word re. Leonard Cohen.  Cohen uses the "C" word; "F" word; and approved a biography with the word "pussy" in a sentence re. taxes.  If you want to talk to Bruce Cutler, call him and ask him to marry you.  If you want to talk to Cooley, call him and ask him to marry you.  If you want to talk about Alan Jackson, call him and talk to him about his fear over Eminem's song "Love the Way You Lie."  If you want to talk about Pat Dixon, call him about his fear over Eminem's song "Puke" and specifically his lyric about "dry humping" that Dixon thinks was dedicated to him.  I know what my constitutional rights are and i know that you have no constitutional right to criminally harass me, my sons, family, friends, appellate attorney, and witnesses.  You clearly feel protected in LA Confidential.  Perhaps that's because you function as an unofficial member of Cohen's legal team and appear to be in bed with Spector's prosecutors.  You're even working on Thanksgiving.  You have dedicated clients, no?


I'm advising advising you to cease and desist, criminal.  You're not representing IRS, FBI, and DOJ.  You're lying to them which is criminal.  That's one reason you belong in prison.

Kelley Lynchr

The Criminal Stalker Was Harassing Me About Bruce Cutler & Steve Cooley But He's A Liar With Motive

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:02 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, Paulmikell.A.Fabian@irscounsel.treas.gov, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>


IRS, FBI, and DOJ,

The Criminal Stalker was talking about "Steve Cooley."  My emails to IRS, FBI, and DOJ are none of his business and are not laced with the F-word and/or homophobic threats.  Gianelli attempted to blame my friends in the LGBT community in the Bay Area for sending the "bloody stump" email.  However, he doesn't know them; they didn't create it; Oliver Stone was targeted in that email; and, Gianelli creates those types of monikers.  As with Tor, and criminal conduct with my Tax Court blog, Gianelli has written that I can never prove.  He's a professional criminal.  

I didn't change the subject.  The Criminal Stalker was attempting to insert extraneous material about Cooley and Bruce Cutler into his harassing emails.  

The man has been continuously advised to cease and desist.  I sent him five responses advising him to cease and desist.  It's all documented because I'm dealing with pathological liars, dangerous clowns, and other actors with motive.

Kelley



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:39 AM
Subject: RE:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Cc: ahootnick@yahoo.com

Ms. Lynch,

I was not talking about Steve Cooley. I was talking about YOUR habit of lacing your emails to the IRS/FBI/DOJ  with the F-word and homophobic epithets and the effect that has had on your credibility. Namely, the impression that you are a crazy crackpot.

You changing the subject to Steve Cooley or Bruce Cutler or Justin Bieber fans or Leonard Cohen’s  propensity to use cuss words in his writings and song lyrics does not alter how YOU appear when YOU act like a crazy nut case.

Sending me five more emails (like the additional ones in my inbox) won’t change that reality either. It just reinforces it.

From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 7:42 PM
To: Stephen Gianelli; alan hootnick; *IRS.Commisioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; nsapao; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; Harriet Ryan; hailey.branson; Stan Garnett; Mike Feuer; mayor.garcetti; Opla-pd-los-occ; Kelly.Sopko; Whistleblower; Attacheottawa; tips@radaronline.com
Subject:

Gianelli,

You want to talk about "Steve Cooley."  That's where you started.   Call LAPD's TMU and have them arrest Justin Bieber's fans for their use of the "F" word re. Leonard Cohen.  Cohen uses the "C" word; "F" word; and approved a biography with the word "pussy" in a sentence re. taxes.  If you want to talk to Bruce Cutler, call him and ask him to marry you.  If you want to talk to Cooley, call him and ask him to marry you.  If you want to talk about Alan Jackson, call him and talk to him about his fear over Eminem's song "Love the Way You Lie."  If you want to talk about Pat Dixon, call him about his fear over Eminem's song "Puke" and specifically his lyric about "dry humping" that Dixon thinks was dedicated to him.  I know what my constitutional rights are and i know that you have no constitutional right to criminally harass me, my sons, family, friends, appellate attorney, and witnesses.  You clearly feel protected in LA Confidential.  Perhaps that's because you function as an unofficial member of Cohen's legal team and appear to be in bed with Spector's prosecutors.  You're even working on Thanksgiving.  You have dedicated clients, no?


I'm advising advising you to cease and desist, criminal.  You're not representing IRS, FBI, and DOJ.  You're lying to them which is criminal.  That's one reason you belong in prison.

Kelley Lynch


The Criminal Stalker Wants To Harass Me Over The Fraud Domestic Violence Program Being Run Out Of Los Angeles & VAWA Funding Fraud

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:57 AM
Subject: Domestic Violence Order & VAWA Funding Fraud
To: Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>


Hello Senate Judiciary,

The Criminal Stalker (who routinely lies to IRS, FBI, DOJ, etc.) is all over the place today, Thanksgiving.  His employers must be paying him overtime for his holiday work, no?  The Criminal has attached the transcript of the so-called hearing re. my motion to vacate the fraudulent domestic violence order.  However, there are bigger issues here.  That would include, but is not limited to, California's use of Domestic Violence form DV-600 to register all non-domestic violence orders in California and fraudulently register them in domestic violence data bases which is wire fraud.  LA Superior Court illegally sentences people for "domestic violence" fraud orders; issues fraudulent domestic violence related orders (after the trial re. "witnesses" who are also Cohen's paid lawyers); and attempts to extort domestic violence fines out of individuals like myself.  Vanderet had no jurisdiction over me; Boulder Combined Court advised me that the fraud Colorado order (issued without "findings" prior to my discovering Cohen's entirely perjured declaration) expired on February 15, 2009; and this does not meet VAWA requirements.  That's the end of it for Colorado and California's picks up with a willful failure to serve me and notify me of the false allegations against me.  There is no due process in California.  I would appreciate Senate Judiciary reviewing this transcript.  LA Superior Court has an excuse for everything and most of it involves their notion of "timing" but not due process or one's constitutional rights.  

I didn't send anything obscene to Cohen but I believe Gianelli wrote the "bloody stump" email and then tried to blame it on my friends in the LGBT community in the Bay Area.  Two people he does not know.

Gianelli was just harassing me over "profanities."  It's fine for Justin Bieber's fans.  It's fine for Cohen.  The prosecutor thought the "curse words" were an issue so Gianelli's lying.  Also, the voice mail messages were altered and tampered with.  That's why Cohen is heard speaking over me.  Does that sound like it would meet evidence standards anywhere? Streeter elicited testimony related to His Holiness Kusum Lingpa's conclusion that "Leonard Cohen is an a&^hole" who is going to hell."  Cohen attempted to conceal that but was then asked to read the quote in context.  This happened time after time. The alleged voice mails were tampered with and altered.  The transcripts were incoherent.  I have transcribed most of them and there's nothing threatening in them.  There are legitimate requests for tax information.  And LAPD's report noted that my alleged emails were generally requests for "tax information."  Regardless of the fact that the prosecutor lied about this during my trial, I don't have the IRS required tax and corporate (K-1s, financial statements, corporate accountings) that I was requesting.  The prosecutor felt that was the most important part of my trial.  However, she lied about this and the jurors clearly relied on that and wanted to hear from IRS.  But, Judge Vanderet wouldn't permit Agent Luis Tejeda, head of IRS fraud unit, to take the stand.  He had something else in mind such as sabotaging my trial and, from what I could tell, condoning Cohen's perjury confession on the stand.  Maybe he relied on the "perjured" testimony over the "dating relationship."  i legitimately want the tax information and I legitimately want Cohen to rescind the illegal K-1s LCI issued and transmitted to IRS.  Who is the City Attorney to lie about federal tax matters and where did their jurisdiction come from to lie about federal tax matters?  The jurors told my lawyers in debriefing that they wanted to hear from IRS and relied on the prosecutor's lies about corporate assets.  Cohen personally borrowed or caused to expended nearly $6.7 million from one entity alone.  But the juror felt sorry for Cohen because "he" believed the lies.  Does that sound like due process or a fair trial?  They don't exist, as far as I'm concerned, before LA Superior Court.
\
And then there's the evidence that Cohen and Kory planned to use fraud restraining orders to discredit me as a "witness."  Boies Schiller was very clear about that and confirmed in writing that they felt Cohen/Kory were attempting to engage me in criminal conduct and wanted Investigator Brian Bennett (DA, Spector's case) to wire me for any meetings with Cohen/Kory.  They also told me in writing that they view Cohen as "another Hollywood fraud" who owes me millions and advised me to find a lawyer to help me "take down" another Hollywood fraud.  I didn't think they were threatening Cohen but I wasn't attempting to set Boies Schiller up with a false threat scam.

I think the ambulance chaser, Gianelli, is wrong legally but we'll see what a federal court thinks.  I also think Senate Judiciary and DOJ should investigate the VAWA funding fraud and extortion attempts re. fraud domestic violence orders in Los Angeles.

Kelley

Streeter:  Did Ms. Lynch ever curse on the voicemail messages? 
 
Streeter Closing:

This is the other thing the people found a little interesting.  She knows what a 1099 is a K-1 -- a K-1.  Whoever heard of a K-1 before this case?  The FTB and the IRS.  Did anyone know there was a difference between the FTB and the IRS?  Or what the FTB is?  … This is a woman who knows what a K-1 is … RT 566

So this isn’t about Ms. Lynch being angry that she didn’t get her tax documents.  RT 577  So what you have here, what this is proof of is not a woman who legitimately wants her IRS records or documents.  It’s the unraveling of a con.  RT 578

From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:18 AM
Subject: Your blog post "Did Leonard Cohen Call The City Attorney Or LAPD's TMU To Have Justin Bieber's Fans Arrested For Their Use Of The "F" Word?"
To: kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com
Cc: ahootnick@yahoo.com


Ms. Lynch,

You were not arrested for using profanity in a tweet or a blog post.

You were arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced for unapologetically sending obscene, threatening, and abusive emails to Leonard Cohen’s personal email address  and leaving obscene, threatening, and abusive emails on Leonard Cohen’s home answering machine – all in violation of a 2008 Colorado restraining order that you consented to and signed for, after the judge who issued it explicitly warned you that if you violated the order by contacting Cohen you could be sentenced to up to 18-months in jail for each violation.

Therefore, the Justin Bieber fan tweets you reference are in no way analogous to the criminal conduct for which you were arrested.

Yes, I know, you claim that you thought the Colorado order had expired. So you told the jury. They didn’t buy it and convicted you – probably because the Colorado order that  you signed for says in big, bold type on the first page:

This Protection Order DOES NOT EXPIRE and only the Court can change this Order.

You are also fond of saying that the California registration of the Colorado order on May 25, 2011 was “fraudulent”. On September 1, 2015 the Los Angeles County Superior Court (Silverman, J. presiding) DISAGREED, and DENIED your BELATED motion to vacate the California registration. (See attached transcript.)

More to the point, though, you could have been arrested and prosecuted for violating the Colorado order WHETHER IT WAS REGISTERED IN CALIFORNIA OR NOT. (See Calif. Fam. Code §6403, subd. (d) “Registration or filing of an order in this state is not required for the enforcement of a valid foreign protection order…”.)

ATTACHED:  KL MOTION TO VACATE FRAUD DMV ORDER HEARING TRANSCRIPT

The Criminal Stalker Wants To Talk About His Pals Steve Cooley, Pat Dixon, & Alan Jackson

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:42 AM
Subject: 
To: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com


Gianelli,

You want to talk about "Steve Cooley."  That's where you started.   Call LAPD's TMU and have them arrest Justin Bieber's fans for their use of the "F" word re. Leonard Cohen.  Cohen uses the "C" word; "F" word; and approved a biography with the word "p*&%y" in a sentence re. taxes.  If you want to talk to Bruce Cutler, call him and ask him to marry you.  If you want to talk to Cooley, call him and ask him to marry you.  If you want to talk about Alan Jackson, call him and talk to him about his fear over Eminem's song "Love the Way You Lie."  If you want to talk about Pat Dixon, call him about his fear over Eminem's song "Puke" and specifically his lyric about "dry humping" that Dixon thinks was dedicated to him.  I know what my constitutional rights are and i know that you have no constitutional right to criminally harass me, my sons, family, friends, appellate attorney, and witnesses.  You clearly feel protected in LA Confidential.  Perhaps that's because you function as an unofficial member of Cohen's legal team and appear to be in bed with Spector's prosecutors.  You're even working on Thanksgiving.  You have dedicated clients, no?


I'm [once again] advising you to cease and desist, criminal.  You're not representing IRS, FBI, and DOJ.  You're lying to them which is criminal.  That's one reason you belong in prison.

Kelley Lynch




From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: FW: FW:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Cc: blinddistribution <blinddistribution@gmail.com>, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>


Ms. Lynch,

You may or may not have a constitutional right to use profanity (depending on the context) but that is a separate issue from whether or not sprinkling your communications to the IRS/FBI or Justice with F-bombs and homophobic epithets marks you as a crackpot nut-case.

HINT: It does. It did. That is one of several reasons why you are not taken seriously.

On Thursday, November 26, 2015, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cease and desist, Gianelli.  Call Bruce Cutler and talk to him about your career as an ambulance chaser and amateur intel operative.  But stop contacting me.

F MOTION

http://scofacts.org/The-F-Motion.html


Did Leonard Cohen Call The City Attorney Or LAPD's TMU To Have Justin Bieber's Fans Arrested For Their Use Of The "F" Word?

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:18 AM
Subject: 
To: alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>, "*IRS.Commisioner" <*IRS.Commisioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, Mike Feuer <mike.feuer@lacity.org>, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, Paulmikell.A.Fabian@irscounsel.treas.gov


Alan Hootnick,

Why does the Criminal Stalker copy you on emails to me?  I may or may not have a constitutional right to use "profanity?"  Did you see the profanity I sent you re. Cohen, his use of the words "c*&t" and "f^&k" or Bieber's fans responding to Cohen?  Did Cohen phone the City Attorney or summon LAPD's TMU to have them arrest Justin Bieber's fans?  Does the City Attorney think it's poetic when Cohen uses the C-word but threatening when Phil Spector does?  It's so subjective.  I've sent you the examples.  These comments were on Twitter.  This is part of our vernacular.

Gianelli does not represent or speak for IRS, FBI, or DOJ.  He wants to talk about Phil Spector and Bruce Cutler.  He's just trying to get around to it right now.  He also thinks a Court may ultimately read these emails of his and buy into his criminal stalking, witness tampering defense.

Kelley

JUSTIN BIEBER FANS ON TWITTER:

It’s been a tough few months for the Beliebers, and last night it didn’t getting any better. At the JUNO Awards — which is Canada’s equivalent to the Grammys — Leonard Cohentopped Justin Bieber, Carly Rae Jepsen, and deadmau5 to win the award for Artist of the Year.
Here’s the obligatory linking to absurd tweets made by Bieber fans in the aftermath of his heartbreaking, totally unfair defeat.
who the fuck is Leonard Cohen
— Cara (@JustinsCarebear) April 21, 2013
I FUCKING CAN’T RIGHT NOW I CAN’T BELIEVE JUSTIN LOSE ARTIST OF THE YEAR TO LEONARD COHEN (who dat) WE WERE SUPPOSED TO VOTE YOU KNOW
— marysol (@ollkidrauhl) April 21, 2013
ok what the flying fuck? WHO THE FUCK IS THIS LEONARD COHEN GUY!??!?! how the fuck did he win the JUNO like wtf is happening us?!?!?!!?
— Monkey (: (@BieberzBrunette) April 21, 2013
http://consequenceofsound.net/2013/04/leonard-cohen-and-not-justin-bieber-is-canadas-artist-of-the-year/



From: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: FW: FW:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Cc: blinddistribution <blinddistribution@gmail.com>, alan hootnick <ahootnick@yahoo.com>


Ms. Lynch,

You may or may not have a constitutional right to use profanity (depending on the context) but that is a separate issue from whether or not sprinkling your communications to the IRS/FBI or Justice with F-bombs and homophobic epithets marks you as a crackpot nut-case.

HINT: It does. It did. That is one of several reasons why you are not taken seriously.

On Thursday, November 26, 2015, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:

Cease and desist, Gianelli.  Call Bruce Cutler and talk to him about your career as an ambulance chaser and amateur intel operative.  But stop contacting me.

F MOTION:

Kelley Lynch's Cease & Desist Letter to the Criminal Stalker & Ambulance Chaser, Stephen Gianelli

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:55 AM
Subject: Re: FW: FW:
To: Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, ": Division, Criminal" <Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, MollyHale <MollyHale@ucia.gov>, nsapao <nsapao@nsa.gov>, fsb <fsb@fsb.ru>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, khuvane <khuvane@caa.com>, blourd <blourd@caa.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@firstlook.org>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, Stan Garnett <stan.garnett@gmail.com>, mike.feuer@lacity.org, "mayor.garcetti" <mayor.garcetti@lacity.org>, Opla-pd-los-occ <OPLA-PD-LOS-OCC@ice.dhs.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, Whistleblower <whistleblower@judiciary-rep.senate.gov>, Attacheottawa <AttacheOttawa@ci.irs.gov>, tips@radaronline.com, Fabian Paulmikell A <Paulmikell.A.Fabian@irscounsel.treas.gov>


Cease and desist, Gianelli.  Call Bruce Cutler and talk to him about your career as an ambulance chaser and amateur intel operative.  But stop contacting me.

DISTRICT COURT, LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO
201 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521
(970) 498-6100
FILED IN COMBINED COURTS
LARIMER COUNTY, CO
2003 JUL -1 PM 3:07


^ COURT USE ONLY ^
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,
Plaintiff,
In the Interest of:
[redacted], a Child.
DAVID S. KAPLAN
Colorado State Public Defender
ERIC VANATTA (#24823)
Deputy State Public Defender
Fort Collins Regional Office
1 Old Town Square, Suite 201
Fort Collins, Colorado 80524
Phone: (970) 493-1212, Fax: (970) 498-8867
E-mail: ftcollins.defenders@state.co.us
Case Number: [redacted]


Courtroom: 4B
MOTION TO DISMISS: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF FUCK, "FUCKER" AND "FUCKING FAG"
Counsel hereby asks the Court to dismiss the case at bar. He states the following:
  1. Mr. [redacted] is charged with Interference with Staff, Faculty or Students of Educational Institutions, a class three misdemeanor. The charge was amended from the original charge of Disorderly Conduct.
  2. The basis of the prosecution is an alleged statement Mr. [redacted] made to his principal at school. During lunch, Mr. [redacted] was contacted by the vice principal for suspicion of smoking in the boy's room. He was taken to the principal's office where he allegedly called the principal a "fucker, a fag, and a fucking fag." He was charged with the present offense based on his statements to the principal and he is being prosecuted for the words he spoke.
  3. In order to provide a context for the alleged crime, we must first examine the history of Fuck and its evolution in society. Fuck's earliest recorded use is prior to the year 1500 from the English-Latin poem Flen Flyys: "Non sunt in celi quia fuccant uuiuys of heli," which traslates to "they are not in heaven because they fuck the wives of Ely." See www.wikipedia.org/wiki/fuck.
  4. Although still offensive to some, Fuck is a more commonly used and accepted term in today's twenty-first century society than it was in the past. Use of the word Fuck "has been accepted in R-rated movies (and occasionally in PG-13 movies, though not often). Since the 1970's, the use of the word Fuck in R-rated movies has become so commonplace in mainstream American movies that it is rarely noticed by most audiences." Id. Some movies such as Scarface, Porky's and Goodfellas are known for the extensive use of the family of Fuck words (Fuck, Fucking, Fucker, Fuckface, Fucked, Absofuckinglutely, etc.) and in the non-US version of the comedy Four Weddings and a Funeral, Fuck is the chief word and repeatedly uttered during the first five minutes of the film. Id. Pulp Fiction was nominated for seven academy awards and took home the Oscar for best screenplay with its zealous and gratuitous use of Fuck phrases. It would be far fetched to argue that the Fuck family has not made its way into mainstream society.
  5. In the world of performing arts, Fuck and its many variants are not limited to Hollywood and the big screen. George Carlin, a well known and admired American comedian, for years has based his act on the use of the more colorful words in the English language, including extraordinarily large amounts of Fuck phraseology. In fact, one of the most well known comedic skits in American history is George Carlin's "Seven Dirtiest Words," two of which are Fuck and Motherfucker. Andrew Dice Clay, Eddie Murphy, Chris Rock, Robin Williams and countless others have used the Fuck family to entertain audiences across the land, enriching their lives with the entertainment and comedic value of Fuck and its progeny.
  6. The word Fuck can be heard almost anywhere at anytime, not just at your local movie theatre or comedy club. Numerous other mainstream and well respected artists have used the family of Fuck words in their music and performances. The Rolling Stones (who have nine number one albums, thirty-four top 10 albums and thirty-eight gold/platinum albums) have used the word in numerous recorded songs and hoards of additional live performances. Other popular musical artists such as Eminem, Lenny Kravitz, Tupac Shakur, Kid Rock, Busta Rhymes, 311, Bad Religion, Beck, Dr. Dre, Blink 182, Spleen Dingo and Everlast have actually titled songs that contain some variation of the word Fuck. For a complete listing of at least 417 song titles containing a member of the Fuck family, one need only access to a computer to visit the non-pornographic site inlyrics.com. Literally millions of Fucking recordings have been distributed by national recording artists, who are backed by national record labels, who seem not to have a problem proliferating this prolific word and its closely related cousins. Counsel knows of no record label or record label executive that has been prosecuted for titling a band, a song or an album with a member of the Fuck family.
  7. From Fa (a syllable used to represent the fourth tone of a major scale or sometimes the tone F) to Fytte (archaic version of Fit), there are roughly eight thousand six hundred words in the English language that begin with the letter F. Webster's 3rd New International Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged, pp. 811-926, (1986). Fuck has the unique distinction of being the only word commonly known as the F word. Fuck is so popular that a 272 page book entitled "The F Word" was published by the well respected national publisher Random House Books in 1999. Coincidentally, Random House also happened to be 1999's number one ranked distributor of children's books. "The F Word" is readily available at the world's largest online bookseller, Amazon.com, or your local Barnes and Noble bookseller for around fifteen dollars.
  8. A search of internet web sites suggests Fuck is a more commonly used word than mom, baseball, hot dogs, apple pie, and Chevrolet. Google Search Engine at Google.com on June 25th, 2003.
  9. Mr. [redacted] is alleged to have spoken two different variations of the root word Fuck. The following table depicts the number of internet search engine hits for [redacted] alleged "Fucker" and "Fucking" statements as compared to Fuck itself and other commonly heard words or phrases. All results are approximate.
    WORDAPPROXIMATE NUMBER OF HITS
    Fuck24,900,000
    Fucking24,700,000
    Fucker735,000
    Mom9,040,000
    Baseball13,600,000
    Hot Dogs607,000
    Apple Pie308,000
    Chevrolet4,090,000
    Freedom of Speech542,000
    First Amendment933,000
    Unconstitutional691,000
    Sticks and Stones May
    Break My Bones
    7,360
  10. Fuck has distinct meanings based on the context in which it is used. When formally defined:
    • a. "FUCK, n, 1680
      • 1. usually obscene: an act of copulation
      • 2. usually obscene: a sexual partner
      • 3a. usually vulgar: DAMN
      • 3b. usually vulgar: used especially with the as a meaningless intensive <what the fuck do they want from me>"
      Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary, www.m-w.com (emphasis in original)
    • b. The Cambridge English Readers Online Dictionary adds more zest to the definition of fuck and fucking (emphasis in original):
      "fuck (EXTREME ANGER) exclamation offensive
      used when expressing extreme anger or annoyance, or to add force to what is being said:
      Fuck — the bloody car won't start!
      Shut the fuck up!
      Who the fuck does she think she is, telling me what to do?
      fucking adjective, adverb offensive
      used to emphasize a statement, especially an angry one:
      What a fucking waste of time!
      He's a fucking idiot.
      He'd fucking well better do it."
  11. Fuck possesses incredible versatility. It can be a noun (you fuck), a verb (everything Billy touches, he fucks up), an adjective (I'm really fucking broke), an adverb (I've been fucking drinking too much), an exclamation (holy fuck, Batman!) or question (what the fuck?). This verstility could partially explain the prevalence of the word and why it is so readily available to anyone with access to a computer, VCR, CD player, eight track recorder, DVD player, phonograph, cassette deck or Blockbuster Video outlet. It may explain why Fuck can be used in almost any sentence at any time no matter what the circumstances and why the word has become almost commonplace in United States culture and society.It is against this backdrop that we turn to the situation at hand.
  12. The question presented by the case at bar is not whether Fuck is a desirable or attractive word, or whether a juvenile should be calling his principal a fucker or a fucking fag. Rather, the question is one of constitutionality and whether the State can criminalize the speech in question by application of the statute at issue. The prosecution is attempting to hold a juvenile criminally responsible for the age old tradition of name-calling. Although Mr. [redacted] could have selected a more desirable choice in prose such as "I respectfully dissent" or "I am disappointed with your attitude, sir, and politely ask you to cease and desist," the use of the words fucker and fucking nonetheless do not amount to criminal conduct in this particular context.
  13. The statement alleged against Mr. [redacted] is protected by the First and Fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution. The United States and Colorado Constitutions both provide that no law abridging or impairing freedom of speech shall be enacted. U.S. Const. Amend. I, applies to the states through U.S. Const. Amend. XIV, and Colo. Const. Art. II, §10.
  14. Freedom of thought, speech, expression and ideas are the very concepts upon which America's liberty is founded. An extremely limited number of exceptions have been judicially carved from one of the most fundamental principals of American jurisprudence. Courts have, on occasion, upheld the constitutionality of statutes which prohibit obscenity, libel, incitement, invasion of substantial privacy interests of the home and "fighting words." People v. Hayden, 548 P.2d 1278 (Colo. 1976).
  15. Fuck is an entirely legal word that may be uttered in public places so long as the manner in which it is uttered will not cause a violent reaction. Cohen v. California 403 U.S. 15 (1971). ("Fuck the Draft" jacket worn in a courthouse was protected by the first amendment.) In overturning a disorderly conduct conviction, the Cohen Court went on to state:
    Against this perception of the constitutional policies involved, we discern certain more particularized considerations that peculiarly call for reversal of this conviction. First, the principle contended for by the State seems inherently boundless. How is one to distinguish this from any other offensive word? Surely the State has no right to cleanse public debate to the point where it is grammatically palatable to the most squeamish among us. Yet no readily ascertainable general principle exists for stopping short of that result were we to affirm the judgement below. For, while the particular four-letter word being litigated here is perhaps more distasteful than most others of its genre, it is nevertheless often true that one man's vulgarity is another's lyric. Indeed, we think it is largely because governmental officials cannot make principled distinctions in this area that the Constitution leaves matters of taste and style so largely to the individual. Additionally, we cannot overlook the fact, because it is well illustrated by the episode involved here, that much linguistic expression serves a dual communicative function: it conveys not only ideas capable of relatively precise, detached explication, but otherwise inexpressible emotions as well. In fact, words are often chosen as much for their emotive as their cognitive force. We cannot sanction the view that the Constitution, while solicitous of the cognitive content of individual speech, has little or no regard for that emotive function which, practically speaking, may often be the more important element of the overall message sought to be communicated. Indeed, as Mr. Justice Frankfurter has said, "[o]ne of the prerogatives of American citizenship is the right to criticize public men and measures — and that means not only informed and responsible criticism but the freedom to speek foolishly and without moderation." Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U.S. 665, 673-674 (1944). Finally, and in the same vein, we cannot indulge the facile assumption that one can forbid particular words without also running a substantial risk of suppressing ideas in the process. Indeed, governments might soon seize upon the censorship of particular words as a convenient guise for banning the expression of unpopular views. We have been able, as noted above, to discern little social benefit that might result from running the risk of opening the door to such grave results.
    Cohen at 25-26 (emphasis added)
  16. The Colorado Supreme Court used the same reasoning in citing and following Cohen by overturning a municipal conviction based on the defendant, Mr. Wade, yelling "Fuck You" at a meeting of over two hundred people at the University of Denver campus. Ware v. City and County of Denver, 511 P.2d 475 (Colo. 1973).
  17. The statement "I don't need this fuckin' school anyway" in concert with violently slamming a door was found to be constitutionally protected speech. The statement was made by a juvenile to a police officer in a school setting after the juvenile was called to the principal's office to be informed that she was being expelled from school. L.M.A.W. v. State, 611 So.2d 497 (Ala. Cr. App. 1992) (conviction for disorderly conduct overturned).
  18. "Shut the fuck up" and words to the effect of "don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out" were ruled to be constitutionally protected speech. B.E.S. v. State, 629 So.2d 761 (Ala. Cr. App. 1993).
  19. A juvenile telling a police officer "fuck you" was held to be constitutionally protected speech. R.I.T. v. State, 675 So.2d 97 (Ala. Cr. App. 1995) (conviction for disorderly conduct overturned). TheR.I.T. court reasoned that police officers are specially trained to deal with vulgarities and situations when others may be verbally abusive towards them, and thus "fuck you" was not likely to provoke a violent response.
  20. A juvenile calling a police officer a "fucking pig, fuckin' kangaroo" and telling the officer "fuck you" during a traffic contact was found to be constitutionally protected speech. State v. John W., 418 A.2d 1097 (Me. 1980). Just like the R.I.T. court, Id., the John W. court also reasoned that police officers deal with these types of situations on an every day basis and therefore "fucking pig, fuckin' kangaroo and fuck you" were not likely to invoke a violent response.
  21. Finally, the Arizona case of In Re Louise C. is almost directly on point with the case at bar. Louise C. was brought to the principal's office in relation to conduct with another student. In the presence of the other student, the principal, and the vice principal, Louise C. was asked whether she planned to fight the other student. She lashed out and said "Fuck this, I don't have to take this shit" and walked towards the door. When the principal asked her to stop she said "Fuck you, I don't have to do what you tell me" and slammed the door behind her. She was later suspended from school for the incident. Louise C.'s statements and conduct were found to be constitutionally protected by the First Amendment. In Re Louise C., 3 P.3d 1004 (Az. App. 1999).
  22. The state has the power to protect its citizenry from actual harm, and thus has the power to outlaw one yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theatre. See, Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919). However, yelling "Fuck!" in a crowded theatre does not create a clear and present danger to anyone and thus cannot be outlawed. Although they are both four letter words that start with F, the distinction is constitutionally significant.
  23. The elements of Interference with Staff, Faculty or Students of Educational Institutions require proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. [redacted] unlawfully and willfully impeded the staff and faculty of the school. The elements also require that he do so by using restraint, abduction, coercion or intimidation. It is difficult to imagine how calling one's principal some naughty words hinders his ability to do his job. Although counsel has not seen a formal description of what his job requires, typically a principal is called on to deal with situations precisely like the one at hand. This is surely not the first time the principal has heard an offensive remark or been called a bad name. In contrast to the general public, one would expect a principal to have special training in dealing with situations that require non-criminal discipline and reprimand. In fact, rather than violently responding to the insults, the principal suspended Mr. [redacted] from school for the incident in question, an entirely legal and appropriate reaction to the alleged statements. However, criminal charges and the potential sanctions that come along with them are categorically different than the in-house sanctions that Mr. [redacted] has already suffered.
  24. Fuck is certainly a controversial word that may be appropriate in certain venues and locales (Florida Elections Commission, speed eating contests, public defender offices) and may be inappropriate in others (weddings, Chuck-E-Cheese pizza parlors, district attorney offices). Some people may believe it is always inappropriate. But in all but a very few circumstances, the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits our government from making that determination. This case falls outside those very limited circumstances and as such, no conviction can result from Mr. [redacted] alleged statements.
Therefore, the Court must dismiss this case.
DAVID S. KAPLAN
COLORADO STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER
(signature)
______________________________
ERIC VANATTA (#24823)
Deputy State Public Defender
Certificate of Service
I certify that, on 7/1/03, the foregoing document was served by delivering __X__ mailing _____ faxing _____ it to opposing counsel.
(signature)
_______________

http://scofacts.org/The-F-Motion.html

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Stephen Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com> wrote:
Ms. Lynch,

If the "F-word" used as an insult in emailed correspondence is not profane, then nothing is.

You seem to simply manufacture word definitions and legal concepts to justify  your own warped view and bad behavior.

On Thursday, November 26, 2015, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stephen Gianelli,
> I am once again advising you to cease and desist. I am aware that you are attempting to infiltrate Phil Spector's legal team, represent Cohen's legal positions, and feel entitled to routinely lie to IRS, FBI, DOJ, etc. If you are interested in Bruce Cutler, call him up and ask him to marry you.  Your obsession with him is deranged and I see right through you and your amateur, vile tactics.
> I did advise you to "fuck off" and I meant that.  There's nothing "profane' about that concept.  You have relentlessly targeted my sons, sister, elderly parents, Paulette Brandt, friends, and witnesses.  My sons have made their positions clear in legal documents submitted to various courts and those documents were indeed signed by them as is true for all declarations submitted to LA Superior Court and provided to IRS Chief Trial Counsel's Office in response to your lies and attempts to infiltrate the Tax Court matter.  I personally wouldn't brag, as you have done, about your alleged connections to the Mafia when threatening me.  Call Cutler and brag about your Mafia connections with him.  I'm sure he'll be impressed that you view yourself as a self-made man and wanna be intel dude.
> Stop criminally harassing me. I see you're up to your tricks again online:  attempting to argue Spector probable doubt theories so they can be attacked and refuted - by people like "Ed Lozzi," etc.  You are arguing that Spector could win on a technicality and his appeal has nothing to do with whether or not he killed Clarkson.  I disagree and view you as an ambulance chaser and chronic liar.  Clarkson shot herself at Phil Spector's home.  You are clearly working with his prosecutors and belong in prison.
> Kelley Lynch
http://radaronline.com/videos/lana-clarkson-murder-phil-spector-best-friend-claims/
>
http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2015/11/kelley-lynchs-email-to-cia-re-amateur.html
http://riverdeepbook.blogspot.com/2015/11/the-criminal-stalker-proxy-lawyer-lays.html
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Stephen R. Gianelli <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 4:05 AM
> Subject: FW: FW:
> To: kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com
>
>
> Not profane?
>
>
>
> From: Kelley Lynch [mailto:kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:19 AM
> To: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI; irs.commissioner; Washington Field; ASKDOJ; Division, Criminal; Doug.Davis; Dennis; MollyHale; nsapao; fsb; rbyucaipa; khuvane; blourd; Robert MacMillan; a; wennermedia; Mick Brown; glenn.greenwald; lrohter; Harriet Ryan; hailey.branson; stan.garnett; USLawEnforcement@google.com; Feedback; mike.feuer@lacity.org; mayor.garcetti; bruce
> Subject: Re: FW:
>
>
>
> FUCK OFF psychopath.
>
>
>
>
>
> STEPHEN R. GIANELLI
>
> <https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/8CBWEZYl_gju-O0mEKjDNw0Eh_qIbYUu1oZBKfZqOypmLO1gU9NfBBUnKK5HrwoN-VKG8iQn_PvQpZDlbxq0IwVL9dQOy_HcGJ0=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif>11:56 PM (20 minutes ago)
>
> <https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/8CBWEZYl_gju-O0mEKjDNw0Eh_qIbYUu1oZBKfZqOypmLO1gU9NfBBUnKK5HrwoN-VKG8iQn_PvQpZDlbxq0IwVL9dQOy_HcGJ0=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif>
>
> <https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/8CBWEZYl_gju-O0mEKjDNw0Eh_qIbYUu1oZBKfZqOypmLO1gU9NfBBUnKK5HrwoN-VKG8iQn_PvQpZDlbxq0IwVL9dQOy_HcGJ0=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif>
>
> <https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/8CBWEZYl_gju-O0mEKjDNw0Eh_qIbYUu1oZBKfZqOypmLO1gU9NfBBUnKK5HrwoN-VKG8iQn_PvQpZDlbxq0IwVL9dQOy_HcGJ0=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif>
>
> to me
>
> <https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/8CBWEZYl_gju-O0mEKjDNw0Eh_qIbYUu1oZBKfZqOypmLO1gU9NfBBUnKK5HrwoN-VKG8iQn_PvQpZDlbxq0IwVL9dQOy_HcGJ0=s0-d-e1-ft#https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif>

>
> Sorry to dash your fantasy Ms. Lynch, but I doubt Mr.  Conzachi will be coming after me after all.
>
>
>
> From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI [mailto:stephengianelli@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 9:46 AM
> To: 'Kelley Lynch'
> Subject: RE:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Bruce Cutler,
>
>
>
> Did this CRIMINAL call you?  He attempts to infiltrate defenses using people and lying.  He wrote this.  I want Linda Carol to call her friend to find out if Gianelli is merely threatening me with the Mafia or if he can back up his treats.
>
>
>
> Kelley Lynch
>
>
>